Expert studies on the impact of risk on the life cycle costs of buildings

• Autorzy: Wieczorek Damian , Zima Krzysztof , Plebankiewicz Edyta

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/ace.2023.147650

Warianty tytułu

PL

Ocena ekspercka wpływu ryzyka na koszty cyklu życia budynku

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The main goal of the studies was to collect information on the impact of the identified risk factors on the amount of costs incurred in the life cycle of buildings. The own studies were focused especially on residential and non-residential buildings. The studies consisted in obtaining expert opinions on the subject of the research involves in the non-random (arbitrary) selection of a sample of respondents from among specialists corresponding to the industry purpose of the studies and the research material. The research used the expert questionnaire method. The studies were divided into three stages. In the first stage, the identification and division of risk factors in the life cycle of buildings was performed. Then, experts assessed 45 selected risk factors that may affect the amount of costs incurred in the life cycle of buildings. In the last step, the research results were developed in the form of a checklist knowledge base, containing information about the potential impact of the identified risk factors in the life cycle of buildings on the amount of the corresponding components of life cycle costs.

PL

Celem głównym artykułu było zebranie informacji na temat wpływu zidentyfikowanych czynników ryzyka na wielkość kosztów ponoszonych w cyklu życia budynków w oparciu o wyniki badań własnych, które zostały przeprowadzone przez autorów w latach 2017-2020 na terenie Polski. Badania zostały ukierunkowane na budynki mieszkalne i niemieszkalne oraz przeznaczone do wielu celów (np. gdy w budynku mieszkalnym ma być wydzielona jednocześnie powierzchnia biurowa lub pod usługi). Badania miały charakter próby celowej, która w badaniach związanych m.in. z pozyskaniem opinii eksperckich na temat przedmiotu badań polega na nielosowym (arbitralnym) doborze próby respondentów spośród specjalistów związanych branżowo z celem badań i materiałem badawczym.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

life cycle; life cycle cost; risk; risk identification; risk quantification; risk management

PL

cykl życia; identyfikacja ryzyka; kwantyfikacja ryzyka; koszt cyklu życia; ryzyko; zarządzanie ryzykiem

• Wydawca: Komitet Inżynierii Lądowej i Wodnej PAN ; Politechnika Warszawska, Wydział Inżynierii Lądowej
• Czasopismo: Archives of Civil Engineering
• Rocznik: 2023
• Tom: Vol. 69, nr 4
• Strony: 105--123
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 32 poz., il., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Wieczorek Damian

• Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3191-2438

autor

Zima Krzysztof

• University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5563-5482

autor

Plebankiewicz Edyta

• Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0892-5027

Bibliografia

• [1] G. Shevchenko, L. Ustinovichius, and A. Andruškevičius, “Multi-attribute analysis of investments risk alternatives in construction”, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 428-443, 2008, doi: 10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.428-443.
• [2] E. Plebankiewicz, A. Leśniak, E. Vitkova, and V. Hromadka, “Models for estimating costs of public buildings maintaining - review and assessment”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 335-351, 2022, doi: 10.24425/ace.2022.140171.
• [3] J. Konior and M. Szóstak, “Methodology of planning the course of the cumulative cost curve in construction projects”, Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 6, art. no. 2347, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12062347.
• [4] J. Konior and M. Szóstak, “Course of planned, actual and earned cost curves of diverse construction investments”, International Journal of Construction Management, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 865-876, 2023, doi: 10.1080/ 15623599.2021.1942769.
• [5] F.H. Knight, Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 2012.
• [6] J. Kulejewski, Metody harmonogramowania budowy z uwzględnieniem rozmytego charakteru danych. Prace Naukowe Politechniki Warszawskiej. Budownictwo, vol. 153. Warszawa, 2010.
• [7] D. Skorupka, “Metoda identyfikacji i kompleksowej oceny ryzyka realizacji przedsięwzięć budowlanych”, in Metody i modele badań w inżynierii przedsięwzięc budowlanych, O. Kapliński, Ed. Warszawa: PAN KILiW, IPPT, 2007, pp. 185-204.
• [8] D. Baloi and A.D. Price, “Modelling global risk factors affecting construction cost performance”, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 261-269, 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(02)00017-0.
• [9] N.A. Kartam and S.A. Kartam, “Risk and its management in the Kuwaiti construction industry: a contractors’ perspective”, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 325-335, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00014-4.
• [10] ISO 15686-5:2017 Buildings and constructed assets - Service life planning - Part 5: Life-cycle costing.
• [11] D. Skorupka, “Zarządzanie ryzykiem w przedsięwzięciach budowlanych”, Zeszyty Naukowe Wyższej Szkoły Oficerskiej Wojsk Lądowych Tadeusza Kościuszko, no. 3, pp. 120-129, 2008.
• [12] A. Nieto-Morote and F. Ruz-Vila, “A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment”, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 220-231, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.02.002.
• [13] W. Zhang, Y. Bai, and Y. Huang, “Risk management for build-transfer plus land usage fee reimbursement delivery method in China”, in Construction Research Congress 2014: Construction in a Global Network, 19-21 May 2014, Atlanta, USA. ASCE, 2014, doi: 10.1061/9780784413517.191.
• [14] A. Leśniak and F. Janowiec, “Risk assessment of additional works in railway construction investments using the Bayes network”, Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 19, art. no. 5388, 2019, doi: 10.3390/su11195388.
• [15] D. Baccarini and R. Archer, “The risk ranking of projects: a methodology”, International Journal of Project Management, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 139-145, 2001.
• [16] D. Wieczorek, “Fuzzy risk assessment in the life cycle of building object - selection of the right defuzzification method”, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1978, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5043866.
• [17] E. Plebankiewicz and D. Wieczorek, “Multidimensional sensitivity study of the fuzzy risk assessment module in the life cycle of building objects”, Open Engineering, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 490-499, 2018, doi: 10.1515/eng-2018-0059.
• [18] K. Jamroz, S. Grulkowski, K. Birr, Ł. Jeliński, and M. Budzyński, “Risk assessment for tram traffic on tramway bridges”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 39-58, 2021, doi: 10.24425/ace.2021. 138485.
• [19] J. Konior, “Enterprise’s risk assessment of complex construction projects”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 63-74, 2015, doi: 10.1515/ace-2015-0025.
• [20] E. Plebankiewicz, K. Zima, and D. Wieczorek, “Modelling of time, cost and risk of construction with using fuzzy logic”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 412-426, 2021, doi: 10.3846/jcem.2021.15255.
• [21] J.Konior, “Significance risks evaluation of commercial construction projects”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 19-33, 2019, doi: 10.2478/ace-2019-0016.
• [22] J.Konior, “Mitigation of correlated risk in construction projects”, Civil Engineering and Architecture, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 17-22, 2019, doi: 10.13189/cea.2019.070103.
• [23] H. Anysz, J. Rosłon, and A. Foremny, “7-score function for assessing the strength of association rules applied for construction risk quantifying”, Applied Science, vol. 12, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12020844.
• [24] N. Ibadov, J. Kulejewski, and M. Krzemiński, “Fuzzy ordering of the factors affecting the implementation of construction projects in Poland”, AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1558, pp. 1298-1301, 2013, doi: 10.1063/1.4825749.
• [25] N. Ibadov, “Determination of the risk factors impact on the construction projects implementation using fuzzy sets theory”, Acta Physica Polonica A, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 107-111, 2016.
• [26] N.Q. Toan, N.T. Thuy, D.T. Hai, and P.X. Anh, “Comparing the risk management standpoint between the project participants for the urban road transport projects in Hanoi”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 275-295, 2022, doi: 10.24425/ace.2022.140642.
• [27] K. Kaczorek, M. Krzemiński, and N. Ibadov, “The problem of choosing risk management methodology at the example of railway construction”, MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 117, 2017, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201711700073.
• [28] E. Plebankiewicz, K. Zima, and D. Wieczorek, “Life cycle cost modelling of buildings with consideration of the risk”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 149-166, 2016, doi: 10.1515/ace-2015-0071.
• [29] N. Ibadov, “Selection of construction project taking into account technological and organizational risk”, Acta Physica Polonica A, vol. 132, pp. 974-977, 2017.
• [30] P. Jaśkowski, S. Biruk, and M. Krzemiński, “Planning repetitive construction processes to improve robustness of schedules in risk environment”, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 643-657, 2020, doi: 10.24425/ ace.2020.134418.
• [31] M. Kowacka, D. Skorupka, A. Duchaczek, A. Waniewska, and D. Dudziak-Gajowiak, “Allocation of risk factors for geodetic tasks in construction schedules”, Open Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 956-962, 2021, doi: 10.1515/ eng-2021-0083.
• [32] Regulation of the Council of Ministers of December 30, 1999 on the Polish Classification of Building Objects (PCBO).

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2024).