Distribution of parameters of elliptic approximation of the human pupil

• Autorzy: Szmigiel M. A. , Kasprzak H

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.5277/oa150104

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper describes the results of measurements of the shape of the human eye pupil with the use of a high-speed CCD camera. Sequences of 2000 frames were recorded within 10 s. The examination was performed on a group of patients. For each patient, the age and intraocular pressure were identified. The form of the pupil was approximated by an ellipse and parameters of area, eccentricity, lengths of semi axes and orientation angle were calculated. Correlations between pairs of averaged parameters for all measurements were analyzed. Distribution of averaged geometrical parameters of the pupil was examined for all measured pupils. Significant correlation was found between the age and the pupil area S. The average eccentricity ε of the pupil was 0.285 ± 0.083. There were no statistical differences between pupil eccentricities of both eyes. The average value of orientation angle α of the longer semi-axis a of the ellipse to horizon was 83.3°. Also the difference of orientation angle α for the left eye (85.2°) and the right eye (93.2°) was statistically insignificant.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

pupil of the eye; pupil parameters; pupil approximation

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej
• Czasopismo: Optica Applicata
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 45, nr 1
• Strony: 41--50
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 23 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Szmigiel M. A.

• Department of Optics and Photonics, Faculty of Fundamental Problems of Technology, Wrocław University of Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland

autor

Kasprzak H

• Department of Optics and Photonics, Faculty of Fundamental Problems of Technology, Wrocław University of Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] WILDES R.P., Iris recognition: an emerging biometric technology, Proceedings of the IEEE 85(9), 1997, pp. 1348–1363.
• [2] SZCZĘSNA D.H., KASPRZAK H.T., The modeling of the influence of a corneal geometry on the pupil image of the human eye, Optik – International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 117(7), 2006, pp. 341–347.
• [3] BOUMA H., BAGHUIS L.C.J., Hippus of the pupil: Periods of slow oscillations of unknown origin, Vision Research 11(11), 1971, pp. 1345–1351.
• [4] BREBBIA C.A., EGLITE M., KNETS I., MIFTAHOF R., POPOV V., [EDS.], Environmental Health and Biomedicine, WIT Press, Great Britan, 2011.
• [5] WINN B., WHITAKER D., ELLIOTT D.B., PHILLIPS N.J., Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 35(3), 1994, pp. 1132–1137.
• [6] BITSIOS P., PRETTYMAN R., SZABATI E., Changes in autonomic function with age: a study of pupillary kinetics in healthy young and old people, Age Ageing 25(6), 1996, pp. 432–438.
• [7] MERRITT S.L., SCHNYDERS H.C., PATEL M., BASNER R.C., O’NEILL W., Pupil staging and EEG measurement of sleepiness, International Journal of Psychophysiology 52(1), 2004, pp. 97–112.
• [8] BARVAIS L., ENGELMAN E., EBA J.M., COUSSAERT E., CANTRAINE F., KENNY G.N., Effect site concentrations of remifentanil and pupil response to noxious stimulation, British Journal of Anaesthesia 91(3), 2003, pp. 347–352.
• [9] CHAPMAN C.R., OKA S., BRADSHAW D.H., JACOBSON R.C., DONALDSON G.W., Phasic pupil dilation response to noxious stimulation in normal volunteers: relationship to brain evoked potentials and pain report, Psychophysiology 36(1), 1999, pp. 44–52.
• [10] FLIEGERT F., KURTH B., GÖHLER K., The effects of tramadol on static and dynamic pupillometry in healthy subjects – the relationship between pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and CYP2D6 metaboliser status, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 61(4), 2005, pp. 257–266.
• [11] KNAGGS R.D., CRIGHTON I.M., COBBY T.F., FLETCHER A.J., HOBBS G.J., The pupillary effects of intravenous morphine, codeine, and tramadol in volunteers, Anesthesia and Analgesia 99(1), 2004, pp. 108–112.
• [12] OSMAN E.A., AL-SALEH A.A., Immediate changes in pupil size following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK): pupillometry study, Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology 24(4), 2010, pp. 139–141.
• [13] HELGESEN A., HJORTDAL J., EHLERS N., Pupil size and night vision disturbances after LASIK for myopia, Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica 82(4), 2004, pp. 454–460.
• [14] NOWAK W., HACHOŁ A., KASPRZAK H., Time-frequency analysis of spontaneous fluctuation of the pupil size of the human eye, Optica Applicata 38(2), 2008, pp. 469–480.
• [15] MEEKER M., DU R., BACCHETTI P., PRIVITERA C.M., LARSON M.D., HOLLAND M.C., MANLEY G., Pupil examination: validity and clinical utility of an automated pupillometer, Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 37(1), 2005, pp. 34–40.
• [16] OLSON E.J., BOEVE B.F., SILBER M.H., Rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder: demographic, clinical and laboratory findings in 93 cases, Brain 123(2), 2000, pp. 331–339.
• [17] IRANZO A., MOLINUEVO J.L., SANTAMARIA J., SERRADELL M., MARTI M.J., VALLDEORIOLA F., TOLOSA E., Rapid-eye-movement sleep behaviour disorder as an early marker for a neurodegenerative disorder: a descriptive study, The Lancet Neurology 5(7), 2006, pp. 572–577.
• [18] DE SANTIS A., IACOVIELLO D., Optimal segmentation of pupillometric images for estimating pupil shape parameters, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 84(2–3), 2006, pp. 174–187.
• [19] CALCAGNINI G., LINO S., CENSI F., CALCAGNINI G., CERUTTI S., Cardiovascular autonomic rhythms in spontaneous pupil fluctuations, Computers in Cardiology 24, 1997, pp. 133–136.
• [20] WYATT, H.J., The form of the human pupil, Vision Research 35(14), 1995, pp. 2021–2036.
• [21] SUNG-SUB SONG, JONG-SOO CHOI, JIN-TAE KIM, Pupil extraction and tracking for interactive optical see-through HMD, Procedia Engineering 29, 2012, pp. 3530–3536.
• [22] ROIG A.B., MORALES M., ESPINOSA J., PEREZ J., MAS D., ILLUECA C., Pupil detection and tracking for analysis of fixational eye micromovements, Optik – International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 123(1), 2012, pp. 11–15.
• [23] SZMIGIEL M.A., KASPRZAK H., Numerical analysis of variability of the eye pupil geometry based on the fast video recording, Proceedings of SPIE 8697, 2012, article 86970P.