Cooperation behavior of chinese SMEs from the perspective of suppliers

• Autorzy: Qi Tian , Zhou Liguo

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2021.24.1.17

Warianty tytułu

PL

Zachowania we współpracy chińskich MŚP z perspektywy dostawców

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

During the economic downturn, the cooperative behavior of the supply chain will change due to the increase of risk level. The purpose of this paper is to measure cooperative behavior more effectively. Therefore, a model of supply chain cooperation is constructed from three dimensions: risk perception, inter-organizational trust and decision preference. Taking the processing trade enterprises in Guangdong Province as a sample and using the structural equation model for analysis, the research found that trust and decision preferences significantly impact cooperative behavior, and decision-making preference partially mediates the relationship between inter-organizational trust and cooperative behavior. However, risk perception has no direct impact on cooperation behavior but has an indirect impact through the mediation of inter-organizational trust and decision-making preferences. Interorganizational trust is partially intervened between risk perception and decision preference. Further, the mediating effect of the inter-organizational trust alone is greater than the dual mediating effect of inter-organizational trust and decision preferences.

PL

W okresie spowolnienia gospodarczego zachowanie kooperacyjne łańcucha dostaw ulegnie zmianie ze względu na wzrost poziomu ryzyka. Celem tego artykułu jest skuteczniejszy pomiar zachowań kooperacyjnych. Dlatego model współpracy w łańcuchu dostaw zbudowany jest z trzech wymiarów: percepcji ryzyka, zaufania między organizacjami i preferencji decyzyjnych. Biorąc za próbę przedsiębiorstwa zajmujące się handlem przetwórstwem w prowincji Guangdong i wykorzystując do analizy model równań strukturalnych, badania wykazały, że zaufanie i preferencje decyzyjne mają istotny wpływ na zachowanie kooperacyjne, a preferencje decyzyjne częściowo pośredniczą w związku między zaufanie i współpraca. Jednak postrzeganie ryzyka nie ma bezpośredniego wpływu na zachowanie w zakresie współpracy, ale pośrednio, poprzez pośrednictwo zaufania między organizacjami i preferencji decyzyjnych. Zaufanie między organizacjami jest częściowo interweniowane między percepcją ryzyka a preferencjami decyzyjnymi. Co więcej, efekt mediacyjny samego zaufania międzyorganizacyjnego jest większy niż podwójny efekt mediacyjny zaufania międzyorganizacyjnego i preferencji decyzyjnych.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

SMEs; risk perception; inter-organizational trust; decision preference; cooperation behavior

PL

MŚP; postrzeganie ryzyka; zaufanie międzyorganizacyjne; preferencja decyzji; zachowanie współpracy

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 24, No. 1
• Strony: 281--305
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 57 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Qi Tian

• Central University of Finance and Economics, Business School, China

autor

Zhou Liguo

• Central University of Finance and Economics, Business School, China

Bibliografia

• 1.Takeishi, A., (2001). Bridging inter- and intra-firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strategic Management Journal, 22(5), 403-433.
• 2.Arniati, T., Puspita, D.A., Amin, A. and Pirzada, K., (2019). The implementation of good corporate governance model and auditor independence in earnings’ quality improvement, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 188-200
• 3.Bastas, A., Liyanage, K., (2018). Sustainable supply chain quality management: a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 181(APR.20), 726-744.
• 4.Berger, A. N., Udell, G. F., (2006). A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(11), 2945-2966.
• 5.Bharadwaj, N., Matsuno, K., (2006). Investigating the antecedents and outcomes of customer firm transaction cost savings in a supply chain relationship. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 62-72.
• 6.Buckley, P. J., Clegg, L. J., Cross, A., Liu, X. and Zheng, P., (2010). The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies.
• 7.Cygler, J., (2015). Structural Pathology in Inter-organizational Networks and the Decision-Making Autonomy of Its Members. Springer International Publishing.
• 8.Das, T. K., (1998). Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.
• 9.Daft, R. L., Weick, K. E., (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretive systems. Academy of Management Review. 9 (2), 284-295.
• 10.Dohmen, T. J., Falk, A., Huffman D. and Sunde, U. (2012). The intergenerational transmission of risk and trust attitudes. Munich Reprints in Economics.
• 11.Dunning, D., Fetchenhauer, D. and Schlösser, T. M., (2012). Trust as a social and emotional act: noneconomic considerations in trust behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(3), 686-694.
• 12.Ehrgott, M., F Reimann, Kaufmann, L. and Carter, C. R., (2013). Environmental development of emerging economy suppliers: antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 131-147.
• 13.Einhorn, F.., Meredith, J. and Marnewick, C., (2020). Business case effectiveness: the critical role of the organization. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.
• 14.Falk, A., Kosfeld, and Michael., (2006). The hidden costs of control. American Economic Review.
• 15.Fassin, Y., Rossem, A.V. and Buelens, M., (2011). Small-business owner-managers' perceptions of business ethics and csr-related concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 425-453.
• 16.Garcia, S., Cintra, Y., Torres, R. D. C. S. R. and Lima, F. G., (2016). Corporate sustainability management: a proposed multi-criteria model to support balanced decision-making. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136(pt. A), 181-196.
• 17.Ginaya, G., Astuti, N.N.S., Susyarini, N.P.W.A., Bagiastuti, N.K. and Ruki, M., (2019). Mixed-Strategies of Marketing in BBTF: Seller Persuasion Towards Prospective Buyers, GATR Journal of Management and Marketing Review, 4(1) 08 - 18.
• 18.Hanif, H., Rakhman, A., Nurkholis, M. and Pirzada, K., (2019). Intellectual capital: extended VAIC model and building of a new HCE concept: the case of Padang Restaurant Indonesia. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 8 (S), 1-15
• 19.Husaini, Pirzada, K. and Saiful, (2020). Risk Management, Sustainable Governance Impact on Corporate Performance. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 9(3), 993-1004.
• 20.Hua, S., Yu, K. and Qiang, L., (2018). Financial service providers and banks' role in helping SMEs to access finance. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 48(1), 69-92.
• 21.Indulal, G., (2012). Credit risk analysis and the kmv-black and scholes model: a proposal of correction and an empirical analysis. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 9(2), 167-181.
• 22.Inkpen A. C., Currall S. C., (2004). The coevolution of trust, control, and learning in joint ventures. Organization Science, 15(5), 586-599.
• 23.Jones, G. R., George, J. M., (1998). The experience and evolution of trust: implications for cooperation and teamwork. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 531-546.
• 24.Juniwati, Sumiyati., (2020). The Role of Satisfaction in Mediating the Effect of e-Service Convenience, Security, and Trust on Repurchase Intention in the Marketplace Case study: Shopee Marketplace, GATR Journal of Management and Marketing Review, 5(2) 93 - 98.
• 25.Kee, D.M.H., Rahman, N.A., (2020). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Innovation and SME Performance: A Study of SME in Malaysia using PLS-SEM, GATR Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review, 8(2), 73 - 80.
• 26.Koehler, D. J., Harvey, N., (2004). Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Blackwell handbooks of experimental psychology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
• 27.Komari, N., Sulistiowati., (2020). Relationship between Organizational Justice and Counterproductive Work Behaviors, GATR Journal of Management and Marketing Review, 5(4) 206 - 212.
• 28.Maule, A J., (2004). Translating Risk Management Knowledge: The Lessons to be Learned from Research on the Perception and Communication of Risk. Risk Management, 6(2), 17-29.
• 29.McColl-Kennedy, Janet R, Fetter, Richard E. (2001). An empirical examination of the involvement to external search relationship in services marketing[J]. Journal of Services Marketing, 15(2), 82-98.
• 30.Naik, S, Prasad, Ch.V.V.S.N.V., (2021). Benefits of Enterprise Risk Management: A Systematic Review of Literature, GATR Journal of Finance and Banking Review, 5 (4), 28 - 35.
• 31.Novitz, T., (2020). Engagement with sustainability at the international labour organization and wider implications for collective worker voice. International Labour Review. 159.
• 32.Nosita, F., Pirzada, K., Lestari, T. and Cahyono, R., (2020). Impact of Demographic Factors on Risk Tolerance. Journal of Security & Sustainability Issues, 9(4) 1265-1273
• 33.Nussbaum, S., Trope, Y. and Liberman, N., (2003). Creeping dispositionism: the temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84(3), 485- 497.
• 34.Pfeffer I., (1965). Measuring the Profit Potential of a New Life Insurance Company. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 32(3), 413.
• 35.Pirzada, K., Mustapha, M.Z. and Alfan, E.B., (2017). Antecedents of Ethnic Diversity: The Role of Nomination Committees. International Journal of Economics and Management, 11(S1), 103-119. Pirzada, K., (2016). Providers and users’ perception of voluntary need of human resource disclosure: A content analysis. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 14(2) 232-242.
• 36.Preacher, K. J., Hayes, A. F., (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods,40(3), 879-891.
• 37.Qin, X., Shen, J. and Meng, X., (2011). Group-based trust, trustworthiness, and voluntary cooperation: evidence from experimental and survey data in China. Journal of SocioEconomics, 40(4), 356-363
• 38.Ritchie R, Brindley, C.S., (2007). Supply chain risk management and performance: a guiding framework for future development. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 27(3), 303-322.
• 39.Rui, H., Yang, J. and Yao, C., (2010). A new conceptional model for merger waves: Industry competition diffusion based on complex networks. 2010 International Conference on Networking and Digital Society. IEEE.
• 40.Schechter L., (2000). Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: a calibration exercise. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 68(1), 1281-1292.
• 41.Segal E F., (2013). Behavioral interaction under concurrent spaced-responding, variableinterval schedules of reinforcement[J]. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4(3):263-266.
• 42.Seppaenen, R., Blomqvist, K. and Sundqvist, S., (2007). Measuring inter-organizational trust—a critical review of the empirical research in 1990-2003. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(2), 249-265.
• 43.Simon, M., Houghton, S. M. and Aquino, K., (2000). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 113-134.
• 44.Smithdoerflein K A, Tracey M. and Tan C L., (2011). Human resource management and supply chain effectiveness: an exploratory study. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 6(3/4)
• 45.Sun, G., Shi, W., Yu, Y. and Zhang, H., (2019). Technical power, inter-organizational trust, and cooperation behavior: a study based on the leader-follow behavior of qinshui gas network. Nankai Business Review.
• 46.Suryani, A., Pirzada, K., (2018). Analysis of opportunistic behavior of management to company performance. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1) 379-388
• 47.Tangpong C., Michalisin M. D. and Melcher A. J., (2008). Toward a typology of buyer- supplier relationships: a study of the computer industry. Decision Sciences. 39(3):571-593.
• 48.Theresia; Indrastuti, D. K. and Alexander, N., (2021). Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: Empirical Evidence of the Distress and Non-Distress Companies, GATR Accounting and Finance Review, 5(4), 23 - 30.
• 49.Touboulic, A., D. Chicksand, and Walker, H., (2014). Managing imbalanced supply chain relationships for sustainability: a power perspective. Decision Sciences, 45(4), 577-619.
• 50.Usher M., McClelland J. L., (2004). Loss Aversion and Inhibition in Dynamical Models of Multialternative Choice. Psychological Review, 111(3):757.
• 51.Uslaner, E. M., Conley, R. S., (2003). Civic engagement and particularized trust the ties that bind people to their ethnic communities. American Politics Research, 31(4), 331-360.
• 52.Wagner S.M., Krause D. R., (2009). Supplier development: communication approaches, activities, and goals. International Journal of Production Research, 47(12), 3161-3177.
• 53.Waroquier L., Marchiori D., Klein O. and Cleeremans A., (2010). Is it better to think unconsciously or to trust your first impression? a reassessment of unconscious thought theory. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(1), S130.
• 54.Wei, S., Sukhotu, V., (2021). Trade Promotion from Thailand to China as A Result of a New Train Route, GATR Journal of Business and Economic Review, 6(1), 98-111.
• 55.Yue, N., (2021). Forecasting the Logistics Demand of Guangxi Beibu Gulf Port, GATR Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review, 9(1), 73 - 89.
• 56.Zaheer S., Zaheer, A., (2006). Trust across borders. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(1), 21-29.
• 57.Zhao, Y., Zhao, C., Guo, Y., Sheng, H. and Feng, T., (2021). Green supplier integration and environmental innovation in Chinese firms: the joint effect of governance mechanism and trust. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. John Wiley & Sons, 28(1), pages 169-183, January.