Critical Infrastructures Protection (CIP) : coupled modelling for threats and resilience

• Autorzy: Eid M. , El-Hami A. , Souza de Cursi E. , Kołowrocki K. , Kuligowska E. , Soszyńska-Budny J.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) requires the development of models and tools able to describe and simulate the threats’ and the Critical Infrastructure’s (CI) dynamic behaviour. However, these modelling activities are very often carried out separately for threats and for CI behaviour. An effective assessment of the CI’s resilience and preparedness requires real coupled models of threats dynamic and CI’s one. The authors develop some basic ideas about coupled modelling in the sense of coupling the dynamics of the threat with that of the CIs, within a stochastic modelling approach. Such coupled dynamic models would enhance the effectiveness of our capabilities to assess CI’s resilience and to help in decision making for crisis management.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Critical Infrastructures Protection; CIP; resilience; robustness; failure; dynamic; model; crisis; management

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Bezpieczeństwa i Niezawodności
• Czasopismo: Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association
• Rocznik: 2015
• Tom: Vol. 6, No. 1
• Strony: 85--94
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 11 poz., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Eid M.

• CEA DANS/DM2S/SERMA, Saclay Bât, Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France

autor

El-Hami A.

• INSA-Rouen, Saint-Etienne du Rouvray, France

autor

Souza de Cursi E.

• INSA-Rouen, Saint-Etienne du Rouvray, France

autor

Kołowrocki K.

• Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

autor

Kuligowska E.

• Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

autor

Soszyńska-Budny J.

• Maritime University, Gdynia, Poland

Bibliografia

• [1] 3RG. (2011). Focal Report 7: CIP Resilience and Risk Management in Critical Infrastructure Protection Policy: Exploring the Relationship and Comparing its Use. Risk and Resilience Research Group, Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich, commissioned by the Federal Office for Civil Protection (FOCP), Zurich, December 2011. (www.css.ethz.ch).
• [2] Argonne National Lab. (2012). Resilience: Theory and Application. ANL/DIS-12-1, Decision and Information Division, January 2012.
• [3] Bloomflield, R. (2009). Infrastructure interdependency analysis: Requirements, capabilities and strategy. D/418/12101/3, 2009, © Adelard LLP.
• [4] COM (2006), DIRECTIVE OF THE COUNCIL (Proposal for a). On the identification and designation of European Critical Infrastructure and the assessment of the need to improve their protection. 2006/0276 (CNS). COM (2006) 787 final. Brussels, 12.12.2006.
• [5] ECD (2008), COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2008 / 114 / EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection. Official Journal of the European Union, 23/12/2008.
• [6] Eid, M., et. al. (2014). Critical Infrastructures Protection (CIP) – Contribution to EU Research on Resilience & Preparedness. Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, Summer Safety and Reliability Seminars, 5, 1.
• [7] Eid, M., et. al. (2015). A resilience model based on Stochastic Poison Process. To be published in the Journal of Polish Safety and Reliability Association, 48th ESReDA seminar, 2015.
• [8] HSA (2002). Homeland Security Act of 2002. PUBLIC LAW 107–296—November 25, 116 STAT. 2135.
• [9] HSPD-7 (2003). Homeland Security Presidential Directive-7. December 17.
• [10] Moteff, J. (2004). Critical Infrastructure and Key Assets: Definition and Identification. October 1, CRS Report for Congress, Order Code RL32631? https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/RL32631.pdf
• [11] OHS (2002). U.S. Office of Homeland Security. The National Strategy for Homeland Security. July 16, 30