A Study of the Smallholder Coffee Agroindustry Sustainability Condition Using the Life Cycle Assessment Approach in Bengkulu Province, Indonesia

• Autorzy: Hamdan , Fauzi Anas Miftah , Rusli Meika Syahbana , Rustiadi Ernan

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/108637

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The management of smallholder coffee plantations in Bengkulu Province has not yet conducted according to good agricultural practices. As a result, the productivity and quality of green beans produced are also low. The efforts to improve this condition need to be made in order to maintain the economic, social, and environmental sustainability of this agribusiness. The present study aimed at identifying the life cycle of the coffee agroindustry in supporting sustainable agriculture using the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. The results of the study revealed that the energy input from the use of fertilizers, herbicides, manpower, and fossil fuel was 4349.08 MJ/ha. The energy output from the green beans and coffee husks was 9763.39 MJ/ha and 13524.21 MJ/ha, respectively, so the efficiency based on the input-output ratio was 5.35. The emission values to the global warming potential, acidification, and eutrophication were 109.43 kg eqCO₂, 345.70 g SO₂eq/ha/year, and 28.54 g PO₄^3-eq/ha/year, respectively. The coffee agribusiness in Kepahiang Regency is categorized as organic. The coffee agribusiness was economically feasible with a Net B/C of 2.87, but the land ownership which was 1.45 ha/household and the present agribusiness conditions indicate a low sustainability rate.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Bengkulu; green bean; husk; life cycle assessment; robusta

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 20, nr 6
• Strony: 153--160
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Hamdan

• Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management Sciences, IPB University, West Java, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia

autor

Fauzi Anas Miftah

• Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, IPB University, West Java, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia

autor

Rusli Meika Syahbana

• Department of Agroindustrial Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, IPB University, West Java, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia

autor

Rustiadi Ernan

• Department of Regional Planning Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, 16680, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1. Anim-Kwapong G.J., Anim-Kwapong E., Oppong F.K. 2010. Evaluation of some robusta coffee (Coffea canephora pierre ex a. Froehner) clones for optimal density planting in Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5(1), 84–89. https://academicjournals.org/article/article1380800006_Anim-Kwapong%20et%20al.pdf
• 2. Audsley E., Stacey K., Parsons D., Williams A. 2009. Estimation Of The Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Agricultural Pesticide Manufacture And Use. Inggris: Cranfield University.
• 3. Babou C., Rudragouda D.S., Mukharib K., Mote N., Gokavi R., Manjunath A.N., Raghuramulu Y. 2017. Influence of micro irrigation and drip fertigation practices on yield and quality parameters of robusta coffee (Coffea canephora). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(2),701–706. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.602.079
• 4. Baon J.B., Wibawa A. 2005. Kandungan bahan organik dan lengas tanah serta produksi kopi pada budi daya ganda dengan tanaman sumber bahan organik. Pelita Perkebunan 21(1), 43–54. https://anzdoc.com/kandungan-bahan-organik-dan-lengastanah-serta-produksi-kopi.html
• 5. Borbor-cordova M.J., Boyer E.W., Mcdowell W.H., Hall C.A. 2006. Nitrogen and phosphorus budgets for a tropical watershed impacted by agricultural land use : Guayas , Ecuador. Biogeochemistry, 79 (1-2), 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9009-7
• 6. [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. Provinsi Bengkulu Dalam Angka. Bengkulu (ID): Badan Pusat Statistik (in Indonesian).
• 7. [BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2017. Provinsi Bengkulu Dalam Angka. Bengkulu (ID): Badan Pusat Statistik (in Indonesian).
• 8. Chala B., Oechsner H., Latif S., Müller J. 2018. Biogas potential of coffee processing waste in Ethiopia. Sustainability, 10(8),1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082678.
• 9. Coltro L., Mourad A.L., de Oliveira P.P.L.V., Andrade J.P.B.O. 2012. Regional differences of coffee cultivation in Brazil. Coffee Science, 7(1), 31–41.http://taurus.unicamp.br/bitstream/REPOSIP/90250/1/2-s2.0-84864363281.pdf
• 10. Cruz G, Crnkovic PM. 2015. Evaluation of the combustion process of coffee husk samples in a drop tube furnace (DTF). Engenharia Térmica (Thermal Engineering), 14(2):53–62. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2139.8086
• 11. Elhami B., Akram A., Khanali M. 2016. Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of chickpea production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and multi objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) approaches. Information Processing in Agriculture, 3(3), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2016.07.002.
• 12. Ezema IC. 2015. Estimating Embodied Energy in Residential Buildings in a Nigerian Context. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10(24), 44140–44149. https://doi.org/10(24):44140–44149
• 13. Falahuddin I, Raharjeng ARP, Harmeni L. 2016. Pengaruh pupuk organik limbah kulit kopi (Coffea Arabica L.) terhadap pertumbuhan bibit kopi. Bioilmi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(2), 108–120. http://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/bioilmi/article/view/1135/953
• 14. Hareesh S.B., Jayarama, D’Souza M.V., Keshavayya J. 2017. The biochemical status of Robusta coffee (Coffea canephora) influenced by organic and integrated nutrient management practices. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(4), 232–239. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.027
• 15. Hulupi R. 2012. Prospek klon-klon lokal kopi Robusta asal Bengkulu. Warta, 24(2), 6–12. https://iccri.net/download/warta_puslit_koka/Warta%20Puslitkoka%20Vol.%2024%20No.%202%20Juni%202012/2.RHL3_6-12.pdf
• 16. Ibnu M., Offermans A., Glasbergen P. 2018. Certification and farmer organisation : Indonesian smallholder perceptions of benefits.Bulletin of Indonesian economic studies, 54(3), 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2018.1506093
• 17. Kiyingi I., Gwali S. 2012. Productivity and profitability of robusta coffee agroforestry systems in central Uganda. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13(1), 85–93. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ujas/article/view/126117/115645
• 18. Killian B., Rivera L., Soto M., Navichoc D. 2013. Carbon footprint across the coffee supply chain : The case of Costa Rican Coffee. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 3(3), 151–170. http://www.mag.go.cr/informacion/prog-nac-cafeCarbon-Footprint.pdf
• 19. [KLH] Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup. 2012. Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Inventarisasi Gas Rumah Kaca Nasional. Jakarta (ID): Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup (in Indonesian).
• 20. Mhilu C.F. 2014. Analysis of Energy Characteristics of Rice and Coffee Husks Blends. ISRN Chemical Engineering, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/196103
• 21. Noponen M.R.A., Edwards-jones G., Haggar J.P, Soto G., Attarzadeh N., Healey J.R. 2012. Greenhouse gas emissions in coffee grown with differing input levels under conventional and organic management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 151, 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.019.
• 22. Oetami R.F. 2017. Perbanyakan In-Vitro KlonKlon Unggul Lokal Kopi Bengkulu. Warta, 29(1), 6–10.
• 23. Panhuysen S., Pierrot J. 2014. Coffee Barometer 2014. Hivos, IUCN Nederland, Oxfam, Novib, Solidaridad, WWF.
• 24. Pauline M., Mama N., Justin F. 2010. Development of a method for the mineralization of coffee husk (Coffea canephora P.) to obtain raw material for soap factories. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(49), 8362–8364. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB07.051.
• 25. Skowrońska M., Filipek T. 2014. Life cycle assessment of fertilizers : a review. International Agrophysics, 28, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.2478/intag-2013-0032.
• 26. Valkila J. 2009. Fair Trade organic coffee production in Nicaragua — Sustainable development or a poverty trap ? Ecological Economics, 68(12), 3018-3025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.07.002.
• 27. Veiga J.P.S., Romanelli T.L., Gimenez L.M., Busato P., Milan M. 2015. Energy embodiment in Brazilian agriculture : an overview of 23 crops. Scientia Agricola, 72(6), 471–477. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0188
• 28. Vera-Acevedo L.D., Vélez-Henao J.A., Marulanda-Grisales N. 2016. Assessment of the environmental impact of three types of fertilizers on the cultivation of coffee at the Las Delicias indigenous reservation (Cauca). Revista Facultad de Ingenieria, (81), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.n81a09.
• 29. Wahyudi T., Jati M. 2012. Challenges of sustainable coffee certification in Indonesia. In Seminar on the Economic, Social and Environmental Impact of Sertification on the Coffee Supply Chain, International Coffee Council 109th Session, London, United Kingdom 25th September 2012, pp. 1–14.
• 30. [WHO] World Health Organization. 2009. The WHO Recommended Classification Of Pesticides By Hazard And Guidelines To Classification 2009. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization.
• 31. Wilson L., John G.R., Mhilu C.F., Yang W., Blasiak W. 2010. Coffee husks gasi fi cation using high temperature air / steam agent. Fuel Processing Technology, 91(10), 1330–1337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.05.003.