Loss and restoration of water coning control - field case history and prediction

• Autorzy: Wojtanowicz A. , Jin L.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.7494/drill.2018.35.1.343

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

It is well known that water coning is a difficult-to-solve problem in heavy oil reservoirs with bottom water. A promising solution is offered by the downhole water sink (DWS) technology – a dual well completion technique for water coning control in reservoirs with bottom aquifer. In the field case addressed in this study, a DWS well was installed in a heavy oil reservoir underlined by thin water zone – notorious for severe water coning problem. Initially, the two well’s completions had no separating packer; Later, the well was recompleted with packer and displayed much improved oil productivity and water coning control. However, after accidental shutdown of the bottom (water sink) completion and continuing production from the top (oil pay) completion the well was rapidly watered out and shut down. In this study, the well’s production history is analyzed to better understand dynamics of water coning control with packer-less DWS and the effect of temporary water sink shut-down. The analysis is performed with a radial grid-based simulation model using the reservoir properties and well production data. An adequate history match is achieved by tweaking reservoir properties within their uncertainty range – mostly the relative permeability and capillary pressure curves. The packer-less completion displays steady invasion of water to the top oil completion through the gravel pack with no separating packer. The analysis also confirms detrimental effect of sole temporary shutdown of the water sink (bottom) production that caused rapid buildup of water saturation in the oil pay zone around the well. This work also evaluates possible restoration of oil productivity by putting the well back on production after a dormant period of time (when water cone might subside) and the contribution of the bottom water drive (aquifer strength) to the restored productivity. A 25-year production performance forecast is performed for three scenarios of well’s operation after the water sink completion’s shut-down for one month: (a) no shut-down and continuing production as DWS well; (b) one-month shut down and conversion to a conventional single-completed well; (c) one-month shut down and continuing production as DWS well. The results reveal that the watered-out well could be revived as an oil producer only by restoring its DWS operation [scenario (c)] as the conventional well operation [scenario (b)] would produce only water. Moreover, detrimental effect of temporary water-sink shut down would irreversibly reduce well's productivity by more than 10 percent. It is also shown that stronger aquifer stimulates DWS well productivity improvement of up to 20 percent in case of strong bottom water drive.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

oil well production; water coning; downhole water sink

• Wydawca: AGH University of Science and Technology Press
• Czasopismo: AGH Drilling, Oil, Gas
• Rocznik: 2018
• Tom: Vol. 35, no. 1
• Strony: 343--360
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 48 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Wojtanowicz A.

• Louisiana State University

autor

Jin L.

• University of North Dakota

Bibliografia

• [1] Qin W.: Analytical design method for cold production of heavy oil with bottom water using Bilateral Sink Wells. Ph.D. Dissertation in Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 2011.
• [2] Wojtanowicz A.K., Qin W.: Improved recovery of heavy oil with bottom water using downhole water sink (DWS) technology. Wiertnictwo, Nafta, Gaz, 27, 2010, pp. 467–84.
• [3] Yu H., Li L., Zheng J., Fu X., Ji W., Gao W., Liu H.et al.: Case Study of Blocking Water Coning in Horizontal Well for Steam Stimulation in Heavy Oil Reservoir. In: SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2016.
• [4] Zaitoun A., Kohler N., Montemurro M.A.: Control of water influx in heavy-oil horizontal wells by polymer treatment. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1992.
• [5] Ju B., Dai S. et al.: An Effective Method to Improve Recovery of Heavy Oil Reservoir with Bottom Water Drive. In: Paper SPE 10521-MS, International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, November 21–23, 2005.
• [6] Ali S.M.F.: Prospects of EOR Techniques in Saskatchewan Oil Reservoirs. The Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 25(2), 1986, pp. 64–67.
• [7] Saskoil S.S., Butler R.M.: The Production of Conventional Heavy Oil Reservoirs With Bottom Water Using Steam-Assisted Gravity Drainage. The Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 29(2), 1990, pp. 78–86.
• [8] Kasraie M., Ali S.M.F.: Steamflooding Bottom Water Reservoirs. In: Paper SPE SS-87-5, Technical Meeting / Petroleum Conference of the South Saskatchewan Section, Regina, October 6–8, 1987.
• [9] Marcio F.C. et al.: The appraisal and development plan for the heavy oil Jubarte field, Deepwater Campos Basin, Brazil. In: Paper SPE 16301, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, May 3–6, 2004.
• [10] Jayasekera A.J., Goodyear S.G.: The Development of Heavy Oil Fields in the United Kingdom Continental Shelf: Past, Present, and Future. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 3(5), 2000, pp. 371–379.
• [11] Zhou W., Zhang J. et al.: Key Technologies of Polymer Flooding in Offshore Oilfield of Bohai Bay. In: Paper SPE 115240, SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Perth, Australia, October 20–22, 2008.
• [12] Liu Y., Yang H. et al.: Improve Offshore Heavy Oil Recovery by Compound Stimulation Technology Involved Thermal, Gas and Chemical Methods. In: Paper SPE 20907, Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, May 3–6, 2010.
• [13] Visser R.C.: Offshore Production of Heavy Oil. SPE Journal of Petroleum Technology, 41(1), 1989, pp. 67–70.
• [14] Recham R., Osisanya S.O., Touami M.: Effects of water coning on the performance of vertical and horizontal wells-a reservoir simulation study of HassiR’mel Field, Algeria. In: SPE/CIM International Conference on Horizontal Well Technology. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2000.
• [15] Sherrard D.W., Brice B.W. et al.: Application of Horizontal Wells at Prudhoe Bay. SPE Journal of Petroleum Technology, 39(11), 1987, pp. 1417–1425.
• [16] Murphy P.J.: Performance of Horizontal Wells in the Helder Field. SPE Journal of Petroleum Technology, 42(6), 1990, pp. 792–800.
• [17] Target P.L.: The Haven Oil Field: Development of a Tiny Marginal Field with Horizontal Wells. SPE Journal of Petroleum Technology, 44(4), 1992, pp. 496–501.
• [18] Chen H.-K.: Performance of Horizontal Wells, Safah Field, Oman. In: Paper SPE 25568, Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, April 3–5, 1993.
• [19] Shecaira F.S., Branco C.C.M. et al.: IOR: The Brazilian Perspective. In: SPE Paper 75170, SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 13–17, 2002.
• [20] Jurus W.J., Stanko M., Parra A., Golan M.: Simplified Near Wellbore Reservoir Simulation to Predict the Performance of Viscous Oil Horizontal Well With Water Coning From an Active Aquifer. In: SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2015.
• [21] Verga F., Viberti D., Ferraro P.: Prediction of water coning and water cresting: analytical or numerical models? In: Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition. Offshore Mediterranean Conference, 2007.
• [22] Thomas F.B., Shtepani E., Marosi G., Bennion D.B.: Production Well Water Coning–Is There Anything We Can Do? In: Canadian International Petroleum Conference. Petroleum Society of Canada, 2002.
• [23] Tu Xingwan, Dragon L. Peng, Zhaohui Chen.: Research and Field Application of Water Coning Control with Production Balanced Method in Bottom-Water Reservoir. In: SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2007.
• [24] Freeborn W., Russell R.B., MacDonald A.J.: South Jenner Horizontal Wells a Water Coning Case Study. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 29, no. 03, 1990.
• [25] Jin L.: Downhole Water Loop (DWL) Well Completion for Water Coning Control – Theoretical Analysis. M.S. Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, Dec. 2009.
• [26] Stuebinger L.A., Elphingstone Jr G.M.: Multipurpose wells: downhole oil/water separation in the future. In: SPE Production & Facilities, Aug 1, 15(03), 2000, pp. 191–195.
• [27] Matthews C.M., Chachula R., Peachey B.R., Solanki S.C.: Application of downhole oil/water separation systems in the alliance field. In: SPE Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1996.
• [28] Peachey B.R., Solanki S.C., Zahacy T.A., Piers K.: Downhole oil/water separation moves into high gear. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Jul 1, 37(07), 1998.
• [29] Peachey B.R. [inventor; Centre for Frontier Engineering Research Institute, assignee]: Multiple cyclone apparatus for downhole cyclone oil/water separation. United States Patent US 5,456,837. Oct 10, 1995.
• [30] Amini S., Mowla D., Golkar M., Esmaeilzadeh F.: Mathematical modelling of a hydrocyclone for the down-hole oil–water separation (DOWS). Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 90(12), 2012, pp. 2186–2195.
• [31] Stokes D.D., Brew J.R. et al.: Steam Drive as a Supplemental Recovery Process In an Intermediate-Viscosity Reservoir, Mount Poso Field, California. SPE Journal of Petroleum Technology, 30(1), 1978, pp. 125–131.
• [32] Lillie W.H.E., Springer F.P.: Status of the Steam Drive Pilot in the Georgsdorf Field, Federal Republic of Germany. SPE Journal of Petroleum Technology, 33(1), 1981, pp. 173–180.
• [33] Proyer G., Chaziteodorou G. et al.: Results of a Steamdrive Pilot Project in the Ruehlertwist Field, Federal Republic of Germany. SPE Journal of Petroleum Technology, 37(2), 1985, pp. 284–294.
• [34] Jin L.A.: Feasibility Study of Multi-functional Wells for Water Coning Control and Disposal. Ph.D. Dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, Dec. 2013.
• [35] Shirman E.I., Wojtanowicz A.K.: More oil using downhole water-sink technology: a feasibility study. SPE Production & Facilities, Nov 1, 15(04), 2000, pp. 234–40.
• [36] Shirman E.I., Wojtanowicz A.K.: Water coning reversal using downhole water sink-theory and experimental study. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition Jan 1, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1997.
• [37] Inikori S.O., Wojtanowicz A.K.: Contaminated Water Production in Old Oil Fields With Downhole Water separation: Effects of Capillary Pressures and Relative Permeability Hysteresis. In: SPE/EPA/DOE Exploration and Production Environmental Conference Jan 1, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2001.
• [38] Wojtanowicz A.K., Armenta M.: Assessment of Down-Hole Water Sink Technology for Controlling Water Inflow at Petroleum Wells. Journal of Energy Resources Technology. Dec 1, 126(4), 2004, pp. 334–41.
• [39] Inikori S.O., Wojtanowicz A.K., Siddiqi S.S.: Water control in oil wells with downhole oil-free water drainage and disposal. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Jan 1, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2002.
• [40] Swisher M.D., Wojtanowicz A.K.: New dual completion method eliminates bottom water coning. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Jan 1, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1995.
• [41] Jin L. et al.: An Analytical Model for Water Coning Control Installation in Reservoirs with Bottomwater. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 49, no. 5, May. 2010.
• [42] Jin L., Wojtanowicz A.K.: Performance Analysis of Wells with Downhole Water Loop Installation for Water Coning Control. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 49, no. 6, Jun. 2010.
• [43] Jin L. et al.: Scaling Analysis of Wells with Downhole Water Loop Completion for Bottom Water Control. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 49, no. 11, Nov. 2010.
• [44] Jin L., Wojtanowicz A.K.: Coning Control and Recovery Improvement Using In-situ Water Drainage/Injection in Bottom-Water-Drive Reservoir. In: SPE 129663, Proceedings of SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK, Apr. 24–28, 2010.
• [45] Jin L., Wojtanowicz A.K.: Minimum Produced Water from Oil Wells with Water-Coning Control and Water-Loop Installations. In: SPE 143715, Proceedings of SPE Americas E&P Health, Safety, Security, and Environmental Conference, Mar. 21–23, Houston, TX, 2011.
• [46] Jin L., Wojtanowicz A.K.: Analytical Assessment of Water-free Production in Oil Wells with Downhole Water Loop for Coning Control. In: SPE 141470, Proceedings of SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, Mar. 27–29, 2011.
• [47] Qin W., Luo P., Wojtanowicz A.K.: Improving Oil Recovery in Offshore Heavy Oil Underlain by Large Aquifer. In: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Apr 11. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2016.
• [48] Qin W., Wojtanowicz A.K., White C.D.: New Cold-Production Technique for Heavy Oil with Strong Bottom Water Drive. In: SPE Journal, Apr 1, 19(02), 2014, pp. 270–279.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).