Do we still need a laboratory to study advanced oxidation processes? A review of the modelling of radical reactions used for water treatment

• Autorzy: Wacławek Stanisław

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.2478/eces-2021-0002

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Environmental pollution due to humankind’s often irresponsible actions has become a serious concern in the last few decades. Numerous contaminants are anthropogenically produced and are being transformed in ecological systems, which creates pollutants with unknown chemical properties and toxicity. Such chemical pathways are usually examined in the laboratory, where hours are often needed to perform proper kinetic experiments and analytical procedures. Due to increased computing power, it becomes easier to use quantum chemistry computation approaches (QCC) for predicting reaction pathways, kinetics, and regioselectivity. This review paper presents QCC for describing the oxidative degradation of contaminants by advanced oxidation processes (AOP, i.e., techniques utilizing •OH for degradation of pollutants). Regioselectivity was discussed based on the Acid Blue 129 compound. Moreover, the forecasting of the mechanism of hydroxyl radical reaction with organic pollutants and the techniques of prediction of degradation kinetics was discussed. The reactions of •OH in various aqueous systems (explicit and implicit solvation) with water matrix constituents were reviewed. For example, possible singlet oxygen formation routes in the AOP systems were proposed. Furthermore, quantum chemical computation was shown to be an excellent tool for solving the controversies present in the field of environmental chemistry, such as the Fenton reaction debate [main species were determined to be: •OH < pH = 2.2 < oxoiron(IV)]. An ongoing discussion on such processes concerning similar reactions, e.g., associated with sulphate radical-based advanced oxidation processes (SR-AOP), could, in the future, be enriched by similar means. It can be concluded that, with the rapid growth of computational power, QCC can replace most of the experimental investigations related to the pollutant’s remediation in the future; at the same time, experiments could be pushed aside for quality assessment only.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

advanced oxidation processes; water treatment; wastewater treatment; Fenton process; radical chemistry; singlet oxygen; density functional theory; DFT; quantum chemistry; computations

PL

zaawansowane procesy utleniania; uzdatnianie wody; uzdatnianie ścieków; proces Fentona; tlen singletowy; teoria funkcjonału gęstości; DFT; chemia kwantowa; obliczenia

• Wydawca: Towarzystwo Chemii i Inżynierii Ekologicznej
• Czasopismo: Ecological Chemistry and Engineering. S
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 28, nr 1
• Strony: 11--28
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 117, rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Wacławek Stanisław

• Institute for Nanomaterials, Advanced Technologies and Innovation, Technical University of Liberec, Studentská 1402/2, 461 17 Liberec 1, Czech Republic, phone [phone]

Bibliografia

• [1] Crutzen PJ, Wacławek S. Atmospheric chemistry and climate in the anthropocene (Chemia atmosferyczna i klimat w antropocenie). Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2015;19:9-28. DOI: 10.1515/cdem-2014-0001.
• [2] Wacławek S, Černík M, Dionysiou DD. The Development and Challenges of Oxidative Abatement for Contaminants of Emerging Concern. A New Paradigm for Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2020. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-9447-8_10.
• [3] Wacławek S, Grübel K, Silvestri D, Padil VVT, Wacławek M, Černík M, et al. Disintegration of wastewater activated sludge (WAS) for improved biogas production. Energies. 2019;12:21. DOI: 10.3390/en12010021.
• [4] Silvestri D, Wacławek S, Stejskal V, Vlkova D, Kvapil P, Kohout P, et al. A pilot test in Eastern Bohemia for chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons groundwater remediation. CEST’19, 2019. Available from: https://cest2019.gnest.org/sites/default/files/presentation_file_list/cest2019_00918_posterf_paper.pdf.
• [5] Grübel K, Machnicka A, Nowicka E, Wacławek S. Mesophilic-thermophilic fermentation process of waste activated sludge after hybrid disintegration. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2014;21:125-36. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2014-0011.
• [6] Wacławek S, Grübel K, Chłąd Z, Dudziak M, Černík M. The impact of oxone on disintegration and dewaterability of waste activated sludge. Water Environ Res. 2016;88:152-7. DOI: 10.2175/106143016x14504669767139.
• [7] Wacławek S, Grübel K, Černík M. The impact of peroxydisulphate and peroxymonosulphate on disintegration and settleability of activated sludge. Environ Technol (United Kingdom). 2016;37:1296-304. DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2015.1112434.
• [8] Wacławek S, Grübel K, Chład Z, Dudziak M. Impact of peroxydisulphate on disintegration and sedimentation properties of municipal wastewater activated sludge. Chem Pap. 2015;69:1473-80. DOI: 10.1515/chempap-2015-0169.
• [9] Wacławek S, Lutze HV, Grübel K, Padil VVT, Černík M, Dionysiou DD. Chemistry of persulfates in water and wastewater treatment: A review. Chem Eng J. 2017;330:44-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.132.
• [10] Wacławek S, Padil VVT, Černík M. Major advances and challenges in heterogeneous catalysis for environmental applications: A review. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2018;25:9-34. DOI: 10.1515/ECES-2018-0001.
• [11] Tsitonaki A, Petri B, Crimi M, Mosbk H, Siegrist RL, Bjerg PL. In situ chemical oxidation of contaminated soil and groundwater using persulfate: A review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2010;40:55-91. DOI: 10.1080/10643380802039303.
• [12] Tentscher PR, Lee M, von Gunten U. Micropollutant oxidation studied by quantum chemical computations: Methodology and applications to thermodynamics, kinetics, and reaction mechanisms. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52:605-14. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00610.
• [13] Tachikawa H, Iyama T, Abe S. DFT study on the interaction of fullerene (C-60) with hydroxyl radical (OH). In: Iwamoto M, Kaneto K, Otomo A, Onoda, M, editors. 9th Int Conf Nano-Molecular Electronics. 2011;14. DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.05.027.
• [14] Pabis A, Szala-Bilnik J, Swiatla-Wojcik D. Molecular dynamics study of the hydration of the hydroxyl radical at body temperature. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2011;13:9458-68. DOI: 10.1039/c0cp02735a.
• [15] Shimizu E, Tokuyama Y, Okutsu N, Nomura K, Danilov VI, Kurita N. Attacking mechanism of hydroxyl radical to DNA base-pair: density functional study in vacuum and in water. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2015;33:158-66. DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2013.864572.
• [16] Yamabe S, Tsuchida N, Yamazaki S. DFT Study of the hydroxyl radical addition to 2’-deoxyguanosine and the guanine base in four double-stranded B-form dimers. J Phys Chem B. 2020;124:1374-82. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b10330.
• [17] Liu P, Wang Q, Niu M, Wang D. Multi-level quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics study of ring opening process of guanine damage by hydroxyl radical in aqueous solution. Sci Rep. 2017;7. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-08219-z.
• [18] Lespade L. Ab initio molecular dynamics of free radical-induced oxidation of ergothioneine. J Mol Model. 2019;25. DOI: 10.1007/s00894-019-4220-3.
• [19] Koppenol WH. Oxygen activation by cytochrome P450: A thermodynamic analysis. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:9686-90. DOI: 10.1021/ja071546p.
• [20] Espinosa-Garcia J, Gutierrez-Merino C. The trapping of the OH radical by coenzyme Q. A theoretical and experimental study. J Phys Chem A. 2003;107:9712-23. DOI: 10.1021/jp035927a.
• [21] Hatipoglu A, Vione D, Yalcin Y, Minero C, Cinar Z. Photo-oxidative degradation of toluene in aqueous media by hydroxyl radicals. J Photochem Photobiol A: Chemistry. 2010;215:59-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.07.021.
• [22] Asghar A, Abdul Raman AA, Wan Daud WMA, Ramalingam A. Reactivity, stability, and thermodynamic feasibility of H2O2/H2O at graphite cathode: Application of quantum chemical calculations in MFCs. Environ Prog Sustain Energy. 2018;37:1291-304. DOI: 10.1002/ep.12806.
• [23] Hanwell MD, Curtis DE, Lonie DC, Vandermeersch T, Zurek E, Hutchison GR. Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform. J Cheminform. 2012;4:17. DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17.
• [24] Neese F. The ORCA program system. WIREs Comput Mol Sci. 2012;2:73-8. DOI: 10.1002/wcms.81.
• [25] Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb M, Cheeseman JR, et al. Gaussian 16_C01 2016. Available from: https://gaussian.com/.
• [26] Lu T, Chen F. Atomic dipole moment corrected Hirshfeld population method. J Theor Comput Chem. 2012;11:163-83. DOI: 10.1142/S0219633612500113.
• [27] Luo S, Gao L, Wei Z, Spinney R, Dionysiou DD, Hu WP, et al. Kinetic and mechanistic aspects of hydroxyl radical-mediated degradation of naproxen and reaction intermediates. Water Res. 2018;137:233-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.002.
• [28] Krawczyk K, Wacławek S, Kudlek E, Silvestri D, Kukulski T, Grübel K, et al. UV-catalyzed persulfate oxidation of an anthraquinone based dye. Catalysts. 2020;10:456. DOI: 10.3390/catal10040456.
• [29] Lu T, Chen F. Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J Comput Chem. 2012;33:580-92. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.22885.
• [30] Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph. 1996;14:33-8. DOI: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5.
• [31] VMD a molecular visualization program, Webpage. Available from: http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd/.
• [32] Toro-Labbé A, Jaque P, Murray JS, Politzer P. Connection between the average local ionization energy and the Fukui function. Chem Phys Lett. 2005;407:143-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2005.03.041.
• [33] Johnson N, Russell I. Advances in Wool Technology. Woodhead Publishing Ltd.; 2008. ISBN: 9781845693329. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/2086/9354.
• [34] Cinar Z. The role of molecular modeling in TiO2 photocatalysis. Molecules. 2017;22:556. DOI: 10.3390/molecules22040556.
• [35] Zhang S, Yu G, Chen J, Zhao Q, Zhang X, Wang B, et al. Elucidating ozonation mechanisms of organic micropollutants based on DFT calculations: Taking sulfamethoxazole as a case. Environ Pollut. 2017;220:971-80. DOI: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2016.10.076.
• [36] Psutka JM, Dion-Fortier A, Dieckmann T, Campbell JL, Segura PA, Hopkins WS. Identifying Fenton-reacted trimethoprim transformation products using differential mobility spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2018;90:5352-7. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00484.
• [37] Lecours MA, Eysseric E, Yargeau V, Lessard J, Brisard G, Segura P, et al. Electrochemistry-high resolution mass spectrometry to study oxidation products of trimethoprim. Environments. 2018;5:18. DOI: 10.3390/environments5010018.
• [38] Dittmer A, Izsák R, Neese F, Maganas D. Accurate band gap predictions of semiconductors in the framework of the similarity transformed equation of motion coupled cluster theory. Inorg Chem. 2019;58:9303-15. DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.9b00994.
• [39] Kamath D, Mezyk SP, Minakata D. Elucidating the elementary reaction pathways and kinetics of hydroxyl radical-induced acetone degradation in aqueous phase advanced oxidation processes. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52:7763-74. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b00582.
• [40] Maeda S, Harabuchi Y, Ono Y, Taketsugu T, Morokuma K. Intrinsic reaction coordinate: Calculation, bifurcation, and automated search. Int J Quantum Chem. 2015;115:258-69. DOI: 10.1002/qua.24757.
• [41] Serobatse KRN, Kabanda MM. An appraisal of the hydrogen atom transfer mechanism for the reaction between thiourea derivatives and center dot OH radical: A case-study of dimethylthiourea and diethylthiourea. Comput Theor Chem. 2017;1101:83-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2016.12.027.
• [42] Moc J, Simmie JM. Hydrogen abstraction from n-butanol by the hydroxyl radical: high level ab initio study of the relative significance of various abstraction channels and the role of weakly bound intermediates. J Phys Chem A. 2010;114:5558-64. DOI: 10.1021/jp1009065.
• [43] Cinar SA, Ziylan-Yavas A, Catak S, Ince NH, Aviyente V. Hydroxyl radical-mediated degradation of diclofenac revisited: a computational approach to assessment of reaction mechanisms and by-products. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24:18458-69. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9482-7.
• [44] Canneaux S, Bohr F, Henon E. KiSThelP: A program to predict thermodynamic properties and rate constants from quantum chemistry results. J Comput Chem. 2014;35:82-93. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23470.
• [45] Aydogdu S, Hatipoglu A. Theoretical investigation on the kinetics of dimethyl phosphoramidate with hydroxyl radicals. J Indian Chem Soc. 2019;96:1117-22.
• [46] Xiao R, Gao L, Wei Z, Spinney R, Luo S, Wang D, et al. Mechanistic insight into degradation of endocrine disrupting chemical by hydroxyl radical: An experimental and theoretical approach. Environ Pollut. 2017;231:1446-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.006.
• [47] Li X, Wang B, Wang Y, Li K, Yu G. Synergy effect of E-peroxone process in the degradation of structurally diverse pharmaceuticals: A QSAR analysis. Chem Eng J. 2019;360:1111-8. DOI: 10.1016/J.CEJ.2018.10.191.
• [48] Sudhakaran S, Calvin J, Amy GL. QSAR models for the removal of organic micropollutants in four different river water matrices. Chemosphere. 2012;87:144-50. DOI: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2011.12.006.
• [49] Lee Y, von Gunten U. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for the transformation of organic micropollutants during oxidative water treatment. Water Res. 2012;46:6177-95. DOI: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2012.06.006.
• [50] Luo S, Wei Z, Dionysiou DD, Spinney R, Hu WP, Chai L, et al. Mechanistic insight into reactivity of sulfate radical with aromatic contaminants through single-electron transfer pathway. Chem Eng J. 2017;327:1056-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.179.
• [51] Liu Y, Cheng Z, Liu S, Tan Y, Yuan T, Yu X, et al. Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) modelling of the degradability rate constant of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by OH radicals in atmosphere. Sci Total Environ. 2020;729:138871. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138871.
• [52] Sudhakaran S, Amy GL. QSAR models for oxidation of organic micropollutants in water based on ozone and hydroxyl radical rate constants and their chemical classification. Water Res. 2013;47:1111-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.033.
• [53] Luo X, Wei X, Chen J, Xie Q, Yang X, Peijnenburg WJGM. Rate constants of hydroxyl radicals reaction with different dissociation species of fluoroquinolones and sulfonamides: Combined experimental and QSAR studies. Water Res. 2019;166. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115083.
• [54] Jia L, Shen Z, Guo W, Zhang Y, Zhu H, Ji W, et al. QSAR models for oxidative degradation of organic pollutants in the Fenton process. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2015;46:140-7. DOI: 10.1016/J.JTICE.2014.09.014.
• [55] Su H, Yu C, Zhou Y, Gong L, Li Q, Alvarez PJJ, et al. Quantitative structure-activity relationship for the oxidation of aromatic organic contaminants in water by TAML/H2O2. Water Res. 2018;140:354-63. DOI: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2018.04.062.
• [56] Cheng Z, Yang B, Chen Q, Tan Y, Gao X, Yuan T, et al. 2D-QSAR and 3D-QSAR simulations for the reaction rate constants of organic compounds in ozone-hydrogen peroxide oxidation. Chemosphere. 2018;212:828-36. DOI: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2018.08.097.
• [57] Gupta S, Basant N. Modeling the pH and temperature dependence of aqueousphase hydroxyl radical reaction rate constants of organic micropollutants using QSPR approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24:24936-46. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0161-5.
• [58] Heeb MB, Criquet J, Zimmermann-Steffens SG, von Gunten U. Oxidative treatment of bromide-containing waters: Formation of bromine and its reactions with inorganic and organic compounds - A critical review. Water Res. 2014;48:15-42. DOI: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2013.08.030.
• [59] Lee H, Park SH, Kim BH, Kim SJ, Kim SC, Seo SG, et al. Contribution of dissolved oxygen to methylene blue decomposition by hybrid advanced oxidation processes system. Int J Photoenergy. 2012;2012:1-6. DOI: 10.1155/2012/305989.
• [60] Zhang R, Wang X, Zhou L, Liu Z, Crump D. The impact of dissolved oxygen on sulfate radical-induced oxidation of organic micro-pollutants: A theoretical study. Water Res. 2018;135:144-54. DOI: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2018.02.028.
• [61] Xie Y, Schaefer HF. Hydrogen bonding between the water molecule and the hydroxyl radical (H2O · HO): The global minimum. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:8829-34. DOI: 10.1063/1.464492.
• [62] Kim KS, Kim HS, Jang JH, Kim HS, Mhin BJ, Xie Y, et al. Hydrogen bonding between the water molecule and the hydroxyl radical (H2O·OH): The 2A″ and 2A′ minima. J Chem Phys. 1991;94:2057-62. DOI: 10.1063/1.459927.
• [63] Dubey MK, Mohrschladt R, Donahue NM, Anderson JG. Isotope specific kinetics of hydroxyl radical (OH) with water (H2O): Testing models of reactivity and atmospheric fractionation. J Phys Chem A. 1997;101:1494-500. DOI: 10.1021/jp962332p.
• [64] Vassilev P, Louwerse MJ, Baerends EJ. Hydroxyl radical and hydroxide ion in liquid water: A comparative electron density functional theory study. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109:23605-10. DOI: 10.1021/jp044751p.
• [65] Allodi MA, Dunn ME, Livada J, Kirschner KN, Shields GC. Do hydroxyl radical-water clusters, OH(H2O)(n), n=1-5, exist in the atmosphere? J Phys Chem A. 2006;110:13283-9. DOI: 10.1021/jp064468l.
• [66] Belair SD, Francisco JS, Singer SJ. Hydrogen bonding in cubic (H2O)(8) and OH center dot((HO)-O-2)(7) clusters. Phys Rev A. 2005;71. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.013204.
• [67] Voglozin D, Cooper P. Altitude profile of the OH radical complex with water in Earth’s atmosphere: a quantum mechanical approach. J Atmos Chem. 2017;74:475-89. DOI: 10.1007/s10874-016-9353-5.
• [68] Park JH. Ab initio study on the complex forming reaction of OH and H2O in the gas phase. Asian J Atmos Environ. 2015;9:158-64. DOI: 10.5572/ajae.2015.9.2.158.
• [69] Schofield DP, Kjaergaard HG. High-level ab initio studies of the electronic excited states of the hydroxyl radical and water-hydroxyl complex. J Chem Phys. 2004;120:6930-4. DOI: 10.1063/1.1687335.
• [70] Soloveichik P, O’Donnell BA, Lester MI, Francisco JS, McCoy AB. Infrared spectrum and stability of the H2O-HO complex: Experiment and theory. J Phys Chem A. 2010;114:1529-38. DOI: 10.1021/jp907885d.
• [71] Crespo-Otero R, Sanchez-Garcia E, Suardiaz R, Montero LA, Sander W. Interactions between simple radicals and water. Chem Phys. 2008;353:193-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2008.08.012.
• [72] Zhou Z, Qu Y, Fu A, Du B, He F, Gao H. Density functional complete study of hydrogen bonding between the water molecule and the hydroxyl radical (H2O · HO). Int J Quantum Chem. 2002;89:550-8. DOI: 10.1002/qua.10315.
• [73] Gonzalez J, Anglada JM. Gas phase reaction of nitric acid with hydroxyl radical without and with water. A theoretical investigation. J Phys Chem A. 2010;114:9151-62. DOI: 10.1021/jp102935d.
• [74] Buszek RJ, Torrent-Sucarrat M, Anglada JM, Francisco JS. Effects of a single water molecule on the OH + H2O2 reaction. J Phys Chem A. 2012;116:5821-9. DOI: 10.1021/jp2077825.
• [75] Domin D, Braida B, Berges J. Influence of water on the oxidation of dimethyl sulfide by the (OH)-O-center dot radical. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121:9321-30. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b05796.
• [76] Marenich AV, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:6378-96. DOI: 10.1021/jp810292n.
• [77] Manonmani G, Sandhiya L, Senthilkumar K. Mechanism and kinetics of diuron oxidation initiated by hydroxyl radical: hydrogen and chlorine atom abstraction reactions. J Phys Chem A. 2019;123:8954-67. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b04800.
• [78] Minakata D, Crittenden J. Linear free energy relationships between aqueous phase hydroxyl radical reaction rate constants and free energy of activation. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:3479-86. DOI: 10.1021/es1020313.
• [79] Codorniu-Hernandez E, Kusalik PG. Insights into the solvation and mobility of the hydroxyl radical in aqueous solution. J Chem Theory Comput. 2011;7:3725-32. DOI: 10.1021/ct200418e.
• [80] Karakus N, Ozkan R. Ab initio study of atmospheric reactions of the hydroxyl radical-water complex (OH-H2O) with saturated hydrocarbons (methane, ethane and propane). J Mol Struct. 2005;724:39-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2004.10.075.
• [81] Mansergas A, Gonzalez J, Ruiz-Lopez M, Anglada JM. The gas phase reaction of carbonyl oxide with hydroxyl radical in presence of water vapor. A theoretical study on the reaction mechanism. Comput Theor Chem. 2011;965:313-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2011.02.023.
• [82] Gonzalez J, Anglada JM, Buszek RJ, Francisco JS. Impact of water on the OH plus HOCl reaction. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:3345-53. DOI: 10.1021/ja100976b.
• [83] Liu P, Li C, Wang S, Wang D. Catalytic effect of aqueous solution in water-assisted proton-transfer mechanism of 8-hydroxy guanine radical. J Phys Chem B. 2018;122:3124-32. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b09965.
• [84] Suma K, Sumiyoshi Y, Endo Y. The rotational spectrum and structure of the HOOO radical. Science. 2005;308:1885-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1112233.
• [85] Gmurek M, Olak-Kucharczyk M, Ledakowicz S. Photochemical decomposition of endocrine disrupting compounds - A review. Chem Eng J. 2017;310:437-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.05.014.
• [86] Duan X, Sun H, Wang S. Metal-free carbocatalysis in advanced oxidation reactions. Acc Chem Res. 2018;51:678-87. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00535.
• [87] Fan J, Qin H, Jiang S. Mn-doped g-C3N4 composite to activate peroxymonosulfate for acetaminophen degradation: The role of superoxide anion and singlet oxygen. Chem Eng J. 2019;359:723-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.165.
• [88] Lee J, von Gunten U, Kim JH. Persulfate-based advanced oxidation: Critical assessment of opportunities and roadblocks. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54:3064-81. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b07082.
• [89] Codorniu-Hernandez E, Hall KW, Boese AD, Ziemianowicz D, Carpendale S, Kusalik PG. Mechanism of O(P-3) formation from a hydroxyl radical pair in aqueous solution. J Chem Theory Comput. 2015;11:4740-8. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00783.
• [90] Howell CD, Michelangeli DV, Allen M, Yuk LY, Thomas RJ. SME observations of O2 (1Δg) nightglow: An assessment of the chemical production mechanisms. Planet Space Sci. 1990;38:529-37. DOI: 10.1016/0032-0633(90)90145-G.
• [91] Vlasov MN, Klopovsky KS, Lopaev DV, Popov NA, Rakhimov AT, Rakhimova TV. The mechanism of singlet oxygen emission in the upper atmosphere. Cosm Res. 1997;35:219-25.
• [92] Tarasick DW, Evans WFJ. A review of the O2 (a1Δg) and O2 (b1Σg+) airglow emissions. Adv Sp Res. 1993;13:145-8. DOI: 10.1016/0273-1177(93)90014-3.
• [93] Zakharov II, Loriya MG, Tselishchev AB. Structure of the HOO-N=N-OOH intermediate in hydrogen peroxide activation of N2: Quantum chemical DFT calculations. J Struct Chem. 2013;54:10-6. DOI: 10.1134/S0022476613010022.
• [94] Wang B, Hou H, Gu Y. Existence of hydrogen bonding between the hydroxyl radical and hydrogen peroxide: OH·H2O2. Chem Phys Lett. 1999;309:274-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00686-7.
• [95] Yamaguchi M. Hemibonding of hydroxyl radical and halide anion in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem A. 2011;115:14620-8. DOI: 10.1021/jp2063386.
• [96] Sevilla MD, Summerfield S, Eliezer I, Rak J, Symons MCR. Interaction of the chlorine atom with water: ESR and ab initio MO evidence for three-electron (sigma(2)sigma{*}(1)) bonding. J Phys Chem A. 1997;101:2910-5. DOI: 10.1021/jp964097g.
• [97] Shah S, Hao C. Quantum chemical investigation on photodegradation mechanisms of sulfamethoxypyridazine with dissolved inorganic matter and hydroxyl radical. J Environ Sci. 2017;57:85-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2016.09.023.
• [98] O’Donnell BA, Li EXJ, Lester MI, Francisco JS. Spectroscopic identification and stability of the intermediate in the OH+HONO2 reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:12678-83. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0800320105.
• [99] Martins-Costa MTC, Ruiz-Lopez MF. Molecular dynamics of hydrogen peroxide in liquid water using a combined quantum/classical force field. Chem Phys. 2007;332:341-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2006.12.018.
• [100] Jin X, Peldszus S, Huck PM. Reaction kinetics of selected micropollutants in ozonation and advanced oxidation processes. Water Res. 2012;46:6519-30. DOI: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2012.09.026.
• [101] Barbusinski K. Fenton reaction - Controversy concerning the chemistry. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2009;16:347-58. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/16kMQeMGRupbWPc4yhlKh48Uy2wH3g2vG/view.
• [102] Kuznetsov ML, Teixeira FA, Bokach NA, Pombeiro AJL, Shul’pin GB. Radical decomposition of hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by aqua complexes {[}M(H2O)(n)](2+) (M = Be, Zn, Cd). J Catal. 2014;313:135-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2014.03.010.
• [103] Novikov AS, Kuznetsov ML, Pombeiro AJL, Bokach NA, Shul’pin GB. Generation of HO center dot radical from hydrogen peroxide catalyzed by aqua complexes of the group III metals {[}M(H2O)(n)](3+) (M = Ga, In, Sc, Y, or La): A theoretical study. ACS Catal. 2013;3:1195-208. DOI: 10.1021/cs400155q.
• [104] Chen HY. Why the reactive oxygen species of the fenton reaction switches from oxoiron(IV) species to hydroxyl radical in phosphate buffer solutions? A Computational Rationale. ACS Omega. 2019;4:14105-13. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b02023.
• [105] Duan X, Yang S, Wacławek S, Fang G, Xiao R, Dionysiou DD. Limitations and prospects of sulfate-radical based advanced oxidation processes. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020;8:103849. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.103849.
• [106] Buda F, Ensing B, Gribnau MCM, Baerends EJ. DFT study of the active intermediate in the Fenton reaction. Chem Eur J. 2001;7:2775-83. DOI: 10.1002/1521-3765(20010702)7:13<2775::AID-CHEM2775>3.0.CO; 2-6.
• [107] Ensing B, Buda F, Blöchl PE, Baerends EJ. A Car-Parrinello study of the formation of oxidizing intermediates from Fenton’s reagent in aqueous solution. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2002;4:3619-27. DOI: 10.1039/b201864k.
• [108] Ensing B, Baerends EJ. Reaction path sampling of the reaction between iron(II) and hydrogen peroxide in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem A. 2002;106:7902-10. DOI: 10.1021/jp025833l.
• [109] Ensing B, Buda F, Blöchl P, Baerends EJ. Chemical involvement of solvent water molecules in elementary steps of the Fenton oxidation reaction. Angew Chemie. 2001;113:2977-9. DOI: 10.1002/1521-3757(20010803)113:15<2977::aid-ange2977>3.0.co;2-q.
• [110] Yamamoto N, Koga N, Nagaoka M. Ferryl-oxo species produced from Fenton’s reagent via a two-step pathway: Minimum free-energy path analysis. J Phys Chem B. 2012;116:14178-82. DOI: 10.1021/jp310008z.
• [111] Petit AS, Pennifold RCR, Harvey JN. Electronic structure and formation of simple ferryloxo complexes: Mechanism of the Fenton reaction. Inorg Chem. 2014;53:6473-81. DOI: 10.1021/ic500379r.
• [112] Lu HF, Chen HF, Kao CL, Chao I, Chen HY. A computational study of the Fenton reaction in different pH ranges. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20:22890-901. DOI: 10.1039/C8CP04381G.
• [113] Lutze HV, Brekenfeld J, Naumov S, von Sonntag C, Schmidt TC. Degradation of perfluorinated compounds by sulfate radicals - New mechanistic aspects and economical considerations. Water Res. 2018;129:509-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.10.067.
• [114] The 1998 Nobel Prizes. Econ. 1998:97. Available from: https://www.economist.com/science-andtechnology/1998/10/15/picking-winners
• [115] Liu F, Sanchez DM, Kulik HJ, Martínez TJ. Exploiting graphical processing units to enable quantum chemistry calculation of large solvated molecules with conductor-like polarizable continuum models. Int J Quantum Chem. 2019;119:e25760. DOI: 10.1002/qua.25760.
• [116] Cheng J, Hu D, Yao A, Gao Y, Asadi H. A computational study on the Pd-decorated ZnO nanocluster for H2 gas sensing: A comparison with experimental results. Phys E Low-Dimensional Syst Nanostructures. 2020;124:114237. DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2020.114237.
• [117] Mei Q, Cao H, Han D, Li M, Yao S, Xie J, et al. J Hazard Mater. 2020;389:121901. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121901.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).