Integration of BIM and GIS Data of a Heritage Building Using FME

• Autorzy: Borkowski Andrzej Szymon , To Duc Alex

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.59440/ceer/190231

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

BIM and GIS technologies are used in both planning and investment and construction processes. GIS is more often used in the former, where one operates on a macro scale and information about the environment is essential for decision-making. BIM, on the other hand, is increasingly implemented in investment and construction processes (micro scale). The BIM model as a resource of knowledge and information about the construction object is the basis for decision-making, while data from GIS systems are necessary to obtain reliable information about the environment and the prevailing spatial, social or economic conditions. The basic information from GIS systems are attributes related to geographic location (coordinate system, angle to true north, elevation ordinate). Unfortunately, both technologies use different programming paradigms. GIS is mainly a relational database based on multidimensional tables, while BIM uses so-called encapsulation, polyform, hierarchy or instantiation, which enrich semantically stored data. There are many benefits to integrating geospatial data with building object information. The problem of compatibility and interoperability of the two technologies is the subject of many considerations of basic science and the problem of practitioners during application work. Georeferencing of BIM models is conferred in several ways, however, most of them require relatively expensive commercial tools or extensive digital skills or even programming. Rarely, however, are tools such as FME used for data conversion, management and visualization. Thus, the purpose of the present work was to attempt to properly georeference a BIM model of a historic building, located at Constitution Square in Warsaw, in a GIS environment, and then convert the data to shapefile output format using FME software. The results of the experimental work indicate that the BIM data can be embedded quite accurately in the space of a given coordinate system and displayed against various contextual data, but the 3D geometry itself loses its detail and quality. The paper discusses the limitations of the procedure and future research directions.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

BIM; GIS; FME; 3D visualization; georeferencing; heritage; integration

PL

BIM; GIS; FME; wizualizacja 3D; georeferencja; dziedzictwo; integracja

• Wydawca: Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego
• Czasopismo: Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports
• Rocznik: 2024
• Tom: Vol. 34, no. 2
• Strony: 204--215
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 26 poz., rys.

Twórcy

autor

Borkowski Andrzej Szymon

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw, Poland

autor

To Duc Alex

• Warsaw University of Technology, Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw, Poland

Bibliografia

• 1. Zhao, X 2017. A scientometric review of global BIM research: Analysis and visualization. Automation in Construction, 80, 37-47.
• 2. Peckienė, A and Ustinovičius, L 2017. Possibilities for Building Spatial Planning using BIM Methodology. Procedia Engineering 172, 851-858.
• 3. Rafiee, A, Dias, E, Fruijtier, S, and Scholten, H 2014. From BIM to Geo-analysis: View Coverage and Shadow Analysis by BIM/GIS Integration. Procedia Environmental Sciences 22, 397-402.
• 4. Borkowski, AS 2023. Evolution of BIM: epistemology, genesis and division into periods. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon) 28, 646-661.
• 5. Borkowski, AS, Kochański, Ł, and Wyszomirski, M 2022. Case Study on Building Information (BIM) and Land Information (LIM) Models Including Geospatial Data. Geomatics and Environmental Engineering 17, 19-34.
• 6. Tiveron, A 2020. e-BIM. The methodology of information modeling in a “result” economy. Selfpublishing with Amazon, 392 p.
• 7. Shirowzhan, S, Sepasgozar, SM, Edwards, DJ, Li, H, and Wang, C 2020. BIM compatibility and its differentiation with interoperability challenges as an innovation factor. Automation in Construction 112, 103086.
• 8. Fosu, R, Suprabhas, K, Rathore, Z, and Cory, C. 2015. Integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS)–a literature review and future needs. Proceedings of the 32nd CIB W78 Conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 27-29.
• 9. Mitera-Kiełbasa, E and Zima, K 2023. BIM Policy in Eastern Europe. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 33, 14-22.
• 10. Radzik, Ł, and Schabowicz, K 2015. Wykorzystanie BIM w remontach obiektów budowlanych. Materiały budowlane 11, 144-146. (in Polish).
• 11. Drozd, W, and Kowalik, M 2016. Wykorzystanie BIM do zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa pracy na budowie. Materiały budowlane 6, 50-51. (in Polish).
• 12. Szóstak, M 2023. Forecasting the Course of Cumulative Cost Curves for Different Construction Projects. Civil and Environmental Engineering Reports 33, 71-89.
• 13. Günther-Diringer, D 2018. From BIM to GIS at the Smithsonian Institution, Proc. Int. Cartogr. Assoc., 1, 52.
• 14. Guyo, E, Hartmann, T, and Ungureanu, L 2021. Interoperability between BIM and GIS through open data standards: An overview of current literature. sign 3, 5-9.
• 15. Shkundalov, D, and Vilutienė, T 2021. Bibliometric analysis of Building Information Modeling, Geographic Information Systems and Web environment integration. Automation in Construction, 128, 103757.
• 16. Weerasinghe, MDG, Rupasinghe AR, and Jayasooriya SD 2018. Application of GIS in construction management, 2018.
• 17. Basir, WA, Majid, WNF, Ujang, U, and Chong, A 2018. Integration of GIS and BIM techniques in construction project management – a review, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-4/W9, 307-316.
• 18. Sultani, R, Soliman, A, and Al-Hagla, K 2009. The use of geographic information system (GIS) based spatial decision support system (SDSS) in developing the urban planning process. Architecture & planning journal 1, 97-115.
• 19. Gotlib, D, and Wyszomirski, M 2018. Cele i wybrane problemy konwersji modeli BIM na modele GIS. Roczniki Geomatyki 80, 19-31. (in Polish).
• 20. Wang, H, Pan, Y, and Luo, X 2019. Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable built environment: A review and bibliometric analysis. Automation in construction 103, 41-52.
• 21. Sani, MJ, and Abdul Rahman, A 2018. GIS and BIM integration at data level: A review. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 42, 299-306.
• 22. Zhu, J, and Wu, P 2022. BIM/GIS data integration from the perspective of information flow. Automation in Construction 136, 104166.
• 23. Matrone, F, Colucci, E, De Ruvo, V, Lingua, A, and Spanò, A 2019. HBIM in a semantic 3D GIS database, Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. XLII-2/W11, 857-865.
• 24. Jusuf, SK, Mosseau, B, Godfroid G, and Soh VJH 2017, Integrated modeling of City GML and IFC for city/neighborhood development for urban microclimates analysis. Energy Procedia, 122, 145-150.
• 25. Borkowski, AS 2023. Ekologia narzędzi BIM – georeferencja modeli obiektów budowlanych z wykorzystaniem CDE, Przegląd Budowlany 12, 2023, 158-162. (in Polish).
• 26. Niestroj, MG, McMeekin, DA, and Helmholz, P 2018. Overview of standards towards road asset information exchange. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 42, 443-450.