Process of finding defects in software testing

• Autorzy: Rana Arti , Rawa Arvind Singh , Bijalwan Anchit

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.15439/2017R18

• Konferencja: The Second International Conference on Research in Intelligent and Computing in Engineering
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Software testing is the most significant stage of the Software Development Life Cycle. Projects underneath testing goes through different stages such as test analysis, test planning, test case, test case review process, test execution process, requirement traceability matrix (RTM), defect tracking (bug logging and tracking), test execution report and closure. In terms of software, defects means whenever expected results not meet actual results. Generally defect is known as a bug. It talks about the complete life cycle of a bug right from the stage it was found, fixed, re-test, and close.This paper basically deals with entire process of bug life cycle and how to avoid the bug. To avoid the bug, Test Engineer should prepare the bug report template which consists of various steps.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

defects; software testing; bugs; request for enhancement

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Informatyczne
• Czasopismo: Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 10
• Strony: 297--300
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 9 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Rana Arti

• Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering Uttaranchal University Dehradun, India

autor

Rawa Arvind Singh

• Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering Uttaranchal University Dehradun, India

autor

Bijalwan Anchit

• Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering Uttaranchal University Dehradun, India

Bibliografia

• 1. Itti Hooda, et al. “Software Test Process, Testing Types and Techniques”, International Journal of Computer Applications (0975 - 8887) February 2015, Volume 111 - No 13.
• 2. Maneela Tuteja, Gaurav Dubey, et al. “A Research Study on importance of Testing and Quality Assurance in Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Models”, International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE) ISSN: 2231-2307, July 2012 ,Volume-2, Issue-3.
• 3. Mohd. Ehmer Khan, et al. “Different forms of software testing techniques for finding errors”, IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science, May 2010, Vol. 7, Issue 3, No. 1.
• 4. Aranda, J., & Venolia, G., et al. “The Secret Life of Bugs: Going Past the Error and Omissions in Software Repositories”, 31st IEEE International Conference on software Engineering (ICSE), 2009, pp298-308.
• 5. Qin, F., Tucek, J., & Zhou, Y., et al. “Treating Bugs As Allergies: A Safe Method for Surviving Software Failures”, Proceedings of the 10th conference on Hot Topics in Operating Systems(HOTOS), 2005, Vol. 10, pp.19-19.
• 6. Breu, S., Premraj, R., Sillito, J., & Zimmermann, T., et al. “Information needs in bug reports: improving cooperation between developers and users”, Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work(CSCW ), 2010, pp301-310.
• 7. Akhilesh, Babu, Kolluri.K, Tameezuddin.Kalpana, Guddikadula.,et al. “Effective Bug Tracking Systems.Theories and Implementation”, IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering ISSN:2278-0661, Oct 2012, Volume 4,Issue 6, pp 31-36.
• 8. Giovanni Denaro, Bernhard Scholz, Zhi Quan Zhou, et al. "Automated Software Testing and Analysis: Techniques, Practices and Tools", 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, vol. 00, no. , pp. 260, 2007, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.96.
• 9. Vishawjyoti and P. Gandhi, et al. "A survey on prospects of automated software test case generation methods," 2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, 2016, pp. 3867-3871.