Map Based Information Support System on Land Use: Case of Horná Nitra, Slovakia

• Autorzy: Pipíšková Petra , Muchová Zlatica , Dežerický Dávid

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/145327

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

A significant problem of the current land management in Slovakia is the long-term separation of usage and property rights. More than 91% of agricultural land is leased and used by larger agricultural enterprises (9%). Current common agricultural policies of the EU have been the subject of criticism for a long time, as inappropriate settings force farmers to manage unsustainably with a negative impact on biodiversity. Substantial, reliable and beneficial mutual information sharing between those who do business on the land, who own the land and who use the surrounding landscape, either as a living space for housing or relaxation and recreation might help to mitigate some issues. In this paper, the authors present an implemented proposal for multi-layer map and analytical support for land and soil use assessment. The model area includes the land units managed by the Agricultural Cooperative of Horná Nitra. The approach includes the identification of undesirable combinations according to criteria (degree of protection, area, type of use, erosion risk, and ecological stability) on each land block. This concept enabled the visualization and quantification of risks in the area in question through an online GIS application with a web interface.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cooperative; information support system; WebGIS system; LPIS; crop; environmental land management

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2022
• Tom: Vol. 23, nr 3
• Strony: 162--173
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 28 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Pipíšková Petra

• Institute of Landscape Engineering, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture, Hospodárska 7, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5534-0684

autor

Muchová Zlatica

• Institute of Landscape Engineering, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture, Hospodárska 7, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7067-6768

autor

Dežerický Dávid

• Institute of Landscape Engineering, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture, Hospodárska 7, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8623-0058

Bibliografia

• 1. Bandlerová A., Lazíková J., Ilková Z., Schwarcz P., Muchová Z., Drenková L. 2007. European Union agricultural law. SPU v Nitre, Nitra. (in Slovak)
• 2. Bandlerová A., Schwarcz P., Marišová E. 2011. Land Tenure and Rural Development - Case of Slovakia. Acta regionalia et environmentalica, 8(1), 6–15.
• 3. Baude M., Meyer B.C., Schindewolf M. 2019. Land use change in an agricultural landscape causing degradation of soil based ecosystem services. Science of The Total Environment, 659(1), 1526–1536. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.455
• 4. Demiryurek K., Erdem H., Ceyhan V., Atasever S., Uysal O. 2008. Agricultural information systems and communication networks: the case of dairy farmers in Samsun province of Turkey. Information Research, 13(2), 343. http://InformationR.net/ir/13-2/paper343.html
• 5. Dicks L.V., Hodge I., Randall N., et al. 2014. A transparent process for ‘evidence-informed’ policy making. Consery, 7(1), 119–125. DOI: 10.1111/conl.12046
• 6. Dijk T. 2003. Scenarios of Central European land fragmentation. Land Use Policy, 20(2), 149–158. DOI: 10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00082-0
• 7. Dobrovodská M., Kanka R., David S., Kollár J., Špulerová J., Štefunková D., Mojses M., Petrovič F., Krištín A., Stašiov S., Halada Ľ., Gajdoš P. 2019. Assessment of the biocultural value of traditional agricultural landscape on a plot-by-plot level: case studies from Slovakia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 28, 2615–2645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01784-x
• 8. European environment agency 2020. Agricultural biodiversity land: the CAP contribution has not stopped decline.13(1), 15–20. DOI: 10.2865/1514
• 9. European environment agency 2021. European Parliament resolution of 28 April 2021 on soil protection. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0143_SK.html#def_1_40
• 10. Eurostat 2010. Archieve: Agricultural census in Slovakia. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Archive:Agricultural_census_in_Slovakia
• 11. Faško P., Handžák Š., Šrámková N. 2002. Average number of days with snow cover, 1: 2000 000. Atlas SR, Bratislava.
• 12. IPBES 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. 43–48. DOI:10.5281/zenodo.3831673
• 13. Janus J., Bozek P. 2019. Land abandonment in Poland after the collapse of socialism: Over a quarterof a century of increasing tree cover on agricultural land. Ecological Engineering, 138(1), 106–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.06.017
• 14. Juleny A. 2018. Current problems of access to land, ownership and lease of agricultural land and direct payments. Komora pozemkových úprav. Slovakia. http://www.kpu.sk/clanky-nazory/aktualne-problemy-pristupu-k-pode-vlastnictva-najmu-polnohospodarskej-pody-priamych/ (in Slovak)
• 15. Kišš V., Tárník A., Čimo J. 2021. Climate change impact on meteorological drought and soil water storage in the Nitra River basin for the period 2015–2019. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae – Special Issue, 17–123. DOI: 10.2478/ahr-2021-0017
• 16. Lapin M., Tekušová M. 2002. Wind speed, 1:2000 000. Atlas SR, Bratislava. (in Slovak)
• 17. Löw J. 1995. Handle of the designer of the local territorial system of ecological stability - methodology after processing the documentation. Agroprojekt, Brno, 124. (in Czech)
• 18. Maglocký Š. 2002. Potential natural vegetation, 1:500 000. Atlas SR, Bratislava. (in Slovak)
• 19. Malík P., Švasta J. 2002. Main hydrogeological regions, 1:1000 000. Atlas SR, Bratislava. (in Slovak)
• 20. Maningas R.V., Orlando V., Perez G., Jane A. 2000. Electronic information dissemination through the farmers information and technology services. Retrieved October. DOI: 10.1.1.202.7673
• 21. Pe ́er G., Dicks L.V., Visconti P., et al. 2002. EU agricultural reform fails on biodiversity. Science, 344(6118), 1090–1092. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.06.017
• 22. Plesník P. 2002. Phytogeographical-vegetation division, 1:1000 000. Atlas SR, Bratislava. (in Slovak)
• 23. Ridzoň J. 2018. Why do birds disappear from Slovak fields. Euractiv, Slovakia. https://euractiv.sk/section/ekonomika-a-euro/news/preco-miznuvtaky-zo-slovenskych-poli/ (in Slovak)
• 24. Rolling N. 1988. Extension science: Information systems in agricultural development. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• 25. Špulerová J. 2021. How to prepare agriculture for climate change. Euractiv. Slovakia. https://euractiv.sk/section/ekonomika-a-euro/news/ako-pripravit-polnohospodarstvo-na-klimaticke-zmeny/
• 26. Špulerová J., Dobrovodská M., Stefunková D. 2010. Driving forces, threats and trends related to mosaics in the agricultural landscape in Slovakia. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 3(2), 59–72. DOI: 10.2478/v10285-012-0027-y
• 27. Urban J. 2020. Ownership and use of agricultural land. Slovakia. Komora pozemkových úprav. Slovakia. http://www.kpu.sk/clanky-nazory/vlastnictvo-uzivanie-polnohospodarskej-pody (in Slovak)
• 28. Zaman M. 2002. Present status of agricultural information technology system and service in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Agricultural University, Maymensigh.