Tytuł artykułu
Autorzy
Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
Abstrakty
Under accelerated urbanisation and rapid social and economic development, environmental pollution has become an important content of the construction industry. Therefore, the environmental benefit analysis of green buildings is of great significance to the effective use of energy and resources and to achieve the goal of protecting resources, reducing pollution and improving the ecological environment. The results show that the measured results of incremental environmental costs of the office building in Taiyuan City in land saving, energy saving, water saving, material saving, indoor environmental quality and operation management are decreased by 13.56 %, 11.02 %, 25.17 %, 14.43 %, and 15.25 %, respectively; incremental environmental benefits in land saving, energy saving, water saving, material saving, indoor environmental quality and operation management are increased by 23.15 %, 10.37 %, 19.30 %, 18.25 %, and 22.53 %, respectively. Those suggest that the BIM technology applied to the complete life cycle cost analysis of green buildings can test, measure and guide all the steps of building design, construction and maintenance and largely meet the criteria of resource-saving and energy-saving. The results of this paper provide a reference for further research on the environmental benefit analysis of green buildings based on BIM technology.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Tom
Strony
191--199
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 20 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
- College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, DaLian University, DaLian 116622, China
Bibliografia
- [1] Nguyen TP, Nguyen VA, Pham DD, Do HQ. Intergrating building information modeling (BIM) and tools with green building certification system in designing and evaluating water efficiency of green building for sustainable buildings. IOP Conf Ser: Materials Sci Eng. 2021;1079(3):32063. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/1079/3/032063.
- [2] Taiwo EM, Yahya KB, Haron Z. Utilisation of building information modelling for indoor environmental quality assessment - A review. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2019;220(1):12051. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/220/1/012051.
- [3] Lu Y, Wu Z, Chang R, Li Y. Building Information Modeling (BIM) for green buildings: A critical review and future directions. Automat Constr. 2017;83:134-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2017.08.024.
- [4] Uddin MN, Wei HH, Chi HL, Ni M, Elumalai P. Building information modeling (BIM) incorporated green building analysis: An application of local construction materials and sustainable practice in the built environment. J Build Rehabil. 2021;6(1):1-25. DOI: 10.1007/s41024-021-00106-5.
- [5] Jiménez-Roberto Y, Sebastián-Sarmiento J, Gómez-Cabrera A, Castillo GL. Analysis of the environmental sustainability of buildings using BIM (Building Information Modeling) methodology. Ing Compet. 2017;19(1):241-51. Available from: http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0123-30332017000100241&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en.
- [6] Cedeño-Laurent JG, Williams A, MacNaughton P, Cao X, Eitland E, Spengler J, et al. Building evidence for health: Green buildings, current science, and future challenges. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;(1):291-08. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044420.
- [7] Kauskale L, Geipele I, Zeltins N, Lecis I. Environmental and energy aspects of construction industry and green buildings. Latv J Phys Tech Sci. 2017;54(2):24-33. DOI: 10. 1515/lpts-2017-0010.
- [8] Eisenstein W, Fuertes G, Kaam S, Seigel K, Arens E, Mozingo L. Climate co-benefits of green building standards: Water, waste and transportation. Build Res Inf. 2017;45(8):828-44. DOI: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1204519.
- [9] Balaban O, de Oliveira JAP. Sustainable buildings for healthier cities: Assessing the co-benefits of green buildings in Japan. J Clean Prod. 2017;163:68-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.086.
- [10] Lo CL. Environmental benefits of renewable building materials: A case study in Taiwan. Energy Buildings.2017;140:236-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.010.
- [11] Su Y, Wang L, Feng W, Zhou N, Wang L. Analysis of green building performance in cold coastal climates: An in-depth evaluation of green buildings in Dalian, China. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2021;146:111149. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111149.
- [12] Wang B, Luo L, Wang F. Research on the incremental cost and benefit of green building based on the whole life cycle. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 2015;580(1):12015. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/580/1/012015.
- [13] Nan C, Jie Z. Estimation of environmental damages of cement building and environmental benefits of prefabricated building: A case study based on a residential project in Henan Province, China. Nature Environ Pollut Technol. 2020;19(2):721-8. DOI: 10.46488/NEPT.2020.v19i02.027.
- [14] Alsulaili AD, Al-Matrouk MF, Al-Baghli RA, Al-Enezi AF. Environmental and economic benefits of applying green building concepts in Kuwait. Environ Dev Sust. 2020;22(4):3371-87. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-019-00352-1.
- [15] Beccali M, Cellura M, Fontana M, Longo S, Mistretta M. Energy retrofit of a single-family house: Life cycle net energy saving and environmental benefits. Renew Sust Energy Rev. 2013;27:283-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.040.
- [16] Arrigoni A, Zucchinelli M, Collatina D, Dotelli G. Life cycle environmental benefits of a forward-thinking design phase for buildings: the case study of a temporary pavilion built for an international exhibition. J Clean Prod. 2018;187(187):974-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.230.
- [17] Mao G, Chen H, Du H, Zuo J, Pullen S, Wang Y. Energy consumption, environmental impacts and effective measures of green office buildings: A life cycle approach. J Green Build. 2015;10(4):161-77. DOI: 10.3992/jgb.10.4.161.
- [18] Poon S. Deconstructing sustainability perceptions: Investigating technological innovation-environmental interaction in green buildings and the influence of architectural design. Int J Built Env Sust. 2020;8(1):91-101. DOI: 10.11113/ijbes.v8.n1.621.
- [19] Wu CH, Tsai SB, Liu W, Shao XF, Xia YK, Wacławek M. Green environment and sustainable development: methods and applications. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2021;28(4),467-70. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2021-0030.
- [20] Liu W, Tsai SB, Wu CH, Shao X, Wacławek M. Corporate environmental management and sustainable operation: theory and application. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2022;29(3):283-5. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2022-0020.
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MEiN, umowa nr SONP/SP/546092/2022 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2022-2023).
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-11ce627d-bb7b-421c-9c53-27c374cd68dc
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.