Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Wykraczając poza podejście instrumentalne - analiza CSR z perspektywy filozoficznej
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
For most economists Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is seen as a tool-box containing useful instruments for enhancing the corporate profitability. By and large, the “business case for CSR” dominates the understanding of CSR especially among economists. However, from a philosophical perspective, such view seems to be quite questionable, since it is based on at least three myths: First of all, the assumption that morality always pays off is neither realistic nor in line with ethical demands. Secondly, the idea that CSR-success can be measured in a form of corporate social performance seems to be problematic. And last but not least, the idea that corporations can learn from best practice raises fundamental questions since it remains unclear what best practice means in the context of CSR.
Większość ekonomistów postrzega społeczną odpowiedzialność przedsiębiorstw (Corporate Social Responsibility - CSR) jako koncepcję dostarczającą użyteczne instrumenty do zwiększania rentowności firmy. Takie biznesowe i proefektywnościowe pojmowanie CSR dominuje szczególnie wśród ekonomistów. Jednak z perspektywy filozoficznej, takie poglądy mogą być podane w wątpliwość, ponieważ opierają się na co najmniej trzech mitach: po pierwsze, założenie, że moralność zawsze się opłaca nie jest ani realistyczne, ani zgodne z wymogami etycznymi; po drugie, wyobrażenie, że sukces CSR może być mierzony za pomocą wyników działalności społecznej przedsiębiorstwa jest bardzo problematyczne; po trzecie, pomysł, że korporacje mogą uczyć się na podstawie najlepszych praktyk, nasuwa fundamentalne wątpliwości, gdyż nie wiadomo co oznacza najlepsza praktyka w kontekście CSR.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
101--117
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 49 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- Technische Universität Dresden Internationales Hochschulinstitut Zittau
Bibliografia
- 1. Albareda L., Lozano J.M., Tamyko Y.: Public Policies on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Governments in Europe. ”Journal of Business Ethics”, 74(4), 2007.
- 2. Aquinas T.: Summa Theologiae (ed.): Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Ave Maria Press, Notre Dame, IN 1981.
- 3. Arendt H.: Organized Guilt and Universal Responsibility [in:] Arendt H.: Essays in Understanding 1930-1954. Harcourt, Brace & Co., New York 1994.
- 4. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics (ed.): Bartlett, R.C., Collins S.D., Chicago University Press, Chicago IL 2011.
- 5. Aßländer M.S.: Grundlagen der Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik. Metropolis Verlag, Marburg 2011.
- 6. Aßländer M.S.: Corporate Social Responsibility as Subsidiary Co-Responsibility. A Macroeconomic Perspective. “Journal of Business Ethics”, No. 99(1), 2011.
- 7. Aßländer M.S.: Honorableness or Beneficialness? - Cicero on Natural Law, Virtues, Glory and (Corporate) Reputation. “Journal of Business Ethics”, No. 116(4), 2013.
- 8. Aßländer M.S., Schenkel M.: Responsible Investment and Exclusion Criteria: A Case Study from a Catholic Private Bank, [in:] Vandekerckhove W. et al. (eds.): Responsible Investment in Times of Turmoil. Springer, Berlin 2011.
- 9. Aßländer M.S., Schenkel M.: SRI as Driver for CSR? Ethical Funds, Institutional Investors and the Pursuit of the Common Good, [in:] Bonanni C., Lépineux F., Roloff J. (eds.): Social Responsibility, Entrepreneurship and the Common Good. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills 2012.
- 10. Banerjee S.B.: Corporate Social Responsibility - The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham 2007.
- 11. Baumann-Pauly D., Scherer A.G.: The Organizational Implementation of Corporate Citizenship: An Assessment Tool and its Application at UN Global Compact Participants. “Journal of Business Ethics”, No. 117(1), 2013.
- 12. Bowen H.R.: Social Responsibilities of the Businessmen. University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, IA 2013.
- 13. Bowie N.E.: Business Ethics - A Kantian Perspective. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA 1999.
- 14. Bowie N.E., Werhane P.H.: Management Ethics. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA 2005.
- 15. Buchholtz A.K., Carroll A.B.: Business and Society. South-Western Publishing, Mason, OH 2009.
- 16. Carroll A.B.: A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. “Academy of Management Review”, No. 4(4), 1979.
- 17. Carroll A.B.: Social Responsibility, [in:] Werhane P.H., Freeman R.E. (ed.): Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA 1998.
- 18. Carroll A.B.: The four Faces of Corporate Citizenship. “Business and Society Review”, No. 100(1), 1998.
- 19. Carroll A.B.: Managing Ethically with Global Stakeholders: A Present and Future Challenge. “The Academy of Management Executive”, No. 18(2), 2004.
- 20. Clark M.: The Changing Basis of Economic Responsibility. “The Journal of Political Economy”, No. 24(3), 1916.
- 21. Crane A., McWilliams A., Matten D., Moon J., Siegel D.S.: The Corporate Social Responsibility Agenda, [in:] Crane A. et al. (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009.
- 22. Diamantopoulou A.: Foreword, [in:] Habisch A. et al. (ed.): Corporate Social Responsibility across Europe. Springer, Berlin 2005.
- 23. Elkington J.: Cannibals with Forks - The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Capstone, Oxford 1999.
- 24. Fombrun C.J.: Corporate Reputation as Economic Assets, [in:] Hitt M.A., Freeman R.E., Harrison J.S. (ed.): Handbook of Strategic Management. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford 2001.
- 25. Gardberg N.A., Fombrun C.J.: Corporate Citizenship: Creating Intangible Assets across Institutional Environments. “Academy of Management Review”, No. 31(2), 2006.
- 26. Habisch A., Jonker J. (ds.): Corporate social Responsibility across Europe. Springer, Berlin 2005.
- 27. Haufler V.: A Public Role for the Private Sector. Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington DC 2001.
- 28. Heald M.: The Social Responsibilities of Business. Case Western Reserve University Press, Cleveland OH 1970.
- 29. Heidbrink L.: Der Verantwortungsbegriff der Wirtschaftsethik, [in:] Aßländer M.S. (ed.): Handbuch Wirtschaftsethik J.B. Metzler Verlag, Stuttgart 2011.
- 30. Höffe O.: Moral als Preis der Moderne. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main 1993.
- 31. ISO: International Standard ISO 26.000: Guidance on Social Responsibility. ISO 26000:2010(E).
- 32. Jonas H.: The Imperative of Responsibility. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago IL 1985.
- 33. Kotler P., Lee N.: Corporate Social Responsibility - Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken NJ 2005.
- 34. Lai C.-S., Chiu C.-J., Yang C.-F., Pai D.-C.: The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Brand Performance: The Mediating Effect of Industrial Brand Equity and Corporate Reputation. “Journal of Business Ethics”, No. 95(3), 2010.
- 35. Leisinger K.M.: Corporate Philanthropy: “The Top of the Pyramid”. “Business and Society Review”, No. 112(3), 2007.
- 36. MacDonald C.: Puma’s Environmental Profit-and-Loss. Canadian Business Magazine, http://www.canadianbusiness.com/blogs-and-comment/pumas-environmental-profit-and - loss/ (2014-10-20).
- 37. Margolis J.D., Elfenbein H.A.: Do Well by Doing Good? Don’t Count on It. “Harvard Business Review”, No. 86(1), 2008.
- 38. Matten D., Moon J.: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding CSR, [in:] Habisch A. et al. (ed.): Corporate Social Responsibility across Europe. Springer, Berlin 2005.
- 39. Matten D., Moon J.: “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A Conceptual Framework for a Comparative Understanding of Corporate Social Responsibility. “Academy of Management Review”, No. 33(2), 2008. of Political Economy”, No. 24(3), 1916.
- 40. McGuire J.W.: Business and Society. McGraw-Hill Books, New York 1963.
- 41. Porter M.E., Kramer M.R.: The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. “Harvard Business Review”, Reprint R0212D, 2002.
- 42. Orlitzky M., Schmidt F.L., Rynes S.L.: Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. “Organizational Studies”, No. 23(3), 2003.
- 43. Scherer A., Palazzo G.: The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and its Implications for the Firm, Governance, and Democracy. “Journal of Management Studies”, No. 48(4), 2011.
- 44. Schreck P.: Zum „Business Case for CSR“ - Konzeptionelle Überlegungen vor dem Hintergrund empirischer Erkenntnisse, [in:] Aßländer, M. S., Löhr, A. (ed.): Corporate Social Responsibility in der Wirtschaftskrise, Rainer Hampp Verlag, München 2010.
- 45. Urip S.: CSR-Strategies - Corporate Social Responsibility for a Competitive Edge in Emerging Markets. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken NJ 2010.
- 46. Utting P.: Corporate Responsibility and the Movement of Business. “Development in Practice:, No. 15(3&4), 2005.
- 47. Walton C.C.: Corporate Social Responsibilities. Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont CA 1967.
- 48. Werther W.B., Chandler D.: Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility. Sage Publishing, Thousand Oaks CA 2006.
- 49. Young I.M.: Responsibility for Justice. Oxford University Press, New York 2011.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-1244001e-8ad8-43f0-8578-15e774429e4c