Technical and economic analysis of the consequences of occupational injuries at machine-building enterprises

• Autorzy: Stupnytska Natalia

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/jok-2021-0001

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The article shows that effective organization of occupational health and Safety (OHS) at industrial enterprises have not only social, but also technical and economic consequences. Analysis of the dependences of the frequency and the severity coefficients of occupational injuries on the cost of OHS measures allowed to draw an important conclusion, that with insufficient funding for injuries protection, the level of injuries remains high enough, and with increasing OHS funds the level of injuries decreases significantly. However, there comes a situation, when further economic stimulation of injuries protection measures does not yield significant results. Definition of technical and economic criteria for assessing the production system from occupational safety indicators is proposed using the apparatus of the probability and queuing theories. An example of calculating the downtime of process equipment due to occupational injuries in the shop of mechanical engineering plant is considered.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

occupational health and safety; OHS; occupational injuries; queuing theory; industrial productivity; equipment dowtime

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Technicznego Wojsk Lotniczych
• Czasopismo: Journal of KONBiN
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 51, iss. 1
• Strony: 1--13
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Stupnytska Natalia

• Lviv Polytechnic National University (Uniwersytet Narodowy "Politechnika Lwowska")

Bibliografia

• 1. BS OHSAS 18001:2007. Occupational health and safety management systems. Requirements.
• 2. Carter S., MacDonald N.J., Denise C., Cheng B.: Basic Finance for Marketers. Food & Agriculture Org., Rome 1997.
• 3. Cohen D.R., Henderson J.B.: Health, prevention, and economics. Oxford University Press, Oxford 1988.
• 4. Declaration on occupational health for all. WHO, Beijing 1994 https://www.who.int/occupational_health/en/oehdeclaration94e.pdf.
• 5. Gross D., Shortle J., Thompson J., Harris C.: Fundamentals of Queueing Theory. John Wiley & Sons, New York 2011.
• 6. ISO/IEC 51:2014. Safety aspects. Guidelines for their inclusion in standards.
• 7. ISSA Annual Review 2018/19. https://ww1.issa.int/sites/default/files/documents/publications/2-ISSA_AR_2018-19_WEB-258951.pdf.
• 8. Klenke A.: Probability Theory: A Comprehensive Course. Springer, London 2014
• 9. Mock C.N., Nugent R., Kobusingye O., et al. (eds.): Injury Prevention and Environmental Health. 3rd edition. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank 2017.
• 10. Newell G.F.: Applications of Queueing Theory. Chapmen and Hall, London 2013.
• 11. Polinder S., Toet H., Panneman M., Beeck van E.: Methodological approaches for cost–effectiveness and cost–utility analysis of injury prevention measures. World Health Organization Report 2011.
• 12. Stupnytska N., Stupnytskyy V.: Optimization model for planning set of measures to prevent occupational injuries in machine-building enterprises. Journal of KONBiN, Vol. 50, Iss. 1, 2020, DOI 10.2478/jok-2020-0008.
• 13. Torén K, Sterner T.: How to promote prevention - economic incentives or legal regulations or both?: Work Environ Health, 29(3) 2003.
• 14. World Statistic 2018. International Labor Organization Report. https://www.ilo.org/moscow/areas-of-work/occupational-safety-andhealth/WCMS_249278/lang--en/index.htm

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).