Hydroid Gonothyraea loveni found on the straightnose pipefish (Nerophis ophidion) in the Gulf of Gdańsk : symbiosis, parasitism or biofouling?

• Autorzy: Dziubińska A. , Sapota M.
• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Straightnose pipefish (Nerophis ophidion), covered with hydroid Gonothyraea loveni, were caught in August 2010 near Gdynia while fishing with fyke nets. The hydroid colonies were spaced around the fish, from the head to the anus. These colonies seemed to cause serious problems with the balance and swimming ability of the fish. It appears that there are no symbiotic or parasitic relationships between the hydroid and the fish. The fish was probably just another substrate for G. loveni and became colonized by fouling on the skin surface. It should also be taken into consideration that hydroid colonies can move from place to place with their fish host. It is possible that the hydroid benefits from the fish active search for planktonic food.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Gonothyraea loveni; Nerophis ophidion; Baltic Sea; biofouling

• Wydawca: Institute of Oceanography University of Gdańsk
• Czasopismo: Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies
• Rocznik: 2013
• Tom: Vol. 42, No. 3
• Strony: 332--335
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 14 poz., fot., mapka

Twórcy

autor

Dziubińska A.

• Department of Experimental Ecology of Marine Organisms Institute of Oceanography, University of Gdańsk, Al. M. Piłsudskiego 46, 81-378, Gdynia, Poland

autor

Sapota M.

• Department of Marine Biology and Ecology Institute of Oceanography, University of Gdańsk, Al. M. Piłsudskiego 46, 81-378, Gdynia, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Aliani, S. & Molcard A. (2003). Hitch-hiking on floating marine debris: macrobenthic species in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Hydrobiologia, 503, 59–67. DOI:10.1023/B:HYDR.0000008480.95045.26.
• 2. Costello, D.P. & Henley C. (1971). Methods for obtaining and handling marine eggs and embryos. Woods Hole, MA: Marine Biological Laboratory.
• 3. Demel, K. (1962). Syngnathidae. In M. Gąsowska (Ed.), Klucze do oznaczania kręgowców Polski. Cyclostomi et Pisces, (pp. 153–156). Warszawa: PWN (in Polish).
• 4. Demel, K. (1967). Nasz Bałtyk. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna, (in Polish).
• 5. Dziubińska, A. & Janas, U. (2007). Submerged objects — a nice place to live and develop. Succession of fouling communities in the Gulf of Gdańsk, Southern Baltic. Oceanol. Hydrobiol. St., 36, 65–78. DOI:10.2478/v10009-007-0026-1.
• 6. Hayward, P.J. & Ryland J.S. (1996). Handbook of the Marine Fauna of North-West Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• 7. Kosevich, I.A. (2006). Branching in colonial hydroids. In J. Davies (Ed.) Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit. Branching morphogenesis (pp. 91–107). Edinburg, Scotland, UK: Eurekah.com and Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
• 8. Margoński, P. (1994). Some aspects of straight-nosed (Nerophis ophidion L.) and broad-nosed (Syngnathus typhle L.) pipefish biology in the Gulf of Gdańsk. Zesz. Nauk. UG Oceanografia. 13, 39–59 (in Polish).
• 9. Puce, S., Cerrano, C., Di Camillo C.G. & Bavestrello G. (2008). Hydroidomedusae (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa) symbiotic radiation. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK. 88(8), 1715–1721. DOI:10.1017/S0025315408002233.
• 10. Slobodov, S.A. & Marfenin N.N. (2005). The features of reproduction of Obelia spp. in the White Sea. Oceanology, 45(1), 69–75.
• 11. Theede, H., Scholz N. & Fischer H. (1979). Temperature and salinity effects on the acute toxicity of cadmium to Laomedea loveni (Hydrozoa). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1, 13–19.
• 12. Vervoort, W. (1946). Hydrozoa (C 1) A. Hydropoliepen, Aflevering 14. Fauna van Nederland (in German).
• 13. Vincent, A.C.J., Berglund A. & Ahnesjo I. (1995). Reproductive ecology of five pipefish species in one eelgrass meadow. Environ. Biol. Fish. 44, 347–361. DOI:10.1007/BF00008250.
• 14. Żmudziński, L. (1974). Zwierzęcy świat Bałtyku. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne (in Polish).