Interaction of schemata and routines - the missing link between theory and practice of organizational dynamics

Dziubińska, Agnieszka

doi:10.29119/1641-3466.2023.169.13

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Interaction of schemata and routines - the missing link between theory and practice of organizational dynamics

Autorzy

Dziubińska Agnieszka

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2023.169.13

Warianty tytułu

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

Purpose: identification of effective mechanisms of organizational adaptation under high uncertainty in light of the assumptions of the complexity theory. Design/methodology/approach: The approach adopted involves literature review, including an interdisciplinary ground of complexity theory. Findings: The content of the article includes the conceptualization of patterns as schemata at the level of an organization, recognition of the relationship between schemata and organizational routines as an area subject to shaping, and identification of the dynamics of routines depending on the degrees of uncertainty. Research limitations/implications: The results of the study are presented in the form of theoretical framework enabling further testing. Originality/value: Conceptualization of the contextual nature of routines depending on the degree of uncertainty as a mechanism of change and stability in the organization.

Słowa kluczowe

uncertainty scheme routines complexity

niepewność schemat rutyny złożoność

Wydawca

Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej

Czasopismo

Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska

Rocznik

2023

Tom

z. 169

Strony

215--231

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 73 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Dziubińska Agnieszka

agnieszka.dziubinska@ue.katowice.pl

University of Economics in Katowice, Department of Enterprise Management, Poland

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4385-1123

Bibliografia

1. Aldrich, H.E., Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations Evolving. SAGE Publications.
2. Argote, L. (2013). Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. New York: Springer.
3. Axelrod, R., Cohen, M. (1999). Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. New York: Free Press.
4. Baddeley, A.D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5. Balogun, J., Johnson, G. (2004). Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47, pp. 523-549. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/20159600.
6. Balogun, J., Johnson, G. (2005). From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies, 26, pp. 1573-1601.
7. Barley, S.R. (1986). Technology as an occasion for structuring: Evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, pp. 78-108. Retrieved from: https://www.ics.uci.edu/~corps/phaseii/Barley-CTScanners-ASQ.pdf, 1.09.2022.
8. Bartunek, J.M. (1984). Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: The example of a religious order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, pp. 355-372.
9. Baum, J.A.C., Singh, J.V. (1994). Organizational Niche and the Dynamics of Organizational Mortality. American Journal of Sociology, 100, pp. 346-380. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/230540.
10. Bourdieu, P. (1995). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bratnicki, M. (2020). Przedsiębiorstwo w kontekście niepewności. Aspekty poznawcze i emocjonalne. Dąbrowa Górnicza: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB.
12. Canales, R. (2011). Rule bending, sociological citizenship, and organizational contestation in microfinance. Regulation and Governance, 5(1), pp. 90-117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01095.x.
13. Cohen, M.D. (2007). Reading Dewey: Reflections on the Study of Routine. Organization Studies, 28(5), pp. 773-786. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406060776.
14. Cohen, M., Bacdayan, P. (1994). Organizational Routines Are Stored As Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study. Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 554568. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.4.554.
15. Dennett, D. (1996). The Intentional Stance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
16. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and Cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, pp. 263-87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263.
17. Douglas, M. (1996). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.
18. Drew, T., Vo, M., Wolfe, J. (2013). The invisible gorilla strikes again: Sustained inattentional blindness in expert observers. Psychological Science, 24(9), pp. 1848-1853. doi: 10.1177/0956797613479386.
19. Durand, R. (2006). Organizational Evolution and Strategic Management. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.
20. Elsbach, K.D., Barr, P.S., Hargadon, A.B. (2005). Identifying situated cognition in organizations. Organization Science, 16, pp. 422-433. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/ orsc.1050.0138
21. Emirbayer, M., Mische, A. (1998). What Is Agency? American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 103, No. 4, pp. 962-1023. Retrieved from: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/ 368026/mod_resource/content/1/18%20Emirbayer,%20M..pdf, 1.09.2022.
22. Feldman, M.S. (2004). Resources in Emerging Structures and Processes of Change. Organization Science, 15(3), pp. 295-309.
23. Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), pp. 94-118.
24. Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B.T. (2003). Re-theorizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, pp. 94-118. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620.
25. Gell-Mann, M. (2002). What is complexity? In: A.Q. Curzio, M. Fortis (eds.), Complexity and Industrial Clusters (pp. 13-24). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.
26. Gersick, C.J.G., Hackman, J.R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organization Science, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 698-706. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.6.698.
27. Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. California: University of California Press.
28. Gioia, D.A., Chittipeddi, K. (1991). Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12(6), pp. 433-448. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ smj.4250120604.
29. Gioia, D.A., Thomas, J.B., Clark, S.M., Chittipeddi, K. (1994). Symbolism and strategic change in academia: The dynamics of sensemaking and influence. Organization Science, 5, pp. 363-383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.3.363.
30. Goldberg, A. (2011). Mapping shared understandings using relational class analysis: The case of the cultural omnivore reexamined. American Journal of Sociology, 116(5), pp. 1397-1436. https://doi.org/10.1086/657976.
31. Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49, pp. 149-64. Retrieved from: http://www.iot.ntnu.no/innovation/ norsi-pims-courses/harrison/Hannan%20&%20Freeman%20(1984).PDF, 1.09.2022.
32. Harris, S. (1994). Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective. Organization Science, 5(3), pp. 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.3.309.
33. Howard-Grenville, J. (2005). The Persistence of Flexible Organizational Routines: The Role of Agency and Organizational Context. Organization Science, 16(6), pp. 618-636. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0150.
34. Huber, G.P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), pp. 88-115. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88.
35. Huff, A.S. (1990). Mapping Strategic Thought. New York: Wiley.
36. Hunzaker, M., Valentino, L. (2019). Mapping cultural schemas: From theory to method. American Sociological Review, 84(5), pp. 950-981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419875638.
37. Isabella, L. (1990). Evolving interpretations as a change unfolds: How managers construe key organizational events. Academy of Management Journal, 33, pp. 7-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/256350.
38. Kuhn, T. (2009). Struktura rewolucji naukowych. Warszawa: Wyd. Aletheia.
39. Kurtz, C.F., Snowden, D.J. (2003). The New Dynamics of Strategy: Sense-making in a Complex and Complicated World. IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 462-483.
40. Labianca, G., Gray, B., Brass, D.L. (2000). A grounded model of organizational schema change during empowerment. Organization Science, 11, pp. 235-257. doi: 10.1287/ orsc.11.2.235.12512.
41. Levitt, B., March, J.G. (1988). Organizational learning. In: W.R. Scott, J. Blake, G.H. Elder Jr. (Eds.), Annual review of sociology, vol. 14 (pp. 319-340). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
42. MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
43. Maitlis, S., Sonenshein, S. (2010). Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspirations and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47, pp. 551-580. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00908.x.
44. March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, pp. 71-87. Retrieved from: http://www-management.wharton.upenn.edu/ pennings/documents/March_1991_exploration_exploitation.pdf, 1.09.2022.
45. March, J.G., Simon, H. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
46. March, J.G., Sutton, R.I. (1997). Organizational performance as a dependent variable.
47. McKelvey, B., Boisot, M. (2009). Redefining strategic foresight: "Fast" and "far" sight via complexity science. In: L.A. Costanzo, R.B. MacKay (Eds.), Handbook of research on strategy and foresight (pp. 15-47). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
48. Merton, R.K. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18(4), 560-568. Retrieved from: http://www.csun.edu/~snk1966/Robert%20K%20Merton%20-%20Bureaucratic%20Structure%20and%20Personality.pdf, 1.09.2022.
49. Mintzberg, H., Waters, J.A. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6, pp. 257-272. Retrieved from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/ viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.658.2255&rep=rep1&type=pdf, 1.09.2022.
50. Morin, E. (2007). Restricted complexity, general complexity. In: C. Gershenson, D. Aerts, B. Edmonds (Eds.), Worldviews, Science and Us: Philosophy and complexity (pp. 5-29). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
51. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.J. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
52. Orlikowski, W. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations. Organization Science, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 404-428.
53. Pentland, B.T., Feldman, M.S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), pp. 793-815. doi: 10.1093/icc/dth070.
54. Pentland, B., Rueter, H. (1994). Organizational Routines as Grammars of Action. Administrative Science Quarterly Vol. 39(3), pp. 484-510. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393300.
55. Plotkin, H. (1993). Darwin Machines and the Nature of Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
56. Rerup, C., Feldman, M. (2011). Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: The role of trial-and-error learning. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 577-610.
57. Rokita, J., Dziubińska, A. (2016). Systemy złożone w zarzadzaniu. Katowice: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach.
58. Rokita, J., Dziubińska, A. (2017), Badanie systemów złożonych w zarządzaniu. In: J. Rokita (Ed.), Strategiczne zarządzanie organizacjami - problemy badawcze i praktyczne (pp. 15-31). Katowice: Wyd. Górnośląskiej Wyższej Szkoły Handlowej im. Wojciecha Korfantego.
59. Simon, H. The Science of Artificial. Cambridge: MIT Press.
60. Snowden, D. (2005). Being efficient does not always mean being effective a new perspective on cultural issues in organisations. Retrieved from: www.cynefin.net, 1.06.2017.
61. Snowden, D., Rancati, A. (2021). Managing complexity (and chaos) in times of crisis. A field guide for decision makers inspired by the Cynefin framework. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, ISBN 978-92-76-28843-5, JRC123629. Retrieved from: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC123629, 1.09.2022.
62. Stacey, R.D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
63. Stene, E. (1940). An Approach to a Science of Administration. American Political Science Review, Vol. 34, Iss. 6, pp. 1124-1137. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1948193.
64. Strauss, C., Quinn, N. (1997). A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167000.
65. Teece, D., Pisano, G. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3), pp. 537-556. doi: 10.1093/icc/3.3.537-a.
66. Tsoukas, H., Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13, pp. 567-582.
67. Turner, S.F., Rindova, V. (2012). A balancing act: How organizations pursue consistency in routine functioning in the face of ongoing change. Organization Science, 23(1), pp. 24-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0653.
68. Victor, B.I., Boynton, A.C., Stephens-Jahng, T. (2000). The Effective Design of Work Under Total Quality Management. Organization Science, 11(1), pp. 102-117. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.1.102.12566.
69. Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organizations. New York: Free Press.
70. Weick, K.E. (2001). Enactment processes in organizations. In: K.E. Weick (Ed.), Making sense of the organization (pp. 179-206). Malden: Blackwell.
71. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
72. Wood, M.L., Stoltz, D.S., Van Ness, J., Taylor, M.A. (2018). Schemas and frames. Sociological Theory, 36(3), pp. 244-261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275118794981.
73. Zerubavel, E. (1997). Social Mindscapes: An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-198e8803-1206-4778-b71f-980d37571c15