Sustainable Development versus Prospecting and Extraction of Shale Gas

• Autorzy: Duda A. , Gołębiowska J. , Żelazna A.

Warianty tytułu

PL

Zrównoważony rozwój a poszukiwanie i wydobywanie gazu łupkowego

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Energy issues are very important for our civilization. Taking into account the perspective of sustainability a lot of attention is devoted to the sources of primary Energy characterized with low emission. Among them shale gas has gained in importance as the primary energy source. The paper presents the role of shale gas in the implementation of the main paradigm of sustainable development, i.e. the intergenerational equity. As the reference, the necessity of implementing water intakes monitoring has been pointed out.

PL

Kwestie energetyczne odgrywają kluczową rolę w rozwoju współczesnej cywilizacji. Patrząc z perspektywy zrównoważoności poszukuje się niskoemisyjnych źródeł energii, wśród nich coraz więcej uwagi poświęcając gazowi łupkowemu. W niniejszym artykule przedstawiono role jaką może odegrać gaz łupkowy w realizacji głównego paradygmatu zrównoważonego rozwoju sprawiedliwości międzygeneracyjnej. Wśród zaleceń zwrócono uwagę na potrzebę monitoringu zanieczyszczeń ujęć wodnych.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainable development; shale gas; water pollution

PL

rozwój zrównoważony; gaz łupkowy; zanieczyszczenie wody

• Wydawca: Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Problemy Ekorozwoju
• Rocznik: 2016
• Tom: Vol. 11, nr 1
• Strony: 177--180
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 34 poz.,

Twórcy

autor

Duda A.

• Department of Teaching Methods and Strategies, Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland

autor

Gołębiowska J.

• Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland

autor

Żelazna A.

• Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Lublin, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. BOGNER J., 2003, Global methane emissions from landfills: New methodology and annual estimates 1980-1996, in: Global Biogeochemical Cycles, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 1065-1072.
• 2. CAULTON D. et al. , 2014, Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development, in: Proceed-ings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, p. 6237-6242.
• 3. CHOLEWA T., PAWŁOWSKI A., 2009, Sustainable Use of Energy in the Communal Sector, in: Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska/Annual Set Environment Protection, vol. 11, p. 1165-1177.
• 4. CLAASSEN P. A. M., VAN LIER J. B., LOPEZ CONTRERAS A. M., VAN NIEL E. W. J., SIJTSMA L., STAMS A. J. M., DE VRIES S. S., WEUSTHUIS R. A., 1999, Utilisation of biomass for the supply of energy carriers, in: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 52, issue 6, p. 741-755.
• 5. EIA, 2013, Technically re-coverable shale oil and shale gas resources: an assessment of 137 Shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States, http://www.eia.gov/analysis/ studies/worldshalegas/pdf/fullreport.pdf (1.06.2015).
• 6. GLEASON R.A., Tangen B.A., 2014, Brine contamination to aquatic resources from oil gas development in the Williston Basin, USGS, United States, p.127-143.
• 7. HALUSZCZAK L.O., ROSE A. W., KUMP L.R., 2013, Geochemical evaluation of flow-back brine from Marcellus gas wells in Pennsylvania, in: Appl. Geochem., p. 55-61.
• 8. HEATH A. et al., 2014, Harmonization of initial estimates of shale gas life cycle greenhouse gas emissions for electric power generation, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111, p. E3167-3176.
• 9. HLADIK M.L., FOCAZIO M.J., ENGLE M., 2014, Discharges of produced waters from oil and gas extraction via wastewater treatment plants are sources of disinfection by-products to receiving streams, in: Sci. Total. Environ. p. 466-467.
• 10. HOFFMAN A., OLSSON G., LINDSTROM A., 2014, Shale Gas and Hydraulic Fracturing: Framing the Water Issue, Report No. 34, SIWI, Stockholm
• 11. HOUSTON N.M., BLAUCH D., WEAVER D.S., MILLER D. O’HARA D., 2009, Fracture-Stimulation in the Marcellus Shale – Lessons Learned in Fluid Selection and Execution, in: SPE Eastern Regional Meeting Proceedings, Paper 125987, Charleston, Society of Petroleum Engineers.
• 12. JRC, 2012, Unconventional gas: potential energy market impacts in the European Union, http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/jrc/downloads/jrc_repor t _2012_09_unconventional_gas.pdf (1.06.2015).
• 13. KHARAKA Y. K., HANOR J.S., 2014, Deep fluids in sedimentary basins, in: Treatise on Geochemistry, 2nd ed., eds. Holland H.D., Turekian K.K., Elsevier, Oxford, vol. 7, p. 472-515.
• 14. KUJAWSKA J., PAWLOWSKA M., CEL W., PAWLOWSKI A., 2016, Potential influence of drill cuttings landfill on groundwater quality –comparison of leaching tests results and ground-water composition, in: Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 57, issue 3, p. 1409-1419.
• 15. LAMPE D.J., STOLZ J.F., 2015, Current per-spectives on unconventional shale gas extraction in the Appalachian Basin, in: J. Environ. Sci. Health A. Tox. Hazard Subst. Environ. Eng., p. 434-446.
• 16. LEBIOCKA M., PAWŁOWSKI A., 2009, Biometanizacja metodą zrównoważonej utylizacji odpadów, in: Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska/Annual Set Environment Protection, vol. 11 (2), p. 1257-1266.
• 17. McKENDRY P., 2002, Energy production from biomass (part 2): conversion technologies, in: Bioresource Technology, Vol. 83 (1), p. 47-54.
• 18. MICHAŁOWSKI M., TORA B., 2012, Wy-brane problem wydobycia gazu łupkowego, in: Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska/Annual Set Environment Protection, vol. 14, p. 866-874.
• 19. MURPHY J.D., McKEOGH E., 2004, Tech-nical, economic and environmental analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste, in: Renewable Energy, vol. 29 (7), p. 1043-1057.
• 20. MAQUAIRE-BOYLE S.J, BARRON A.R., 2014, Organic compounds in produced waters from shale gas wells., in: Environ. Sci. Process Impacts, p. 2237-2248.
• 21. MONTUSIEWICZ A., LEBIOCKA M., PAWŁOWSKA M., 2008, Characterization of the biomethanization process in selected waste mixtures, in: Archives of Environmental Protection, vol. 34, issue 3, p. 49-61.
• 22. NEWELL R., RAIMI D., 2014, Implications of shale gas development for climate change, in: Environmental Science and Technology 48, p. 8360-8368.
• 23. NEW YORK State Dept. of Environmental Conservation, 2009, Preliminary Revised Draft Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement of the Oil, Gas and Solution Mining Regulatory Program: Well Permit Issuance for Horizontal Drilling and High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing to Develop the Marcellus Shale and Other Low-Permeability Gas Reservoirs.
• 24. PAWŁOWSKI A., 2009, Sustainable energy as a sine qua non condition for the achievement of sustainable development, in: Problemy Ekorozowju/Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 4, no 2, p. 9-12.
• 25. PAWŁOWSKA M., SIEPAK J., 2006, Enhancement of Methanogenesis at a Municipal Landfill Site by Addition of Sewage, in: Environmental Engineering Sciences, 23(4), p. 673-679.
• 26. POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2014, Description of the shale gas formations: re-serves and characteristics of problems related to its exploitation, March 11.
• 27. RAHM B., RIHA S., 2014, Evolving shale gas management: water resource risks, impacts and lessons learned, in: Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 16, p. 1400.
• 28. SHARMA S., MULDER M.L., SACK A., SCHROEDER K., HAMMACK R., 2014, Isotope approach to assess hydrologic connections during Marcellus Shale drilling, in: Ground Water, p. 424-33.
• 29. STARK M., ALLINGHAM R., CALDER J., LENNARTZ-WALKER T., WAI K., P. THOMPSON P., ZHAO S., 2012, Water and Shale Gas Development, Accenture Report.
• 30. STREESE J., STEGMANN R., 2003, Microbial oxidation of methane from old landfills in bio-filtres, in: Waste Management, vol. 23, issue 7, p. 573-580.
• 31. US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, 2013, Mod-ern Shale Gas Development in the United States: An Update. National Energy Technology Laboratory, http://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20 Library/Research/Oil-Gas/shale-gas-promer-update-2013.pdf (07.05.2014).
• 32. WILLIAMS J.H., 2013, Shale gas development and water resources in the United States with a focus on the Marcellus Play, presentation at BGR-GFZ-UFZ conference, Hannover, 24 June.
• 33. VIDIC R.D., BRANTLEY S.L., VANDEN-BOSSCHE J.M., YOXTHEIMER D., ABAD J.D., 2013, Impact of shale gas development on region water quality, in: Science, 340, p. 6134.
• 34. VENGOSH A., JAACKSON R.B., WARNER N., DARRAH T.H, KONDASH A., 2014, A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States, in: Environmental Science Technology, p. 8334-8348.