Influence of post-processing on the accuracy of fdm products

• Autorzy: Kuczko W. , Górski F. , Wichniarek R. , Buń P.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12913/22998624/70996

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

This paper presents the assessment of the rapid prototyping finishing techniques for printed components. The aim of the study was to compare the element printed with FDM technology before and after the treatment, using 3D scanning techniques. The object was scanned right after manufacturing, then it was subjected to finishing treatment and 3D-scanned again. The assessment of the results was performed using the GOM Inspect software, based on a comparison between scans and nominal model.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

additive manufacturing; Fused Deposition Modelling; 3d scanning; post-processing; visual prototype

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology ; Polish Society of Ecological Engineering (PTIE), Branch of PTIE in Lublin
• Czasopismo: Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 11, no 2
• Strony: 172--179
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., fig., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Kuczko W.

• Poznan University of Technology, Chair of Production Engineering and Management, Poznan, Poland

autor

Górski F.

• Poznan University of Technology, Chair of Production Engineering and Management, Poznan, Poland

autor

Wichniarek R.

• Poznan University of Technology, Chair of Production Engineering and Management, Poznan, Poland

autor

Buń P.

• Poznan University of Technology, Chair of Production Engineering and Management, Poznan, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Ahn D., et al.: Surface roughness prediction using measured data and interpolation in layered manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209 (2), 2009, 664–671.
• 2. Anithaa R., et al. Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in Fused Deposition Modelling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 118 (1), 2001, 385–388.
• 3. Fig. 11. Comparison of cross sections of 3D scans of the product surface before (blue color) and after the post processing (red color)Boschetto A., et al. Design for manufacturing of surfaces to improve accuracy in Fused Deposition Modeling. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 37, 2016, 103–114.
• 4. Boschetto A., et al. Finishing of Fused Deposition Modeling parts by CNC machining. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 41, 2016, 92–101.
• 5. Chil-Chyuan K., et al. A simple method for improving surface quality of rapid prototype. Indian Journal of Engineering & Materials Sciences, 20, 2013, 465-470.
• 6. Fischer F. FDM and Polyjet 3D printing. Popular Plastics & Packaging, 60 (6), 2015, 31-34.
• 7. Gajdoš I., et al. Structure and tensile properties evaluation of samples produced by Fused Deposition Modeling. Open Engineering, 1 (6), 2016, 86-89.
• 8. Górski F., et al. Influence of process parameters on dimensional accuracy of parts manufactured using Fused Deposition Modelling technology. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 7 (19), 2013, 27-35.
• 9. Górski F., et al. Strength of abs parts produced by Fused Deposition Modelling technology – a critical orientation problem. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 9 (26), 2015, 12-19.
• 10. Greene T. U.S. 3D Printer Forecast, 2016–2020: New 3D Print/Additive Manufacturing Technologies Fuel Growth. Whitehall Enterprises, Inc., 2016.
• 11. Kłonica M. and Kuczmaszewski J. Determining the value of surface free energy on the basis of the contact angle:. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 11 (1), 2017, 66–74.
• 12. Kłonica M., et al. Polyamide 6 surface layer following ozone treatment. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 64, 2016, 179–187.
• 13. Kwang-Ho J., et al. A study of post-processing methods for improving the tightness of a part fabricated by fused deposition modeling. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 17 (11), 2016, 1541-1546.
• 14. Novakova-Marcincinova, L., et al. Special materials used in FDM rapid prototyping technology application. IEEE, 16th International Conference on Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES), Lisbon, Portugal 2012, 73-76.
• 15. Pennington R., et al. Significant factors in the dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 219 (1), 2005, 89-92.
• 16. Rupinder S., et al. Investigation for surface finish improvement of FDM parts by vapor smoothing process. Composites Part B: Engineering, 111, 2017, 228–234.
• 17. Vasudevarao B., et al. Sensitivity of RP surface finish to process parameter variation. Proceedings of solid free form fabrication, 2000, 252-258.
• 18. Weiss E., et al. Accuracy of parts manufactured by rapid prototyping technology. Annals of DAAAM for 2010 & Proceedings of the 21st International DAAAM Symposium, Vienna, Austria 2010, 21, 1.
• 19. Wichniarek R., et al. Application of additively manufactured polymer composite prototypes in foundry. Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 9 (26), 2015, 20–27.

Uwagi

Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017)