Comparative analysis of machinability of nitinol alloy using weighted radar diagram

• Autorzy: Kowalczyk M. , Niżankowski C.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.1515/mper-2017-0038

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper presents an attempt to analyze comparative machinability of two different varieties of nitinol alloy type, or compare the susceptibility of these materials to change the volume, shape and dimension of adopted machining conditions. The machinability of the material can not be fully determined numerically by only one independent factor. Therefore multivariate analysis technique of weighted diagram radar was developed by authors. This technique allowed for the comprehensive identification machinability analyzed varieties of nitinol alloy exclusively on the basis of the specified in literature directional material properties and general recommendations tool manufacturers on the cutting conditions. In the paper the full usefulness of this technique to demonstrate the differences in machinability of different varieties of the same species alloy, without the need for lengthy and cost-intensive experimental trials was presented.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

machinability; nitinol; TiNi; weighted radar diagram

• Wydawca: Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences ; Polish Association for Production Management
• Czasopismo: Management and Production Engineering Review
• Rocznik: 2017
• Tom: Vol. 8, No. 4
• Strony: 74--81
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 16 poz., rys., zdj.

Twórcy

autor

Kowalczyk M.

• Cracow University of Technology, Production Engineering Institute, Al. Jana Pawła II 37, 31-864 Cracow, Poland

autor

Niżankowski C.

• Cracow University of Technology, Production Engineering Institute, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] Guo Y., Klink A., Fu Ch., Snyder J., Machinability and surface integrity of Nitinol shape memory alloy, CIRP Annals – Manu. Tech., 62, 83-86, 2013.
• [2] Starzynska B., Hamrol A., Excellence toolbox: Decision support system for quality tools and techniques selection and application, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24, 5, 2013.
• [3] Hamrol A., Process diagnostic as a means of improving the efficiency of quality control, Production Planning & Control, 11, 8, 797-805, 2000.
• [4] Biermann D., Kahleyss F., Krebs E., Upmeier T., A study on micro-machining technology for the machining of NiTi: five-axis micro-milling and micro deep-hole drilling, JMEPEG, 20, 745-751, 2011.
• [5] Kaynak Y., Robertson S.W., Karacac H.E., Jawahir I.S., Progressive tool-wear in machining of roomtemperature austenitic NiTi alloys: the influence of cooling/lubricating, melting, and heat treatment conditions, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 215, 95-104, 2015.
• [6] Kaynak Y., Karaca H.E., Noebe R.D., Jawahir I.S., Tool wear analysis in cryogenic machining of NiTi shape memory alloys: a comparison of tool wear performance with dry and MQL machining, Wear, 306, 51-63, 2013.
• [7] Lin H.C., Lin K.M., Chen Y.C., A study on the machining characteristics of TiNi shape memory alloys, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 105, 327-332, 2000.
• [8] Piquard R., Acunto A.D., Laheurte P., Dudzinski D., Micro-end milling of NiTi biomedical alloys, burr formation and phase transformation, Prec. Eng., 38, 356-364, 2014.
• [9] Weinert K., Petzoldt V., Kotter D., Turning and drilling of NiTi shape memory alloys, CIRP Annals – Manuf. Technol., 53, 1, 65-68, 2004.
• [10] Weinert K., Petzoldt V., Machining of NiTi based shape memory alloys, Mater. Sci. and Eng., A 378, 180-184, 2004.
• [11] Weinert K., Petzoldt V., Machining NiTi microparts by micro-milling, Mater. Sci. and Eng., 481-482, 672-675, 2008.
• [12] Wu S.K., Lin H.C., Chen C.C., A study on the machinability of a Ti 49,6 Ni 50,4 shape memory alloy, Mater. Letters, 40, 27-3, 1999.
• [13] Elahinia M.H., Hashemi M., Tabesh M., Bhaduri S.B., Manufacturing and processing of NiTi implants: a review, Prog. in Mater. Sci., 57, 911-946, 2012.
• [14] Nadolny K., Mahadi Al-Obaidi A.S, A multi-criteria methodology for effectiveness assessment of internal cylindrical grinding process with modified grinding wheels, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., pp. 1-13, 2016.
• [15] Seco Tools, Adjustment of regulations – The machinability analysis system that improves the cutting effects of metal, Obr. Metalu., 2, 55-58, 2015.
• [16] Niżankowski Cz., The polarized profiles of school airplanes for RP air forces, Monograph “Antiaircraft and air defense systems” OBRSM Tarnow, Cracow, pp. 299-308, 2003.

Uwagi

Opracowanie w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2018).