The technology of hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis in library research

• Autorzy: Кunenets N.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This article describes the simple technology of the hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis of 20 different libraries, presented by the samples of classification attributes of the same volumes. It is necessary to construct a proximity matrix for an effective process of cluster analysis, using the data from the table “library-classification features”. For separating a set of selected objects into clusters, so that each of them has objects, the most appropriate for its type, it is necessary to create a table “object-property”, where libraries are objects and individual and equal dimension vectors (sets) of characteristic classification features are properties. To do this you should: form the set of libraries that are the objects of clustering; define for each library the set of classification features and its power (volume) in the same nominal scale; choose the value scale of classification features; form a table object-property. This technology is implemented in the environment of MsExcel-2003. It includes the transformation of one-dimensional data into multi-dimensional indexes, using the descriptive statistics and distributions of individual parameters, the creation of the “object-property” table, the building of the proximity matrix, the definition of the dendrogram structure and the cluster interpretation. The application of clustering method can further focus on creating algorithms of effective information search, and also building the scientifically-reasonable classification systems orientated on the library science. The method of hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis can be used with typological or semantic distribution of library funds, or studying of their thematic and specific composition. This method can be considered as universal, that gives an opportunity to formalize the typology division of any objects of librarianship.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

cluster analysis; object-property table; proximity matrix; dendrogram; clusters

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Branch in Lublin
• Czasopismo: ECONTECHMOD : An International Quarterly Journal on Economics of Technology and Modelling Processes
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 5, No 1
• Strony: 35--41
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 25 poz., tab., wz.

Twórcy

autor

Кunenets N.

• Informative systems and networks department Lviv Polytechnic National University S. Bandery str., 12, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine

Bibliografia

• 1. Solton D. 1979. Dynamic library – information systems. Moscow. 9, 35, 369 (in Russian).
• 2. Odilia Yim and Kylee T. Ramdeen. 2015. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis: Comparison of Three Linkage Measures and Application to Psychological Data The Quantitative Methods for Psychology. – Access mode: http://www.tqmp.org/RegularArticles/vol11-1/p008/p008.pdf.
• 3. Alexander M.J. and Spaans Willem A. van der Kloot. 2005. The rules of SPSS’ Hierarchical Cluster Analysisfor processing ties.– Access mode: http://www.leidenuniv.nl/fsw/mtlab/software/SPSS%20rules.pdf.
• 4. 4.Klimchuk V.O. 2006. Cluster analysis: the use of psychological studies Proc. Practical psychology and social work. №4, 30–36.( in Ukrainian)
• 5. Nasledov A. D. 2004. SPSS: Computer analysis of data in psychology and social sciences. – SPb. – 416. (in Russian).
• 6. Warsha Singh. 2008. Robustness of three hierarchical agglomerative clustering techniques for ecological data. – Access mode: http://www.unuftp.is/static/files/rannsoknarritegrdir/WarshaSingh_MastersThesis.pdf.
• 7. Giovanni Bottegoni, Walter Rocchia, Maurizio Recanatini and Andrea Cavalli. 2006. AClAP, Autonomous hierarchical agglomerative Cluster Analysis based protocol to partition conformational datasets . – Access mode: http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/22/14/e58.abstract.
• 8. I. Crawford, S. Ruske, D. O. Topping and M. W. Gallaghe. 2015. Evaluation of hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis methods for discrimination of primary biological aerosol Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 8, 7303–7333, 201. – Access mode:http://www.atmosmeas-tech – personal /discuss.net/8/7303/2015/amtd-8-7303-2015-print.pdf.
• 9. Janette Walde. 2002. Cluster Analys. – Access mode:http://www.uibk.ac.at/statistics/janettewalde/lehre/phd_biology/clusteranalyse.pdf
• 10. Volkova N.A. 2005. Cluster analysis the results of a sociological survey of employees. – Access mode: http://ieee.tusur.ru/nauka/cluster.pdf. ( in Russian). 11.
• 11.Sokolova L.V., Veryasova G.M. and Sokolov O.E. 2011. Application cluster analysis methods in practice enterprises In Proceedings of the N U “Lviv Polytechnic”.– №720:Management, 240–246 (in Ukrainian).
• 12. Voronin A.V. 2001. Using cluster analysis to select local strategies In Problems and prospects of economic management and marketing in organizations. –Access mode: http://perspectives.utmn.ru/No1/text02.shtml. (in Russian).
• 13. Lavrenko A.S. 2011. Clustering in the tasks of assortment planning in retail networks In Management of economic systems: electronic scientific journal, № 5 (29). –Access mode: http://uecs.mcnip.ru. (in Russian).
• 14. Even G.M. 2009. Clustered analysis in the study of the motivational structure of personnel of the enterprise[electronic resource] In Actual problems of economy. –№ (93). –Access mode: /http://www.nbuv.gov.ua /Portal/Soc_Gum/APE/2009_3/226-230.pdf. (in Russian).
• 15. Kurylo О. 2013. Structuring expenses of industrial enterprises in the evaluation process of its production and sales potential / A. Emelyanov, O. Kurylo, A. Vysotskij //Ekontechmod. An international quarterly jornal. – Poland, Lublin – Rzeszow. Vol. 02. No. 4, 11–16.
• 16. Pasichnyk V.V. and Savchuk V.V. 2015. Mobile information technologies for tourism domain. Econtechmod:an international quarterly journal on economics in technology, new technologies and modelling processes. – Lublin–Rzeszow, Vol. 04, No. 2, 25–32.
• 17. Grabmeier J. and Rudolph A. 2002.Techniques of cluster algorithms in data mining // Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. – October, Vol. 6, №4, 303–360.
• 18. Runkler T.A., Bezdek J.C. 2003. Web mining with relational clustering In International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. – February, Vol. 32, №. 2–3, 217–236.
• 19. Wagstaff K. 2001. Constrained K-means Clustreing with Background Knowledge. In Proceedings of the Eighteen International Conference on Mahine Learning . Cardie, 577–584.
• 20. Tryon R.C. 1939. Cluster analysis. London: Ann Arbor Edwards Bros, 139.
• 21. 3. Statistical method for computers. – Moscow, 1986, 269–301(in Russian).
• 22. Blei David M. 2008. Hierarchical clustering. COS424 Princeton University.February 28. – Access mode http://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/spr08/cos424/slides/clustering-2.pdf.
• 23. Fionn Murtagh and Pierre Legendre. 2011. Ward's Hierarchical Clustering Method: Clustering Criterion and Agglomerative Algorithm. – Access mode: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1111.6285.pdf.
• 24. Kunanets N. E. 2011. Libraries in Western Ukraine (XIII. – 1939): consolidated information resource monograph. Lviv. 448. (in Ukrainian).
• 25. Ana Fred Hierarchical Clustering: Agglomerative Methods. – Access mode: http://www.lx.it.pt/~afred/tutorials/.pdf.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę