PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Stress analysis of total hip arthroplasty with a fully hydroxyapatite-coated stem: comparing thermoelastic stress analysis and CT-based finite element analysis

Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution in a synthetic femur that was implanted with a fully hydroxyapatite- coated stem using thermoelastic stress and finite element analyses, and to clarify the differences in the stress distributions between these two methods. Methods: Thermoelastic stress analysis is a stress-analysis technique that employs the thermoelastic effect. Sinusoidal vertical loads were applied to the head of the stem placed on the synthetic femur, and surface stress distribution images were acquired using an infrared stress measurement system. The finite element model for the synthetic femur and stem were set up similarly to the thermoelastic stress analysis experiment, and vertical load was applied to the head of the stem. Surface stress distribution and stress values obtained via these two methods were compared. Results: Thermoelastic stress analysis showed that compressive and tensile stresses were distributed from the proximal femur to the diaphysis, not only on the medial and lateral surfaces, but also on the anterior and posterior surfaces. However, finite element analysis showed that compressive stress was not distributed on the anterior and posterior surfaces of the femoral intertrochanter. The stress values of thermoelastic stress analysis tended to be higher in the proximal femur than that obtained via the finite element analysis. Conclusions: The surface stress distribution obtained by these two methods were different specifically in the proximal femur. Our results imply that thermoelastic stress analysis has a better potential than finite element analysis to show the surface stress distribution that reflects the stem design.
Rocznik
Strony
47--54
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 31 poz., rys., wykr.
Twórcy
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
autor
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
autor
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
autor
  • Environment and Safety Division, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST).
Bibliografia
  • [1] AAMODT A., LUND-LARSEN J., EINE J., ANDERSEN E., BENUM P., HUSBY O.S., Changes in proximal femoral strain after insertion of uncemented standard and customised femoral stems, An experimental study in human femora, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2001, 83, 921–929.
  • [2] ASSAF A., MANARA J.R., TEOH K.H., EVANS A.R., Mid-term clinical results of the cementless R3 cup and Polarstem total hip arthroplasty, Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol., 2019, 29, 827–833.
  • [3] BIEGER R., IGNATIUS A., DECKING R., CLAES L., REICHEL H., DURSELEN L., Primary stability and strain distribution of cementless hip stems as a function of implant design, Clin. Biomech., (Bristol, Avon), 2012, 27, 158–164.
  • [4] BOUGHERARA H., SALEEM M., SHAH S., TOUBAL L., SARWAR A., SCHEMITSCH E.H., ZDERO R., Stress analysis of a carbon fiberreinforced epoxy plate with a hole undergoing tension: A comparison of finite element analysis, strain gages, and infrared thermography, J. Compos. Mater., 2018, 52 (19), 2679–2689.
  • [5] CANNELLA F., GARINEI A., D’IMPERIO M., ROSSI G., A novel method for the design prostheses based on thermoelastic stress analysis and finite element analysis, J. Mech. Med. Biol., 2014, 14 (5), 1450064.
  • [6] CYPRES A., FIQUET A., GIRARDIN P., FITCH D., BAUCHU P., BONNARD O., NOYER D., ROY C., Long-term outcomes of a dualmobility cup and cementless triple-taper femoral stem combination in total hip replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis, J. Orthop. Surg. Res., 2019, 14, 376.
  • [7] ELISABETTA M.Z., ALBERTO L.A., Differential thermography for experimental, full-field stress analysis of hip arthroplasty, J. Mech. Med. Biol., 2010, 10 (3), 515–529.
  • [8] ELISABETTA M.Z., CRISTINA B., ALBERTO L.A., Human pelvis loading rig for static and dynamic stress analysis, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2012, 14 (2), 61–66.
  • [9] ENGH C.A., BOBYN J.D., GLASSMAN A.H., Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding and clinical results, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 1987, 69, 45–55.
  • [10] FLOERKEMEIER T., WELTIN J., BUDDE S., HURSCHLER C., WINDHAGEN H., Von LEWINSKI G., GRONEWOLD J., A short stem with metaphyseal anchorage reveals a more physiological strain pattern compared to a standard stem : an experimental study in cadavaric bone, Acta Bioeng. Biomech., 2019, 21 (2), 153–159.
  • [11] HEINER A.D., Structural properties of fourth-generation composite femurs and tibias, J. Biomech., 2008, 41, 3282–3284.
  • [12] HEINER A.D., BROWN T.D., Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias, J. Biomech., 2001, 34, 773–781.
  • [13] HERRERA A., PANISELLO J.J., IBARZ E., CEGONINO J., PUERTOLAS J.A., GRACIA L., Long-term study of bone remodelling after femoral stem: a comparison between dexa and finite element simulation, J. Biomech., 2007, 40, 3615–3625.
  • [14] HERRERA A., REBOLLO S., IBARZ E., MATEO J., GABARRE S., GRACIA L., Mid-term study of bone remodeling after femoral cemented stem implantation: comparison between DXA and finite element simulation, J. Arthroplasty, 2014, 29, 90–100.
  • [15] HUISKES R., WEINANS H., DALSTRA M., Adaptive bone remodeling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty, Orthopedics, 1989, 12, 1255–1267.
  • [16] HYODO K., INOMOTO M., MA W., MIYAKAWA S., TATEISHI T., Thermoelastic femoral stress imaging for experimental evaluation of hip prosthesis design, JSME Int. J. Ser. C. Mech. Sys., Machine Elements and Manuf, 2001, 44, 1065–1071.
  • [17] KEYAK J.H., ROSSI S.A., JONES K.A., SKINNER H.B., Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling, J. Biomech., 1998, 31, 125–133.
  • [18] KIM Y.H., KIM J.S., CHO S.H., Strain distribution in the proximal human femur. An in vitro comparison in the intact femur and after insertion of reference and experimental femoral stems, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2001, 83, 295–301.
  • [19] MCNAMARA B.P., CRISTOFOLINI L., TONI A., TAYLOR D., Relationship between bone-prosthesis bonding and load transfer in total hip reconstruction, J. Biomech., 1997, 30, 621–630.
  • [20] NISHINO T., MISHIMA H., KAWAMURA H., SHIMIZU Y., MIYAKAWA S., OCHIAI N., Follow-up results of 10–12 years after total hip arthroplasty using cementless tapered stem – frequency of severe stress shielding with synergy stem in Japanese patients, J. Arthroplasty, 2013, 28, 1736–1740.
  • [21] OBA M., INABA Y., KOBAYASHI N., IKE H., TEZUKA T., SAITO T., Effect of femoral canal shape on mechanical stress distribution and adaptive bone remodelling around a cementless tapered-wedge stem, Bone Joint Res., 2016, 5, 362–369.
  • [22] OKAZAKI Y., ISHII D., OGAWA A., Spatial stress distribution analysis by thermoelastic stress measurement and evaluation of effect of stress concentration on durability of various orthopedic implant devices, Mater. Sci. Eng. C., 2017, 75, 34–42.
  • [23] OTANI T., WHITESIDE L.A., WHITE S.E., The effect of axial and torsional loading on strain distribution in the proximal femur as related to cementless total hip arthroplasty, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1993, 292, 376–383.
  • [24] PIVEC R., JOHNSON A.J., MEARS S.C., MONT M.A., Hip arthroplasty, The Lancet, 2012, 380, 1768–1777.
  • [25] Registry, A.O.A.N.J.R. Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2020 annual report. Adelaide: AOA 2020. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2020.
  • [26] SPEIRS A.D., HELLER M.O., TAYLOR W.R., DUDA G.N., PERKA C., Influence of changes in stem positioning on femo ral loading after THR using a short-stemmed hip implant, Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon), 2007, 22, 431–439.
  • [27] TAKEHASHI H., NISHINO T., MISHIMA H., WADA H., YAMAZAKI M., HYODO K., Stress distribution of cementless stems with unique flanges in a rectangular cross-section: thermoelastic stress imaging study, J. Rural Med., 2021, 16, 83–90.
  • [28] The National Joint Registry 17th Annual Report 2020. London: National Joint Registry 2020, https://www.njrcenter.org.uk
  • [29] THOMSON W., On the Dynamical Theory of Heat, with numerical results deduced from Mr Joule’s Equivalent of a Thermal Unit, and M. Regnault’s Observations on Steam, Trans. R. Soc. Edinburgh, 1853, 20, 261–288.
  • [30] VIDALAIN J.P., Twenty-year results of the cementless Corail stem, Int. Orthop., 2011, 35, 189–194.
  • [31] WILLBURGER R.E., HEUKAMP M., LINDENLAUB P., EFE T., PETERLEIN C.D., SCHUTTLER K.F., Excellent midterm survival and functional outcomes of a fully hydroxyapatite-coated cementless stem: first results of a prospective multicenter study, Arthroplast Today, 2020, 6, 201–205.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-14443414-0188-41c2-a80f-88eda6ea9662
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.