Partnership organizational mechanism in rural areas development : stakeholders analysis

• Autorzy: Atkočiūnienė V. , Štareikė E.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.37055/nsz/129451

Warianty tytułu

PL

Partnerski mechanizm organizacyjny w rozwoju obszarów wiejskich : analiza interesariuszy

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Process of rural areas development becoming more open and complex. Impact of stakeholders is getting more clear and transparent for decisions and acts which are done in rural areas. Success and effectiveness of development initiatives ensuring stakeholder’s goals that need to be linked with development purposes of rural organizations, which are implemented acting in partnership. Partnership organizational mechanism synchronizes actions and interactions of stakeholders and other elements of the mechanism, organizational changes and also combines interests of stakeholders and motivates them to engage and participate in rural development initiatives in order to solve existing problems. The purpose of this article – to define partnership organizational mechanism and determine stakeholders related with mechanism’s functioning. During the investigation the evolution of the mechanism concept was analyzed, that created preconditions for creation of concept of partnership organizational mechanism in rural areas development. The missions analysis of Lithuania’s 51 local action groups development strategies (2007–2013 year) allowed to identify stakeholders, that are related to partnership organizational mechanism functioning in rural areas development.

PL

Proces rozwoju obszarów wiejskich staje się bardziej otwarty i złożony. Wpływ zainteresowanych stron jest coraz wyraźniejszy i przejrzysty w przypadku decyzji i działań podejmowanych na obszarach wiejskich. Sukces i skuteczność inicjatyw rozwojowych zapewniających cele interesariuszy, które muszą być powiązane z celami rozwojowymi organizacji wiejskich, są realizowane w partnerstwie. Mechanizm organizacyjny partnerstwa synchronizuje działania i interakcje interesariuszy oraz innych elementów mechanizmu, zmiany organizacyjne, a także łączy interesy zainteresowanych stron i motywuje ich do angażowania się, jak również uczestnictwa w inicjatywach rozwoju obszarów wiejskich w celu rozwiązania istniejących problemów. Cel tego artykułu to zdefiniowanie mechanizmu organizacyjnego partnerstwa i określenie interesariuszy związanych z funkcjonowaniem tego mechanizmu. W trakcie badania przeanalizowano ewolucję koncepcji mechanizmu, która stworzyła wstępne warunki dla koncepcji partnerstwa mechanizmu organizacyjnego w rozwoju obszarów wiejskich. Analiza misji 51 strategii rozwoju lokalnych grup działania Litwy (lata 2007-201 ) pozwoliła zidentyfikować interesariuszy, którzy związani są z funkcjonowaniem mechanizmu organizacyjnego partnerstwa w rozwoju obszarów wiejskich.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

partnership; organization; mechanism; stakeholders

PL

partnerstwo; organizacja; mechanizm; interesariusze

• Wydawca: Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna im. Jarosława Dąbrowskiego
• Czasopismo: Nowoczesne Systemy Zarządzania
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: T. 12, nr 1
• Strony: 71--88
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 67 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Atkočiūnienė V.

• Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Faculty of Economics and Management, Business and Rural Development Management Institute

autor

Štareikė E.

• Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Faculty of Economics and Management, Business and Rural Development Management Institute

Bibliografia

• 1. ALIGICA P. D., 2006, Institutional and stakeholder mapping: frameworks for policy analysis and institutional change. Public organizational review, Vol. 6 (1).
• 2. ARIMAVIČIŪTĖ M., 2007, Savivaldos institucijų strateginės analizės metodiniai aspektai. Viešoji politika ir administravimas, Nr. 22, p. 9–17.
• 3. BEBBINGTON A., BATTERBURY S.P.J., 2001, Transnational livelihoods and landscapes: political ecologies of globalization. Ecumene 8, 369–80.
• 4. BECHTEL W., ABRAHAMSEN A., 2005, Explanation: A mechanist alternative. Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, Vol. 36.
• 5. BHASKAR R., 1978, A realist theory of science, 2nd ed. Harvester, Hassocks.
• 6. BOWER G. H., 1975, Cognitive Psychology: An Introduction. In: W. K. Estes (ed.). Handbook of Learning and cognitive process. New York: Wiley.
• 7. BUERET J., 2006, BIODIVERSITY and STAKEHOLDERS: CONCERTATION ITINERARIES, UNESCO.
• 8. COLEMAN J. S., 1994, Foundations of social theory, 1st ed. London: Harvard University Press.
• 9. CORK DECLARATION: A LIVING COUNTRYSIDE, 1996, Cork, Ireland, 7–9 November.
• 10. CORK DECLARATION: A BETTER LIFE IN RURAL AREAS, 2016, Cork, Ireland, 5-6 September.
• 11. DAVIS G. F., MCADAM D., SCOTT W. R., ZALD M. N. (eds.), 2005, Social Movements and Organization Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• 12. DALAL-CLAYTON B., BASS S., 2012, Sustainable development strategies – a resource book, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
• 13. DARKOH M.B.K., MBAIWA J.E., 2002, Globalization and the livestock industry in Botswana. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 23, 149–66.
• 14. DARŠKUVIENĖ V., BENDORAITENĖS E., 2013, The Stakeholder Concept Analysis. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai, Nr. 68.
• 15. ELSTER J., 1989, Nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
• 16. EPP R., WHITSON D., 2001, Writing off the rural West: globalization, governments and the transformation of rural communities. Edmonton: University of Alberta Press.
• 17. FREEMAN E. R., 2010, Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, 2rd ed. Cambridge University Press.
• 18. GLENNAN S., 2005, Modeling mechanisms. Studies in history and philosophy of science part C: studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, Vol. 36.2.
• 19. GRAY I., LAWRENCE G., 2001, A future for regional Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 20. HARRE R., 1985, The philosophies of science, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.
• 21. HÉDOIN C. (2013). Modeling Social Mechanisms: Mechanism-Based Explanations and Agent-Based Modeling in the Social Sciences. University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France.
• 22. HEDSTROM P., SWEDBERG R., 1998, Social Mechanisms. An analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
• 23. HERNES G., 1998, Real virtuality. In P. Hedström and R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• 24. HOOGHE L., MARKS G., 2001, Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
• 25. HURWICZ L., 1973, The Design of Mechanisms for Resource Allocation. American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 63.
• 26. HURWICZ L., STANLEY R., 2007, Designing Economic Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 27. JUŠČIUS V., 2009, Įmonių socialinė atsakomybė ir organizacijų tapatumas šiuolaikinės ekonominės krizės kontekste. Ekonomika ir vadyba, 2009 (14).
• 28. KILLICK T., 2001, Globalization and the rural poor. Development Policy Review 19.
• 29. KOOIMAN J., 2000, Societal governance: levels, modes, and orders of social political interaction, in Pierre J. (ed), Debating Governance. Authority, steering and democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• 30. KRONE K. J., JABLIN F. M., PUTNAM L. L., 1987, Communication theory and organizational communication: Multiple perspectives. Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective, Vol. 18.1.
• 31. LITTLE D., 1991, Varieties of social explanation: An introduction to the philosophy of social sciences. CO: Westview Press, Boulder.
• 32. LOWE P., N. WARD, 2007, Sustainable rural economies: some lessons from the English experience. p. 15, vol. 5.
• 33. LUKESCH R., 2007, The LAG handbook – a guide through the stunning word of local action groups, LEADER+.
• 34. LUNENBURG FRED C., 2012, Organizational Structure: Mintzberg’s Framework. International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity. Volume 14, Number 1.
• 35. MACHAMER P., DARDEN L., CRAVER C. F., 2000, Thinking about Mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, Vol. 67 (1).
• 36. MILKOWSKI M., 2011, Beyond Formal Structure: A Mechanistic Perspective on Computation and Implementation. Journal of Cognitive Science, Vol. 12.
• 37. NAUJOKAITIS S., 1990, Mechanizmų ir mašinų teorija. Vilnius: Mokslas.
• 38. OSBORNE S. P., 2006, The New Public Governance? Public Mangement Review, Vol. 8, Issue 3.
• 39. OSTROM, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of the social norms. Journal of economic perspectives, Vol. 14 (3).
• 40. OSTROM, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
• 41. PASQUIER M., VILLENEUVE J., P., 2007, Organizational barriers to transparency: a typology and analysis of organizational behavior tending to prevent or restrict access to information. International Review of Administrative Sciences, March 2007 (73).
• 42. PAJUNEN K., 2008, The Nature of Organizational Mechanisms. Organization Studies, Vol. 29 (11).
• 43. PÉREZ SÁINZ J.P., ANDRADE-EEKHOFF K.E, 2003, Communities in globalization: the invisible Mayan Nahual. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
• 44. POWELL, W., 1991, Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organisation. In Thompson G., Frances J., Levavcic R. and Mitchell J. (eds), Markets and Hierarchies and Networks: The Co-ordination of Social Life, London: Sage.
• 45. PIERRE J., 2000, Debating Governance. Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• 46. RAIPA A., 2012, Modernus viešasis valdymas. Kaunas: Vitae Litera.
• 47. RAIPA A., 2016, Šiuolaikinio viešojo administravimo pagrindai. Registrų Centras, Vilnius.
• 48. REED M., 2000, Organization, trust and control: A realist analysis. Organization Studies, Vol. 22.
• 49. REY-VALETTE H., LARDON S., CHIA E., 2008, Special issue on Governance: Institutional and Learning Plans facilitating the Appropriation of Sustainable Development. International Journal of Sustainable Development, vol. 11, n° 2-3-4.
• 50. RYBAKOVAS E., 2009, A novel approach of the driving forces of socio-economic regional development. Socialiniai mokslai, Vol. 1 (63).
• 51. SCHUMPETER J. A., 1963, History of Economic Analysis. New York: George Allen.
• 52. SCHELLING T., 1998, Social mechanisms and social dynamics. In Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge University Press.
• 53. SINDHAV B., ADIDAM P. T., 2005, Marketing Communication as Organizational Communication: Exploration and Synthesis of the Underlying Theoretical Perspectives. Innovative Marketing, Vol. 1 (2).
• 54. STINCHCOMBE A. L., 1991, The conditions of fruitfulness of theorizing about mechanisms in social science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 21.
• 55. STOLL-KLEEMANN S., WELP M., 2006, Towards a more effective and democratic natural resources management. Stakeholder dialogues in natural resources management: theory and practice. Berlin – Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
• 56. ŠIMANSKIENĖ L., TARASEVIČIUS T., 2010, Organizacinės kultūros ir vadovų tipų sąsajos. Management theory and studies for rural business and infrastructure development, Vol. 20 (1).
• 57. TORRE A., ZUINDEAU B., 2009, Proximity economics and environment: assessment and prospects, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 52, n°1.
• 58. WELCH R., 2002, Legitimacy of rural local government in the new governance environment. Journal of rural studies, 18.
• 59. WETTENHALL R., 2003, The rhetoric and reality of public-private partnerships. Public Organization Review, 3, 1.
• 60. WOODS M., 2007, Engaging the global countryside: globalization, hybridity and the reconstitution of rural place. Progress in Human Geography, 31(4).
• 61. YESCOMBE C., 2007, Public–Private Partnerships: Principles of Policy and Finance, London: Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier.
• 62. ZAKAREVIČIUS P., 2010, Organizacijos veiklos procesų valdymas. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai, Vol. 56.
• 63. CAMPBELL, J. L. (2002). Where do we stand? Common mechanisms in organizations and social movements research. http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/Organizations/smo/protected/resources/2002/wherestand.pdf, (08.04.2016).
• 64. FREEMAN, E. R. (2001). Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation. Perspectives in Business Ethics Sie, https://businessethics.qwriting.qc.cuny.edu/files/2012/01/Freeman.pdf (08.04.2016).
• 65. HURWICZ, L. (2009). Asimetrinė informacija ir ekonominės institucijos. Nobelio 2007 m. Ekonomikos mokslų premijos laureatai. Pinigų studijos, Nr. 2, p. 70–94, https://www.lb.lt/nobelio_laureatai_7 (08.10.2016).
• 66. PARTNERSHIPS: FRAMEWORKS FOR WORKING TOGETHER. STRENGTHENING NONPROFITS: A CAPACITY BUILDER’S RESOURCE LIBRARY (2010), http://www.strengtheningnonprofits.org/resources/guidebooks/Partnerships.pdf (10.10.2016)
• 67. PHILLS, J.A., DEIGLMEIER, K. & MILLER, D.T. (2008). Rediscovering Social Innovation.Stanford Social Innovation Review, Fall, p. 34-43, http://csi.gsb.stanford.edu/print/2307 (08.04.2016).

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).