The role of organizational innovations in improving local government performance

• Autorzy: Putro Sandry Windiharto , Kusumawardhani Amie , Raharjo Susilo Toto

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2021.23.2.26

Warianty tytułu

PL

Rola innowacji organizacyjnych w poprawie wydajności samorządów lokalnych

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Within the public sector, innovations are imperative in the spirit of new governance, flexibility, efficiency, and organization administration responsiveness. While the role and appropriateness of innovations in the private sector have been widely discussed in the literature, innovations confront some defiance in public sectors. Some studies have been conducted to understand the role of innovations in the performance of the private and public sector, but there are different results in the significances of the role of innovations. This study aims to understand the role of organizational innovation in the local government through quantitative analysis using multiple regression and Sobel Test. The results showed that innovations have partially mediated the relationship among organizational culture, leadership support and performance organizations. The study also found that leadership support and organizational culture directly influence organizational performance than if the influence is indirectly through innovation.

PL

W sektorze publicznym innowacje są niezbędne w duchu nowego zarządzania, elastyczności, wydajności i responsywności administracji organizacji. Podczas gdy rola i adekwatność innowacji w sektorze prywatnym są szeroko omawiane w literaturze, innowacje napotykają pewien bunt w sektorach publicznych. Przeprowadzono kilka badań, aby zrozumieć rolę innowacji w funkcjonowaniu sektora prywatnego i publicznego, ale wyniki dotyczące znaczenia roli innowacji są różne. Niniejsze badanie ma na celu zrozumienie roli innowacji organizacyjnych w samorządzie lokalnym poprzez analizę ilościową z wykorzystaniem regresji wielokrotnej i testu Sobela. Wyniki pokazały, że innowacje częściowo pośredniczyły w relacjach między kulturą organizacyjną, wsparciem przywództwa i organizacjami wydajnościowymi. Badanie wykazało również, że wsparcie przywództwa i kultura organizacyjna mają bezpośredni wpływ na wydajność organizacji, niż jeśli pośrednio wpływają na innowacje.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

leadership support; organizational culture; organizational innovation; local government; public sector

PL

wsparcie przywództwa; kultura organizacyjna; innowacyjność organizacyjna; samorząd terytorialny; sektor publiczny

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 23, No. 2
• Strony: 437--448
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 35 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Putro Sandry Windiharto

• Ministry of Finance of Republic of Indonesia

autor

Kusumawardhani Amie

• Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

autor

Raharjo Susilo Toto

• Faculty of Economics and Business Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1.Ab Rahman, Z. N., Ismail, N., (2018). Determinant Factors for Managing Innovation in the Malaysian Public Sector. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150, 05042.
• 2.Al-madadha, A., Al-adwan, A. S., (2021). Organisational culture and organisational citizenship behaviour: the dark side of organisational politics. Organizacija, 54(1).
• 3.Al-Matari, E. M., Omira, O. D. Bin., (2014). The mediating effect of organizational culture on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 67-78.
• 4.Anggraeni, A., (2020). Executive Role in the Use of Information Technology in Public Organisations. Arthatama, 4(1), 17-32.
• 5.Anis Chariri., (2008). The dynamics of financial reporting practice in an indonesian company: a reflection of javanese views on an ethical social relationship.
• 6.Asencio, H., (2016). Leadership, trust and organizational performance in the public sector. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, Special Issue 2016, Pp. 5-22, (SI), 5-22.
• 7.Brem, A., Nylund, P. A. and Schuster, G., (2016). Innovation and de facto standardization: The influence of dominant design on innovative performance, radical innovation, and process innovation. Technovation, 50-51, 79-88.
• 8.Brewer, G. A., Selden, S. C., (2000). Why elephants gallop: Assessing and predicting organizational performance in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
• 9.Fernandez, S., Cho, Y. J. and Perry, J. L., (2010). Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance. Medicina Del Lavoro, 101(6), 427-436.
• 10.Geertz, C., (1960). In the religion of Java. Animal Genetics (Vol. 39).
• 11.Ghozali, I., (2017). Model persamaan struktural. Konsep dan aplikasi dengan program AMOS 24. Update Bayesian SEM (7th ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
• 12.Hsieh, J. Y., Liou, K. T., (2018). Collaborative leadership and organizational performance: Assessing the structural relation in a public service agency. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(1), 83-109.
• 13.InnoSupportTransfer., (2007). Characteristics and types of innovation Innovation - Introduction, 1-21.
• 14.Keban, Y. T., (2003). Indikator kinerja pemerintah daerah: Pendekatan manajemen dan kebijakan. Yogyakarta: Fisipol: UGM.
• 15.Khan, F., Xuehe, Z., Atlas, F., Khan, K. U., Pitafi, A. and Saleem, M. U., (2017). Impact of absorptive capacity and dominant logic on innovation performance of public sector organizations in Hefei (Anhui Province), China. Management Science Letters, 7, 275-284.
• 16.Kreitner, R., Kinicki, A., (2007). Organizational determinants. In Organizational Behavior.
• 17.Lee, S. M., Hwang, T. and Choi, D., (2012). Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries. Management Decision, 50(1), 147-162.
• 18.Lin, H.-E., McDonough III, E. F., (2011). Investigating the role of leadership and organizational culture in fostering innovation ambidexterity. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 58(3), 497-509.
• 19.Lopes, R., Costa, D. A., Miguel, J. and Dias, Á., (2021). Exploring the cultural, managerial, and organizational implications on mergers and acquisitions outcomes, 54(1).
• 20.Mafini, C., (2015). Predicting organisational performance through innovation, quality and inter-organisational systems: A public sector perspective, 31(3), 939-952.
• 21.Mahsun, M., (2006). Pengukuran Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit BPFE.
• 22.Mikoláš, Z., Karpeta, J., (2015). Possibilities of managing local culture under the pressure of globalization trends at the beginning of the 21st century. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 3(1), 6.
• 23.Moghaddam, J. Y., Khorakian, A. and Maharati, Y., (2015). Organizational entrepreneurship and its impact on the performance of governmental organizations in the city of mashhad. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169(August 2014), 75-87.
• 24.Moussa, M., McMurray, A. and Muenjohn, N., (2018). A conceptual framework of the factors influencing innovation in public sector organizations. The Journal of Developing Areas, 52(3), 231-240.
• 25.Muldrow, T. W., Buckley, T. and Schay, B. W., (2002). Creating high-performance organizations in the public sector. Human Resource Management, 41(3), 341-354.
• 26.Mulgan, G., Albury, D., Halvorsen, T., Hauknes, J., Miles, I., Roste, R., … Albury, D., (2002). Innovation in the public sector : Differences between public and private innovation. PUBLIN.
• 27.Mulyono, Fransisca., (2008). Inovasi di sektor publik. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 5.2.
• 28.OECD., (2015). The Innovation Imperative in the Public Sector.
• 29.Oke, A. O., (2018). Activist leadership: A grounded theory study of leadership and effective public-sector performance in a young democracy. Andrews University.
• 30.Petrakis, P. E., (2013). Culture, growth and economic policy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41440-4
• 31.Sawner, T. E., (2000). An empirical investigation of the relationship between organizational culture and oganizational performance in a large public sector organization. The George Washington University.
• 32.Steers, R. M., (2003). Organization effectiveness, a behavioral view. Good Year Publishing Company.
• 33.Treven, S., Mulej, M., (2007). The systemic approach to the encouragement of innovativeness through employee diversity management. Kybernetes.
• 34.Verbeeten, F. H. M., Speklé, R. F., (2015). Management control, results-oriented culture and public sector performance: Empirical evidence on new public management. Organization Studies, 36(7), 953-978.
• 35.Wynen, J., Verhoest, K., Ongaro, E. and van Thiel, S. (2014). Innovation-oriented culture in the public sector: Do managerial autonomy and result control lead to innovation? Public Management Review, 16(1), 45-66.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).