Analysis and Classification of the Tools for Assessing the Risks Associated With Industrial Machines

• Autorzy: Paques J. J. , Gauthier F. , Perez A.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

To assess and plan future risk-analysis research projects, 275 documents describing methods and tools for assessing the risks associated with industrial machines or with other sectors such as the military, and the nuclear and aeronautics industries, etc., were collected. These documents were in the format of published books or papers, standards, technical guides and company procedures collected throughout industry. From the collected documents, 112 documents were selected for analysis; 108 methods applied or potentially applicable for assessing the risks associated with industrial machines were analyzed and classified. This paper presents the main quantitative results of the analysis of the methods and tools.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

risk; assessment; estimation; methods; tools; safety; machinery

• Wydawca: Taylor & Francis
• Czasopismo: International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics
• Rocznik: 2007
• Tom: Vol. 13, No. 2
• Strony: 173--187
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Paques J. J.

• Institut Robert-Sauve de recherche en sante et securite du travail du Quebec, Montreal, Que., Canada

autor

Gauthier F.

• Departement de Genie industriel, Universite du Quebec a Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivieres, Que., Canada

autor

Perez A.

• Departement de Genie industriel, Universite du Quebec a Trois-Rivieres, Trois-Rivieres, Que., Canada

Bibliografia

• 1.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Safety of machinery—basic concepts, general principles for design—part 1: basic terminology, methodology (Standard No. ISO 12100-1:2003). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 2003.
• 2.International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Safety of machinery—principles of risk assessment (Standard No. ISO 14121:1999). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 1999.
• 3.Association canadienne de normalization (ACN). Exigences et guide pour l’analyse des risques (Standard No. ACN/CSAQ634-91). Ottawa, Ont., Canada: ACN; 1991.
• 4.Caisse Regionale d’Assurance Maladie d’Ile-de-France (CRAMIF). Securite des equipements de travail. Guide pour l’analyse des risques et le choix des mesures de prevention (DTE 127). Paris, France: CRAMIF; 2000.
• 5.Forsblom-Parli U. Methode Suva d’appreciation des risques a des postes de travail et lors de processus de travail (ref. 66099f). Lucerne, Switzerland: Caisse nationale suisse d’assurance en cas d’accidents; 2001.
• 6.Worsell N, A practical methodology for machinery risk assessment and the revision of ISO 14121. In: Ciccotelli J, editor. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference: Safety of Industrial Automated Systems (SIAS). Nancy, France: Institut National de Recherche et de Securite; 2003. p. 31–6.
• 7.Safe book 2. Machinery safety safeguarding and protective measures legislation, theory and practice. Fremont, CA, USA: Scientific Technologies Inc.; 1998.
• 8.Clemens PL, Simmons RJ. System safety and risk management, a guide for engineering educators. Lesson II Risk assessment matrix. NIOSH Instructional Module. Cincinnati, OH, USA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1998.
• 9.Comite “Securite machine” de l’Association Internationale de Securite Sociale (AISS). Calculez vous-meme vos risques d’accident!—appreciation du risque mecanique au poste de travail (No. 2034 F). Geneva, Switzerland: AISS; 1998.
• 10.Main B. Risk assessment: basics and benchmarks. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: Design Safety Engineering; 2004.
• 11.Worsell N, Wilday J. The application of risk assessment to machinery safety—review or risk ranking and risk estimation techniques. Sheffield, UK: Health and Safety Laboratory; 1997.
• 12.Worsel N, Ioannides A. Machinery risk assessment validation literature review (HSL/200/18). Sheffield, UK: Health and Safety Laboratory; 2000.
• 13.Lane J, Tardif J, Bourbonniere R. Educational approaches to promote in order to favour the transfer of competencies in risk assessment and protective devices training. In: Ciccotelli J, editor. Proceedings of 3rd International Conference: Safety of Industrial Automated Systems (SIAS). Nancy, France: Institut National de Recherche et de Securite; 2003. p. 41–6.
• 14.Parry GW. Uncertainty in PRA and its implications for use in risk-informed decision making. In: Mosleh A, Bari RA, editors. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM 4. New York, NY, USA: Springer Verlag; 1998. p. 2190–5.
• 15.Charpentier P. Projet europeen RAMSEM—developpement et validation d’une methode d’appreciation du risque machine basee sur les principes de la normes EN 1050 (Projet A.5/1,058). Paris, France: Institut National de Recherche et de Securite; 2003.
• 16.Abrahamsson M. Uncertainty in quantitative risk analysis—characterisation and methods of treatment. Lund, Sweden: Department of Fire Safety Engineering, Lund University; 2002.
• 17.Wallsten TS, Budescu DV, Rappaport A, Zwick R, Forsyth B. Measuring the vague meanings of probability terms. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1986;115(4):348–65.
• 18.Paques J-J, Perez A, Lamy P, Gauthier F, Charpentier P, David R. Reasoned review of the tools for assessing the risks associated with industrial machines: preliminary results. In: 4th International Conference Safety of Industrial Automated Systems [CD-ROM]. Chicago, IL, USA: Automation Technologies Council (ATC) and NIOSH; 2005.
• 19.Paques J-J, Gauthier F. Thematic program: integrated projects on risk assessment tools for industrial machinery. HST–CDN (Hygiene et securite du travail). Paris, France: Institut National de Recherche et de Securite; 2006. p. 33–40.
• 20.European Committee for Standardization (CEN). Safety of machinery. Principles for risk assessment (Standard No. EN 1050:1997). Brussels, Belgium: CEN; 1997.