PL EN


Preferencje help
Widoczny [Schowaj] Abstrakt
Liczba wyników
Tytuł artykułu

Neural network based hybrid ground motion prediction equations for Western Himalayas and North Eastern India

Wybrane pełne teksty z tego czasopisma
Identyfikatory
Warianty tytułu
Języki publikacji
EN
Abstrakty
EN
This work aims at developing a hybrid ground motion prediction equation (GMPE) for spectral acceleration in Western Himalayas and North-Eastern India. The GMPE is derived using an efcient nonparametric modelling based on neural network algorithm. In this study, owing to sparsity in the recorded ground motions (498 recordings) for the region, the available information is combined with 13,294 records from the well-tested NGA-West 2 database. For the methodology adopted in the study, regional fags are assigned to the records. Thus, given a magnitude, distance, shear wave velocity, fault type and region, the model is able to predict the possible spectral acceleration. The developed GMPE is observed to be unbiased with respect to region. Further, the inter- and intra-event standard deviations are also in acceptable ranges. It is observed that developed GMPE for Western Himalayas and North-Eastern India is able to capture all the known ground motion characteristics. Additionally, the GMPE is compared with the existing GMPE for rock-type soil condition available for the Western Himalayas and North-Eastern India. Furthermore, applicability of the developed GMPE model in estimating hazard is analysed by obtaining the uniform hazard response spectra for Delhi and Guwahati.
Czasopismo
Rocznik
Strony
303--324
Opis fizyczny
Bibliogr. 29 poz.
Twórcy
autor
  • Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Indian Institute of Technology Madras Chennai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Bibliografia
  • 1. Abrahamson NA, Youngs R (1992) A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model. B Seismol Soc Am 82(1):505–510
  • 2. Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ, Kamai R (2014) Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1025–1055
  • 3. Berry M, Linoff G (1997) Data mining techniques: for marketing, sales and marketing support. Wiley, Hoboken
  • 4. Boore DM, Stewart JP, Seyhan E, Atkinson GM (2014) NGA-West2 equations for predicting PGA, PGV, and 5% damped PSA for shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1057–1085
  • 5. Campbell KW (2003) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in eastern north america. B Seismol Soc Am 93(3):1012–1033
  • 6. Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2014) NGA-West2 ground motion model for the average horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5% damped linear acceleration response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1087–1115
  • 7. Chadha R, Srinagesh D, Srinivas D, Suresh G, Sateesh A, Singh S, Pérez-Campos X, Suresh G, Koketsu K, Masuda T et al (2015) CIGN, a strong-motion seismic network in central indo-gangetic plains, foothills of himalayas: first results. Seismol Res Lett 87(1):37–46
  • 8. Chiou BSJ, Youngs RR (2014) Update of the chiou and youngs nga model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 30(3):1117–1153
  • 9. Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. B Seismol Soc Am 58(5):1583–1606
  • 10. Derras B, Bard PY, Cotton F (2014) Towards fully data driven ground-motion prediction models for europe. B Earthq Eng 12(1):495–516
  • 11. Dhanya J, Raghukanth STG (2018) Ground motion prediction model using artificial neural network. Pure Appl Geophys 175(3):1035–1064
  • 12. Douglas J (2018) Ground motion prediction equations 1964–2018. University of Strathclyde, Glasgow
  • 13. Garson GD (1991) Interpreting neural-network connection weights. AI Expert 6(4):46–51
  • 14. GSI (2000) Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs. Geological Survey of India
  • 15. Gupta I (2018) Uniformly processed strong motion database for himalaya and northeast region of india. Pure Appl Geophys 175(3):829–863
  • 16. IBC I (2015) International building code. International Code Council, Inc (formerly BOCA, ICBO and SBCCI)
  • 17. Iyengar R, Raghukanth STG (2004) Attenuation of strong ground motion in Peninsular India. Seismol Res Lett 75(4):530–540
  • 18. Kiureghian AD, Ang AH (1977) A fault-rupture model for seismic risk analysis. B Seismol Soc Am 67(4):1173–1194
  • 19. Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. In: Hall WJ (ed) Prentice-hall international series in civil engineering and engineering mechanics. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
  • 20. Kumar A, Harinarayan N, Verma V, Anand S, Borah U, Bania M (2018) Seismic site classification and empirical correlation between standard penetration test n value and shear wave velocity for guwahati based on thorough subsoil investigation data. Pure Appl Geophys 175(8):2721–2738
  • 21. Muthuganeisan P (2017) Development of seismic displacement and velocity hazard maps of India. Ph.D. thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Madras
  • 22. NDMA (2010) Development of probabilistic seismic hazard map of India. The National Disater Management Authority, p 86
  • 23. Pezeshk S, Zandieh A, Tavakoli B (2011) Hybrid empirical ground-motion prediction equations for eastern north america using nga models and updated seismological parameters. B Seismol Soc Am 101(4):1859–1870
  • 24. Raghucharan M, Somala SN (2017) Simulation of strong ground motion for the 25 April 2015 Nepal (Gorkha) Mw 7.8 earthquake using the SCEC broadband platform. J Seismol 21(4):777–808
  • 25. Raghukanth STG, Kavitha B (2014) Ground motion relations for active regions in india. Pure Appl Geophys 171(9):2241–2275
  • 26. Satyam DN, Rao K (2010) Multi channel analysis of surface wave (MASW) testing for dynamic site characterization of Delhi region. In: Fifth international conference on recent advances on geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics and symposium in honor of Professor I. M. Idriss. 24–29 May 2010, San Diago, CA
  • 27. Sharma ML, Douglas J, Bungum H, Kotadia J (2009) Ground-motion prediction equations based on data from the Himalayan and Zagros regions. J Earthq Eng 13(8):1191–1210
  • 28. Singh S, Srinagesh D, Srinivas D, Arroyo D, Pérez-Campos X, Chadha R, Suresh G, Suresh G (2017) Strong ground motion in the indo-gangetic plains during the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake sequence and its prediction during future earthquakes. B Seismol Soc Am 107(3):1293–1306
  • 29. Tavakoli B, Pezeshk S (2005) Empirical-stochastic ground-motion prediction for eastern North America. B Seismol Soc Am 95(6):2283–2296
Uwagi
Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021)
Typ dokumentu
Bibliografia
Identyfikator YADDA
bwmeta1.element.baztech-0f77480c-66f5-430c-95c8-565c412ee943
JavaScript jest wyłączony w Twojej przeglądarce internetowej. Włącz go, a następnie odśwież stronę, aby móc w pełni z niej korzystać.