Potrzeba nowych protokołów transportowych w Internecie

• Autorzy: Woźniak Józef , Nowicki Krzysztof

Warianty tytułu

EN

The Need for New Transport Protocols on the INTERNET

• Języki publikacji: PL

Abstrakty

PL

Zestaw protokolarny TCP/IP jest powszechnie wykorzystywany w sieciach IP, bez względu na zróżnicowane środowiskai scenariusze użycia. Z uwagi na to, że stanowi on podstawową koncepcję organizacji pracy Internetu jest przedmiotem zainteresowania oraz stałych analiz zarówno operatorów, użytkowników jak też badaczy zagadnień sieciowych, a wreszcie i projektantów. Internet jestorganizmem "żywym", w którym pojawiają się nowe potrzeby. Jest to szczególnie istotne, z uwagi na pojawiające się nowe wymagania aplikacji - na najwyższym poziomie architektury sieciowej, a jednocześnie na zupełnie nowe sposoby realizacji przekazów związanez nowymi technologiami transmisyjnymi i technikami odbioru, pozwalającymi na zrównoleglenie przekazów oraz bezstratne przełączanie pomiędzy kilkoma interfejsami W pracy zasygnalizowano oczekiwania i wymagania związane, w szczególności z nowymi "wielobiektowymi" aplikacjami, jak też ograniczenia wynikające z dużej bezwładności, obserwowanej po stronie infrastruktury transportowej sieci IP. Mając na uwadze zarówno ograniczenia, jak też formułowane wymagania dokonano charakterystyki wybranych protokołów transportowych typu end-to-end. Większą uwagę poświęcono przy tym dwóm protokołom realizującym przekazy wielostrumieniowe, a mianowicie SCTP oraz QUIC.

EN

TThe TCP/IP protocol suite is widely used in IP networks, regardless of diverse environments and usage scenarios. Due to the fact of being the basic concept of organizing the work of the Internet, it is the subject of interest and constant analysis of operators, users, network researchers, and designers. The Internet is a "living" organism in which new needs appear all the time. This is particularly important due to the emerging new application requirements - at the highest level of network architecture, and at the same time, completely new ways of transmitting messages related to new technologies and reception techniques, allowing for parallelization of messages transfer and lossless switching/handover between several interfaces. The paper highlights the expectations and requirements related, in particular, to new "multi-object" applications, as well as the limitations resulting from the high inertia observed on the side of the IP network transport infrastructure. Taking into account both the limitations and the formulated requirements, the selected end-to-end transport protocols have been characterized. More attention was paid to two protocols implementing multi-stream transfers, namely SCTP and QUIC.

Słowa kluczowe

PL

protokoły transportowe; przegląd rozwiązań; TCP; MPTCP; QUIC; SCTP

EN

transport protocol; survey of solution; TCP; MPTCP; QUIC; SCTP

• Wydawca: INFOTECH
• Czasopismo: Automatyka, Elektryka, Zakłócenia
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 14, nr 3(53)
• Strony: 84--106
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 58 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Woźniak Józef

• Politechnika Gdańska

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2982-0972

autor

Nowicki Krzysztof

• Politechnika Gdańska

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6574-6263

Bibliografia

• [1] M. Waldrop: „DARPA and the Internet Revolution, in 50 Years of Bridging the Gap.”, https://www.darpa.mil/attachments/(2O15)%20Global%20Nav%20-%20About%20Us%20-%20History%20-%20Resources%20-%2050th%20-%20Internet%20(Approved).pdf
• [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model
• [3] ISO/IEC JTC1, Information Technology - Open System Interconnection - OSI Reference Model, ISO 7498, 1984.
• [4] J. Woźniak, K. Nowicki: "Sieci LAN, MAN, WAN - protokoły komunikacyjne", Fundacja Postępu Telekomunikacji, Kraków 1998.
• [5] J. H. McFadyen: „Systems Network Architecture: An overview.”, IBM Systems Journal (Volume: 15, Issue: 1, 1976).
• [6] DECnet Digital Network Architecture Phase IV NSP Functional Specification. Order No. AA-X439A- TK, Copyright © 1983 by Digital Equipment Corporation, Dec.1983.
• [7] Internet Protocol. DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification. RFC: 791, September 1981 (ed. Jon Postel).
• [8] Transmission Control Protocol. DARPA Internet Program Protocol Specification. RFC: 793 (Replaces: RFC 761), September 1981.
• [9] M. Sportack: „TCP/IP First-Step.”, Cisco Press. 1st ed. Dec 3, 2004.
• [10] User Datagram Protocol. RFC 768, August 1980 (ed. J. Postel).
• [11] Z. J. Haas, A. Warkhedi: „The design and performance of Mobile TCP for wireless networks.”, Journal of High Speed Networks 10 (2001) 187-207 187, IOS Press.
• [12] A. Bakre B.R. Badrinath: „I-TCP: Indirect TCP for Mobile Hosts.”, Rutgers University, 1994.
• [13] J. Rendbn, F. Casadevall, D. Serarols: „Snoop TCP Performance over GPRS.”, 0-7803-6728-6/01, IEEE 2001.
• [14] M. Hoeft, J. Woźniak: „Evaluation of Connectivity Gaps Impact on TCP Transmissions in Maritime Communications.”, Computer Networks. Springer International Publishing, 2017, p.91-105 (eds P. Gaj, A. Kwiecień, M.Sawicki).
• [15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_layer
• [16] A. Ford, C. Raiciu, M. Handley, O. Bonaventure: „TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses.”, RFC 6824 - 01.2013.
• [17] A. Ford, C. Raiciu, M. Handley, O. Bonaventure, C. Paasch: „TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses.”, RFC 8684 - 03.2020.
• [18] J. Iyengar, M. Thomson (Eds.): „QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport.”, RFC 9000, May 2021.
• [19] M. Kühlewind, B. Trammell: „Manageability of the QUIC Transport Protocol.”, RFC 9312, September 2022.
• [20] R. Stewart, Q. Xie, K. Morneault, C. Sharp, H. Schwarzbauer, T. Taylor, I. Rytina, M. Kalla, L. Zhang, V. Paxson: „Stream Control Transmission Protocol.", RFC 2960, October 2000.
• [21] R. Stewart (ed.): „Stream Control Transmission Protocol.”, RFC 4960, September 2007.
• [22] R. Stewart, M. Tüxen, K. Nielsen: „Stream Control Transmission Protocol.”, RFC 9260, June 2022.
• [23] L. Schumann, T. Viet Doan, T. Shreedhar, R. Mok, V. Bajpai: „Impact of Evolving Protocols and COVID-19 on Internet Traffic Shares.”, arXiv:2201.00142v2 [cs.NI] 15 Jan 2022.
• [24] Mobile Network Infrastructure Getting Started. Version 10.1 122 ©2023 Palo Alto Networks.
• [25] https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/service-providers/10-1/mobile-network-infrastructure-getting-started/sctp/sctp-use-cases
• [26]. 5G: NG-RAN - NG signalling transport. (3GPP TS 38.412 version 15.0.0 Release 15). ETSI TS 138 412 V15.0.0. 2018-07.
• [27] System architecture for the 5G System (5GS). Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects. 3rd Generation Partnership Project. Stage 23GPP TS 23.501 V18.3.0 (2023-09) (Release 18).
• [28] M. Allman, V. Paxson, E. Blanton, "TCP Congestion Control", RFC 5681, September 2009.
• [29] T. Henderson, S. Floyd, A. Gurtov, A, Y. Nishida: „The NewReno Modification to TCPs Fast Recovery Algorithm.”, RFC 6582, April 2012.
• [30] I. Rhee, L. Xu, S. Ha, A. Zimmermann, L. Eggert, R. Scheffenegger: „CUBIC for Fast Long-Distance Networks.”, RFC 8312, February 2018.
• [31] G. Huston: „A quick look at QUIC.”, The ISP Column - A monthly column on things Internet. March, 2019, https://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2019-03/quic.pdf
• [32] J. Dellaverson, T. Li, Y. Wang, J. Iyengar, A. Afanasyev, L. Zhang: „A Quick Look at QUIC*.”, 2021.
• [33]. Multipath TCP - Wikipedia.
• [34] C. Paasch, G. Detal, F. Duchene, C. Raiciu, O. Bonaventure: „Exploring mobile/WiFi handover with multipath TCP. Proceedings of the 2012 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Cellular networks: Operations, challenges, and future design - Cell Net 12.”, p. 31.
• [35] S. Pokhrel; M. Panda; H. Vu (2017-02-24). "Analytical Modeling of Multipath TCP Over Last-Mile Wireless.", IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking. 25 (3): 1876-1891. doi:10.1109/TNET.2017.2663524. S2CID 21518823
• [36] L. Chao, C. Wu, T. Yoshinaga, W. Bao, Y. Ji: „A Brief Review of Multipath TCP for Vehicular Networks". Sensors 2021, 21, 2793.
• [37] C. Raiciu, S. Barré, C. Pluntke, A. Greenhalgh, D. Wischik, M. Handley: "Improving datacenter performance and robustness with multipath TCP". In: Computer Communications Review, Vol. 41, no. 4, p. 1-12 (2011).
• [38] K. Nowicki: „Ethernet - sieci, mechanizmy.”, ISBN: 83-921711-2-8, INFOTECH, 2006.
• [39] C. Paasch; G. Detal; S. Barré; F. Duchêne; O. Bonaventure. "The fastest TCP connection with Multipath TCP.". Retrieved 2013-09-20.
• [40] Arun Joseph, Tianxiang Li, Zihao He, Yong Cui, Lixia Zhang: „A Comparison between SCTP and QUIC.”, QUIC working group. Internet-Draft Intended status: Informational, September 6, 2018.
• [41] Protocol numbers, Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA), Last Updated 2023-10-19, https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocolnumbers/protocol-numbers.xhtml
• [42] Q. De Coninck, O. Bonaventure: “Multipath Extensions for QUIC (MP-QUIC).”, Internet-Draft draft-deconinck-quic-multipath-07. IETF. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-deconinck-quic-multipath-07 Work in Progress 2021.
• [43] Q. De Coninck: “The packet number space debate in multipath QUIC.”, ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Volume 52, Issue 3, July 2022, pp 2-9 https://doi.org/10.1145
• [44] J. Iyengar, M. Thomson: QUIC: A UDP-Based Multiplexed and Secure Transport.draft-ietf-quic-transport-08. December 5, 2017.
• [45] E. Rescorla: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 - draft-ietf-tls-tls13- 18. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tls-tls13-18, October 2016.
• [46] A. Ghedini: Even faster connection establishment with QUIC 0-RTT resumption. 20.11.2019. https://blog.cloudflare.com/even-faster-connection-establishment-with-quic-0-rtt-resumption
• [47] K. Nichols, S. Blake, F. Baker, D. Black: „Definition of the Differentiated Services Field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers.”, RFC 2474, December 1998.
• [48] H. Krawczyk, M. Bellare, R. Canetti: „ HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication.”, February 1997 - RFC2104.
• [49] Shaojian Fu, M. Atiquzzaman, W. Ivancic: „SCTP over satellite networks.”, Computer Communications Workshop. Dana Point, California, October 20-21, 2003, pp. 112-116.
• [50] Ł. Budzisz: „Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP), a proposal for seamless handover management at the transport layer in heterogeneous wireless networks.”, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya ` Department of Signal Theory and Communication Radio Communication Group. Ph.D. Dissertation, Barcelona, 2009.
• [51] E. Barker, Q. Dang, S. Frankel, K. Scarfone, P. Wouters: „Guide to IPsec VPNs.”, NIST Special Publication 800-77 Revision 1. June 2020.
• [52] A. Jungmaier, E. Rescorla and M. Tuexen, “Transport Layer Security over Stream Control Transmission Protocol.”, RFC 3436, December 2002.
• [53] M. Tuexen, R. Seggelmann and E. Rescorla, "Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) for Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP).", RFC 6083, January 2011.
• [54] M. Westerlund, J. Preuss Mattsson, C. Porfiri: „Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) over Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP).”, Draft-ietf-tsvwg-dtls-over-sctp-bis-07. October 2023.
• [55]] G. Huston: „A look at QUIC use.”, July 2022. https://blog.apnic.net/2022/07/11/a-look-at-quic-use
• [56] Usage statistics of QUIC for websites. https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/ce-quic (October 2023).
• [57] Specifications of the Signalling System No 7. ITU-T Recommendation Q.700. 03/1993.
• [58] V. Fajardo, J. Arkko, J. Loughney, G. Zorn: Diameter Base Protocol . RFC 6733, October 2012.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).