Shifting from Asian to Western model of leadership : the role of organizational culture

• Autorzy: Widyanti Rahmi , Rajiani Ismi , Basuki , Hairul

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2020.22.1.38

Warianty tytułu

PL

Przesunięcie z azjatyckiego na zachodni model przywództwa : rola kultury organizacyjnej

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Transformational leadership has been acknowledged as innovative means of empowering employees. However, its applicability in developing countries remains unproven due to the different perspective in organizational cultures. This article aims at investigating the practice of paternalistic and transformational leadership and firm performance of the public sector organization in Indonesia mediated through organizational culture. The data were taken from the leaders and members of the public sector organization from South Kalimantan of Indonesia. The smart PLS was used for analysis. As Indonesia is still reflecting a traditional bureaucratic type culture in favour of paternalistic leadership, implementation of transformational leadership is only partially applicable. Empirical insights into transformational leadership attempts most clearly indicate that Indonesian’s ability to fit into this framework is problematical, but gradually, the concept is accepted. Thus, Indonesia can adopt the well-developed country administrative models, carefully examine their future and adversative effects, and selectively practice only those parts of such models that are appropriate to its societal contexts and people's need. This research implies that although public sector reform becomes more differentiated in the future and a variety of governance reforms emerge in the forms of law-driven, service-driven, or citizen-driven will be located within the context of a country’s overall cultural dimensions.

PL

Przywództwo transformacyjne zostało uznane za innowacyjny sposób wzmacniania pracowników. Jednak jego zastosowanie w krajach rozwijających się pozostaje nieudowodnione z powodu odmiennej perspektywy kultur organizacyjnych. Artykuł ma na celu zbadanie praktyki przywództwa paternalistycznego i transformacyjnego oraz zdecydowanych działań organizacji sektora publicznego w Indonezji, w których pośredniczy kultura organizacyjna. Dane zostały pobrane od liderów i członków organizacji sektora publicznego z południowego Kalimantanu w Indonezji. Do analizy wykorzystano inteligentny PLS. Ponieważ Indonezja nadal odzwierciedla tradycyjną kulturę biurokratyczną na rzecz paternalistycznego przywództwa, wdrażanie przywództwa transformacyjnego ma zastosowanie tylko częściowo. Empiryczne spostrzeżenia na temat prób przywództwa transformacyjnego najwyraźniej wskazują, że zdolność Indonezji do dopasowania się do tych ram jest problematyczna, ale stopniowo koncepcja jest akceptowana. W ten sposób Indonezja może przyjąć dobrze rozwinięte modele administracyjne kraju, dokładnie zbadać ich przyszłość i negatywne skutki i wybiórczo praktykować tylko te części takich modeli, które są odpowiednie dla jej kontekstu społecznego i potrzeb ludzi. Badania te sugerują, że chociaż reforma sektora publicznego będzie w przyszłości bardziej zróżnicowana i pojawi się wiele różnych reform zarządzania, w formie zorientowanych na prawo, usługi lub obywateli, będą one osadzone w kontekście ogólnych wymiarów kulturowych kraju.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

performance; paternalistic; leadership; culture; public organization

PL

performans; paternalistyczność; przywództwo; kultura; organizacja publiczna

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 22, No. 1
• Strony: 595--610
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 52 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Widyanti Rahmi

• Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB, Banjarmasin Indonesia

autor

Rajiani Ismi

• Department of Social Science, Lambung Mangkurat University Banjarmasin, Indonesia

autor

Basuki

• Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB, Banjarmasin Indonesia

autor

Hairul

• Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Islam Kalimantan MAB, Banjarmasin Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1. Abbas, E. W., Hadi, S. and Rajiani, I., (2018). The prospective innovator in public university by scrutinizing particular personality traits. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 9-19.
• 2. Adams, D., Velarde, J. M., (2020). Leadership in a culturally diverse environment: perspectives from international school leaders in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-13.
• 3. Akhmad, B. A., Suryadi, B. and Rajiani, I., (2020). Communicating the dissatisfaction in workplace among public sector employees: loyalty and neglect as an alternative model of responses. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(1), 9-21.
• 4. Aliekperova, N., (2018). Pharmaceutical leadership in Ukraine: Transformational and transactional. Economics and Sociology, 11(4), 265-279.
• 5. Antlöv, H., (2003). Village government and rural development in Indonesia: The new democratic framework. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 39(2), 193-214.
• 6. Arsawan, I. W. E., Rajiani, I. and Suryantini, S. P., (2018). Investigating knowledge transfer mechanism in five star hotels. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(2),22-32.
• 7. Asseburg, J., Homberg, F., (2020). Public service motivation or sector rewards? Two studies on the determinants of sector attraction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 40(1), 82-111.
• 8. Bedi, A., (2020). A Meta-Analytic Review of Paternalistic Leadership. Applied Psychology, 69(3), 960-1008.
• 9. Buil, I., Martínez, E. and Matute, J., (2019). Transformational leadership and employee performance: The role of identification, engagement and proactive personality. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 64-75.
• 10. Chen, J. X., Sharma, P., Zhan, W. and Liu, L., (2019). Demystifying the impact of CEO transformational leadership on firm performance: Interactive roles of exploratory innovation and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 96, 85-96.
• 11. Crede, M., Jong, J. and Harms, P., (2019). The generalizability of transformational leadership across cultures: A meta-analysis. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34 (3), 139-155.
• 12. Dacko-Pikiewicz, Z., Walancik, M. (2016). The economic or social dimension of lifelong learning, Forum Scientiae Oeconomia 4(2), 13-25.
• 13. Dedahanov, A. T., Bozorov, F. and Sung, S., (2019). Paternalistic leadership and innovative behavior: Psychological empowerment as a mediator. Sustainability, 11(6), 1770.
• 14. Erden, P., Otken, A. B., (2019). The Dark Side of Paternalistic Leadership: Employee Discrimination and Nepotism. European Research Studies Journal, 22(2), 154-180.
• 15. Fransen, K., Mertens, N., Cotterill, S. T., Vande Broek, G. and Boen, F., (2020). From autocracy to empowerment: Teams with shared leadership perceive their coaches to be better leaders. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 32(1), 5-27.
• 16. Hair Jr, J. F., Howard, M. C. and Nitzl, C., (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101-110.
• 17. Haque, M. S., (2019). Questioning cross-cultural applicability of public administration knowledge: a critical Asian perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 41(2), 110-118.
• 18. Harun, H., Wardhaningtyas, S., Khan, H. Z., An, Y. and Masdar, R., (2020). Understanding the institutional challenges and impacts of higher education reforms in Indonesia. Public Money & Management, 40(4), 307-315.
• 19. Hiller, N. J., Sin, H. P., Ponnapalli, A. R. and Ozgen, S., (2019). Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: A multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 165-184.
• 20. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. and Minkov, M., (2015). Cultures and organizations: pyramids, machines, markets, and families: organizing across nations. Classics of Organization Theory, 314(23), 701-704.
• 21. IDN Financial, February 2020. USTR considers Indonesia as a developed country. Available at. https://www.idnfinancials.com/news/32191/ustr-considers-indonesia-developed-country
• 22. Irawanto, D. W., Ramsey, P. L. and Ryan, J. C., (2011). Tailoring leadership theory to Indonesian culture. Global Business Review, 12(3), 355-366.
• 23. Ismail, N., Kot, S., Abd Aziz, A. S., & Rajiani, I. (2020). From innovation to market: Integrating university and industry perspectives towards commercialising research output. Forum Scientiae Oeconomia, 8(4), 99-115.
• 24. Jackson, C. J., (2020). Transformational leadership and gravitas: 2000 years of no development?. Personality and Individual Differences, 156, 109760.
• 25. Jaes, L., Razali, N. A. and Suhaimy, K. A. M., (2020). Mahathir as the Prime Minister: Peak of “Paternalistic Leadership” in Malaysia. Journal of Social Transformation and Regional Development, 2(1), 42-51.
• 26. Kim, D., Lee, S., (2020). How Paternalistic Leadership affects Employee Voice Behavior in Korean Hierarchical Organizations?. International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology, 8(2), 48-57.
• 27. Lau, W. K., Li, Z. and Okpara, J., (2020). An examination of three-way interactions of paternalistic leadership in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 26(1), 32-49.
• 28. Leithwood, K., (2019). Characteristics of effective leadership networks: A replication and extension. School Leadership & Management, 39(2), 175-197.
• 29. Leithwood, K., Harris, A. and Hopkins, D., (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School leadership & management, 40(1), 5-22.
• 30. Lendvai Bainton, N., Szelewa, D., (2020). Governing new authoritarianism: Populism, nationalism and radical welfare reforms in Hungary and Poland. Social Policy & Administration.
• 31. Mansur, J., Sobral, F. and Goldszmidt, R., (2017). Shades of paternalistic leadership across cultures. Journal of World Business, 52(5), 702-713.
• 32. Martinez, P. G., 2003. Paternalism as a positive form of leader-subordinate exchange: Evidence from Mexico. Journal of Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 1, 227-242.
• 33. Mihaela, H., (2014). A synergistic approach of cross-cultural management and leadership style. Journal of International Studies, 7(2), 106-115.
• 34. Mills, J. C. H., Mills, A. J., (2017). Rules, Sensemaking, Formative Contexts, and Discourse in the Gendering of Organizational Culture. In Insights and Research on the Study of Gender and Intersectionality in International Airline Cultures. Emerald Publishing Limited, 49-69.
• 35. Nguyen, T. T. N., Luu, T. M. N., (2019). Linking Transformational Leadership and Organizational Performance: an Empirical Investigation of Manufacturing Firms in Vietnam. Economics & Sociology, 12(2), 170.
• 36. Nguyen, T. T., Mia, L., Winata, L. and Chong, V. K., (2017). Effect of transformational-leadership style and management control system on managerial performance. Journal of Business Research, 70, 202-213.
• 37. Passakonjaras, S., Hartijasti, Y. and Rajiani, I., (2019). Servant leadership: an empirical study of Indonesian managers across different ethnic groups. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20(2), 391-402.
• 38. Podgórski, D., (2015). Measuring operational performance of OSH management system - A demonstration of AHP-based selection of leading key performance indicators. Safety science, 73, 146-166.
• 39. Rafferty, A. E., Griffin, M. A., (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The leadership quarterly, 15(3), 329-354.
• 40. Rajiani, I., Kot, S., (2020). Javanese Indonesia: Human Resource Management Issues in a Uniquely Collectivist Culture. Cultural Management: Science and Education, 4 (2), 9-21.
• 41. Rajiani, I., Pypłacz, P., (2018). National culture as modality in managing the carbon economy in Southeast Asia. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 296-310.
• 42. Rajiani, I., Ismail, N., (2019). Management innovation in balancing technology innovation to harness universities performance in the era of community 4.0. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19, 309-321.
• 43. Selvarajah, C., Meyer, D., (2017). Human capacity development in Indonesia: leadership and managerial ideology in Javanese organizations. Asia Pacific Business Review, 23(2), 264-289.
• 44. Selvarajah, C., Meyer, D. and Dahanayake, P., (2020). Profiling the paternalistic manager: leadership excellence in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Business Review, 1-28.
• 45. Subiyakto, B., Kot, S. and Syaharuddin, S., (2020). The government reform on healthcare facilities from the standpoint of service quality performance. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(1), 16-31.
• 46. Suyanto, B., Sugihartati, R., Hidayat, M. and Subiakto, H., (2019). Global vs. local: lifestyle and consumption behaviour among the urban middle class in East Java, Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 27(4), 398-417.
• 47. Takeuchi, R., Wang, A. C. and Farh, J. L., (2020). Asian Conceptualizations of Leadership: Progresses and Challenges. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 233-256.
• 48. Tofighi, D., MacKinnon, D. P., (2016). Monte Carlo confidence intervals for complex functions of indirect effects. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(2), 194-205.
• 49. Turner, M., Prasojo, E. and Sumarwono, R., (2019). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 1-19.
• 50. Wang, Y., Tang, C., Naumann, S. E. and Wang, Y., (2019). Paternalistic leadership and employee creativity: A mediated moderation model. Journal of Management and Organization, 25(1), 137-156.
• 51. Widyanti, R., Basuki, (2020). What Role Perceived Red Tape, Job Goal Clarity, and Leader-Member Exchange Can Play in Organizational Commitment? An Empirical Study of Indonesian Pharmaceutical Sector, Systematic Review of Pharmacy, 11 (1), 573-581.
• 52. Yeşiltaş, M., Gürlek, M., Tuna, M., Kanten, P. and Çeken, H., (2020). Paternalistic leadership and organizational identification: The mediating role of forgiveness climate. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 1-30.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).