Shared mobility as a form of overcoming social barriers in access to transport services and social exclusion

• Autorzy: Turoń Katarzyna , Sierpiński Grzegorz

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21008/j.2083-4950.2019.9.3.2

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Currently, in urban areas, there are a lot of services related to the new mobility concept. The development of such services brings many benefits, from supplementing the transport of fer of a given city to environmental and economic aspects. However, it is worth remembering that these services are dedicated to the society and it is the target group of recipients of all the adwantages of shared mobility. Due to this, the authors proposed the possibility of considering shared mobility services as a solution supporting the overcoming of barriers in access to transport services and a preventive measure of social exclusion. The work includes aspects of improving transport accessibility, possibilities of adjusting services to the needs of the society, safety of services and reduction of the phenomenon of social exclusion. The work is support for the popularization of shared mobility services and public education.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

shared mobility; transport exclusion; access to transport; sustainable transport solutions; transport services popularization; car-sharing

• Wydawca: Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Research in Logistics & Production
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 9, No. 3
• Strony: 177--186
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 38 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Turoń Katarzyna

• Department of Automotive Vehicle Construction, Faculty of Transport, Silesian University of Technology, Katowice, 40-019, Poland

autor

Sierpiński Grzegorz

• Department of Transport Systems and Traffic Engineering, Faculty of Transport, Silesian University of Technology, Katowice, 40-019, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Berg Insight, (2018), Car-sharing telematics market, availableat: http://www.berg-insight.com/reportPDF/Summary/bi-carsharing2-sum.pdf (accessed 13 May 2019).
• 2. Blumenberg E., Moga S. & Ong P. M., (1998), Getting Welfare Recipients to Work, University of California Transportation Center Report 389, available at: http://soc-rates.berkeley.edu/~uctc (accessed 13 May 2019).
• 3. Clark J. & Curl A., (2016), Bicycle and Car Share Schemes as Inclusive Modes of Travel? A Socio-Spatial Analysis in Glasgow, UK. Social Inclusion, Vol. 4(3), pp. 83–99.
• 4. Communication From The Commission To The European Parliament, The Council, The European Economic And Social 356, (2016), A European agenda for the colla-borative economy, European Commission, Belgium, Brussels.
• 5. DeMaio P., (2009), Bike-sharing: History, Impacts, Models of Provision, and Future, Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 41–56.
• 6. Doherty M., J., Sparrow F.T., Sinha K.C., (1987), Public use of autos: Mobility Enterprise Project, Journal of Transportation Engineering, no 113, pp. 84–97.
• 7. Felson M. & Spaeth J., (1978), Community Structure and Collaborative Consumption: Aroutine activity approach, American Behavioral Scientist, nr 21, pp. 614–624.
• 8. Frenken K. & Schor J., (2017), Putting the sharing economy into perspective, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, no.23, pp.3–10.
• 9. Graphical Research Portal, (2019), European car-sharing market, avialable at: https://www.graphicalresearch.com/industry-insights/1003/europe-car-sharing-market (accessed 13 May 2019).
• 10. Hamari J., Sjöklint M. & Ukkonen A., (2016), The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption, “Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology”, nr 67(9), pp. 2047–2059.
• 11. Hine J., (2008), Transport and social justice, R.D. Knowles, J. Shaw, I. Docherty (eds.), Transport geographies mobilities, flows and spaces. Oxford, John-Wiley/Blackwells.
• 12. Jaroš V., (2017), Social and transport exclusion, Geographia Polonica 2017, Vol. 90(3), pp. 247–263.
• 13. Johansson P., (1987), The Economic Theory and Measurement of Environmental Benefits, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
• 14. Kenyon S., Lyons G. & Rafferty J., (2002), Transport and social exclusion: Investigating the possibility of promoting inclusion through virtual mobility. Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 207–209.
• 15. Mackett R. & Thoreau R., (2015), Transport, social exclusion and health. Journal of Transport and Health, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 610–617.
• 16. Mattioli G., (2014), Where sustainable transport and social exclusion meet: households without cars and car dependence in Great Britain. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 379–400.
• 17. Midgley, P., (2011), Bicycle Sharing Schemes. Enhancing Sustainable Mobility in Urban Areas, Commission on Sustainable Development Nine teenth Session New York, United Nations Department of Economic And Social Affairs, Background Paper No. 8 CSD19/2011/BP8, New York.
• 18. Mindur L., Turoń K. & Sierpiński G., (2018), Car-Sharing Development – Current State and Perspective, Logistics and Transport No 3(39), pp. 5–14.
• 19. Mrugalska B. & Wyrwicka M., (2017), Towards lean production in industry 4.0, Procedia Engineering No 1. Iss.1, pp. 466–473.
• 20. Münzel K., Boon W., Frenken K. & Vaskelainen T., (2017), Carsharing business models in Germany: characteristics, success and future prospects, Information Systems and e-Business Management, No 2, pp. 1–21.
• 21. National Association of City Transportation Officials Portal, 2018, Shared Micromobility in the U.S.: Report 2018, available at: https://nacto.org/wp-content/upload-s/2019/04/NACTO_Shared-Micromobility-in-2018_Web.pdf (accessed 15 May 2019).
• 22. Okraszewska R., Nosal K. & Sierpiński G., (2014), The role of the Polish universities in shaping a new mobility culture – assumptions, conditions, experience. Case study of Gdansk University of Technology, Cracow University of Technology and Silesian University of Technology., L. Gomez Chova, A. Lopez Martinez, I. Candel Torres (Eds.), 7th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. ICERI2014, Conference proceedings., IATED Academy, Valencia, pp. 2971–2979.
• 23. Pawłowska B., (2013), Zrównoważony rozwój transportu na tle współczesnych procesów społeczno–gospodarczych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk.
• 24. Perboli G., Ferrero F., Musso S. & Vesco A., (2018), Business models and tariff simulation in car-sharing services, Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol.115, pp. 32–48.
• 25. Preston J. & Rajé F., (2007), Accessibility, mobility and transport-related social exclusion. Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 151–160.
• 26. Turoń K., Sierpiński G. & Staniek M., (2018), Methodology for communicating electric mobility at various levels of education, L. Gomez Chova, A. Lopez Martinez, I. Candel Torres (Eds.), 11th Annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. ICERI 2018, Conference proceedings., IATED Academy, Valencia, pp.10402–10408.
• 27. Schreier H., Grimm C. & Kurz U., (2017) Schwieger B., Keßler S., Möser G., Analyse Der Auswirkungen Des Car-Sharing In Bremen. Berlin Institute Team Red.
• 28. Shaheen S. & Cohen A.P. (200&), Growth in Worldwide Carsharing an International Comparison, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1992, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 81–89.
• 29. Sierpiński G., (2010), Miary Dostępności Transportowej Miast i Regionów, Scientific Journal Silesian University of Technology. Series Transport vol 66., pp.91–96.
• 30. Spiekermann K., Neubauer J., (2002), European Accessibility and Peripherality: Concepts, Models and Indicators. Nordregio, Stockholm.
• 31. Statista Portal, (2019)., Numbers of car-sharing users around the world, avialable at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/415636/car-sharing-number-of-users-worldwide/ (accessed 13 May 2019).
• 32. Stewart A.F. & Zergas P.Ch., (2016), CoAXs: A Collaborative Accessibility-based Stakeholder Engagement System for Communicating Transport Impacts. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol: 59, November 2016, pp. 423–433.
• 33. Szczepański M., (2013), Bezpieczeństwo dzięki zrównoważeniu” – wstępna ocena proponowanych zmian, Reformowanie systemów emerytalnych–porównania i oceny. Ed. M. Szczepański (Ed.), Publishing House of Poznań University of Technology, Poznań, pp. 145–175.
• 34. Szmelter A., (2018), Mobility-as-a-service – a challenge for it in the age of sharing economy. Information Systemsin Management, Vol: 7, No. 7, pp. 59–71.
• 35. Szołtysek J. & Twaróg S., (2018), Meeting Places in the Urban Strategy to Build a Happy City: A Mixed Research Approach, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Urban and Civil Engineering Vol. 12, No. 6,pp.40–44.
• 36. Turoń K., (2018), Car-sharing problems – multi-criteria overview, O. Cokorilo (Ed.), International Conference on Traffic and Transport Engineering. ICTTE, City Net Scientific Research Center, Belgrade, pp. 916–922.
• 37. Ziobrowska J., (2017)., Sharing economy jako nowy trend konsumencki, Własność wprawie i gospodarce, E-Wydawnictwo. Prawnicza i Ekonomiczna Biblioteka Cyfrowa. Wydział Prawa, Administracji i Ekonomii Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego pp.261–269.
• 38. Żak J., (2004), Identification of the most important road transportation decision problems, Archives of Transport, No 16, iss.2, pp. 89–109.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).