Validation of a behavioral marker system for rating cadet’s non-technical skills

• Autorzy: da Conceição V. P. , Mendes J. B. , Teodoro M. F. , Dahlman J.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.13.01.08

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Simulator-based training assumes a very important role in the maritime domain, particularly in the education of Officers Of the Watch (OOW). In the Portuguese Navy, most of the cadet’s skills as future OOW rely on the success of this training. Beyond theory and technical training, the development of non-technical skills is a key factor for obtaining officers capable of identifying and solving problems. To optimize the training and development of non-technical skills, using the Portuguese Naval Academy Simulator, a previously designed Behavioral Marker System model was further assessed. The revised model, which comprises new parameters such as the effectiveness of the task, was validated through a set of simulated sessions, where 11 instructors and 48 students participated. After each session, data was collected with questionnaires and focus group discussion, focusing on the quality and usability of the model and on the design of the scenario. The results show that the revised model, positively addresses the limitations found on the previous version, and it has received encouraging feedback from both instructors and cadets. This new model is now under implementation in all the Naval Academy course programs, and future research aims to digitalize the behavior markers.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

non-technical skills; maritime education and training (MET); officer of the watch (OOW); behavioral marker system; rating cadets; naval academies; crew qualification improvement; MET system in Portugal

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 13, no. 1
• Strony: 89--96
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 27 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

da Conceição V. P.

• Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
• CINAV, Portuguese Naval Academy, Lisbon, Portugal
• Instituto Dom Luiz, Faculdade de Ciências, Lisbon, Portugal

autor

Mendes J. B.

• CINAV, Portuguese Naval Academy, Lisbon, Portugal

autor

Teodoro M. F.

• CINAV, Portuguese Naval Academy, Lisbon, Portugal
• CEMAT, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal

autor

Dahlman J.

• Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden
• VTI, Gothenburg, Sweden

Bibliografia

• 1. Barnett, M., Gatfield, D. & Habberley, J., 2002. Shipboard crisis management: A Case Study. In RINA, Royal Institution of Naval Architects International Conference - Human Factors in Ship Design, Safety and Operation. London, United Kingdom, pp. 131–145.
• 2. Barnett, M., Gatfield, D. & Pekcan, C., 2006. Non-technical skills: the vital ingredient in world maritime technology? In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Maritime Technology. London: Institute of Marine engineering, Science and technology.
• 3. Bué, I.M.G., Lopes, F.C. & Semedo, Á., 2015. The Use of the Portuguese Naval Academy Navigation Simulator in Developing Team Leadership Skills. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, (June), pp.83–88. - doi:10.1201/b18515-13
• 4. Ceitil, M., 2016. Gestão e Desenvolvimento de Competências 2a Edição. M. Robalo, ed., Lisboa: Edições Sílabo.
• 5. da Conceição V.F.P., Basso J.C., Lopes C.F., Dahlman J.: Development of a Behavioural Marker System for Rating Cadet's Non-Technical Skills. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 11, No. 2, doi:10.12716/1001.11.02.07, pp. 255-262, 2017
• 6. Deist, F.D. Le & Winterton, J., 2005. What Is Competence? Human Resource Development International, 8(1), pp.27–46. - doi:10.1080/1367886042000338227
• 7. Elashkar, M.A., 2016. the Use of Simulation Techniques in the Development of Non-Technical Skills for Marine Officers. International Journal of General Engineering and Technology (IJGET), 5(5), pp.19–26.
• 8. Ericsson, A.K. et al. eds., 2006. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, Cambridge University Press. - doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816796
• 9. Fjeld, G.P., Tvedt, S.D. & Oltedal, H., 2018. Bridge officers’ non-technical skills: a literature review. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. - doi:10.1007/s13437-018-0158-z
• 10. Flin, R., O’Connor, P. & Crichton, M., 2008. Safety at the sharp end: a guide to non-technical skills, Aldershot England: Ashgate.
• 11. Flin, R.H. & Martin, L., 2001. Behavioral Markers for Crew Resource Management: A Review of Current Practice. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11(1), pp.95–118. - doi:10.1207/S15327108IJAP1101_6
• 12. Grech, M.R., Horberry, T.J. & Koester, T., 2008. Human Factors in the Maritime Domain, London: CRC Press.
• 13. Hetherington, C., Flin, R. & Mearns, K., 2006. Safety in shipping: The human element. Journal of Safety Research, 37(4), pp.401–411. - doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.007
• 14. Hontvedt, M., 2015. Professional vision in simulated environments - Examining professional maritime pilots’ performance of work tasks in a full-mission ship simulator. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 7(November 2015), pp.71–84. - doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.07.003
• 15. Klampfer, B. et al., 2001. Enhancing Performance in High Risk Environments, Recommendations for the Use of Behavioural Markers. In Behavioral Markers Workshop, GIHRE. Zürich, Switzerland.: Gottlieb Daimler and Karl Benz Foundation.
• 16. Manuel, M.E., 2011. Maritime Risk and Organizational Learning, Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
• 17. Mjeldea, F.V. et al., 2016. Military teams – A demand for resilience. Work, 54, pp.283–294. - doi:10.3233/WOR-162298
• 18. O’Connor, P., 2011. Assessing the Effectiveness of Bridge Resource Management Training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 21(4), pp.357–374. - doi:10.1080/10508414.2011.606755
• 19. O’Connor, P. & Long, W.M., 2011. The development of a prototype behavioral marker system for US Navy officers of the deck. Safety Science, 49(10), pp.1381–1387. - doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.05.009
• 20. Oltedal, H.A. & Lützhöft, M., 2018. Managing Maritime Safety, Oxon: Routledge. - doi:10.4324/9780203712979
• 21. Pacheco, J., Caetano, A. & Tavares, S.M., 2015. Is training leaders in functional leadership a useful tool for improving the performance of leadership functions and team effectiveness? The Leadership Quarterly, 26(3), pp.470–484. - doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.010
• 22. Pekcan, C., Gatfield, D. & Barnett, M., 2005. Content and Context: Understanding the complexity of human behaviour in ship operation. In RINA, Royal Institution of Naval Architects International Conference - Human Factors in Ship Design, Safety and Operation, 23-24 February. London, United Kingdom, pp. 99–107.
• 23. Salas, E. et al., 2006. Does Crew Resource Management Training Work? An Update, an Extension, and Some Critical Needs. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48(2), pp.392–412. - doi:10.1518/001872006777724444
• 24. Sampson, H., Gekara, V. & Bloor, M., 2011. Water-tight or sinking? A consideration of the standards of the contemporary assessment practices underpinning seafarer licence examinations and their implications for employers. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(1), pp.81–92. - doi:10.1080/03088839.2010.533713
• 25. Santos, J., Caetano, A. & Jesuíno, C., 2008. As competências funcionais dos líderes e a eficácia das equipas. Revista Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gestão, 7, pp.22–33.
• 26. Sellberg, C., 2017. From briefing, through scenario, to debriefing: the maritime instructor’s work during simulator-based training. Cognition, Technology and Work, (November), pp.1–14. - doi:10.1007/s10111-017-0446-y
• 27. Sellberg, C., 2016. Simulators in bridge operations training and assessment: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, (November), pp.1–17 - doi:10.1007/s13437-016-0114-8

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu w ramach umowy 509/P-DUN/2018 ze środków MNiSW przeznaczonych na działalność upowszechniającą naukę (2019).