The human imprint on the unique geological landscape of the Western Caucasus

• Autorzy: Mikhailenko Anna V. , Ruban Dmitry A. , Zorina Svetlana O. , Nikashin Konstantin I. , Yashalova Natalia N.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/logos-2020-0022

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Human intervention in the geological environment is commonly thought to pose a threat to geoheritage. However, new information from the Western Caucasus where unique geological features are concentrated in Mountainous Adygeya, implies that man-made features in fact add value to geoheritage. Such features include a lengthy artificial niche in the Guama Gorge, accumulations of large artificial clasts along the road leading to the Lagonaki Highland and the Khadzhokh Quarry with the artificial Red Lake. These contribute to the regional uniqueness of geosites and can be classified as geomorphological, sedimentary, economical and hydro(geo)logical geoheritage types. Interestingly, these artificial features have natural analogues in the study area. Such integrity of local geological landscapes urgently require special interpretations for guided excursions and explanatory panels for correct comprehension of the origin of these unique features on the part of unprepared tourists. Generally, the human imprint on geological landscapes of Mountainous Adygeya is significant and occasionally positive, which makes the entire geodiversity hotspot of special, international interest and an object for further investigations.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

artificial landform; geotourism; megaclasts; quarry lake; southwest Russia

PL

sztuczne ukształtowanie terenu; geoturystyka; megaklasty; jezioro; kamieniołom; południowo-zachodnia Rosja

• Wydawca: Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza. Instytut Geologii
• Czasopismo: Geologos
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 26, No. 3
• Strony: 233--244
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 57 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Mikhailenko Anna V.

• Institute of Earth Sciences, Southern Federal University, Zorge Street 40, Rostov-on-Don 344090, Russia

autor

Ruban Dmitry A.

• K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (The First Cossack University), Zemlyanoy Val Street 73, Moscow 109004, Russia
• Department of Hospitality Business, Higher School of Business, Southern Federal University, 23-ja Linija Street 43, Rostov-on-Don 344019, Russia (postal address: P.O. Box 7333, Rostov-on-Don 344056, Russia)

autor

Zorina Svetlana O.

• Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya Street 18, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan 420008, Russia

autor

Nikashin Konstantin I.

• Institute of Geology and Petroleum Technologies, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya Street 18, Kazan, Republic of Tatarstan 420008, Russia

autor

Yashalova Natalia N.

• Department of Economics and Management, Business School, Cherepovets State University, Sovetskiy Avenue 10, Cherepovets, Vologda Region 162600, Russia

Bibliografia

• Adamia, S., Alania, V., Chabukiani, A., Kutelia, Z. & Sadradze, N., 2011a. Great Caucasus (Cavcasioni): A Long-lived North-Tethyan Back-Arc Basin. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 20, 611–628.
• Adamia, S., Zakariadze, G., Chkhotua, T., Sadradze, N., Tsereteli, N., Chabukiani, A. & Gventsadze, A., 2011b. Geology of the Caucasus: A review. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences 20, 489–544.
• Began, M., Višnic, T., Djokic, M. & Vasiljevic, D.A., 2017. Interpretation Possibilities of Geoheritage in Southeastern Serbia—Gorge and Canyon Study. Geoheritage 9, 237–249.
• Bétard, F. & Peulvast, J.-P., 2019. Geodiversity Hotspots: Concept, Method and Cartographic Application for Geoconservation Purposes at a Regional Scale. Environmental Management 63, 822–834.
• Bétard, F., Peulvast, J.-P., Magalhães, A.O., Carvalho Neta, M.L. & de Freitas, F.I., 2018. Araripe Basin: A Major Geodiversity Hotspot in Brazil. Geoheritage 10, 543–558.
• Blair, T.C. & McPherson, J.G., 1999. Grain-size and textural classification of coarse sedimentary particles. Journal of Sedimentary Research 69, 6–19.
• Blott, S.J. & Pye, K., 2012. Particle size scales and classification of sediment types based on particle size distributions: Review and recommended procedures. Sedimentology 59, 2071–2096.
• Bruno, B.C. & Wallace, A., 2019. Interpretive Panels for Geoheritage Sites: Guidelines for Design and Evaluation. Geoheritage 11, 1315–1323.
• Bruno, D.E. & Ruban, D.A., 2017. Something more than boulders: A geological comment on the nomenclature of megaclasts on extraterrestrial bodies. Planetary and Space Science 135, 37–42.
• Cooper, A.H., Brown, T.J., Price, S.J., Ford, J.R. & Waters, C.N., 2018. Humans are the most significant global geomorphological driving force of the 21st century. Anthropocene Review 5, 222–229.
• Crutzen, P.J. & Stoermer, E.F., 2000. The “Anthropocene”. Global Change Newsletter 41, 17.
• Forte, A.M., Cowgill, E. & Whipple, K.X., 2014. Transition from a singly vergent to doubly vergent wedge in a young orogen: The Greater Caucasus. Tectonics 33, 2077–2101.
• Gordon, J.E., 2018. Geoheritage, Geotourism and the Cultural Landscape: Enhancing the Visitor Experience and Promoting Geoconservation. Geosciences 8, 136.
• Gray, M., 2008. Geodiversity: developing the paradigm. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 119, 287–298.
• Habibi, T., Ponedelnik, A.A., Yashalova, N.N. & Ruban, D.A., 2018. Urban geoheritage complexity: Evidence of a unique natural resource from Shiraz city in Iran. Resources Policy 59, 85–94.
• Hooke, R.LeB., 2000. On the history of humans as geomorphic agents. Geology 28, 843–846.
• Ismail-Zadeh, A., Adamia, S., Chabukiani, A., Chelidze, T., Cloetingh, S., Floyd, M., Gorshkov, A., Gvishiani, A., Ismail-Zadeh, T., Kaban, M.K., Kadirov, F., Karapetyan, J., Kangarli, T., Kiria, J., Koulakov, I., Mosar, J., Mumladze, T., Müller, B., Sadradze, N., Safarov, R., Schilling, F. & Soloviev, A., 2020. Geodynamics, seismicity, and seismic hazards of the Caucasus. Earth-Science Reviews 207, 103222.
• Kaban, M.K., Petrunin, A.G., El Khrepy, S. & Al-Arifi, N., 2018. Diverse Continental Subduction Scenarios Along the Arabia-Eurasia Collision Zone. Geophysical Research Letters 45, 6898–6906.
• Kirillova, K., Fu, X., Lehto, X. & Cai, L., 2014. What makes a destination beautiful? Dimensions of tourist aesthetic judgment. Tourism Management 42, 282–293.
• Kiseleva, S.V., Korinevich, L.A. & Lebedev, S.A., 2017. Assessment of the renewable energy potential in the Republic of Adygeya. Ecologica Montenegrina 14, 143–151.
• Koulakov, I., Zabelina, I., Amanatashvili, I. & Meskhia, V., 2012. Nature of orogenesis and volcanism in the Caucasus region based on results of regional tomography. Solid Earth 3, 327–337.
• Kubalikova, L., Kirchner, K., Kuda, F. & Machar, I., 2019. The role of anthropogenic landforms in sustainable landscape management. Sustainability 11, 4331.
• Lóczy, D., 2010. Anthropogenic geomorphology in environmental management. In: Szabó, J., Dávid, L. & Lóczy, D. (Eds): Anthropogenic Geomorphology: A Guide to Man-Made Landforms. Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 25–38.
• Lozovoj, S.P., 1984. Lagonakskoe nagor’e (Lagonaki Highland). Krasnodar (Krasnodarskoe Knizhnoe Izdatel’stvo), 160 pp. (in Russian)
• Manríquez, H., Mansilla, P., Figueroa-Sterquel, R. & Moreira-Muñoz, A., 2019. Geodiversity meets Biodiversity: A landscape approach for biogeocultural conservation and governance in Mediterranean central Chile. Eco.mont 11, 43–48.
• Martin, S., 2014. Interactive visual media for geomorphological heritage interpretation. Theoretical approach and examples. Geoheritage 6, 149–157.
• Migoń, P. & Pijet-Migoń, E., 2017. Interpreting geoheritage at New Zealand’s geothermal tourist sites – Systematic explanation versus storytelling. Geoheritage 9, 83–95.
• Migoń, P., Duszyński, F., Jancewicz, K. & Różycka, M., 2019. From Plateau to Plain – using space-for-time substitution in geoheritage interpretation, Elbsandsteingebirge, Germany. Geoheritage 11, 839–853.
• Modrej, D., Fajmut Štrucl, S. & Hartmann, G., 2018. Results of the geointerpretation research in the frame of the Danube GeoTour project. Geologija 61, 101–110.
• Moreira, J.C., 2012. Interpretative panels about the geological heritage – a case study at the Iguassu Falls National Park (Brazil). Geoheritage 4, 127–137.
• Newsome, D., Dowling, R. & Leung, Y.-F., 2012. The nature and management of geotourism: A case study of two established iconic geotourism destinations. Tourism Management Perspectives 2–3, 19–27.
• Petersen, J.F., 2002. The role of roadcuts, quarries, and other artificial exposures in geomorphology education. Geomorphology 47, 289–300.
• Prosser, C.D., 2019. Communities, quarries and geoheritage – making the connections. Geoheritage 11, 1277–1289.
• Reynard, E., 2008. Scientific research and tourist promotion of geomorphological heritage. Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quaternaria 31, 225–230.
• Reynard, E. & Brilha, J. (Eds), 2018. Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 482 pp.
• Rostovtsev, K.O., Agaev, V.B., Azarian, N.R., Babaev, R.G., Besnosov, N.V., Hassanov, N.A., Zesashvili, V.I., Lomize, M.G., Paitschadze, T.A., Panov, D.I., Prosorovskaya, E.L., Sakharov, A.S., Thodria, V.A., Topchishvili, M.V., Abdulkasumzade, M.R., Avanesian, A.S., Belenkova, V.S., Bendukidze, N.S., Vuks, V.Ya., Doludenko, M.P., Kiritchkova, A.I., Klikushin, V.G., Krimholz, G.Ya., Romanovskaya, G.M. & Schevchenko, T.V., 1992. Yura Kavkaza (Jurassic of the Caucasus). Nauka, St. Petersburg, 192 pp. (in Russian)
• Ruban, D.A., 2010a. Quantification of geodiversity and its loss. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 121, 326–333.
• Ruban, D.A., 2010b. The Permian/Triassic mass extinction among brachiopods in the Northern Caucasus (northern Palaeo-Tethys): A tentative assessment. Geobios 43, 355–363.
• Ruban, D.A., 2013. The Greater Caucasus – A Galatian or Hanseatic terrane? Comment on “The formation of Pangea” by G.M. Stampfli, C. Hochard, C. Vérard, C. Wilhem and J. von Raumer [Tectonophysics 593 (2013) 1–19]. Tectonophysics 608, 1442–1444.
• Ruban, D.A., 2020. Geological heritage of the Anthropocene Epoch – a conceptual viewpoint. Heritage 3, 19–28.
• Ruban, D.A., Ponedelnik, A.A. & Yashalova, N.N., 2019. Megaclasts: term, use and relevant biases. Geosciences 9, 14.
• Sharkov, E., Lebedev, V., Chugaev, A., Zabarinskaya, L., Rodnikov, A., Sergeeva, N. & Safonova, I., 2015. The Caucasian-Arabian segment of the Alpine-Himalayan collisional belt: Geology, volcanism and neotectonics. Geoscience Frontiers 6, 513–522.
• Stepišnik, U. & Repe, B., 2015. Identification of geodiversity hotspots on example of the Rakov Škocjan landscape park. Dela 44, 45–62.
• Stepišnik, U. & Trenchovska, A., 2018. A new quantitative model for comprehensive geodiversity evaluation: the Škocjan Caves Regional Park, Slovenia. Geoheritage 10, 39–48.
• Subramanian, M., 2019. Humans versus Earth: the quest to define the Anthropocene. Nature 572, 168–170.
• Taha, M.M.N., Al-Hashim, M.H. & El-Asmar, H.M., 2020. Geoarcheomorphosites under strong urbanization pressure at the Tineh Plain, NE of the Nile Delta, Egypt. Geoheritage 12, 24.
• Terry, J.P. & Goff, J., 2014. Megaclasts: proposed revised nomenclature at the coarse end of the Udden-Wentworth gain-size scale for sedimentary particles. Journal of Sedimentary Research 84, 192–197.
• Van Hinsbergen, D.J.J., Torsvik, T.H., Schmid, S.M., Matenco, L.C., Maffione, M., Vissers, R.L.M., Gürer, D. & Spakman, W., 2020. Orogenic architecture of the Mediterranean region and kinematic reconstruction of its tectonic evolution since the Triassic. Gondwana Research 81, 79–229.
• Varshanina, T.P. & Matusov, D.V., 2006. Bioclimatic regionalization of Adygeya. Izvestiya Akademii Nauk, Seriya Geograficheskaya 4, 115–121.
• Vasey, D., Cowgill, E., Roeske, S.M., Niemi, N.A., Godoladze, T., Skhirtladze, I. & Gogoladze, S., 2020. Evolution of the Greater Caucasus basement and formation of the Main Caucasus Thrust, Georgia. Tectonics 39, e2019TC005828.
• Veress, M., Telbisz, T., Toth, G., Loczy, D., Ruban, D.A. & Gutak, J.M., 2019. Glaciokarsts. Springer, Cham, 516 pp.
• Vorob’ev, I.E., 2014. Poisk iskopaemykh na Severo-Zapadnom Kavkaze. Krasnodarskij kraj i Respublika Adygeja (Fossil search on the North-Western Caucasus. Krasnodar Region and Republic of Adygeya). KO RosGeo, Krasnodar, 300 pp.
• Wilkinson, B.H., 2005. Humans as geologic agents: A deep-time perspective. Geology 33, 161–164.
• Williams, M.A., McHenry, M.Y. & Boothroyd, A., 2020. Geoconservation and geotourism: Challenges and unifying themes. Geoheritage 12, 63.
• You, Y., Tian, M., Yang, Y. & Gao, L., 2014. Construction of geoparks’ interpretation system based on geoheritage protection. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment 189, 863–870.
• Zalasiewicz, J., Waters, C.N. & Williams, M., 2014. Human bioturbation, and the subterranean landscape of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene 6, 3–9.
• Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Smith, A., Barry, T.L., Coe, A.L., Bown, P.R., Brenchley, P., Cantrill, D., Gale, A., Gibbard, P., Gregory, F.J., Hounslow, M.W., Kerr, A.C., Pearson, P., Knox, R., Powell, J., Waters, C., Marshall, J., Oates, M., Rawson, P. & Stone, P., 2008. Are We Living in the Anthropocene? GSA Today 18, 4–8.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).