PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Environmental concerns, financial sacrifice, and motivation as predictors of Gen Z sustainable behaviour

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Aspekty środowiskowe, poświęcenie finansowe i motywacja jako predyktory zrównoważonych zachowań pokolenia Z
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Sustainable consumer behaviour is critical to improving the natural environment and protecting natural resources. The paper explores selected factors influencing the home sustainable behaviour of Generation Z consumers. Particular attention was paid to concern for the environment, willingness to make financial sacrifices, which is understood as the willingness to incur higher costs resulting from pro-ecological behaviour, and motivation for sustainable behaviour. The research was conducted among 492 consumers belonging to Generation Z. A serial mediation model was developed to test four research hypotheses. The results indicate a significant mediation relationship between environmental concerns, motivation, and pro-environmental consumer behaviour and an insignificant mediation associated with willingness to make a financial sacrifice. This implies that financial sacrifice did not play a crucial role in explaining the relationship between environmental concern and pro-environmental home behaviour. However, in the model in which motivation for sustainable behaviour and willingness to financial sacrifice were serial mediators, we observe a significant positive relation between motivation and willingness to financial sacrifice.
PL
Zrównoważone zachowania konsumentów są kluczowe dla ochrony środowiska naturalnego i zasobów naturalnych. W artykule przedstawiono wybrane czynniki wpływające na zrównoważone zachowania konsumentów pokolenia Z w ich gospodarstwach domowych. Szczególną uwagę zwrócono na troskę o środowisko, skłonność do poświęceń finansowych, rozumianą jako skłonność do ponoszenia wyższych kosztów wynikających z proekologicznych zachowań oraz motywację do zrównoważonych zachowań. Badania przeprowadzono w grupie 492 przedstawicieli generacji Z. Opracowano model seryjnej mediacji w celu przetestowania czterech hipotez badawczych. Wyniki wskazują na istotny związek mediacyjny między troską o środowisko, motywacją i proekologicznym zachowaniem konsumenta oraz nieistotny związek mediacyjny związany z gotowością do poświęceń finansowych. Oznacza to, że poświęcenie finansowe nie odegrało kluczowej roli w wyjaśnieniu związku między troską o środowisko a proekologicznym zachowaniem konsumenta. Jednak w modelu, w którym motywacja do zrównoważonego zachowania i gotowość do poświęceń finansowych były mediatorami seryjnymi, obserwujemy istotny pozytywny związek między motywacją a gotowością do poświęceń finansowych.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
art. no. 988
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 67 poz., rys., tab.
Twórcy
  • Warsaw University of Life Sciences
autor
  • Poznan University of Economics and Business
  • Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska Street 166, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
  • Poznan University of Economics and Business
  • Warsaw University of Life Sciences
  • Warsaw University of Life Sciences
Bibliografia
  • Adam, D., Siregar, E., Musannip, Z., Supriadi, E., & Ende, Y. (2021). Environmental Concern and Environmental Knowledge, Attitude toward Pro-Environmental Behaviour as Predictors of Pro-Environmental Behaviour: Evidence from Textile Industry in Indonesia. Calitatea, 22(182), 138–144. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366822983_Environmental_Concern_and_Environmental_Knowledge_Attitude_toward_Pro-Environmental_Behavior_as_Predictors_of_Pro-Environmental_Behavior_Evidence_from_Textile_Industry_in_Indonesia
  • Ayar, I., & Gürbüz, A. (2021). Sustainable Consumption Intentions of Consumers in Turkey: A Research Within the Theory of Planned Behaviour. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047563
  • Balderjahn, I., & Hüttel, A. (2019). Why Consumers Buy Sustainably: The Role of Personal Values. ZFP – Journal of Research and Management, 41, 24–38. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26588532.
  • Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
  • Bang, H., Ellinger, A. E., Hadjimarcou, J., & Traichal, P. A. (2000). Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychology & Marketing, 17(6), 449-468. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200006)17:6%3C449::AID-MAR2%3E3.0.CO;2-8
  • Black, I. R., & Cherrier, H. (2010). Anti-consumption as part of living a sustainability lifestyle: daily practices, contextual motivation and subjective values. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 437-453. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.337
  • Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the 'value‐action gap ' in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local environment, 4(3), 257-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839908725599
  • Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (1990). Direct and indirect effects: Classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociological Methodology, 20, 115–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/271084
  • Chen, C.-C., Sujanto, R. Y., Tseng, M.-L., Fujii, M., & Lim, M. K. (2021). Sustainable consumption transition model: Social concerns and waste minimization under willingness-to-pay in Indonesian food industry. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 170, 105590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105590
  • Corral-Verdugo, V., Mireles-Acosta, J., Tapia-Fonllem, C. O., & Fraijo-Sing, B. (2011). Happiness as Correlate of Sustainable Behaviour: A Study of Pro-Ecological, Frugal, Equitable and Altruistic Actions That Promote Subjective Wellbeing. Human Ecology Review, 18(2), 95-104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286377093_Happiness_as_Correlate_of_Sustainable_Behavior_A_Study_of_Pro-Ecological_Frugal_Equitable_and_Altruistic_Actions_That_Promote_Subjective_Wellbeing
  • Dagher, G. K., & Itani, O. (2014). Factors influencing green purchasing behaviour: Empirical evidence from the Lebanese consumers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(3), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1482
  • Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (2003). Green and greenback: The behavioural effects of environmental attitudes in low-cost and high-cost situations. Rationality and Society, 15(4), 441-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463103154002?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate
  • Dimitrova, T., Ilieva, I., & Angelova, M. (2022). Exploring Factors Affecting Sustainable Consumption Behaviour. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040155
  • ElHaffar, G., Durif, F. & Dubé, L. (2020). Towards closing the attitude-intention-behaviour gap in green consumption: A narrative review of the literature and an overview of future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122556
  • García-Machado, J. J., Figueroa-García, E. C., & Jachowicz, A. (2020). Sustainable Consumption Behaviour in Poland Through a PLS-SEM Model. In W. Sroka (Ed.), Perspectives on Consumer Behaviour. Contributions to Management Science (pp. 147-172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47380-8_7
  • Ghaffar, A., Zaheer Zaidi, S. S., & Islam, T. (2023). An investigation of sustainable consumption behaviour: the influence of environmental concern and trust in sustainable producers on consumer xenocentrism. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 34(3), 771–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-05-2022-0153
  • Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro‐environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034
  • Ha, H. & Janda, S. (2012), Predicting consumer intentions to purchase energy‐efficient products, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(7), 461-469. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211274974
  • Hanss, D., & Böhm, G. (2013). Promoting purchases of sustainable groceries: An intervention study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.10.002
  • Harring, N., Jagers, S. C., & Matti, S. (2017). Public Support for Pro-Environmental Policy Measures: Examining the Impact of Personal Values and Ideology. Sustainability, 9, 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050679
  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation: A regression-based approach. London: Guilford Press.
  • Hosta, M., & Zabkar, V. (2021). Antecedents of Environmentally and Socially Responsible Sustainable Consumer Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04416-0
  • Huang, Y., & Warnier, M. (2019). Bridging the attitude-behaviour gap in household energy consumption. 2019 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT-Europe), IEEE. 1-5 https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGTEurope.2019.8905660
  • Jaska, E., Balińska, A., & Werenowska, A. (2025). Mobile applications in the sustainable lifestyle of Generation Z. Economics and Environment, 91(4), 957. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2024.91.4.957
  • Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2017). Investigating the determinants of consumers' sustainable purchase behaviour. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 10, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SPC.2017.02.002
  • Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2019). Consumers' Sustainable Purchase Behaviour: Modeling the Impact of Psychological Factors. Ecological Economics, 159, 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.025
  • Jung, H. J., Choi, Y. J. & Oh, K. W. (2020). Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers' Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer "Attitude–Behavioural Intention" Gap. Sustainability, 12(5), 1770. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051770
  • Khachatryan, H., Campbell, B., Hall, C., Behe, B., Yu Khachatryan, H., Campbell, B., Hall, C., Behe, B., Yue, C., & Dennis, J. (2014). The Effects of Individual Environmental Concerns on Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Plant Attributes. HortScience, 49(1), 69-75. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.49.1.69
  • Krsnik, S., & Erjavec, K. (2024). Comprehensive Study on the Determinants of Green Behaviour of Slovenian Consumers: The Role of Marketing Communication, Lifestyle, Psychological, and Social Determinants. Sustainability, 16(17), 7555. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177555
  • Lee, K (2008). Making environmental communications meaningful to female adolescents: A study in Hong Kong. Science Communication, 30(2), 147-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008324364
  • Leonard-Barton, D. (1981). Voluntary Simplicity Lifestyles and Energy Conservation. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(3), 243–252. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2488881
  • Lin, Y.-T., Tseng, T. H., Chang, A., & Yang, C.-C. (2022). A value adoption approach to sustainable consumption in retail stores. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 50(11), 1412–1435. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-07-2021-0326
  • Luchs, M. G., & Mooradian, T. A. (2012). Sex, Personality, and Sustainable Consumer Behaviour: Elucidating the Gender Effect. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-011-9179-0
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
  • Maduku, D. K. (2024). How environmental concerns influence consumers' anticipated emotions towards sustainable consumption: The moderating role of regulatory focus. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 76, 103593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103593
  • Mastria, S., Vezzil, A., & De Cesarei, A. (2023). Going Green: A Review on the Role of Motivation in Sustainable Behaviour. Sustainability, 15, 15429. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115429
  • McDonald, S., Oates, C J., Young, C. W., & Hwang, K. (2006). Toward Sustainable Consumption: Researching Voluntary Simplifiers. Psychology & Marketing, 23(6), 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20132
  • Mughal, M. F., Cai, S. L., Faraz, N. A., & Ahmed, F. (2022). Environmentally specific servant leadership and employees' pro-environmental behaviour: Mediating role of green self efficacy. Psychology Research and Behaviour Management, 15, 305-316. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S328776
  • Nguyen, H. V., Thanh Do, L., & Thu Le, M. T. (2024). From environmental values to pro-environmental consumption behaviours: The moderating role of environmental information. Current Psychology, 43(4), 3607-3620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04569-2
  • Nielsen. (2015). Global Report on Consumer Sustainability Trends: Insights 2015. https://engageforgood.com/2015-nielsen-global-sustainability-report/
  • Oberoi, P., & Bhandari, J. (2024). Evaluating the Role of Economic Factors in Sustainable Consumption Behaviour. Asian Journal of Water, Environment and Pollution, 21(2), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.3233/AJW2 40018
  • Olech, I., Szczepaniak, I., Shrestha, R., & Bhattarai, P. C. (2025). A comparative study on knowledge, attitude, and behaviour of Polish and Nepali students towards the circular economy. Economics and Environment, 92(1), 829. https://doi.org/10.34659/eis.2025.92.1.829
  • Olgum, G., & Gülova, A. A. (2023). Digitalization and generation Z: Advantages and disadvantages of digitalization. In B. Akkaya & A. Tabak (Eds.), Two Faces of Digital Transformation Technological Opportunities Versus Social Threats. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-096-020231003
  • Pelau, C., Dabija, D. C., & Ene, I. (2021). What makes an AI device human-like? The role of interaction quality, empathy and perceived psychological anthropomorphic characteristics in the acceptance of artificial intelligence in the service industry. Computers in Human Behaviour, 122, 106855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106855.
  • Rašić, J., Crnković, B., & Ham, M. (2024). The influence of personal motives and personal norm on purchasing sustainable products. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog Fakulteta u Rijeci / Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, 42(1), 167–196. https://doi.org/10.18045/zbefri.2024.1.167
  • Reyes, J. A. L. (2021). How Different Are the Nordics? Unravelling the Willingness to Make Economic Sacrifices for the Environment. Sustainability, 13(3), 1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031294
  • Saari, U. A., Damberg, S., Frömbling, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2021). Sustainable consumption behaviour of Europeans: The influence of environmental knowledge and risk perception on environmental concern and behavioural intention. Ecological Economics, 189, 107155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107155
  • Salvietti, G., Ranfagni, S., & Berti, D. (2023). Framing Generation Z's Purchasing Process: A Mixed Method Approach. Micro and Macro Marketing, 32(2), 281–310. https://doi.org/10.1431/107643
  • Schill, M., & Shaw, D. (2016). Recycling today, sustainability tomorrow: Effects of psychological distance on behavioural practice. European Management Journal, 34(4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.05.004
  • Schoemann, A. M., Boulton, A. J., & Short, S. D. (2017). Determining Power and Sample Size for Simple and Complex Mediation Models. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617715068
  • Seyfi, S., & Michael Hall, C. (2024). Is Gen Z a pro-SDG generation? A critical review and reflection. In A.K. Boluk, F. Higgins-Desbiolles & M. Akhoundoghli (Eds.), The Elgar Companion to Tourism and the Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 246-258). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802203219.00025
  • Sh. Ahmad, F., Rosli, N. T., & Quoquab, F. (2022). Environmental quality awareness, green trust, green self-efficacy and environmental attitude in influencing green purchase behaviour. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 38(1), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2020-0072
  • Shah, P., & Yang, J. Z. (2022). Consumer Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Products. Environmental Communication, 16(8), 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2022.2152847
  • Sharma, N., Lal, M., Goel, P., Sharma, A., & Rana, N. P. (2022). Being socially responsible: How green self-identity and locus of control impact green purchasing intentions? Journal of Cleaner Production, 357, 131895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131895
  • Sinha, J. I. (2025). Tapping Generation Z micro-influencers for marketing and branding. Journal of Brand Strategy, 13(4), 391–401. https://doi.org/10.69554/MKSO7650
  • Siraj, A., Taneja, S., Zhu, Y., Jiang, H., Luthra, S., & Kumar, A. (2022). Hey, did you see that label? It's sustainable!: Understanding the role of sustainable labelling in shaping sustainable purchase behaviour for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 2820–2838. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3049
  • Tapia-Fonllem, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., & Durón-Ramos, M. F. (2013). Assessing sustainable behaviour and its correlates: A measure of pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability, 5(2), 711-723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5020711
  • Tarapata, J. (2020). Orientacja na zrównoważona konsumpcje w zachowaniach młodych konsumentów. HUMANITAS Zarządzanie, 2, 207-218. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.2884 (in Polish).
  • Testa, F., Cosic, A., & Iraldo, F. (2020). Determining factors of curtailment and purchasing energy-related behaviours. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(5), 3810-3819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.134
  • Verain, M. C., Bartels, J., Dagevos, H., Sijtsema, S. J., Onwezen, M. C., & Antonides, G. (2012). Segments of sustainable food consumers: A literature review. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(2), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01082.x
  • Wang, B., & Udall, A. M. (2023). Sustainable Consumer Behaviours: The Effects of Identity, Environment Value and Marketing Promotion. Sustainability, 15(2), 1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021129
  • Wang, J., Wang, J., & Gao, J. (2020). Effect of green consumption value on consumption intention in a pro-environmental setting: The mediating role of approach and avoidance motivation. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244020902074. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020902074?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate
  • White, K., & Simpson, B. (2013). When Do (and Don't) Normative Appeals Influence Sustainable Consumer Behaviours? Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0278
  • White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviours to be more sustainable: A literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649
  • White, K., Simpson, B., & Argo, J. J. (2014). The Motivating Role of Dissociative Out-Groups in Encouraging Positive Consumer Behaviours. Journal of Marketing Research, 51 (4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0335
  • Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S., & Oates, C. J. (2009). Sustainable consumption: Green consumer behaviour when purchasing products. Sustainability, 18(1), 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.394
  • Zia, A., & Alzahrani, M. (2022). Investigating the Effects of E-Marketing Factors for Agricultural Products on the Emergence of Sustainable Consumer Behaviour. Sustainability, 14(20), 13072. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013072
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-18b7eb36-cf0f-4417-81dc-abdbf08216ac
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.