Investigations of masonry churches seismic performance with numerical models: application to a case study

• Autorzy: D'Amato Michele , Sulla Roselena

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1007/s43452-021-00312-5

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Recovering and preserving ancient churches is necessary to ensure the transmission of this cultural heritage to the future generations. To this scope, it is necessary to evaluate their performance in seismic prone areas, to design interventions capable of reducing their vulnerability ensuring also their safety use for the faithful. In this paper, investigations on seismic performance of masonry churches are illustrated by applying two different numerical methods on a case study, an existing brick masonry church. The seismic assessment is conducted by applying two simplified methods proposed by the current Italian Directive containing the Guidelines for assessment and reduction of cultural heritage seismic risk. Moreover, linear kinematic analysis is used also for investigating the influence of main parameters governing to the main façade simple overturning and narthex longitudinal response. The investigations performed highlight that the activation multiplier of macro-element response mechanism may significantly vary according to the assumptions made and that also, as narthex longitudinal response, a minimization procedure of the activation multiplier is required.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

brick masonry churches; cultural heritage; linear kinematic analysis; macroelements; seismic vulnerability

PL

dziedzictwo kulturowe; kościół; budynek ceglany

• Wydawca: Springer ; Wrocław University of Science and Technology
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 21, no. 4
• Strony: 437--462
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

D'Amato Michele

• Department of European and Mediterranean Cultures: Architecture, Environment, Cultural Heritage, University of Basilicata, Matera, Italy

autor

Sulla Roselena

• Department of European and Mediterranean Cultures: Architecture, Environment, Cultural Heritage, University of Basilicata, Matera, Italy

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5057-2141

Bibliografia

• [1] UNESCO, Paris: Report of the Director General, 1983.
• [2] ICOMOS, "Risk preparedness. Heritage at Risk. Bibliography.," July 2005. [Online]. Available: http://www.international.icomos.org/centre_documentation/bib/riskpreparedness.pdf.
• [3] Feldein BM, Jokilehto J. Management Guidelines for world cultural heritage sites. Rome: ICCROM; 1998.
• [4] CENAPRED, Diagnóstico de Peligros e Identificación de Riesgo de Desastres en México, Centro Nacional de Prevención de Desastres, Coyoacán, México, 2014.
• [5] I. S. ISCR, "Carta del Rischio," 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.cartadelrischio.it/.
• [6] Caprili S, Mangini F, Paci S, Salvatore W, Bevilacqua MG, Karwacka E, Squeglia N, Barsotti R, Bennati S, Scarpelli G, Iannelli P. A knowledge-based approach for the structural assessment of cultural heritage, a case study: La Sapienza Palace in Pisa. Bull Earthq Eng. 2017;15(11):4851–86.
• [7] Caprili S, Puncello I. Knowledge-Based approach for the structural assessment of monumental buildings: application to case studies. Front Built Environ. 2019;5:52.
• [8] Lagomarsino S. Damage assessment of churches after l’Aquila earthquake (2009). Bull Earthq Eng. 2012;10:73–92.
• [9] Doglioni F, Moretti A, Petrini V. Churches and the earthquake. Trieste: LINT; 1994.
• [10] Brandonisio G, Lucibello G, Mele E, De Luca A. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Eng Fail Anal. 2013;34:693–714.
• [11] D’Ayala DF, Paganoni S. Assessment and analysis of damage in L’Aquila historic city centre after 6th April 2009. Bull Earthq Eng. 2011;9(1):81–104.
• [12] Formisano A, Marzo A. Simplified and refined methods for seismic vulnerability assessment and retrofitting of an Italian cultural heritage masonry building. Comput Struct. 2017;180:13–26.
• [13] Ferrante A, Giordano E, Clementi F, Milani G, Formisano A. FE vs. DE modeling for the nonlinear dynamics of a Historic Church in Central Italy. Geosciences. 2021;11(5):189.
• [14] Ferrante A, Loverdos D, Clementi F, Milani G, Formisano A, Lenci S, Sarhosis V. Discontinuous approaches for nonlinear dynamic analyses of an ancient masonry tower. Eng Struct. 2021;230:111626.
• [15] Milani G, Clementi F. Advanced seismic assessment of four masonry bell towers in italy after operation modal analysis identification. Int J Archit Herit. 2019;15(2):157–86.
• [16] Formisano A, Di Lorenzo G, Krstevska L, Landolfo R. Fem model calibration of experimental environmental vibration tests on two churches Hit by L’Aquila Earthquake. Int J Archit Herit. 2021;15(1):113–31.
• [17] Di Lorenzo G, Formisano A, Krstevska L, Landolfo R. Ambient vibration test and numerical investigation on the St. Giuliano church in Poggio Picenze (L’aquila, Italy). J Civ Struct Heal Monit. 2019;9(4):477–90.
• [18] G.U. n.47. Directive of the Prime Minister dated 09/02/2011. Assessment and mitigation of seismic risk of cultural heritage with reference to the technical code for the design of the construction, issued by D.M. 14/01/2008, Rome (Italy). In Italian. 2011.
• [19] D’Amato M, Laterza M, Díaz Fuentes D. Simplified Seismic Analyses of Ancient Churches in Matera’s Landscape. Int J Archit Herit. 2020;14(1):119–38.
• [20] D’Amato M, Gigliotti R, Laguardia R. Comparative seismic assessment of ancient masonry churches. Front Built Environ. 2019;5:56.
• [21] D’Amato M, Laterza M, Casamassima VM. Seismic performance evaluation of a multi-span existing masonry arch bridge. Open Civil Eng J. 2017;11(11):1191–207.
• [22] Lagomarsino S, Podestà S. Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches. Part 1: damage assessment and emergency planning. Earthq Spectra. 2004;20(2):377–94.
• [23] Lagomarsino S, Podestà S. Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches. Part 2: statistical analysis of surveyed data and methods for risk analysis. Earthq Spectra. 2004;20(2):395–412.
• [24] Díaz Fuentes D, Baquedano Julià PA, D’Amato M, Laterza M. Preliminary Seismic damage assessment of Mexican Churches after September 2017 earthquakes. Int J Archit Herit. 2021;15(4):505–25.
• [25] Lourenço PB, Roque JA. Simplified indexes for the seismic vulnerability of ancient masonry buildings. Constr Build Mater. 2006;20(4):200–8.
• [26] Lourenço PB, Oliveira DV, Leite JC, Ingham J, Modena C, Da Porto F. Simplified indexes for the seismic assessment of masonry buildings: international database and validation. Eng Fail Anal. 2013;34:585–605.
• [27] Formisano A, Ciccone G, Mele A. Large scale seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation of a masonry churches sample in the historical centre of Naples, Thessaloniki, 2017.
• [28] Formisano A, Florio G, Landolfo R, Mazzolani FM. Numerical calibration of a simplified procedure for the seismic behaviour assessment of masonry building aggregates, Chania, Crete, 2011.
• [29] Valente M, Milani G. Damage survey, simplified assessment, and advanced seismic analyses of two masonry churches after the 2012 Emilia earthquake. Int J Archit Herit. 2019;13(6):901–24.
• [30] Marotta A, Sorrentino L, Liberatore D, Ingham J. Seismic risk assessment of New Zealand unreinforced Masonry Churches using statistical procedures. Int J Archit Herit. 2018;12(3):448–64.
• [31] De Felice G, Giannini R. Out of plane seismic resistance of masonry walls. J Earthquake Eng. 2001;5(2):253–71.
• [32] D’Ayala D, Speranza E. Definition of collapse mechanisms and seismic vulnerability of historic masonry buildings. Earthq Spectra. 2003;19(3):479–509.
• [33] Lagomarsino S, Resemini S. The assessment of damage limitation state in the seismic analysis of monumental buildings. Earthq Spectra. 2009;25(2):323–46.
• [34] Heyman J. The stone skeleton. Int J Solids Struct. 1966;2(2):249–279.
• [35] CE CEN. Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Brussels: CEN, Comité Européen de Normalisation; 2004.
• [36] Instructions for the application of the Ministerial Decree M.D. (14/01/2008). In Italian. 2008.
• [37] Lagomarsino S, Podestà S. Inventario e vulnerabilità del patrimonio monumentale dei parchi dell’Italia centro-meridionale e meridionale, Vol.III - Analisi di vulnerabilità e rischio degli edifici monumentali, INGV/GNDT-Istituto Nazionale di geofisica e Vulcanologia / Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti, L’Aquila. In Italian. 2005.
• [38] Instructions for the application of the Ministerial Decree M.D. (17/01/2018). In Italian. 2018.
• [39] D'Onofrio R. Il “San Rocco” di Ernesto “B” La Padula a Pisticci. Siti/02 Periodico dell’Ordine degli Architetti, Pianificatori, Paesaggisti e Conservatori della provincia di Matera. In Italian. 2003.
• [40] Ministerial Decree. Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. S.O. n.30 of the official Gazette of the Italian Republic 2008, n.29, Rome (Italy). In Italian. 2008.
• [41] Paulay T, Priestley M. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1992.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023)