Improving occupational safety management with the use of human reliability analysis methods

• Autorzy: Tabor Joanna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/cqpi-2021-0012

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The aim of this work is to review the basic issues and problems related to the analysis of human reliability in terms of the possibility of using the methods functioning in this area to improve occupational safety management. Methods of human reliability analysis (HRA) are related to the prediction and assessment of system failures, which are the result of incorrect actions or omissions by a human, and not the failure of a physical element in the system. The paper presents the significance of the problem of human reliability from the point of view of accidents; describes HRA as a process with three main components; characterizes human errors using various criteria as well as discusses the generations of HR analysis and evaluation methods, including factors influencing the performance. The basic guidelines for the selection of methods for reliability analysis were also presented in terms of their possible use for improving the health and safety management system.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

management system; OHS; human reliability; HRA methods

PL

system zarządzania; BHP; niezawodność człowieka; metody HRA

• Wydawca: De Gruyter
• Czasopismo: Quality Production Improvement - QPI
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 3, Iss. 1
• Strony: 120--131
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 47 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Tabor Joanna

• Częstochowa University of Technology, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7746-2970

Bibliografia

• 1.ANSI/ASME RA-S-2002. Standard for Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications.
• 2.Bell, J, Holroyd, J., 2009. Review of human reliability assessment method, Research Report RR679, HSE, Health and Safety Laboratory, Buxton: Derbyshire.
• 3.Bellamy, L.J., Geyer, T.A.W, 1992. Organizational, Management and Human Factors in Quantified Risk Assessment – Report 1, HSE Contract Research Report 33/92.
• 4.Bello, G.C., Colombari, V., 1980. Empirical Technique to estimate operator’s error (TESEO), Reliability Engineering, 1(3), 3-24.
• 5.Boring, R. L, Gertman, D.I., 2005. Atomistic and holistic approaches to human Reliability analysis in the US nuclear power industry, Safety and reliability, 25(2), 21-37, DOI: 10.1080/09617353.2005.11690802
• 6.Cadieux, J., Roy, M., Desmarais, L., 2006. A preliminary validation of a new measure of occupational health and safety, Journal of Safety Research, 37(4), 413-419, DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.008
• 7.CEN, 2009, EN-ISO 9004: 2009. Managing for the sustained success of an organization – A quality management approach, CEN.
• 8.Denton, D., 1982. Safety management: Improving Performance, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
• 9.DOE-HDBK-1208-2012, Accident and Operational Safety Analysis, Volume I: Accident Analysis Techniques, US Department of Energy.
• 10.Dougherty, E.M., 1992. SRK- It just keeps a rolling, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 38, 253-255.
• 11.Embrey, D.E., 1983. The Use of Performance Shaping Factors and Quantified Expert Judgment in the Evaluation of Human reliability: An Initial Appraisal, NUREG/CR-2986, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
• 12.EN-62508: 2010. Guidance on human aspects of dependability, (IEC 62508), CENELEC, Brussels.
• 13.Everdij, M.H.C, Blom, H.A.P, 2008. Safety Method Database, http://www.nlr.nl/documents/flyers/SATdb.pdf
• 14.Forester, J., Bley, D., Cooper, S. Lois, E., Siu, N., Kolaczkowski, A, Wreathall, J., 2004.Expert elicitation approach for performing ATHEANA quantification, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 83, 207-220, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.011
• 15.Forester, J. Kolaczkowski, A., Lois, E., Kelly, D., 2006. Evaluation Analysis Methodsagainst Good Practices, Final Report. NUREG-1842, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Washington DC.
• 16.Gertman, D., Blackam, H., Marble, J., Byers, C , Smith, C, 2004. The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method, NUREG/CR-6883. Idaho National Laboratory, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Washington, DC.
• 17.Granerud, R.L., Rocha, R.S., 2011. Organizational learning and continuous improvement of health and safety in certified manufacturers, Safety Science, 49, 1030-1039, DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.01.009
• 18.Hannaman, G.W., Spurgin, A.J., 1984. Systematic Human Action Reliability Procedures, EPRI NF 3583.
• 19. Helmreich, R.L., 2000. On error management: lessons from aviation, British Medical Journal, 320(7237) 781-785, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7237.781
• 20.Hollnagel, E., 1993. Human reliability analysis: Context and control, Academic Press.
• 21.Hollnagel, E., 1998. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM), Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.
• 22.Humphreys, P. (ed.) 1988. Human Reliability Assessor Guide, Safety and Reliability Directorate, UK, RTS 88/95Q.
• 23.Hunns, D.M., 1982. The method of paired comparisons, [In:] A.E. Green (ed.) High risk safety technology, Wiley, Chichister.
• 24.ILO, 2013. Audit Matrix for the ILO Guidelines on Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems (ILO-OSH 2021), ILO, Switzerland.
• 25.Kariuki, S.G., Loewe, K., 2007. Integrating human factors into process analysis, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92, 1764-1773, DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.01.002
• 26.Kirwan, B., 1996. The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques, THERP, HEART and JHESI: Part 1 - technique descriptions and validation issues, Applied Ergonomics, 27(6), 359-337, DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(96)00044-0
• 27.Kirwan, B., Kennedy, R., Taylor-Adams, S., Lambert ,B., 1997. The validation of three human reliability quantification techniques THERP, HEART and JHEDI: Part II – results of validation exercise, Applied Ergonomics, 28(1), 17-25, DOI: 10.1016/S0003-6870(96)00045-2
• 28.Kirwan, B., 1998. Human error identification techniques for risk assessment of high risk systems – Part 1: Review and evaluation of techniques, Applied Ergonomics, 29(3), 157-177, DOI: 10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00010-6
• 29.Klimecka-Tatar, D., Niciejewska, M., 2016. The OHS management system in the small-sized production company, Production Engineering Archives, 13(4), 49-52.
• 30.Law, W.K., Chan, A.H.S., Pun, K.F., 2006. Prioritizing the safety management elements, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 106(6), 778-792, DOI:10.1108/02635570610671470
• 31.Lyons, M., Adams, S., Woloshynowych, M., Vincent, C., 2004. Human reliability analysis in healthcare: A review of techniques, International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 16, 223-237.
• 32.NEA/CSNI/R(98)1, 1998. Critical operator actions: Human reliability modeling and data issues, Principal Working Group, NE Agency, Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations.
• 33.Norman, D.A., 1981. Categorization of action slips, Psychological Review, 88, 1-15.
• 34.Rasmussen, J., 1980. What Can be Learned from Human Error Reports? [In:] Duncan, K.D., Gruenberg, M.M., Wallis, D. (Eds.). John Wiley and Sons Ltd., London.
• 35.Rasmussen, J., 1982. Human errors: a taxonomy for describing human malfunction in industrial installations, Journal of Occupational Accidents, 4, 311-335.
• 36.Reason, J., 1990. Human Error. Cambridge University Press, New York. Ren, J., Jenkinson, I., Wang, J., Xu, D.L., Yang, J.B., 2008. A methodology to model causal relationships in offshore safety assessment focusing on human and organizational factors, Journal of Safety Research, 39, 87-100.
• 37.Stewart, M.G., Melchersand, R.E., 1997. Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Engineering Systems, Chapman and Hall, London, Berlin.
• 38. Seaver, D.A., Stillwell, W.G., 1983. Procedures for using expert judgement to estimate human error probabilities in nuclear power plant operations, NUREG/CR-2743, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC.
• 39.Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Baber, C., Jenkins, D.P., 2005. Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design, Ashgate Pub. Co., Aldershot, England, 2005.
• 40.Swain, A.D., Guttmann, H.E., 1983. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications, NUREG/CR-1278, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
• 41.Swain, A.D., 1987. Accident Sequence Evaluation Program Human Reliability Analysis Procedure, NUREG/CR-4772, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC.
• 42.Tabor, J., 2019. Fuzzy TOPSIS in the Assessment of OHS Management System, System Safety: Human-Technical Facility - Environment, 1(1), 18-25, DOI: 10.2478/czoto-2019-0003
• 43.USNRC, 2000. Technical Basis and Implementation Guidelines for A Technique for Human Event Analysis (ATHEANA), NUREG-1624, Division of Risk Analysis and Applications, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Washington DC.
• 44.Whalley, S. P., 1988. Minimizing the cause of human error, [In:] 10th Advances in Reliability Technology Symposium, G.P. Libberton (ed.), London: Elsevier.
• 45.Williams, J., 1986. HEART – A proposed method for assessing and reducing human error, [In:] Ninth Advances in Reliability Technology Symposium, University of Bradford, NCRS, UK, pp. B3/R/1-B3/R/13.
• 46.Williams, J.C., 1989. Validation of human reliability assessment techniques, Reliability Engineering, 11, 149-162.
• 47.Williams, J.C., 1992. Toward and improved Evaluation Analysis Tool for Users of Heart, [In:] Proceedings of the International Conference on Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis, Human Factors and Human Reliability in Process Safety, 15-17 January 1992, Orlando, Florida.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).