Application of quantitative risk assesment to ship in emergency conditions

• Autorzy: Gerigk M. K. , Szulczewski P.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper is devoted to safety ofships in emergency conditions The currently valid prescriptive method ofsafety assessment ofships in damage conditions is included in the SOLAS 2009 Part B-2 Ch.H-l regulations. h is devoted to the design stage and difficult to apply in operation. A possible alternative described in this paper is a method based on assessment of performance of ships and risk assessment. Type of risk evaluation is the quantitative risk assessment. The matrix type risk model has been applied for estimation the riskand the measure of safety of ships level is based on the risk acceptance criteriafrom the risk matrix. After the risk assessment the method may be itsed for the safety management purposes using the risk control options.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

emergency conditions; safety of ships; risk control

PL

sytuacje awaryjne; bezpieczeństwo statków; kontrola ryzyka

• Wydawca: Faculty of Ocean Engineering and Ship Technology, Gdańsk University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Polish CIMAC
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 9, no 2
• Strony: 45--55
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Gerigk M. K.

• Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Ocean Engineerlng and Ship Technology Gdańsk, Poland

autor

Szulczewski P.

• Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Ocean Engineerlng and Ship Technology Gdańsk, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Abramowicz-Gerigk T. 2006. Determination of Safety Factors for Ship Berthing Operations. Proceedings and Monographs in Engineering, Water and Earth Sciences. Proceedings ofthe European Safety and Reliability Conference 2006 (ESREL 2006), Yolume 3, Estoril, Portugal, 18-22 September 2006, Published by Taylor & Francis / Balkema, London / Leiden / New York / Philadelphia / Singapore, 2737-2742.
• 2. Abramowicz-Gerigk T. 2008. The risk analysis of harbour operations. in S. Martorell, C. Guedes Soares & Julie Barnet (eds.) Safety Reliability and Risk Analysis: Theory, Methods and Applications. Proceedings of the ESREL 2008 and 17th SRA-Europe Conference, Yalencia, Vol. 4: 3343-3350, London: Balkema.
• 3. Abramowicz-Gerigk T., Burciu Z. 2013. Safety assessment of maritime transport - Bayesian risk-based approach in different fields of maritime transport, in C. Guedes Soares, & F. Lopez Pena (eds.) Developments in Maritime Transportation and Exploitation of Sea Resources. Proc. 15th Int. Congress ofthe International Maritime Association ofthe Mediterranean (IMAM'2013),AComn&, Vol.2: 699-704, London: Balkema.
• 4. Arangio, S., 2012. Reliability based approach for structural design and assessment: performance criteria and indicators in current European codes and guidelines. International Journal of Lifecycle Performance Engineering, 1(1), p.64.
• 5. Burciu, Z. & Grabski, Fr. 2011. The experimental and theoretical study on the reliability ofthe life rafts. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 96: 1456-146.
• 6. Gerigk M. 2004. On a risk-based method for safety assessment of a ship in critical conditions at the preliminary design stage. Polish Maritime Research, No. l (39), Vol. 11,8-13.
• 7. Gerigk M. 2005. Chałlenges of modern assessment of safety of ships in critical conditions. Proceedings and Monographs in Engineering, Water and Earth Sciences. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of the International Maritime Association ofthe Mediterranean IMAM 2005, Yolume 2, Lisboa, Portugal, 26-30 September 2005, Published by Taylor & Francis / Balkema, London / Leiden / New York / Philadelphia / Singapore, 1529-1536.
• 8. Gerigk M. 2006. A method for assessing hazards, risks and safety of damaged ships at sea. Proceedings and Monographs in Engineering, Water and Earth Sciences. Proceedings ofthe European Safety and Reliability Conference 2006 (ESREL 2006), Volume 3, Estoril, Portugal, 18-22 September 2006, Published by Taylor & Francis / Balkema, London / Leiden /New York / Philadelphia / Singapore, 2783-2790.
• 9. Gerigk M. 2008. Modeling of hazards, consequences and risk for safety assessment of ships in damaged conditions in operation. Proceedings and Monographs in Engineering, Water and Earth Sciences. Proceedings ofthe European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2008 andlJth SRA-Europe, Yolume 4, Yalencia, Spain, 22-25 September 2008, Published by CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Balkema, Boca Raton/London/New York/Leiden, 3303-3310.
• 10. Gerigk M. 2010. Acomplex method for safety assessment of ships in damaged conditions using the risk assessment (D.Sc. thesis), Monography No. 101, Published by the Gdańsk University of Technology (in Polish), Gdańsk 2010.
• 11. Gerigk M. 2012. Assessment of safety of ships after the collision and during the ship salvage using the matrix type risk model and uncertainties. in Sustainable Maritime Transportation and Exploitation of Sea Resources. Proceedings ofthe 14th International Congress of the International Maritime Association ofthe Mediterranean (IMAM), Yolume 2: 715-719, London: Balkema.
• 12. IMO, 2005. Report ofthe Maritime Safety Committee on Its Eightieth Session. MSC 80/24/Add.l, London, 2005.
• 13. IMO. 2008. http://www.imo.ors.
• 14. IMO. 2009. Stability and Seakeeping Characteristics of Damaged Passenger Shłps in a Seaway When Returning to Port by Own Power or Under Tow, A survey of residual Stability margin, Submitted by Germany, SLF 52/8/1, London, 26 October 2009.
• 15. Jasionowski, A. & Yassalos, D. 2006. Conceptualising Risk, Proceedings ofthe 9th International Conference on Stability of Ships and Ocean Vehicles STAB 2006, Rio de Janeiro, 25-29 September 2006.
• 16. Nowakowski, T. & Werbińka, S., 2009. On problems of multicomponent system maintenance modelling. International Journal ofAutomation and Computing, 6(4), pp.364-378.
• 17. Perera L.P. & Soares Guedes C. 2011. Detections of potential collision situations by relative motions of yessels under parameter uncertainties, Proceedings ofthe 14th International Congress of the International Maritime Association ofthe Mediterranean (IMAM), Genova, Italy, 13-16 September 2011.
• 18. Skjong, R. & Yanem, E. & Rusas, S. & Olufsen, O. 2006. Holistic and Rłsk Based Approach to Collision Damage Stability of Passenger Ships, Proceedings ofthe tf International Conference on Stability of Ships and Ocean Yehicles STAB 2006, Rio de Janeiro, 25-29 September 2006.
• 19. Soares, C.G. & Teixeira, A.P., 2001. Risk assessment in maritime transportation. Reliability engineering and System Safety, 74, pp.299-309.
• 20. SOLAS, 2005. International Convention for the Safety of Life
• 21. at Sea. Lloyd's Register Rulefinder 2005 - Version 9.4.,
• 22. pp. 1-910.
• 23. SSRC. 2009. http://www.ssrc. na-me.ac. uk
• 24. Vassalos D. 2006. Passenger Ship Safety: Containing the Risk, MarinE Technology, Vol. 43, No. 4, October 2006, pp. 203-213.
• 25. Vassalos D. 2007. Safe return to port, Seminarfor the 5tfh session of the IMO SLF Sub-Committee, London, May 2007.
• 26. University of Strathclyde- Total Stability assessment of damaged Passanger Ro/Ro Vessels -1998