PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

GIS tools for landscape character assessment: case of Ziban region in Algeria

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Landscape is an area formed by the interactions between humans and nature, which bring various characteristics to the area. Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) methods enable more accurate description, mapping, and evaluation of features within the landscape. Also, landscape characterization and classification is facilitated by the advances of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which constitute a very efficient tool for analysis and overlay mapping. This paper explores and tests an application of Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) methodology at a regional scale in Ziban region, Algeria, combining natural and cultural attributes using GIS. The first stage of overlay of attributes is followed by the verification of draft map involving a visual assessment on-site in order to develop the final classification and assessment describing each landscape character area and type. The study results show that Ziban region has a rich structure with diversified landscapes created by unique natural and cultural landscape values composed of 36 different character areas and 19-character types. The main contribution of this research consists in developing a typology for Ziban landscape and providing useful results for decision-making related to the future management of landscape character in the Algerian context, which has undergone strong pressure related to urbanization, industry, transport, desertification, and tourism.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
19--29
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 21 poz., rys.
Twórcy
autor
  • University of Biskra Department of Architecture, Laboratory Lacomofa, Algeria
  • University of Biskra Department of Architecture, Laboratory Lacomofa, Algeria
Bibliografia
  • André J., Derk-Jan S., Jeroen C.J.G., Walter A.H.R. 2009. Landscape character assessment using region-growing techniques in geographical information systems. J. Environ. Manag., 90, S161–S174.
  • Cary’s S. 2002. Landscape Character Assessment. Guidance for England and Scotland. Countryside Agency, Cheltenham/Scottish National Heritage, Edinburgh.
  • Christine T. 2014. An Approach to Landscape Character Assessment. Natural England, Worcester, UK.
  • Dirk M.W. 2005. European landscape character areas: typologies, cartography, and indicators for the assessment of sustainable landscapes. Final ELCAI Project Report, Landscape Europe
  • Heritage Council. 2006. Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) in Ireland: Baseline Audit and Evaluation. Final Report to the Heritage Council. Heritage Council, Kilkenny, Ireland.
  • Ioannis V., Louis F. C., 2007. Coastal Landscapes of Tunisia with special focus on Cap Bon: A Proposed Landscape Character Assessment. UNEP PAP/RAC.
  • Keun-Ho K., Stephan P. 2007. Landscape Character, Biodiversity and Land Use Planning: The Case of Kwangju City Region, South Korea. Land Use Policy, 4, 264–274.
  • Lars B. 2009. Classifying landscape character. Landscape Research, 34(3), 299–321.
  • Meryem A., Rabia I., Veli O., Emrah Y. 2015. Definition of landscape character areas and types in Side region, Antalya-Turkey with regard to land use planning. Land Use Policy, 44, 90– 100.
  • Meryem A., Rabia I., Veli O. 2016. Clusters of landscape characters as a way of communication in characterisation: A study from side, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Management, 182, 385‒396.
  • Meryem A., Rabia I., Veli O., Emrah Y. 2017. Exploring a combination of objective and subjective assessment in landscape classification: Side case from Turkey. Applied Geography, 83, 130–140.
  • Nick S., Ioannis V., Geoffrey G., Steven W., Vasso V., Maria Z., Vassilis T. 2013. Geospatial tools for Landscape Character Assessment in Cyprus. Proceedings of SPIE. The International Society for Optical Engineering.
  • Nilgun G., Cengiz A., Abdul-Aziz G., Mustafa D., Fevzi K. 2015. Coastal land degradation and character assessment of Southern Black Sea landscape. Ocean & Coastal Management, 118, 282‒289.
  • Osman U., Figen D., Gulay Ç., Fusun E., Sebahat A. 2011. National and Regional Landscape Classification and Mapping of Turkey: Konya Closed Basin, Sula Lake and its Surrounding Area. International Journal of the Physical Sciences (IJPS), 6(3), 550‒565.
  • Paul A.L., Michael F.G., David J.M., David W.R. 2005. Geographic Information Systems and Science (2nd ed.). Wiley, Chichester.
  • Planning Department. 2008. Landscape Value Mapping of Hong Kong – Technical Report 2. Technical Report by the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.pland.gov.hk
  • Sam T. 2005. Devon Historic Landscape Characterisation. Devon County Council Historic Environment Service/English Heritage, Exeter.
  • Stefan S., Geoffrey J.H. 2009. Free and open-source geographic information tools for landscape ecology. Ecol. Inf., 4 (4), 183‒195.
  • Steven W., Geoffrey G., Ioannis V. 2008. Cyprus landscape mapping project. Final Report. Landscape Mapping Group, University of Reading, 31.
  • Trond S., Rune H., Lars E. 2018. Methods for landscape characterization and mapping: A systematic review. Land Use Policy, 75, 557–569.
  • Yu H., Liu X., Kong B., Li R., Wang G. 2019. Landscape ecology development supported by geospatial technologies: A review. Ecological Informatics, 51, 185‒192.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-14c58060-9e08-4cb2-a378-202410436c66
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.