Trust in academics teachers and immediate supervisors according to selected nationalities of the Generation Z

• Autorzy: Tomaszuk Anna

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.29119/1641-3466.2024.200.42

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Purpose: The purpose of this article was to identify differences in evaluations of factors affecting trust in academics and direct supervisors as perceive by Generation Z from Poland, Spain and Turkey. Design/methodology/approach: The presented analyzes constitute a part of a broader study on the trust that generation Z place in entities from various spheres of life. The article focuses on the academic teachers and supervisors. The research was carried out with the use of CAWI and PAPI methods on a sample of 656 respondents. Findings: The aspects most and least influential on trust in both academics and supervisors were identified, statistically significant differences in the perception of these aspects depending on nationality were analyzed, and a correlation between respondents' evaluations of individual factors of trust. Research limitations/implications: The research sample (lack of representativeness of the sample). Practical implications: The article indicates which trust constructs should paid attention supervisor especially in the aspect of working in multinational teams. Originality/value: The article indicates differences in the perception of trust constructs among young Poles, Spaniards and Turks. The article is addressed primarily to people managing multinational teams and academic teachers teaching students of various nationalities.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

trust; aspects of trust; generation Z; supervisor; academic teacher

PL

zaufanie; aspekty zaufania; pokolenie Z; przełożony; nauczyciel akademicki

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej
• Czasopismo: Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie / Politechnika Śląska
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: z. 200
• Strony: 565--577
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 41 poz.

Twórcy

autor

Tomaszuk Anna

• Bialystok University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2675-0323

Bibliografia

• 1. Blomqvist, K. (1997). The many faces of trust. Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 271-286, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(97)84644-1
• 2. Büssing, A. (2002). Trust and its relations to commitment and involvement in work and organisations. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 36-42, https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v28i4.77
• 3. Cattell, V. (2001). Poor people, poor places, and poor health: The mediating role of social networks and social capital. Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 52, No. 10, pp. 1501-1516, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00259-8
• 4. Caumont, A. (2014). What would you name today's youngest generation of Americans? https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/03/12/what-would-you-name-todaysyoungest-generation-of-americans/, 2.02.2024.
• 5. Czyczerska, K.M., Ławnik, A.J., Szlenk-Czyczerska, E. (2020). Współczesny rynek pracy w Polsce a generacja. Różnice między pokoleniami X, Y oraz Z. Rozprawy Społeczne, no. 14(3), pp.102-125, https://doi.org/10.29316/rs/125693
• 6. Dentsu Aegis Network (2019). Gen Z. Jak zrozumieć dziś pokolenie jutra. Wersja DEMO. Infuture Hatalska Foresight Institute, Onet-RAS Polska.
• 7. Edelmann (2021). 2021 Edelman trust barometer global report. https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2021-01/2021-edelman-trustbarometer.pdf, 9.02.2024.
• 8. Espina, A.G.B., Lopez, M.I.M., Pacana, A.D., Salas, V.L. (2017). Students' Attitude in Business Ethics. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 386-402.
• 9. Friman, M., Gärling, T., Millett, B., Mattsson, J., Johnston, R. (2002). An analysis of international business-to-business relationships based on the Commitment-Trust theory. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 403-409.
• 10. Fulmer, C.A., Ostroff, C. (2017). Trust in direct leaders and top leaders: A trickle-up model. Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 102, No. 4, pp. 648-657, https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000189
• 11. Gajda, J. (2017). Oczekiwania przedstawicieli pokolenia Z wobec pracy zawodowej i pracodawcy. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, no. 491, pp. 158-171, DOI: 10.15611/pn.2017.491.15
• 12. Jabłońska, R., Billewicz, K. (2016). Pokolenie przełomu w WEB 2.0. Acta Universitatis Lodzie, Folia Sociologica, no. 56, pp. 83-97, http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.56.06
• 13. Kharouf, H., Lund, D.J. (2019). An empirical examination of organisational trust recovery: Influences and implications. European Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 11151128, https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12309
• 14. Kobylińska, U. (2018). Kulturowe uwarunkowania jakości relacji we wsparciu przedsiębiorczości akademickiej. Studia Ekonomiczne. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, No. 376, pp. 63-79.
• 15. Ławińska, O., Korombel, A. (2023). Pokolenie Z jako wyzwanie współczesnego zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem. Relacje, media społecznościowe i crowdsourcing. Częstochowa: Politechnika Częstochowska.
• 16. Lipka, A. (2022). Employee experience. Zarządzanie kapitałem ludzkim w kategoriach rynku doznań. Warszawa: PWE.
• 17. Lu, S.C., Kong, D.T., Ferrin, D.L., Dirks, K.T. (2017). What are the determinants of interpersonal trust in dyadic negotiations? Meta-analytic evidence and implications for future research. Journal of Trust Research, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 22-50, https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1285241
• 18. Malhotra, N.K. (2010). Marketing research. An applied orientation. London: Pearson Higher Education.
• 19. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 709-734, https://doi.org/10.2307/258792.
• 20. McKnight, D.H., Chervany, N.L. (2001). Conceptualizing Trust: A typology and e-commerce customer relationships model. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, Hawaii 2001, https://www.academia.edu/ 26734496/Conceptualizing_trust_a_typology_and_e-commerce_customer_relationships_ model, 5.02.2024.
• 21. Mishra, A.K., Mishra, K.E. (1994) The role of the mutual trust in effective downsizing strategies. Human Resource Management, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 261-279, DOI:10.1002/hrm.3930330207
• 22. Nienaber, A.M., Hofeditz, M., Romeike, P.D. (2015). Vulnerability and trust in leaderfollower relationships. Personnel Review, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 567-591, DOI:10.1108/PR09-2013-0162
• 23. Oxford Economics 2021, Gen Z's Role in Shaping the Digital Economy, Economic Consulting Team Oxford Economics, doc_num.php (cereq.fr), 8.02.2024.
• 24. Pandit, V. (2015). We Are Generation Z: How Identity, Attitudes, and Perspectives Are Shaping Our Future. Dallas, Texas: BookBaby.
• 25. Romeike, P., Wohlers, C., Hertel, G., Schewe, G. (2016). New ways of working: Chances and challenges for trust-enhancing leadership. In: B. Blöbaum (Ed.), Trust and Communication in a Digitized World. Cham: Springer.
• 26. Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S.B., Burt, R.S., Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: a cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, pp. 393-404, DOI:10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
• 27. Różańska-Bińczyk, I. (2022). Oczekiwania przedstawicieli pokolenia Z (C) wobec firm co do prowadzenia przez nie działalności proekologicznej - wyniki badań własnych. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, No. 2(145), pp. 47-63, http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/ 01.3001.0015.8336
• 28. Searle, R., Den Hartog, D., Weibel, A., Gillespie, N., Six, F., Hatzakis, T., Skinner, D. (2011). Trust in the employer: The role of high-involvement work practices and procedural justice. International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 22, No. 5, DOI:10.1080/09585192.2011.556782, pp. 1069-1092
• 29. Six, F., Sorge, A. (2008). Creating a high-trust organization: An exploration into organizational policies that stimulate interpersonal trust building. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 45, No. 5, pp. 857-884, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00763.x
• 30. Sladek, S., Grabinger, A. (2014). Gen Z. The first Generation of the 21st Centaury Has arrived! XYZ University, https://www.xyzuniversity.com/gen-z-the-first-generation-ofthe-21st-century-has-arrived-download-paper/, 5.02.2024.
• 31. Stańczyk-Hugiet, E., Stańczyk, S. (2013). Kulturowy kontekst relacji międzyorganizacyjnych. Zeszyty Naukowe WSB w Poznaniu, no. 49(4), pp. 41-57.
• 32. Stillman, D., Stillman, J. (2017). Gen Z Work: How the Next Generation Is Transforming the Workplace. New York: HarperCollins.
• 33. Tschannen-Moran, M., Bankole, R.A., Mitchell, R.M., More, D.M. Jr (2013). Student Academic Optimism: a confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 150-175.
• 34. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, W.K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 70, No. 4, pp. 563-579, https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070004547
• 35. Twenge, J. (2024). Pokolenia. Prawdziwe różnice między pokoleniami Z, Y, Z, baby boomersami i cichym pokoleniem oraz co one oznaczają dla przyszłości zachodniego świata. Sopot: Smak Słowa.
• 36. Van der Berg, Y., Martins, N. (2013). The relationship between organisational trust and quality of work life. Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-13, DOI:10.4102/SAJHRM.V11I1.392
• 37. Wasiluk, A., Bańkowska, M. (2021). Przesłanki dotyczące wyboru miejsca pracy przez pracowników pokolenia X, Y i Z. Zeszyty Naukowe Polskiego Towarzystwa Ekonomicznego w Zielonej Górze, no. 8(14), pp. 138-159, DOI: 10.26366/PTE.ZG.2021.197
• 38. Wasiluk, A., Tomaszuk, A. (2020). Organizacja w sieci relacji. Białystok: Oficyna Wydawnicza PB.
• 39. Wasiluk, A., Tomaszuk, A. (2022). Trust in Superiors: The Opinion of Representatives of Generation Z. Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi, Vol. 149, Iss. 6, pp. 60-76, doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0016.2046
• 40. Wiktorowicz, J., Warwas, I., Kuba, M., Staszewska, E., Woszczyk, P., Stankiewicz, A., Kliombka-Jarzyna, J. (2016). Pokolenia - co się zmienia? Kompendium zarządzania multigeneracyjnego. Warszawa: Wolters kluwer.
• 41. Żarczyńska-Dobiesz, A., Chomątowska, B. (2016). Zarządzanie pracownikami z pokolenia paradoksów. Nauki o Zarządzaniu, no. 2(27).