Factors used for modeling process of forming ecological management instruments of industrial enterprise based on cognitive cards

• Autorzy: Svyatokho N
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article is devoted to the process of forming ecological management instruments of industrial enterprise which belongs to weak-structured problems that are complex in nature and those that are different in qualitative dependencies between structural elements. The essence of cognitive cards is searched as a subjective model of the situation (process), based on the expertise and knowledge. Factors that are used to simulate the process of forming industrial ecological management instruments are marked on the basis of cognitive cards, in terms of achieving the overall socio-ecological-economic efficiency of its operations and its stated requirements. The character, composition and direction of the relationship between indicators within the proposed factors are defined.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

weak-structured problems; ecological management instruments; cognitive cards; factors; socio-ecologicaleconomic efficiency of industrial enterprise activity

• Wydawca: Polish Academy of Sciences, Branch in Lublin
• Czasopismo: ECONTECHMOD : An International Quarterly Journal on Economics of Technology and Modelling Processes
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 3, No 1
• Strony: 105--111
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 20 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Svyatokho N

• Department of management, The National Academy of Environmental Protection and Resort Development 181, Kiyivskaya str., room 311, Simferopol, Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Ukraine, 95000

Bibliografia

• 1. Avdeeva Z.K. and Kovriga S.V. 2011. Formirovanie strategii razvitiya sotsialno-ekonomicheskih ob'ektov na osnove kognitivnyih kart. Saarbrucken, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG, 184. (RUS)
• 2. Avdeeva Z.K. 2009. Sravnitel'niy analiz vyborochnyh kognitivnyh kart po stepeni formalizacii. Trudy VIII Mezhd. konf. "Kognitivniy analiz i upravlenie razvitiem situaciy". CASC’2009, M., IPU RAN, 11-15. (RUS)
• 3. Axelrod R. 1976. Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press, 400. (US)
• 4. Baydala N., Kniaz S. and Pauk O. 2013. Method of choosing vectors for investment strategies implementation. Econtechmod. An international quarterly journal. Poland, Lublin, Rzeszow, Vol. 02, Nr 4, 3-11. (POL)
• 5. Chernyavskiy A.L. and Dorofeyuk A.A. and Pokrovskaya I.V. 2009. Kognitivnyie metody prinyatiya resheniy v zadachah upravleniya slaboformalizovannyimi sistemami, baziruyuschiesya na protsedurah strukturnoiteratsionnoy ekspertizy. Kognitivnyiy analiz i upravlenie razvitiem situatsiy (CASC'2009), Trudyi Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii (17-19 noyabrya 2009 g., Moskva). М., IPU RAN, 117-121. (RUS)
• 6. Kornoushenko E.K. 2009. Dostizhenie tseley v situatsiyah pri ogranichennyih resursah na upravlenie (kognitivnyiy podhod). Kognitivnyiy analiz i upravlenie razvitiem situatsiy (CASC'2009), Trudyi Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii (17-19 noyabrya 2009 g., Moskva). М., IPU RAN, 89-100. (RUS)
• 7. Kornoushenko E.K. and Maksimov V.I. 1999. Upravlenie processami v slaboformalizovannyh sredah pri stabilizacii grafovyh modeley sredy. Trudy IPU RAN, Sb. nauch. tr. M., IPU RAN, Vol.2, 82–94. (RUS)
• 8. Kovriga S.V. and Maksimov V.I. 2005. Primenenie strukturno-celevogo analiza razvitiia social'no-ekonomicheskih situaciy. Problemy upravleniia, Nr 3, 39–43. (RUS)
• 9. Kulinich A.A. 2001. Model podderzhki formirovaniya znaniy v ploho opredelennih problemnih oblastyah. Trudy mezhdunarodnogo kongressa "Iskusstvenniy intellekt v 21 veke" ICAI 2001, Divnomorsk, 84-92. (RUS)
• 10. Kulinich A.A. 2002. Sistema modelirovaniya ploho opredelennih nestatsionarnih situatsiy. Trudy vtoroy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii "Kognitivniy analiz i upravlenie razvitiem situatsii". M., IPU RAN, 4-50. (RUS)
• 11. Mel'nik L.G. and L. Hens. 2007. Social'noekonomicheskiy potencial ustoichivogo razvitiya. Sumy, ITD "Universitetskaya kniga", 1120. (UKR)
• 12. Newell A. and Simon H.A. 1976. Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search. Communications of the ACM, Nr 19, 113-126. (US)
• 13. Newell A. and Simon H.A. 1972. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall. (US)
• 14. Pahomova N.V. and A. Enders and K. Rihter. 2003. Ekologicheskiy menedzhment. SPb., Piter, 544. (RUS)
• 15. Prohorova V.V. 2011. Kognitivnoe modelirovanie ustoychivogo ekonomicheskogo razvitiya predpriyatiy. Ekonomika i upravlenie, Nr 1, 24-29. (RUS)
• 16. Roberts F.S. 1986. Diskretnie matematicheskie modeli s prilozheniyami k sotsialnim, biologicheskim i ekonomicheskim zadacham. M., Nauka, 496. (RUS)
• 17. Saimon G.A. 2002. Racional'noe priniatie resheniy v delovyh organizaciiah. Psihologicheskiy zhurnal, Vol. 23, Nr 1, 42-51. (RUS)
• 18. Suharev M.V. 2008. Evolucionnoe upravlenie social'noekonomicheskimi sistemami. Petrozavodsk, KarNC RAN, 258. (RUS)
• 19. Taran T.A. and Shemaev V.N. 2004. Obobschenie otsenki faktorov v zadachah kognitivnogo modelirovaniya. Matematichni mashiny i sistemy, Nr 3, 110-124. (RUS)
• 20. Taran T.A. 1996. Situatsionnoe modelirovanie na osnove kachestvennih rassuzhdeniy. Iskusstvenniy intellect, Nr 1, 102-114. (RUS)