PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

On the Non-Symmetric Nash and Kalai–Smorodinsky Bargaining Solutions

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Konferencja
10th Spain-Italy-Netherlands Meeting on Game Theory (SING10)
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
Recently, in some negotiation application areas, the usual assumption that negotiators are symmetric has been relaxed. In particular, weights have been introduced to the Nash Bargaining Solution to reflect the different powers of the players. Yet, we feel that operating with non-symmetric bargaining solutions and their implications is not well understood. We analyze the properties and optimization of the non-symmetric Nash Bargaining Solution and of a non-symmetric Kalai–Smorodinsky Bargaining Solution. We provide extensive comparative statics, then comment on the implications of the concepts in supply chain coordination contexts.
Rocznik
Strony
55--61
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 9 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • Tel Aviv University, Department of Industrial Engineering, Israel
Bibliografia
  • 1. Cachon, G.P., 2003. Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science.
  • 2. Dubra, J., 2001. An Asymmetric Kalai-Smorodinsky Solution. Economics Letters, 73, pp. 131–136.
  • 3. Eppen, G.D., 1979. Effects of Centralization on Expected Costs in a Multi-Location Newboy Problem. Management Science, 25(5), pp. 498–501.
  • 4. Hanany, E., Gerchak, Y., 2008. Nash Bargaining Over Allocations in Inventory Pooling Contracts. Naval Research Logistics, 55, pp. 541–550.
  • 5. Kalai, E., 1977. Non-symmetric Nash Solutions and Replications of a Person Bargaining. International Journal of Game Theory, 6, pp. 129–133.
  • 6. Kalai, E., Smorodinsky, M., 1975. Other Solutions to Nash’s Bargaining Problem. Econometrica, 43, pp. 513–518.
  • 7. Mantin, B., Krishnan, H., Dhar, T., 2014. The Strategic Role of Third Party Marketplace in Retailing. Production and Operations Management, 23, 1937–1949.
  • 8. Nagarajan, M., Sosic, G., 2008. Game Theoretic Analysis of Cooperation Supply Chain Agents: Review and Extensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 187, pp. 719–745.
  • 9. Wu, D., Baron O., Berman, O., 2009. Bargaining in Competitive Supply Chain with Uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, pp. 548–558.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-146c0a60-dbd3-40e1-ba25-c779ba9fa59d
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.