Infrastructure investment projects in terms of conformity with domains of sustainable development — a comparative analysis of municipalities in the vicinity of Olsztyn city, in Warmia and Mazury region, Poland

• Autorzy: Kocur-Bera Katarzyna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15576/GLL/2019.2.87

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The concept of sustainable development has a number of definitions. In a general sense, it assumes interdependence and equivalence of three domains of reality: environment, society and economy. Harmonisation of the relationship between the society, the economy and the natural environment requires the development of new, more efficient and environmentally-friendly technologies, limiting the exploitation of natural resources, energy consumption, the elimination of environment-polluting forms of production, as well as a widespread change of the way of life and revision of the acceptable hierarchy of values. According to the valid principles, the investment trends in municipalities should be in line with the domains of sustainable development, thereby providing balance in all the three areas of investment: environmental, economic and social. The aim of the study is to conduct a comparative analysis of the investment projects carried out in the period of 2007–2013 in selected municipalities of the Warmia and Mazury Region for their compliance with the principles of sustainable development of rural areas. Investment projects co-financed from EU funds were examined. This has allowed us to highlight the spheres of investment, which drew particular attention within the period of time under study. The shifted focus of investment efforts also testifies to backwardness in the supported sphere.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

infrastructural investment project; sustainable development; EU funds; projekt inwestycji infrastrukturalnej; zrównoważony rozwój; fundusze unijne

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rolniczego w Krakowie
• Czasopismo: Geomatics, Landmanagement and Landscape
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: no. 2
• Strony: 87--95
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 16 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kocur-Bera Katarzyna

• Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie Wydział Geodezji, Inżynierii Przestrzennej i Budownictwa Instytut Geoinformacji i Kartografii 10-720 Olsztyn, ul. Prawocheńskiego 15

Bibliografia

• Bond R., Curran J., Kirkpatrick C., Lee N., Francis P. 2001. Integrated impact assessment for sustainable development: A case study approach. World Dev., 29(6), 1011–1024.
• Bossel H. 2001. Indicators for sustainable development: theory, method, applications. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Canada.
• Chaabane A., Ramudhin A., Paquet M. 2012. Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 135, 37–49.
• Cieślak I. 2018. Wieloaspektowa analiza konfliktów przestrzennych. Wyd. UWM, Olsztyn.
• Cole M.J., Bailey R.M., New M.G. 2014. Tracking Sustainable Development with a National Barometer for South Africa Using a Downscaled “Safe and Just Space” Framework. PNAS.
• Cornelissen A.M.G., Van Den Berg J., Koops W.J., Grossman M., Udo H.M.J. 2001. Assessment of the contribution of sustainability indicators to sustainable development: A novel approach using fuzzy set theory. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 86, 173–185.
• Ferng J. 2015. Nested open system: An important concept for applying ecological footprint analysis to sustainable development assessment. Ecol. Econ., 106, 105–111.
• Garcia-Alvarez M.T., Moreno B., Soares I. 2016. Analyzing the sustainable energy development in the EU-15 by an aggregated synethetic index. Ecol. Indic., 60, 996–1007.
• Golusin M., Muntilak Ivanovic O., Teodorovic N. 2011. The review of the achieved degree of sustainable development in South Eastern Europe – the use of linear regression method. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15(1), 766–772.
• Govindan K., Kaliyan M., Kannan D., Haq A.N. 2014. Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 147 (B), 555–568.
• GUS 2019. Statistics Poland (GUS). https://stat.gov.pl/ (accessed: 29.03.2019).
• Jayarman R., Colapinto C., La Tore D., Malik T. 2015. Multi-criteria model for sustainable development using goal programming applied to the United Arab Emirates. Energy Policy, 87, 447–454.
• Kocur-Bera K. 2018. A comparative analysis of local investment projects implemented in Poland after its accession to the European Union to promote the sustainable development of rural areas. Transylvanian Review, XXVI (30), 7939–7949.
• Shen L., Muduli K., Barve A. 2015. Developing a sustainable development framework in the context of mining industries: AHP Approach. Res. Policy, 46(1), 15–26.
• Stevens C. 2005. Measuring Sustainable Development. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD, Statistics Brief, 10, 1–8.
• Yang Sh., Mei X. 2017. A sustainable agricultural development assessment method and a case study in China based on Euclidean distance theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 551–557.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).