Boosting impulse buying behavior in marketing management : customer satisfaction perspective

• Autorzy: Princes Elfindah

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.17512/pjms.2019.20.2.34

Warianty tytułu

PL

Wzmocnienie impulsowego zachowania kupującego w zarządzaniu marketingiem : z perspektywą zadowolenia klienta

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Many firms suffer loss from costs of innovation process, piling stocks and innovation failures. Majority of the problems happened due to the slow respond of the firms to adapt to the market or even the changing of the trend before the products hit the market. To overcome these problems, firm are taking advantages from the online world by going online to introduce their products and innovations. Some innovations are even merely designs, and produced based on the customer requests. They trigger the online impulse buying behavior of customers and take advantage of them. This research talks about the impulse buying behavior from the customer satisfaction perspective. Being impulsive has always been considered as an irresponsible behavior, bad performance and spontaneous conduct which will lead to big disappointment. But since the year 2004, research results have shown contradictory results. Impulsive behaviour can also be advantageous for the individual and the company. The risk of losing an opportunity due to lack of necessary quick respond can be diminished. The year 2016 and after, more and more research support both opposite arguments. The researcher addresses this research gap by conducting a quantitative research to 156 respondents to address this issue by testing the relationship between impulse buying and customer satisfaction. The researcher concludes that if customer satisfaction is increased by improving management strategies and product innovations in ensuring the after-buying effects then actually impulse buying does not always give negative effects on customer satisfaction. Hence, when the customer satisfaction increases, the firm performance will increase too.

PL

Wiele firm ponosi straty z powodu kosztów procesu innowacji, gromadzenia zapasów i awarii innowacji. Większość problemów pojawiła się z powodu powolnej reakcji firm na dostosowanie się do rynku lub nawet zmiany trendu, zanim produkty trafiły na rynek. Aby przezwyciężyć te problemy, firma czerpie korzyści ze świata online, przechodząc do sieci w celu wprowadzenia swoich produktów i innowacji. Niektóre innowacje to nawet tylko projekty i produkowane na podstawie życzeń klientów. Wyzwala to impulsowe zachowania klientów w zakresie zakupów online i korzystają z nich. Badanie to mówi o zachowaniach związanych z zakupami impulsowymi z perspektywy zadowolenia klienta. Impulsywność zawsze była uważana za nieodpowiedzialne zachowanie, złe wyniki i spontaniczne zachowanie, które doprowadzi do dużego rozczarowania. Ale od 2004 r. wyniki badań wykazały sprzeczne wyniki. Zachowanie impulsywne może być również korzystne dla jednostki i firmy. Ryzyko utraty szansy z powodu braku niezbędnie szybkiej reakcji można zmniejszyć. W 2016 r. i później coraz więcej badań potwierdza oba te przeciwne argumenty. Autor rozwiązuje tę lukę badawczą, przeprowadzając badanie ilościowe dla 156 respondentów, aby rozwiązać ten problem, testując związek między zakupem impulsowym a satysfakcją klienta. Badacz dochodzi do wniosku, że jeśli satysfakcja klienta zostanie zwiększona poprzez ulepszenie strategii zarządzania i innowacji produktowych w celu zapewnienia efektów po zakupie, to tak naprawdę zakup impulsowy nie zawsze ma negatywny wpływ na zadowolenie klienta. Dlatego, gdy wzrośnie zadowolenie klienta, wzrośnie również wydajność firmy.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

e-commerce; purchase intention; online impulsive buying; customer satisfaction

PL

handel elektroniczny; zamiar zakupu; impulsywne zakupy online; zadowolenie klienta

• Wydawca: Czestochowa University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Polish Journal of Management Studies
• Rocznik: 2019
• Tom: Vol. 20, No. 2
• Strony: 403--413
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Princes Elfindah

• Bina Nusantara University, Research in Management Department, Indonesia

Bibliografia

• 1. Adner, R., & Helfat, C. E. (2003). Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10 Spec Iss.), 1011-1025.
• 2. Afonasova, M. A., Panfilova, E. E., Galichkina, M. A., & Ślusarczyk, B. (2019). Digitalization in economy and innovation: The effect on social and economic processes. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(2), 22-32.
• 3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
• 4. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.
• 5. Aymen, A., Alhamzah, A., & Bilal, E. (2019). A multi-level study of influence financial knowledge management small and medium enterprises. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 21-31.
• 6. Aysuna, C., Erdem, S., & Uslu, A. (2015). The Effects of Personality Traits and Website Quality on Online Impulse Buying. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 175, 98-105.
• 7. Basri, W. (2019). Management concerns for social media usage: Moderating role of trust in Saudi communication sector. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 59-69.
• 8. Bellini, S., Cardinali, M. G., & Grandi, B. (2017). A structural equation model of impulse buying behaviour in grocery retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 36(July 2016), 164-171.
• 9. Berčík, J., Horská, E., Virágh, R., & Šulaj, A. (2017). Advanced Mapping and Evaluation of Consumer Perception and Preferences on the Car Market Based on Eye-Tracking. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 16(2), 28-39.
• 10. Bhakat, R. S., & Muruganantham, G. (2013). A Review of Impulse Buying Behavior. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5(3), 149-160.
• 11. Bossuyt, S., Vermeir, I., Slabbinck, H., De Bock, T., & Van Kenhove, P. (2017). The compelling urge to misbehave: Do impulse purchases instigate unethical consumer behavior? Journal of Economic Psychology, 58, 60-76.
• 12. Chen, Y.-C., Shang, R.-A., Shu, C.-Y., & Lin, C.-K. (2015). The Effects of Risk and Hedonic Value on the Intention to Purchase on Group Buying Website: The Role of Trust, Price and Conformity Intention. Universal Journal of Management, 3(6), 246-256.
• 13. Cheng, X., Gu, Y., & Shen, J. (2019). An integrated view of particularized trust in social commerce: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 45(August 2018), 1-12.
• 14. Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals. (2019). Focus on Customer Experience: Research on supply chain priorities and investments.
• 15. Daniel Lerner and Dimo Dimov. (2016). Action! Impulse Driven Logic & Entrepreneurial Opportunity Pursuit. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016(10224), 1-24.
• 16. de Kervenoael, R., Aykac, D. S. O., & Palmer, M. (2009). Online social capital: Understanding e-impulse buying in practice. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16(4), 320-328.
• 17. Dew, N., Read, S., Sarasvathy, S. D., & Wiltbank, R. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 287-309. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S088390260800027X
• 18. Fitriyah, N. (2019). Multivariate analysis of strategic management and business development in service sector. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 19(1), 145-156.
• 19. Grimmer, M., Kilburn, A. P., & Miles, M. P. (2016). The effect of purchase situation on realized pro-environmental consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1582-1586.
• 20. Hunt, R. A., & Lerner, D. A. (2017). Following the Muse: Non-Deliberative, Unreasoned Nascent-Stage Venturing. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 6, 1-6.
• 21. Jeffrey, S. A., & Hodge, R. (2007). Factors influencing impulse buying during an online purchase. Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3-4), 367-379.
• 22. Kaplan, S. (2011). Research in Cognition and Strategy: Reflections on Two Decades of Progress and a Look to the Future. Journal of Management Studies, 48(3), 665-695.
• 23. Khan, N., Hui Hui, L., Booi Chen, T., & Yong Hoe, H. (2015). Impulse Buying Behaviour of Generation Y in Fashion Retail. International Journal of Business and Management, 11(1), 144-151.
• 24. Khan, S. A., Liang, Y., & Shahzad, S. (2015). An Empirical Study of Perceived Factors Affecting Customer Satisfaction to Re-Purchase Intention in Online Stores in China. Journal of Service Science and Management, 08(03), 291-305.
• 25. Kong, Y., Wang, Y., Hajli, S., & Featherman, M. (2019). In Sharing Economy We Trust: Examining the Effect of Social and Technical Enablers on Millennials’ Trust in Sharing Commerce. Computers in Human Behavior, (March 2018).
• 26. Kraus, Sascha; Kauranen, I. (2009). Strategic management and entrepreneurship: Friends or foes? International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management, 4(1), 37-50.
• 27. Kytö, E., Virtanen, M., & Mustonen, S. (2019). From intention to action: Predicting purchase behavior with consumers’ product expectations and perceptions, and their individual properties. Food Quality and Preference, 75(February), 1-9.
• 28. Lerner, D. A. (2014). Opportunity Pursuit, Disinhibition, & Social Bias: Advancing Beyond Individual Action. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 261, 1-6.
• 29. Lerner, D. A., Hunt, R. A., & Dimov, D. (2018). Action! Moving Beyond the Intendedly-Rational Logics of Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 52-69.
• 30. Lin, Y. H., & Chen, C. F. (2013). Passengers’ shopping motivations and commercial activities at airports - The moderating effects of time pressure and impulse buying tendency. Tourism Management, 36, 426-434.
• 31. Pavlou, P. A. (2002). What Drives Electronic Commerce? A Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective. Academy of Management Proceedings, OCIS(A1), 1-8.
• 32. Pezzotta, G., Pinto, R., Pirola, F., & Ouertani, M. Z. (2014). Balancing product-service provider’s performance and customer’s value: The SErvice Engineering Methodology (SEEM). Procedia CIRP, 16, 50-55.
• 33. Princes, E. (2019). Strategic impulses: An opportunity or a threat? International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue), 417-422.
• 34. Ragunathan, T., Battula, S. K., Jorika, V., Mounika, C., Sruthi, A. U., & Vani, M. D. (2015). Advertisement posting based on consumer behavior. Procedia Computer Science, 50, 329-334.
• 35. Santibáñez, C. (2017). Strategically wrong: On the relationship between generalized deception and persuasive behaviour. Journal of Pragmatics, 114, 16-31.
• 36. Seinauskiene, B., Mascinskience, J., & Jucaityte, I. (2015). The relationship of happiness, impulse buying and brand loyalty. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 687-693.
• 37. Teichert, T., & Bouncken, R. (2008). Strategic impulses for innovation in supply chains. Academy of Management 2008 Annual Meeting: The Questions We Ask, AOM 2008, 1-9.
• 38. Thornberry, N., & College, B. (2001). Corporate Entrepreneurship : Antidote or Oxymoron? 19(5), 526-533.
• 39. Victor, V., Nathan, R. J., Grabara, J., & Fekete-Farkas, M. (2018). Price tracking behaviour in electronic commerce and the moderating role of fair price perception. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(2), 375-387.
• 40. Wu, T., Zhang, K., Liu, X., & Cao, C. (2019). A two-stage social trust network partition model for large-scale group decision-making problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 163, 632-643.
• 41. Yamada, K. (2019). The Effects of Customer Expectations for Consumer Behavior in Reputation Information Sites. Procedia CIRP, 79, 684-689.
• 42. Zhang, K. Z. K., & Benyoucef, M. (2016). Consumer behavior in social commerce: A literature review. Decision Support Systems, 86, 95-108.
• 43. Zhao, J.-D., Huang, J.-S., & Su, S. (2019). The effects of trust on consumers’ continuous purchase intentions in C2C social commerce: A trust transfer perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50(October 2018), 42-49.

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2020).