PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Powiadomienia systemowe
  • Sesja wygasła!
Tytuł artykułu

Social Responsibility, Internal Governance and Manufacturing Growth

Autorzy
Treść / Zawartość
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
PL
Odpowiedzialność społeczna, zarządzanie wewnętrzne a wzrost produkcji
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This article presents a structural equation model for exploring the impact of social responsibility, which been divided into responsibility for the internal stakeholder and responsibility for the external stakeholder, as well as internal governance on Chinese manufacturing growth on the basis of data collected from 500 manufacturing enterprises in the East region of China. Our results show that both social responsibility and internal governance have a positive impact on manufacturing growth and promote sustainable development in manufacturing. In addition, social responsibility has a positive impact on internal governance, and the internal governance plays a partial intermediary role in the impact of social responsibility on manufacturing growth. These findings signify that it is important for Chinese Manufacturing to undertake Social Responsibility, and it can provide a beneficial guidance for Chinese Manufacturing Growth and help strengthen the competitive advantage of manufacturing industry.
PL
Artykuł przedstawia model równania strukturalnego odnoszący się do społecznej odpowiedzialności, wyróżniając w jej ramach odpowiedzialność za wewnętrznego oraz zewnętrznego akcjonariusza i wewnętrzne zarządzanie w kontekście wzrostu produkcji w Chinach, w oparciu o informacje uzyskane z 500 firm pochodzących ze wschodniej części kraju. Przeprowadzona analiza pokazuje, że zarówno społeczna odpowiedzialność, jak i wewnętrzne zarządzanie, mają pozytywny wpływ na wzrost produkcji i promocję zrównoważonego wytwarzania. Ponadto społeczna odpowiedzialność ma pozytywny wpływ na wewnętrzne zarządzanie, a w oddziaływaniu społecznej odpowiedzialności na wzrost produkcji, wewnętrzne zarządzane odgrywa po części rolę pośrednika. Uzyskane rezultaty wskazują, że społeczna odpowiedzialność jest ważna, może pełnić rolę dobrego doradcy w kontekście wzrostu chińskiej produkcji i pomóc w zwiększeniu konkurencyjnej przewagi dla przemysłu wytwórczego.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
41--54
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 75 poz., fig., tab.
Twórcy
autor
  • School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, CB3 0FS Cambridge, UK
autor
  • School of Economics &Management, Tongji University, Shanghai, China; School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China
autor
  • Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, CB30FS Cambridge, UK
autor
  • Anhui Cadre Institute of Economics Management,Hefei, 230008, China
Bibliografia
  • 1. ABBOTT W.F., MONSEN J., 1979, On the Measurement of Corporate Social Responsibility: Self- Reported Disclosures as a Method of Measuring Corporate Social Involvement, in: Academy of Management Journal, vol. 22, no 3, p. 501-515.
  • 2. AKIYOSHI H. HANAZAKI M.-H., 2004, Governance structure of Japanese companies, in: Economic and management research, no 1, p. 95-101.
  • 3. ANDERSON J.C., FRANKLE A.W., 1980, Voluntary Social Reporting: An isobeta Portfolio Analysis, in: The Accounting Review, vol. 55, no 3, p. 467-479.
  • 4. AUPPELE K.E., CARROLL A.B., HATFIELD J.D.,1985, An Empirical Examination of The relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability, in: Academy of Management Journal, vol. 28, no 2, p. 446-462.
  • 5. BAGOZZI R.P., YI Y., 1988, On the evaluation of structural equation models, in: Academy of Marketing Science, vol. l16, no 1, p. 74-94.
  • 6. BAYSINGER B., BUTLER H., 1985,Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance effects of Changes in Board Composition. Journal of Law, in: Economics and Organization, vol. 1, no1, p.101-124.
  • 7. BHAGAT S., BLACK B., 2002,The Non-Cor-relation Between Board Independence and Long-Term Firm Performance, in: Journal of Corporation Law, no 27, p. 231-273.
  • 8. BLAIR M.M., 1995, Corporate ‘Ownership’, in: The Brookings Review, vol. 13, no1, p. 16-19.
  • 9. BOWEN H.R., 1953, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman, HarPer&Row, New York.
  • 10. BOWMAN E.H., HAIRE M.A,1975, Strategic Posture toward Corporate Social Responsibility, in: California Management Review, vol. 18, no 2, p. 58-68.
  • 11. BRAMNRNER S..WILLIAMS G.,ZINKLN,J., 2007, Religion and Attitudes to Corporate Social Responsibility in a Large Cross-Country Sample, in: Journal of Business Ethies, vol. 71, no 3, p. 229-243.
  • 12. CARROLL A.B., 1979, A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 4, no 4, p. 497-505.
  • 13. CHANG K., 2004, Put corporate social responsibility movement in our country's labor law track, in: Chinese party and government cadres Forum, no 3, p. 25-28.
  • 14. CHEN Y.S., LIN M.J., CHANG C.H., 2009, The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets, in: Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 38, no 2, p. 152-158.
  • 15. CHENG H., XIN Y., 2003, The capital structure, enterprise scale and enterprise growth of Chinese science and technology enterprise, in: Journal of world economy, no 12, p.72-75.
  • 16. CHENG X.,WANG H., 2004, Equity balance and corporate value: model and empirical evidence, in: Quantitative economic technology and Economic Research, no 11, p. 102-110.
  • 17. CHENG Z., 2006, Research on the independent innovation strategy of agricultural equipment manufacturing industry, in: Agriculture Machinery Technology Extension, no 8, p. 8-11.
  • 18. CLARKSON M.E.1995,A Stakeholder Frame-work for Analysing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no 1, p. 92-11.
  • 19. DIANE D.K., MCCONNELL J., 2003, International Corporate Governance, in: Journal of Finacial and Quantitative Analysis, vol. 38, no 1, p. 1-36.
  • 20. DING Y. D., 2010, China's manufacturing industry’s upgrade facing the global industry value chain, Science Press, Beijing.
  • 21. DUNNE P., HUGHES A., 1992, Age, Size, Growth and Survival Revisited, in: Small Business Research Centre, University of Cam-bridge.
  • 22. FREDERICK W.C., 1994, From CSRI to CSRZ: The Maturing of Business-and-Society thought, in: Business and Society, vol. 33, no 2, p. 150-164.
  • 23. GAO L., SONG S., Executive stock ownership and corporate performance – based on the Listing Corporation from 2000-2004, p.134-143.
  • 24. GREENLY G.E., FOXALL G.R., 1997, Multiple Stakeholder Orientation in UK Companies and the Implications for Company Performance, in: Journal of Management Studies, vol. 34, no 2, p. 59-284.
  • 25. GRIFFIN J.J., MAHON J.F., 1997, The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate TwentyGfive Years of Incomparable Research, in: Business&Society, vol. 36, no1, p.5-31.
  • 26. GUNGOR A., GUPTA S.M., 1999, Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey, in: Journal of computers & industrial engineering , vol. 36, no 4, p. 811-853.
  • 27. HAN S., LI K., 2005, Research on the international transfer of iron and steel industry, in: Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), no 5, p. 5-10.
  • 28. HIDEAKI M., NITTA K., SAITO N., YUSUKE O., 2004, Enterprise management efficiency and corporate governance, in: NLI Re-search Institute report, vol. 33, no 3, p.52-98.
  • 29. HOLMSTROM B.R., MILGROM P., 1991, Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership and Job Design, in: Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, no7, p. 24-52.
  • 30. ILGIN M.A.,GUPTA S.M., 2010, Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art, in: Journal of environmental management, vol. 91, no 3, p.563-591
  • 31. INGRAM R.W., 1978, An Investigation of the Information Content of (Certain) Social Responsibility Disclosures, in: Journal of Accounting Research, no 16, p. 270-285.
  • 32. JIN L., 2006, Empirical Study on the evaluation index system of corporate social responsibility movement – consumer perspective, in: China's industrial economy, no 6, p. 114-120.
  • 33. JONES T.M., Instrumental Stakeholder Theory A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics, in: Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no 2, p. 404-437.
  • 34. JU F., XIE Z., BAO G., 2005, Realization of corporate social responsibility based on consumer choice, in: China Industrial economy, no 9, p. 91-98.
  • 35. KUROIWA I., OZEKI H., 2010, Intra-regional Trade between China, Japan, and Korea Before and After the Financial Crisis, In: Ide Discussion Paper, no 237.
  • 36. LIN L., 2005, The industry analysis of the equity of the listing Corporation in China, in: Industrial economy research, no 6, p. 43-47.
  • 37. LICHTENBERGER F.R., PUSHNER G.M., 1994, Ownership Structure and corporate performance in Japan, in: Japan and World Economy, no 6, p.239-261.
  • 38. LI Z., 2006, Study on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate value Empirical Evidence from Shanghai stock market listing Corporation, in: China's industrial economy, no 2, p. 77-83.
  • 39. LU G., 2002, Research on innovation of recession industry, in: Economic Issues in China, no 5, p. 45-51.
  • 40. MAIGNAN, FERRELL O.C., 2000, Measuring Corporate Citizenship in Two Countries: The Case of the United States and France, in: Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 23, no 3, p.283-297.
  • 41. MERZ G.R., SAUBER M.H., 1995, Profiles of Managerial Activities in Small Firms, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 16, no 7, p.551-564.
  • 42. MOSKOWITZ M.R., 1972, Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks , in: Business & Society Re-view, p.71-76.
  • 43. NAGAR V., PETRONI K., WOLFENZON D., 2000, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance in Closely-Held Corporations, in :Working Paper of University of Michigan Business School, no 1, p. 50-57.
  • 44. PESARAN M., HASHEM R., 1995 , Estimating Long-Run Relationships from Dynamic Heterogenous Panels, in: Journal of Econometrics, vol. 68, no1, p. 79-113.
  • 45. PRESTON L.E.,1978, Comparing Corporate Social Performance: Germany, France, Canada and the U.S., in: California Management Re-view, vol. 20, no 4, p. 40-49.
  • 46. QIAN Y., 1995, Corporate governance structure reform and financial structure reform, in: Economic Research Journal, no 1, p. 20-29.
  • 47. DONKELS R., MIETTINEN A., 1997, Measuring growth: Methodological considerations and empirical results, in: Entrepreneurship and SME research, Ashgate, UK.
  • 48. ROBERT R.W., 1992, Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: an Application of Stakeholder Theory, in: Accounting, Organizations & Society, vol. 17, no 6, p. 595-612.
  • 49. SHAH R., WARD P.T., 2003, Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance, in: Journal of operations management, vol. 21, no 2, p. 129-149.
  • 50. SHENG H., 2006, A review of the research on the corporate social responsibility of corporate social responsibility in the 21st Century, in: Foreign economics and management, vol. 28, no 8, p. l-9.
  • 51. SONG Z., ZHANG Z., ZHU J., 2005, Analysis on the influence of the equity incentive of the managers of the Listing Corporation, in: Management review, no 3, p. 3-8.
  • 52. SUN H., 2006, Research on corporate governance structure and company growth ability, Ji-lin University.
  • 53. SVENDSEN A., BOUTILIER R., ABBOTT R., WHEELER D., 2003, Measuring the Business Value of Stakeholder Relationships, in: Stake-holder Relationships, Social Capital and Business Value Creation. Research Report by Center for Innovation in Management (CIM) of Simon Fraser University, Schulich School of Business and Canadian Institute of Chartered Account-ants (CICA).
  • 54. TAKAFUMI S., YASUHIRO, Y.,2000,Corporate governance and shareholder's value, in: Securities Analysts Journal, no 9, p.28-46.
  • 55. TIROLE J., 2001, Corporate Governance, in: Econometrica, vol. 69, no1, p. 1-35.
  • 56. VACHON S., KLASSEN R.D., 2008, Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain, in: International journal of production economics, vol. 111, no 2, p. 299-315.
  • 57. WADDOCK S.A., GRAVES A.B., 1997, The Corporate social Performance-Financial Performance Link, in: Strategic Management Journal, vol. 18, no 4, p. 303-319.
  • 58. WADDOCK S.A.,GRAVES S.B.,1997,Quality of management and quality of Stakeholder relations : Are They Synonymous? in: Business&Society, vol. 36, no 3, p. 250-279.
  • 59. WANG Q., HE S., 2005, Analysis of the main factors affecting the growth of Chinese Listing Corporation, in: Journal of statistics and decision making, no 1, p. 33-36.
  • 60. WARD P.T., DURAY R., 2000, Manufacturing strategy in context: environment, competitive strategy and manufacturing strategy, in: Journal of operations management, vol. 18, no 2, p.123-138.
  • 61. WHEELER D., COLBERT B., FREEMAN R.E. 2003, Focusing on Value: Reconciling Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and a Stakeholder Approach in a network world, in: Journal of General Management, vol. 28, no 3, p. l-28.
  • 62. WILLIAMSON O.E., 1975, Markets and Hierarehies, Fress Press, New York.
  • 63. WOOD D.J., JONES R.E., 1995, Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical problem In Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance, in: International Journal of organizational Analysis(1993-2002), vol. 3, no3, p. 229-267.
  • 64. WOOD D.J., 1991, Corporate social performance Revisited, in: The Academy of Management Review, vol. 16, no 4, p. 691-717.
  • 65. WOKUTCH R.E, MCKINNEY E.W., 1991, Behavioral and Perceptual Measures of Corporate Social Performance, in: Post J.E. (ed.), Re-search in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, no 12, p. 309-330.
  • 66. WU M.L., 2006, Corporate Social Performance, Corporate Financial Performance and Firm Size: A Meta-Analysis, in: Journal of American Academy of Business Cambridge, vol. 8, no 1, p. 163-171.
  • 67. XU L., XIN Y., CHENG G., 2006, The impact of ownership concentration and equity balance and its impact on the company's operating performance, in: Economic research, no 1, p. 90-100.
  • 68. YANG L.., ZHAO C., 2010, Summary of Enterprise Growth Theory-Based on View of Growth Motivation, in: Soft Science, vol. 7, no 24, p. 106-110.
  • 69. YAO Q., 2006, Debt maturity structure, corporate performance and growth, Dongbei Finance and Economics University.
  • 70. YOU J., CHENG S., 2003, Advanced management science, Higher Education Press, Bejing.
  • 71. ZHANG P., 2013, Global value Chains specialization and China’s manufacturing industries’ growth. Liaoning University.
  • 72. ZHANG Q., 2003, The international competitiveness of China's manufacturing industry un-der the opening conditions, in: Management World, no 8, p. 74-79.
  • 73. ZHOU X., 2004, Industry rise and fall of, in: Journal of humanities, no 7, p. 15.
  • 74. ZHOU Z., 2005, Corporate social responsibility: perspective, form and connotation, in: Theory Journal, no 3, p. 14-24.
  • 75. ZHU H.,WANG T., 2003, Study on the inner mechanism of the growth of modern enterprises, in: Journal of Southern Yangtze University, vol. 2, no 2, p. 63-69.
Uwagi
Opracowanie ze środków MNiSW w ramach umowy 812/P-DUN/2016 na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (zadania 2017)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-0ffc2e21-f56a-432c-9e0c-70d4fe8af27a
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.