Interaction of surface water and groundwater in Nida valley, Poland

• Autorzy: Phan Cong Ngoc , Strużyński Andrzej , Kowalik Tomasz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/jwld.2023.147226

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The study area of the Nida valley was examined to investigate variations in groundwater and surface water levels, as well as the interaction between them. In the valley, there were three branches. The two actives were the Nida River itself and the Smuga Umianowicka branch while the Stara Nida branch was dry during the measurement session. Over a 12-month period from June 2021 to June 2022, 7 monitoring points were equipped with piezometers, comprising 5 groundwater points and 2 surface water points. The monitoring frequency was set to 30 minutes. The results of this research indicate that there are significant differences in the water level at the same observed point at different times. This study demonstrates seasonal changes in both surface water and groundwater levels with higher levels in autumn and winter and lower levels in spring and summer, which are closely tied to the changes in meteorological conditions during the research period, such as precipitation and air temperature. The study results also indicate that during summer and winter at the Nida River and its riparian area, losing stream is the primary process occurring in the studied reach. Conversely, during autumn and spring, the main process is gaining stream. At the human-maintained Smuga Umianowicka branch and in its riparian area, losing stream is the main process during summer and autumn, and gaining stream is the main process during spring. During winter, losing stream and gaining stream processes can occur simultaneously, and neither process takes place mainly.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

groundwater; interaction; Nida valley; piezometer; surface water; transition zone

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo ITP
• Czasopismo: Journal of Water and Land Development
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: no. 59
• Strony: 35--43
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 62 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Phan Cong Ngoc

• University of Agriculture in Krakow, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland
• Vinh University, Institute of Chemistry, Biology and Environment, 182 Le Duan St, Vinh City, Nghe An Province, Vietnam

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-9885

autor

Strużyński Andrzej

• University of Agriculture in Krakow, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3836-3547

autor

Kowalik Tomasz

• University of Agriculture in Krakow, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Land Surveying, al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-3786

Bibliografia

• Ahmad, S. et al. (2021) “Meteorological controls on water table dynamics in Fen Peatlands depend on management regimes,” Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, 630469. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.630469.
• Azizi, H. et al. (2021) “Evaluating the effects of climate change on groundwater level in the Varamin plain,” Water Science & Technology: Water Supply, 21(3), pp. 1372–1384. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.007.
• Bao, Q., Ding, J. and Han, L. (2022) “Quantifying the effects of human activities and climate variability on runoff changes using variable infiltration capacity model,” PLOS ONE, 17(9), e0272576. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272576.
• Baxter, C., Hauer, F.R. and Woessner, W.W. (2003) “Measuring groundwater–stream water exchange: New techniques for installing minipiezometers and estimating hydraulic conductivity,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 132, pp. 493–502. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(2003)132<0493:MGWENT>2.0.CO;2.
• Belemtougri, A. et al. (2021) “Understanding key factors controlling the duration of river flow intermittency: Case of Burkina Faso in West Africa,” Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 37, 100908. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2021.100908.
• Boano, F., Revelli, R. and Ridolfi, L. (2010) “Effect of streamflow stochasticity on bedform-driven hyporheic exchange,” Advances in Water Resources, 33(11), pp. 1367–1374. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2010.03.005.
• Borek, Ł. and Drymajło, K. (2019) “The role and importance of irrigation system for increasing the water resources: The case of the Nida River Valley,” Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Formatio Circumiectus, 18(3), pp. 19–30. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15576/asp.fc/2019.18.3.19.
• Brunke, M. and Gonser, T. (1997) “The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater,” Freshwater Biology, 37(1), pp. 1–33. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00143.x.
• Chang, J. et al. (2016) “Assessing the impact of climate variability and human activities on streamflow variation,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(4), pp. 1547–1560. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-1547-2016.
• Cook, P.G. et al. (2003) “Determining natural groundwater influx to a tropical river using radon, chlorofluorocarbons and ionic environmental tracers,” Journal of Hydrology, 277(1–2), pp. 74–88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00087-8.
• Dai, X. et al. (2021) “Understanding topography-driven groundwater flow using fully-coupled surface-water and groundwater modeling,” Journal of Hydrology, 594, 125950. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125950.
• Dettinger, M.D. and Diaz, H.F. (2000) “Global characteristics of stream flow seasonality and variability,” Journal of Hydrometeorology, 1(4), pp. 289–310. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2000)001<0289:GCOSFS>2.0.CO;2.
• Detty, J.M. and McGuire, K.J. (2010) “Topographic controls on shallow groundwater dynamics: implications of hydrologic connectivity between hillslopes and riparian zones in a till mantled catchment,” Hydrological Processes, 24(16), pp. 2222–2236. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7656.
• Elliott, A.H. and Brooks, N.H. (1997) “Transfer of nonsorbing solutes to a streambed with bed forms: Laboratory experiments,” Water Resources Research, 33(1), pp. 137–151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1029/96wr02783.
• Findlay, S.E.G. (1995) “Importance of surface-subsurface exchange in stream ecosystems: The hyporheic zone,” Limnology and Oceanography, 40(1), pp. 159–164. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1995.40.1.0159.
• Freeze, R.A. and Cherry, J.A. (1979) Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
• Frei, S. et al. (2009) “Patterns and dynamics of river–aquifer Exchange with variably-saturated flow using a fully-coupled model,” Journal of Hydrology, 375(3–4), pp. 383–393. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.038.
• Ghotbi, S. et al. (2020) “Climate and landscape controls of regional patterns of flow duration curves across the continental United States: Statistical approach,” Water Resources Research, 56(11). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1029/2020wr028041.
• Gomboš, M. et al. (2018) “Impact of soil texture and position of groundwater level on evaporation from the soil root zone,” in A.M. Negm and M. Zeleňáková (eds.) Water resources in Slovakia: Part I. The handbook of environmental chemistry, pp. 167–181. Cham: Springer International Publishing. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2017_181.
• Grajewski, S., Miler, A.T. and Okoński, B. (2014) “Seasonal variability of ground water levels in the Puszcza Zielonka Forest,” Journal of Water and Land Development, 21(1), pp. 55–62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/jwld-2014-0014.
• Grant, G.E. (2012) “The geomorphic response of gravel-bed rivers to dams: Perspectives and prospects,” in M. Church, P.M. Biron and A.G. Roy (eds.) Gravel-bed rivers: Processes, tools, environments. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, pp. 165–181. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119952497.ch15.
• Guay, C. et al. (2012) “Comparison of two modeling approaches for groundwater-surface water interactions,” Hydrological Processes, 27(16), pp. 2258–2270. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9323.
• Hakam, O.K. et al. (2001) “Uranium and radium in groundwater and surface water samples in Morocco,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 61(3–6), pp. 653–654. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-806x(01)00362-0.
• Hutchinson, P.A. and Webster, I.T. (1998) “Solute uptake in aquatic sediments due to current-obstacle interactions,” Journal of Environmental Engineering, 124, pp. 419–426. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:5(419).
• Hynes, H.B.N. (1983) “Groundwater and stream ecology,” Hydrobiologia, 100(1), pp. 93–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00027424.
• IMGW-PIB (2022) Hydro. Warszawa: Polish Institute of Meteorology and Water Management – National Research Institute. Available at: https://hydro.imgw.pl (Accessed: December, 2022).
• Jan, C.-D., Chen, T.H. and Lo, W. (2007) “Effect of rainfall intensity and distribution on groundwater level fluctuations,” Journal of Hydrology, 332(3–4), pp. 348–360. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.07.010.
• Jin, G. et al. (2010) “Transport of nonsorbing solutes in a streambed with periodic bedforms,” Advances in Water Resources, 33(11), pp. 1402–1416. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwa-tres.2010.09.003.
• Jones, J.P., Sudicky, E.A. and McLaren, R.G. (2008) “Application of a fully-integrated surface-subsurface flow model at the watershed-scale: A case study,” Water Resources Research, 44(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006wr005603.
• Jutebring Sterte, E. et al. (2018) “Groundwater-surface water interactions across scales in a boreal landscape investigated using a numerical modelling approach,” Journal of Hydrology, 560, pp. 184–201. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.03.011.
• Kalbus, E., Reinstorf, F. and Schirmer, M. (2006) “Measuring methods for groundwater – surface water interactions: A review,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10(6), pp. 873–887. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-873-2006.
• Kubicz, J. (2019) “Groundwater level analisys in reaction to meteorological drought periods, using SPI and STI,” Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, 18(4), pp. 103–112. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15576/asp.fc/2019.18.4.103.
• Lajczak, A. (2004) “Negative consequences of regulation of a meandering sandy river and proposals tending to diminish flood hazard. Case study of the Nida River, southern Poland,” Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on River Sedimentation, Yichang, China. Beijing: IAHR, pp. 1773–1783. Available at: https://www.iahr.org/library/infor?pid=17260 (Accessed: 15 April, 2023).
• Lee, D.R. (1977) “A device for measuring seepage flux in lakes and estuaries,” Limnology and Oceanography, 22(1), pp. 140–147. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1977.22.1.0140.
• Lee, D.R. and Cherry, J.A. (1979) “A field exercise on groundwater flow using seepage meters and mini-piezometers,” Journal of Geological Education, 27(1), pp. 6–10. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5408/0022-1368-27.1.6.
• Li, M. et al. (2023) “Quantifying the impact of climate variability and human activities on streamflow variation in Taoer River Basin, China,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(19), pp. 56425–56439. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26271-3.
• Listyani T.R.A., Prabowo, I.A. and Suparta, W. (2023) “Determination of groundwater recharge–discharge zone to support water resources in Galur–Lendah area, Indonesia,” Journal of Water and Land Development, 56, pp. 203–214. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2023.143761.
• Lv, X. et al. (2021) “Quantitative estimation on contribution of climate changes and watershed characteristic changes to decreasing streamflow in a typical basin of Yellow River,” Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, 888. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.752425.
• Martinez, J., Raiber, M. and Cox, M. (2015) “Assessment of groundwater–surface water interaction using long-term hydrochemical data and isotope hydrology: Headwaters of the Condamine River, Southeast Queensland, Australia,” Science of the Total Environment, 536, pp. 499–516. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.031.
• Merz, B. et al. (2021) “Causes, impacts and patterns of disastrous river floods,” Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2(9), pp. 592–609. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00195-3.
• Négrel, Ph. et al. (2003) “Surface water–groundwater interactions in an alluvial plain: Chemical and isotopic systematics,” Journal of Hydrology, 277(3–4), pp. 248–267. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(03)00125-2.
• Nowicka, E. et al. (2015) "Zmiany poziomów wód gruntowych w dolinie rzeki Odry poniżej stopnia wodnego w Brzegu Dolnym w okresie 1971–2012 [Changes of ground water levels in the Oder valley below the stage of water fall in Brzeg Dolny in the years 1971–2012],” Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, 14(1), pp. 169–178. Available at: https://doi.org/10.15576/asp.fc/2015.14.1.169.
• Orfánus, T. et al. (2016) “Variability of soil water content controlled by evapotranspiration and groundwater–root zone interaction,” Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 62(11), pp. 1602–1613. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2016.1155700.
• Oyarzun, R. et al. (2014) “Multi-method assessment of connectivity between surface water and shallow groundwater: The case of Limarí River basin, north-central Chile,” Hydrogeology Journal, 22(8), pp. 1857–1873. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-014-1170-9.
• Phan, C.N., Strużyński, A. and Kowalik, T. (2023) “Monthly changes in physicochemical parameters of the groundwater in Nida valley, Poland (case study),” Journal of Water and Land Development, 56, pp. 220–234. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2023.143763.
• Rinderer, M., Meerveld van, I. and Seibert, J. (2014) “Topographic controls on shallow groundwater levels in a steep, prealpine catchment: When are the TWI assumptions valid?,” Water Resources Research, 50(7), pp. 6067–6080. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/2013wr015009.
• Saha, G.C. et al. (2017) “Temporal dynamics of groundwater-surface water interaction under the effects of climate change: A case study in the Kiskatinaw River Watershed, Canada,” Journal of Hydrology, 551, pp. 440–452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.06.008.
• Savant, S.A., Reible, D.D. and Thibodeaux, L.J. (1987) “Convective transport within stable river sediments,” Water Resources Research, 23(9), pp. 1763–1768. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1029/wr023i009p01763.
• Schumm, S.A. and Spitz, W. (1996) “Geological influences on the Lower Mississippi River and its alluvial valley,” Engineering Geology, 45(1–4), pp. 245–261. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-7952(96)00016-6.
• Słowik, M. et al. (2021) “The influence of changes in flow regime caused by dam closure on channel planform evolution: insights from flume experiments,” Environmental Earth Sciences, 80(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09437-5.
• Sophocleous, M. (2002) “Interactions between groundwater and surface water: The state of the science,” Hydrogeology Journal, 10(1), pp. 52–67. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-001-0170-8.
• Strużyński, et al. (2015) “Wetlands in river valleys as an effect of fluvial processes and anthropopression,” in S. Ignar and M. Grygoruk (eds.) Wetlands and Water Framework Directive, GeoPlanet: Earth and planetary sciences. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 69–90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13764-3_5.
• Thomas, B.F., Behrangi, A. and Famiglietti, J.S. (2016) “Precipitation intensity effects on groundwater recharge in the southwestern United States,” Water, 8(3), 90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/w8030090.
• Trevisan, A. et al. (2020) “The topographic control on land surface energy fluxes: A statistical approach to bias correction,” Journal of Hydrology, 584, 124669. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124669.
• Unland, N.P.H. et al. (2013) “Investigating the spatio-temporal variability in groundwater and surface water interactions: A multi-technique approach,” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(9), pp. 3437–3453. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3437-2013.
• Wang, Q. et al. (2018) “Integrated effects of land use and topography on streamflow response to precipitation in an agriculture-forest dominated northern watershed,” Water, 10(5), 633. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050633.
• Wang, P. et al. (2013) “Groundwater recharge and hydrogeochemical evolution in the Ejina Basin, northwest China,” Journal of Hydrology, 476, pp. 72–86. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.10.049.
• Wei, X. et al. (2020) “Impacts of climate change and human activities on the water discharge and sediment load of the Pearl River, southern China,” Scientific Reports, 10, 16743. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73939-8.
• Winter, T.C. (1995) “Recent advances in understanding the interaction of groundwater and surface water,” Reviews of Geophysics, 33(S2), pp. 985–994. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1029/95rg00115.
• Woessner, W. (2000) “Stream and fluvial plain ground water interactions: Rescaling hydrogeologic thought,” Ground Water, 38(3), pp. 423–429. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2000.tb00228.x.
• Xu, W. et al. (2017) “Multi-tracer investigation of river and groundwater interactions: A case study in Nalenggele River basin, northwest China,” Hydrogeology Journal, 25(7), pp. 2015–2029. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1606-0.
• Żelazo, J. (1993) “Współczesne poglądy na regulację małych rzek nizinnych [The recent views on the small lowland river training],” in L. Tomiałojć (ed.) Ochrona przyrody i środowiska w dolinach nizinnych rzek Polski [Nature and environment conservation in the lowland river valleys in Poland]. Kraków: IOP PAN, pp. 145–154.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).