Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Purpose: The study aimed to identify differences in the level of innovation of the two types of firms – family (FB) and non-family (NFB) – and understand how the expectations of the management and/or business owners vary regarding the impact of innovations on business performance. Design/methodology/approach: Research questions were formulated based on the review of the findings of the surveys that compared innovation in family and non-family firms worldwide. Then, empirical research was conducted in 334 family and non-family firms in Poland. Findings: The findings do not confirm significant differences in the level of product innovation between FB and NFB. On the other hand, they point to a higher level of innovation measured with the number of process innovations in NFB. Research shows that firms rate the degree to which the expectations of innovation effects were fulfilled relatively low in both types of firms. Research limitations/implications: The applied measurement of the level of innovation according to the number of implemented innovations does not take into account their qualitative aspect, whether they are radical or incremental. The survey (questionnaire and interview) was based solely on the number of innovations declared as implemented by the respondents. Practical implications: The survey findings should inspire managers of family and non-family firms to analyze both the expected effects of the implementation of a particular type of innovation and to assess its actual outcomes. Social implications: Studies show that FB are not less innovative when it comes to implementing new or modified products and services. This contradicts both the opinions and some research results about the conservatism of FB or their stronger orientation towards family goals at the expense of a firm’s growth. Originality/value: This comparative study on FB and NFB innovation fills a gap in the area where knowledge concerning this issue is still scarce in Poland.
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
81--98
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 37 poz.
Twórcy
autor
- University of Economics in Katowice
Bibliografia
- 1. Ahluwalia, S., Mahto, R.V., and Walsh, S.T. (2017). Innovation in small firms: Does family vs. non-family matter? Journal of Small Business Strategy, 27(3), 39-49.
- 2. Alberti, F.G., and Pizzurno, E. (2013). Technology, innovation and performance in family firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 17(1-3), 142-161. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2013.055253.
- 3. Bendig, D., Foege, J.N., Endriß, S., and Brettel, M. (2020). The Effect of Family Involvement on Innovation Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Board Social Capital. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(3), 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/ jpim.12522.
- 4. Chrisman, J.J., Chua, J.H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., and Wright, M. (2015). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12207.
- 5. Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J., and Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 23(4), 19-39. https://doi.org/ 10.1177%2F104225879902300402.
- 6. Classen, N., Carree, M., Van Gils, A., and Peters, B. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 595-609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9490-z.
- 7. De Massis, A., & Foss, N.J. (2018). Advancing family business research: The promise of microfoundations. Family Business Review, 31(4), 386-396. doi:10.1177/ 0894486518803422.
- 8. De Massis, A., and Foss, N.J. (2018). Advancing family business research: The promise of microfoundations. Family Business Review, 31(4), 386-396. https://doi.org/ 10.1177%2F0894486518803422.
- 9. De Massis, A., Audretsch, D., Uhlaner, L., and Kammerlander, N. (2018). Innovation with Limited Resources: Management Lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12373.
- 10. De Massis, A., Di Minin, A., and Frattini, F. (2015). Family-Driven Innovation: Resolving the Paradox in Family Firms. California Management Review, 58(1), 5-19. https://doi.org/10.1525%2Fcmr.2015.58.1.5.
- 11. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., and Lichtenthaler, U. (2013). Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26(1), 10-31. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0894486512466258.
- 12. Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., van Essen, M., and Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224-64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424.
- 13. Fuetsch, E., and Suess-Reyes, J. (2017). Research on innovation in family businesses: are we building an ivory tower? Journal of Family Business Management. 7(1), 44-92. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-02-2016-0003.
- 14. Habbershon, T.G., and Williams, M.L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1-25. doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00001.x.
- 15. Ingram, A.E., Lewis, M.W., Barton, S., and Gartner, W.B. (2016). Paradoxes and innovation in family firms: The role of paradoxical thinking. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(1), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fetap.12113.
- 16. Jaskiewicz, P., Combs, J.G., and Rau, S.B. (2015). Entrepreneurial legacy: Toward a theory of how some family firms nurture transgenerational entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.001.
- 17. Kammerlander, N., and van Essen, M. (2017). Family firms are more innovative than other companies. Harvard Business Review, January 25.
- 18. Klein, S.B. (2000). Family business in Germany: significance and structure. Family Business Review, 13(3), 157-182.
- 19. Kraśnicka, T., and Głód, G. (2018). Związki pomiędzy innowacyjnością a wynikami firm rodzinnych. Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie, 19(6), cz. 2, Konkurencyjność współczesnych przedsiębiorstw-modele, koncepcje i uwarunkowania), 309-323.
- 20. Kraśnicka, T., Głód, W., Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2018). Management innovation, pro-innovation organisational culture and enterprise performance: testing the mediation effect. Review of Managerial Science, 12(3), 737-769.
- 21. Kraśnicka, T., Ingram, T., Głód, G. (2019). Rodzinność polskich przedsiębiorstw- stymulator czy przeszkoda innowacyjności. Przegląd Organizacji, 7, 22-31.
- 22. Kraśnicka, T., Steinerowska-Streb, I. (2019). Family involvement, and innovation of family enterprises. Organization & Management, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, Sería: Organizacja i Zarządzanie,136, 289-303.
- 23. Matzler, K., Veider, V., Hautz, J., and Stadler, Ch. (2015). The Impact of Family Ownership, Management, and Governance on Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12202.
- 24. Naldi, L., Cennamo, C., Corbetta, G., and Gomez-Mejia, L. (2013). Preserving socioemotional wealth in family firms: Asset or liability? The moderating role of business context. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1341-1360. https://doi.org/ 10.1111%2Fetap.12069.
- 25. Neubaum, D. (2018). Family business research: Roads travelled and the search for unworn paths. Family Business Review, 31, 259-270. https://doi.org/ 10.1177%2F0894486518792948.
- 26. OECD Publishing (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OECD.
- 27. Pichlak, M. (2012). Uwarunkowania innowacyjności organizacji. Studium teoretyczne i wyniki badań empirycznych. Warszawa: Difin.
- 28. Podręcznik Oslo (2008). Zasady gromadzenia i interpretacji danych dotyczących innowacji. OECD, EUROSTAT, 2005. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego, Departament Strategii i Rozwoju Nauki.
- 29. Reay, T., Jaskiewicz, P., & Hinings, C.R. (2015). How family, business, and community logics shape family firm behavior and “rules of the game” in an organizational field. Family Business Review, 28(4), 292-311. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0894486515577513.
- 30. Roessl, D., Fink, M., and Kraus, S. (2010). Are family firms fit for innovation? Towards an agenda for empirical research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 2(3-4), 366-380. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEV.2010.037118.
- 31. Rondi, E., De Massis, A., and Kotlar, J. (2019). Unlocking innovation potential: A typology of family business innovation postures and the critical role of the family system. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4), 100236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.12.001.
- 32. Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., and Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002.
- 33. Safin, K. (2007). Przedsiębiorstwa rodzinne – istota i zachowania strategiczne. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo AE.
- 34. Steeger, J.H., and Hoffmann, M. (2016). Innovation and family firms: ability and willingness and German SMEs. Journal of Family Business Management. 6(3), 251-269. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-09-2015-0036.
- 35. Steinerowska-Streb, I. (2015). Bariery finansowe w działalności polskich przedsiębiorstw rodzinnych. In: B. Piasecki, A. Marjański (eds.), Przedsiębiorczość i Zarządzanie. Firmy rodzinne – doświadczenia i perspektywy zarządzania, tom XVI, zeszyt 7, część II, 351-369.
- 36. Sułkowski, Ł., and Marjański, A. (2009). Firmy rodzinne, jak osiągnąć sukces w sztafecie pokoleń. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Poltex.
- 37. Surdej, A., and Wach, K. (2010). Przedsiębiorstwa rodzinne wobec sukcesji. Warszawa: Difin.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-11d26704-068c-4eea-b0c7-af18edc2de20