PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Human reliability management in industrial maintenance

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
The purpose of this study is to propose and verify the feasibility of using gray relative analysis (GRA) to identify key characteristics of an industrial maintenance system and key factors for managing human reliability in this system. The developed approach is verified using qualitative and quantitative data obtained from seven companies in the furniture industry. Through the approach used, the following maintenance characteristics are identified as key: scheduling intensity index, work scheduling intensity index, and work request response index. In addition, the following human reliability management factors are identified as key: analysis of error reduction measures, implementation of error reduction measures, and evaluation of the effectiveness of implemented human error reduction measures. The approach verified in this paper is computationally simple and beneficial in cases of imprecise and incomplete information and small sample size, while the results obtained are easy to interpret. This approach can, therefore, be a crucial tool for improving enterprises in maintenance and in terms of improving human reliability. The application of GRA in human reliability management in industrial maintenance is original.
Rocznik
Strony
46--55
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 56 poz., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • Częstochowa University of Technology 69 J.H. Dąbrowskiego St., 42-201, Częstochowa, Poland
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abreu, J., Martins, P.V., Fernandes, S. & Zacarias, M. (2013) Business processes improvement on maintenance management: a case study. Procedia Technology 9, pp. 320‒330.
  • 2. Alsyouf, I. (2007) The role of maintenance in improving companies’ productivity and profitability. International Journal of Production Economics 105 (1), pp. 70‒78, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.06.057.
  • 3. Antti, S. & Mats, D. (2011) Costs of poor maintenance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 17 (1), pp. 63‒73.
  • 4. Bell, J. & Holroyd, J. (2009) Review of human reliability assessment method. Research Report RR679, HSE, Health and Safety Laboratory, Buxton: Derbyshire.
  • 5. Carol, K.H.H., Chan Albert, P.C. & Chan Daniel, W.M. (2011) Strategies for improving safety performance of repair, maintenance, minor alteration, and addition (RMAA) works. Facilities 29 (13/14), pp. 591‒610, doi:10.1108/02632771111178391.
  • 6. Carrillo-Castrillo, J.A., Rubio-Romero, J.C., Guadix, J. & Onieva, L. (2015) Risk assessment of maintenance operations: the analysis of performing task and accident mechanism. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion 22 (3), pp. 267‒277.
  • 7. Crespo Márquez, A., Moreu de León, P., Gómez Fernández, J.F., Parra Márquez, C. & López Campos, M. (2009) The maintenance management framework: A practical view to maintenance management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 15 (2), pp. 167‒178, doi: 10.1108/13552510910961110.
  • 8. Cui, J.F., Zhou, R.J. & Liu, R. (2009) Grey incidence analysis based on coefficient of determination and its economic application with the data of Central Henan Urban Agglomeration. IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services, pp. 32–36.
  • 9. Deng, J.L. (1989) Introduction of grey system theory. Journal of Grey Systems 1, pp. 1–24.
  • 10. Ding, S.H., Kamaruddin, S. & Azid, I.A. (2014) Maintenance policy selection model – a case study in the palm oil industry. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 25 (3), pp. 415‒435.
  • 11. EASHW (2010) Safe maintenance in practice. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
  • 12. EN 13306:2010 Maintenance – Maintenance terminology. BSI Standards Publication, CEN, Brussels.
  • 13. EN 62508:2010 Guidance on human aspects of dependability (IEC 62508). CENELEC, Brussels.
  • 14. Forester, J., Kolaczkowski, A., Lois, E. & Kelly, D. (2006) Evaluation Analysis Methods Against Good Practices. Final Report. NUREG-1842, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Washington DC.
  • 15. Goyal, S. & Grover, S. (2012) Applying fuzzy grey relational analysis for ranking the advanced manufacturing systems. Grey Systems: Theory and Application 2 (2), pp. 284‒298.
  • 16. Gunda, Y.R., Gupta, S. & Singh, L.K. (2023) Assessing human performance and human reliability: a review. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management 14 (3), pp. 817‒828, doi: 10.1007/s13198- 023-01893-5.
  • 17. Helmreich, R.L. (2000) On error management: lessons from aviation. British Medical Journal 320 (7237), pp. 781–785.
  • 18. Hollnagel, E. (1993) Human Reliability Analysis: Context and Control. Academic Press.
  • 19. Jha, P., Di Pasquale, V., Saleem, J. & Wang, X. (2024) Taxonomy of performance shaping factors in manufacturing: A systematic literature review. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 34 (3), pp. 367‒385, doi: 10.1002/HFM.21036.
  • 20. Kapustka, K., Ziegmann, G., Klimecka-Tatar, D. & Ostrega, M. (2020) Identification of health risks from harmful chemical agents – review concerning bisphenol A in workplace. Production Engineering Archives 26 (2), pp. 45‒49, doi: 10.30657/pea.2020.26.10.
  • 21. Karimi, T. & Forrest, J. (2014) Analyzing the results of buildings energy audits by using grey incidence analysis. Grey Systems: Theory and Application 4 (3), pp. 386–399.
  • 22. Kariuki, S.G. & Lowe, K. (2007) Integrating human factors into process analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 92 (12), pp. 1764‒1773, doi: 10.1016/j. ress.2007.01.002.
  • 23. Kelly, T.P. & McDermid, J.A. (2001) A systematic approach to safety case maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 71(3), pp. 271‒284.
  • 24. Kirwan, B. (1998) Human error identification techniques for risk assessment of high-risk systems – Part 1: Review and evaluation of techniques. Applied Ergonomics 29 (3), pp. 157‒177, doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00010-6.
  • 25. Laumann, K. (2020) Criteria for qualitative methods in human reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 194, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2018.07.001.
  • 26. Leong, T.K., Zakuan, N. & Saman, M.Z.M. (2012) Quality management maintenance and practices – technical and non-technical approaches. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 65, pp. 688‒696.
  • 27. Lind, S. & Nenonen, S. (2008) Occupational risks in industrial maintenance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 14 (2), pp. 194‒204, doi:10.1108/13552510810877683.
  • 28. Liu, S., Forrest, J. & Yang, Y. (2012) A brief introduction to grey systems theory. Grey System: Theory and Application 2 (2), pp. 89–104.
  • 29. Liu, S.F. & Lin, Y. (2010) Grey Systems: Theory and Applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • 30. Liu, W., Zhang, J., Wu, C. & Chang, X. (2016) Identifying key industry factors of remanufacturing industry using grey incidence analysis: A case of Jiangsu province. Grey Systems: Theory and Application 6 (3), pp. 398–414.
  • 31. Liyanage, J.P., Badurdeen, F. & Chandima Ratnayake, R.M. (2009) Industrial asset maintenance and sustainability performance: Economical, environmental and societal implications. In: Ben-Daya, M., Duffuaa, S.O., Raouf, A., Knezevic, J. & Ait-Kadi, D. (Eds) Handbook of Maintenance Management and Engineering (pp. 665‒693), Springer.
  • 32. Löfsten, H. (1999) Management of industrial maintenance-economic evaluation of maintenance policies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 19 (7), pp. 716‒737, doi:10.1108/01443579910271683.
  • 33. Nenonen, S. (2011) Fatal workplace accidents in outsourced operation in the manufacturing industry. Safety Science 49 (10), pp. 1394‒1403.
  • 34. Niciejewska, M. & Kiriliuk, O. (2020) Occupational health and safety management in small size enterprises, with particular emphasis on hazards identification. Production Engineering Archives 26 (4), pp. 195‒201, doi: 10.30657/ pea.2020.26.34.
  • 35. Pan, X., Lin, Y. & He, C. (2017) A review of cognitive models in human reliability analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 33 (7), pp. 1299‒1316, doi: 10.1002/gre.2111.
  • 36. Parida, A. & Chattopadhyay, G. (2007) Development of a multi-criteria hierarchical framework for maintenance performance measurement (MPM). Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 13 (3), pp. 241‒258, doi:10.1108/13552510710780276.
  • 37. Patriarca, R., Ramos, M., Paltrinieri, N., Massaiu, S., Costantino, F., Di Gravio, G. & Boring, R.L. (2020) Human reliability analysis: Exploring the intellectual structure of research field. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 203, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107102.
  • 38. Pollard, J., Heberger, J. & Dempsey, P.G. (2014) Maintenance and repair injuries in US mining. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 20 (1), pp. 20‒31.
  • 39. Rajesh, R. & Ravi, V. (2015) Supplier selection in resilient supply chains: a grey relational analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 86, pp. 343–359.
  • 40. Read, G.J.M., Shorrock, S., Walker, G.H. & Salmon, P.M. (2021) State of science: evolving perspectives on human error. Ergonomics 64 (9), pp. 1091‒1114, doi: 10.1080 /00140139.2021.1953615.
  • 41. Reason, J. & Hobbs, A. (2003) Managing Maintenance Error—A Practical Guide. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Company.
  • 42. Ren, J., Jenkinson, I., Wang, J., Xu, D.L. & Yang, J.B. (2008) A methodology to model causal relationships in offshore safety assessment focusing on human and organisational factors. Journal of Safety Research 39, pp. 87‒100.
  • 43. Sheikhalishahi, M., Pintelon, L. & Azadeh, A. (2016) Human factors in maintenance: a review. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 22 (3), pp. 218‒237.
  • 44. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Baber, C. & Jenkins, D.P. (2005) Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Pub. Co.
  • 45. Tabor, J. (2014) Maintenance management and occupational safety in manufacturing organizations. Polish Journal of Management Studies 10 (2), pp. 225‒235.
  • 46. Tabor, J. (2018) A grey-based decision-making approach to the improvement of OHS management system. Polish Journal of Management Studies 18 (1), pp. 389–402.
  • 47. Tabor, J. (2021a) Ranking of management factors for safe maintenance system based on Grey Systems Theory. Production Engineering Archives 27 (3), pp. 196–202.
  • 48. Tabor, J. (2021b) Improving occupational safety management with the use of human reliability analysis methods. In: Ulewicz, R. & Hadzima, B. (Eds) Quality Production Improvement. QPI 2021 (pp. 120‒131). Warszawa, De Gruyter, doi: 10.2478/cqpi-2021-0012.
  • 49. Tao, J., Qiu, D.Y., Yang, F. & Duan, Z.P. (2020) A bibliometric analysis of human reliability research. Journal of Cleaner Production 260, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121041.
  • 50. Teplická, K. & Hurná, S. (2021) New approach of costs of quality according their trend of during long period in industrial enterprises in SMEs. Management Systems in Production Engineering 29 (1), pp. 20‒26, doi: 10.2478/mspe2021-0003.
  • 51. Trzaskalik, T. (2014) Wielokryterialne wspomaganie decyzji. Przegląd metod i zastosowań. Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie 74/1921.
  • 52. Tsang, A.H.C. (2002) Strategic dimensions of maintenance management. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 8 (1), pp. 17‒39, doi:10.1108/13552510210420577.
  • 53. Van Horenbeek, A. & Pintelon, L. (2011) Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework ‒ using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selection. Omega 42, pp. 33‒43, doi: 10.1016/j.omega. 2013.02.006.
  • 54. Wang, L., Chu, J. & Wu, J. (2007) Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics 107 (1), pp. 151‒163, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.005.
  • 55. Wijeratne, W.M.P.U., Perera, B.A.K.S. & De Silva, L. (2014) Identification and assessment risks in maintenance operations. Built Environment Project and Asset Management 4 (4), pp. 384‒405.
  • 56. Williams, J.C. (1989) Validation of human reliability assessment techniques. Reliability Engineering 11 (3), pp. 149‒162, doi: 10.1016/0143-8174(85)90068-X.
Uwagi
1. W pdf'ie błędnie podany nr Orcid.
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-117e2686-b2fe-45cb-a56e-f14e63dffb70
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.