Metrological Aspects of Surface Topographies Produced by Different Machining Operations Regarding Their Potential Functionality

• Autorzy: Żak K. , Grzesik W.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/mms-2017-0027

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper presents a comprehensive methodology for measuring and characterizing the surface topographies on machined steel parts produced by precision machining operations. The performed case studies concern a wide spectrum of topographic features of surfaces with different geometrical structures but the same values of the arithmetic mean height Sa. The tested machining operations included hard turning operations performed with CBN tools, grinding operations with Al2O3 ceramic and CBN wheels and superfinish using ceramic stones. As a result, several characteristic surface textures with the Sa roughness parameter value of about 0.2 μm were thoroughly characterized and compared regarding their potential functional capabilities. Apart from the standard 2D and 3D roughness parameters, the fractal, motif and frequency parameters were taken in the consideration.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

surface metrology; surface topography; surface roughness; areal parameters; machining operations

• Wydawca: Komitet Metrologii i Aparatury Naukowej PAN
• Czasopismo: Metrology and Measurement Systems
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 24, nr 2
• Strony: 325--335
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 15 poz., rys., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Żak K.

• Opole University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Mikołajczyka 5, 45-271 Opole, Poland

autor

Grzesik W.

• Opole University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Mikołajczyka 5, 45-271 Opole, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Jiang, X.Jm, Whitehouse, D.J. (2012). Technological shifts in surface metrology. CIRP Annals-Manuf. Technol., 61(2), 815-836.
• [2] Leach, R. (ed.) (2013). Characterization of areal surface texture. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
• [3] Grzesik, W. (2008). Advanced machining processes of metallic materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
• [4] Klocke, F. (2011). Manufacturing processes 1. Cutting, Berlin, Springer.
• [5] König, W., Berktold, A., Koch, K.F. (1993). Turning versus grinding- a comparison of surface integrity aspects and attainable accuracies. CIRP Annals-Manuf. Technol., 42(1), 39-43.
• [6] Davim, J.P. (ed.) (2011). Machining of hard materials. London, Springer.
• [7] Klocke, F., Brinksmeier, E., Weinert, K. (2005). Capability profile of hard cutting and grinding processes. CIRP Annals-Manuf. Technol., 54(2), 557−580.
• [8] Grzesik, W., (2016). Prediction of the functional performance of machined components based on surface topography: a survey. J. Mater. Eng. Perf., 25(10), 4460-4468.
• [9] Waikar, R.A., Guo, Y.B. (2008). A comprehensive characterization of 3D surface topography induced by hard turning versus grinding. J. Mat. Proc. Technol., 197, 189-199.
• [10] Grzesik, W., Rech, J., Wanat, T. (2007). Surface finish on hardened bearing steel parts produced by superhard and abrasive tools. Int. J. Mach. Tools and Manuf., 47, 255-262.
• [11] ISO 25178, part 2 (2012), Geometrical product specification (GPS) - surface texture: areal. Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters, ISO.
• [12] Digital Surf, Mountains® Map software, www. digitalsurf.com.
• [13] Griffiths, B. (2001). Manufacturing surface technology. Surface integrity and functional performance. London, Penton Press.
• [14] Dietzsch, M., Papenfuss, K., Hartman, T. (1998). The MOTIF-method (ISO 12085)- a suitable description for functional, manufactural and metrological requirements. Int. J. Mach. Tools and Manuf., 38, 625-632.
• [15] Thomas, T.R., (1999). Rough Surfaces. London, Imperial College Press.

Uwagi

PL

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017).