Numerical analysis of resistance characteristics of a novel high-speed quadramaran

• Autorzy: Liu Xin , Yang Jinglei , Wu Defeng , Hou Liang , Li Xiaowen , Wan Qian

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/pomr-2023-0018

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper utilised computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology to calculate the resistance of a novel high-speed quadramaran in calm water using the Navier‒Stokes (N‒S) equation, analysed the total resistance, frictional resistance, and residual resistance characteristics of this novel high-speed quadramaran at different length Froude numbers, and compared them with the results of a conventional high-speed catamaran with the same displacement. The results showed that the total resistance of the quadramaran had a significant hump at the Froude number of 0.6, due to the complexity of the wave interference among the four demihulls, and the hump value was about 1.6 times that of the catamaran. Above the hump speed, the total resistance of the quadramaran decreased with the increase of the Froude number, until reaching the Froude number of 1.06, when the curve became flat, and it showed a maximum resistance reduction of 40% at the Froude number of 1.66 compared with the catamaran, where the total resistance curve was steep. The frictional resistance of the quadramaran increased gradually with the growth of the Froude number, which was basically consistent with the change trend of the catamaran. The residual resistance of the quadramaran first rose and then reduced with the rising Froude number, the curve showed a large hump due to the adverse wave interference, and the hump value was about 1.7 times that of the catamaran. Above the Froude number of 1.06, as the wave interference changed from adverse to favourable, the quadramaran had lower residual resistance than the catamaran. The bow and stern demihulls of the quadramaran were also analysed for their resistance characteristics. The total resistance of the bow demihulls increased gradually with the increase of the Froude number, the curve had a small hump at the Froude number of 0.7, and above the hump speed, the curve was steep. The total resistance of the stern demihulls first increased and then decreased with the growth of the Froude number, the hump value at the Froude number of 0.85 was significant and was about 2 times that of the bow demihulls, and the curve became flat above the Froude number of 1.51.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

high-speed quadramaran; high-speed catamaran; resistance characteristic; wave-making interference; resistance hump

• Wydawca: Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Ocean Engineering & Ship Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Maritime Research
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: nr 2
• Strony: 11--27
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Liu Xin

• Jimei University, School of Marine Engineering, Xiamen, China

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8077-2147

autor

Yang Jinglei

• Jimei University, School of Marine Engineering, Xiamen, China

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2849-6330

autor

Wu Defeng

• Jimei University, School of Marine Engineering, Xiamen, China

autor

Hou Liang

• Shanghai Xiyi Marine Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China

autor

Li Xiaowen

• Jimei University, School of Marine Engineering, Xiamen, China

autor

Wan Qian

• Dalian Shipbuilding Industry Co., Ltd, Dalian, China

Bibliografia

• 1. J. L. Yang, H. B. Sun, X. W. Li, and X. Liu, “Flow field characteristic analysis of cushion system of partial air cushion support catamaran in regular waves,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 35‒46, 2022. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2022-0024.
• 2. J. L. Yang, Z. Lin, P. Li, Z. Q. Guo, H. B. Sun, and D. M. Yang, “Experimental investigations on the resistance performance of a high-speed partial air cushion supported catamaran,” International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, vol. 12, pp. 38‒47, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j. ijnaoe.2019.05.004.
• 3. S. W. Kim, G. W. Lee, and K. C. Seo, “The comparison on resistance performance and running attitude of asymmetric catamaran changing shape of tunnel stern exit region,” in Proc. 1st International Joint Conference on Materials Science and Mechanical Engineering, Bangkok, Thailand, February 2018. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/383/1/012047.
• 4. A. Honaryar, M. Ghiasi, P. F. Liu, and A. Honaryar, “A new phenomenon in interference effect on catamaran dynamic response,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 190, 106041, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.106041.
• 5. H. Wang, R. C. Zhu, L. Zha, and M. X. Gu, “Experimental and numerical investigation on the resistance characteristics of a high-speed planing catamaran in calm water,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 258, 11837, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j. oceaneng.2022.111837.
• 6. Z. S. Dong, X. P. Gao, W. C. Dong, and X. P. Lu, “Supercritical twin-planing-hull (in Chinese),” Shipbuilding of China, vol. 41, no. 3. pp. 1‒7, Sep. 2000. doi: 10.3969/j. issn.1000-4882.2000.03.001.
• 7. H. X. Peng, Numerical computation of multi-hull ship resistance and motion. Ph.D. thesis, Dalhousie University, Canada, 2001. URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10222/55750.
• 8. B. Fang, X. P. Gao, and Z. S. Dong, “Performance of small waterplane area quad-hull’s resistance (in Chinese),” Journal of Naval University of Engineering, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 70‒75, Feb. 2003. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-3486.2003.01.018.
• 9. X. G. Cai, H. B. Chang, and P. Wang, “Research about the wave-making resistance of multi-hull ship in the calm water (in Chinese),” Journal of Hydrodynamics, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 713‒723, 2009. doi: 10.16076/j.cnki.cjhd.2009.06.009.
• 10. Y. Zhang, L. Chen, Z. Y. Zhang, F. Yang, and L. Zheng, “Research on resistance of multi-hull ships with FLUENT (in Chinese),” Ship & Boat, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 23‒30, Oct. 2012. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9855.2012.05.005.
• 11. X. W. Liu and D. C. Wan, “Numerical analysis of wave interference among demihulls of high-speed quadramarans (in Chinese),” Shipbuilding of China, vol. 58, Special Issue, pp. 140‒151, Nov. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/ Detail?id=673742485&from=Qikan_Search_Index.
• 12. Yanuar, Gunawan, A. Muhyi, and A. Jamaluddin, “Ship resistance of quadramaran with various hull position configurations,” Journal of Marine Science and Application, vol. 15, pp. 28‒32, 2016. doi: 10.1007/s11804-016-1340-3.
• 13. Yanuar, K. T. Waskito, and M. P. Widjaja, “Energy efficiency of high speed tetramaran ship model with minimum resistance configuration,” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics Research, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 263‒267, 2017. doi: 10.18178/ijmerr.6.4.263-267.
• 14. A. Farkas, N. Degiuli, and I. Martic, “Numerical investigation into the interaction of resistance components for a series 60 catamaran,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 146, pp. 151‒169, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.09.043.
• 15. J. F. Hu, Y. H. Zhang, P. Wang, and F. Qin, “Numerical and experimental study on resistance of asymmetric catamaran with different layouts,” Brodogradnja, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 91‒110, 2020. doi: 10.21278/brod71206.
• 16. A. Ebrahimi, R. Shafaghat, A. Hajiabadi and M. Yousefifard, “Numerical and experimental investigation of the aerohydrodynamic effect on the behavior of a high-speed catamaran in calm water,” Journal of Marine Science and Application, vol. 21, pp. 56‒70, 2022. doi: 10.1007/ s11804-022-00295-6.
• 17. A. Li and Y. B. Li, “Numerical and experimental study on seakeeping performance of a high-speed trimaran with T-foil in head waves,” Polish Maritime Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 65‒77, 2019. doi: 10.2478/pomr-2019-0047.
• 18. M. Heidari, Z. Razaviyan, F. Yusof, E. Mohammadian, A. B. Alias, M. H. Akhbari, A. Akbari, and F. Movahedi, “Numerical analysis of side hull configuration in trimaran,” Revista Internacional de Métodos Numéricos para Cálculo y Diseño en Ingeniería, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1‒31, 2019. doi: 10.23967/j.rimni.2019.06.004.
• 19. B. Yildiz, B. Sener, S. Duman, and R. Datla, “A numerical and experimental study on the outrigger positioning of a trimaran hull in terms of resistance,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 198, 106938, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.106938.
• 20. A. Nazemian and P. Ghadimi, “CFD-based optimization of a displacement trimaran hull for improving its calm water and wavy condition resistance,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 113, 102729, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2021.102729.
• 21. J. D. Anderson, Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.
• 22. J. H. Ferziger, M. Perić, and R. L. Street, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 4th ed. 2020 Edition. Springer, 2019.
• 23. User Guide, 2022. STAR CCM+ version 2022. SIEMENS Simcenter.
• 24. K. V. Meredith, A. Heather, J. de Vries, and Y. Xin, “A numerical model for partially-wetted flow of thin liquid films,” Computational Methods in Multiphase Flow VI, vol. 70, pp. 239‒250, 2011. doi:10.2495/MPF110201.
• 25. H. Kazemi, M. M. Doustdar, A. Najafi, H. Nowruzi, and M. J. Ameri, “Hydrodynamic performance prediction of stepped planing craft using CFD and ANNs,” Journal of Marine Science and Application, vol. 20, pp. 67‒84, 2021. doi.org/10.1007/s11804-020-00182-y.
• 26. P. Ghadimi, S. M. Sajedi, and M. Sheikholeslami, “Experimental study of the effects of V-shaped steps on the hydrodynamic performance of planing hulls,” Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, vol. 237(1), pp. 238–256, 2023. doi: 10.1177/14750902221098304.
• 27. ITTC, 2021. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. Uncertainty Analysis in CFD Verification and Validation Methodology and Procedures. 7.5-03-01-01.
• 28. ITTC, 2017. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. Uncertainty Analysis in CFD, Examples for Resistance and Flow. 7.5-03-02-01.
• 29. L. Birk, Fundamentals of Ship Hydrodynamics: Fluid Mechanics, Ship Resistance and Propulsion. UK, Chichester: John Wiley, 2019.
• 30. ITTC, 2014. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. Practical Guidelines for Ship CFD Applications. 7.5-03-02-03.
• 31. Z. H. Liu, W. T. Liu, Q. Chen, F. Y. Luo, and S. Zhai, “Resistance reduction technology research of high-speed ships based on a new type of bow appendage,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 206, 107246, 2020. doi.org/10.1016/j. oceaneng.2020.107246.
• 32. O. Faltinsen, Hydrodynamics of High-Speed Marine Vehicles. Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).