Growth, Yield and Biochemical Responses in Barley to DAP and Chitosan Application Under Water Stress

• Autorzy: Al-Tawaha Abdel Rahman M. , Jahan Nusrat , Odat Nidal , Al-Ramamneh Ezz Al-Dein , Al-Tawaha Abdel Razzaq , Abu-Zaitoon Yousef M. , Fandi Khalid , Alhawatema Mohammad , Amanullah , Rauf Abdur , Wedyan Mohammad , Shariati Mohammad Ali , Qaisi Ali M. , Imran , Tawaha Khaled , Turk Munir , Khanum Samia

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12911/22998993/123251

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The present investigation was aimed at enhancing the quality and productivity of barley by the fertilizer and chitosan application. The field experiments were conducted in the northern region of Jordan, under the rain fed conditions in the main growing seasons of 2014/2015 and 2015/2016. The experiment was conducted in a well-designed split-plot having three replications and two fertilizer levels (0 and 100 kg•ha^-1 DAP (Diammonium phosphate 46% P₂O₅). Chitosan, in three different concentrations (0, 5, and 10 g•L^-1), was randomly applied to all fertilized plots as subplot treatments. The results revealed the highest seed dry weight (5.8 g per plant) in the plants treated with 100 kg•ha^-1 of DAP, while the lowest (5.2 g per plant) was recorded in the control which exhibited an increase of about 10%. However, other parameters, namely the number of grains, number of spikes, and number of grains were also found to be influenced by the chitosan treatment. Significant variation (P < 0.01) were also high between the lines in the presence and absence of chitosan application. The highest number of grain yield, number of spikes, and grains/spike were found by the foliar treatment of 10 g•L^-1 chitosan to barley plants at the tillering stage. Similarly, the grain quality, particularly with respect to protein and starch, was found to be enhanced significantly over control. The highest protein (12.6%) and starch (62.3%) were obtained with 100 kg•ha^-1 DAP fertilizer level mixed with 10 g•L^-1 chitosan. Hence, based on results, it can be concluded that the fertilizer level 100 kg•ha^-1 DAP combined with 10 g•L^-1 chitosan is economically best and recommendable for improving the quality and productivity of barley in the northern region of Jordan.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

barley; DAP; chitosan; fertilizer; Jordan

• Wydawca: Polskie Towarzystwo Inżynierii Ekologicznej ; Lublin University of Technology
• Czasopismo: Journal of Ecological Engineering
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: Vol. 21, nr 6
• Strony: 86--93
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Al-Tawaha Abdel Rahman M.

• Department of Biological Sciences, Al Hussein Bin Talal University, P.O. Box 20, Ma’an, Jordan

autor

Jahan Nusrat

• Department of Botany, Faculty of Life Sciences Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh-202002, UP, India

autor

Odat Nidal

• Department of Medical Laboratories, Faculty of Science, Al-Balqa Applied University, 19117, Al Salt, Jordan

autor

Al-Ramamneh Ezz Al-Dein

• Department of Agricultural Sciences, Al-Balqa Applied University, Al-Shouback College, Al-Shoubak, Jordan

autor

Al-Tawaha Abdel Razzaq

• Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selango, Malaysia

autor

Abu-Zaitoon Yousef M.

• Department of Biological Sciences, Al Hussein Bin Talal University, P.O. Box 20, Ma’an, Jordan

autor

Fandi Khalid

• Department of Biological Sciences, Al Hussein Bin Talal University, P.O. Box 20, Ma’an, Jordan

autor

Alhawatema Mohammad

• Department of applied biological science, Faculty of Science, Tafila Technical University, Tafila, Jordan

autor

Amanullah

• Agronomy Department, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan

autor

Rauf Abdur

• Department of Chemistry, University of Swabi, Anbar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

autor

Wedyan Mohammad

• Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, the Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan

autor

Shariati Mohammad Ali

• Laboratory of Biocontrol and Antimicrobial Resistance, Orel State University Named After I.S. Turgenev, 302026 Orel, Russia

autor

Qaisi Ali M.

• Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

autor

Imran

• Agronomy Department, The University of Agriculture Peshawar, Pakistan

autor

Tawaha Khaled

• Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

autor

Turk Munir

• Department of Plant Production, Jordan University of science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

autor

Khanum Samia

• Department of Botany, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan

Bibliografia

• 1. AACC, 2000. Approved methods of the AACC (10 ed.). St. Paul, MN, USA.
• 2. Abdel-Mawgoud A. Tantawy M.R. El-Nemret A.S. Sassine M.A. Y.N. 2010. Growth and yield responses of strawberry plants to chitosan application. Eurasian Journal of Scientific Research, 39: 170–177.
• 3. Abera T. Molla A. Feyissa A. Liben M. Woyema A. Admassu L. Bekele A. 2011. Research achievements in barley cultural practices in Ethiopia. Barley Research and Development in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 2nd National Barley Research and Development Review Workshop: 113.
• 4. Al-Ajlouni M.M. Al-Ghzawi A.A. Al-Tawaha A. M. 2009. Crop rotation and fertilization effect on barley yield grown in arid conditions. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 88: 869–872.
• 5. Al-Tawaha A.M. Al-Ghzawi A.M. 2013. Response of barley cultivars to Chitosan application under semi-arid conditions. Research on Crops, 14: 427–430.
• 6. Al-Tawaha A.M. Turk M.A. Maghaereh G.A. 2002. Response of barley to herbicide versus mechanical weed control under semi–arid conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 188: 106–112.
• 7. Al-Tawaha A.M. Seguin P. Smith D.L. and Beaulieu C. 2006. Foliar application of elicitors alters isoflavone concentrations and other seed characteristics of field-grown soybean. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86: 677–684.
• 8. Al-Tawaha A.M. Singh V.P. Turk M.A. Zheng W. 2003. A review on growth, yield components and yield of barley as influenced by genotypes, herbicides and fertilizer application. Research on Crops, 4: 1–9.
• 9. Al-Tawaha A.M. Turk M.A. 2002. Awnless barley (Hordeum vulagre L.) response to hand weeding and 2,4–D application at two growth stages under Mediterranean environment. Weed Biology and Management, 2: 163–168.
• 10. Asare E.K. Jaiswal S. Maley J. BåGa J. Sammynaiken M.R. Rossnagel B. Chibbar R.N. 2011. Barley grain constituents, starch composition, and structure affect starch in vitro enzymatic hydrolysis. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 59: 4743–4754.
• 11. Baik B. K. Ullrich S. E. 2008. Barley for food: characteristics, improvement, and renewed interest. Journal of Cereal Science, 48: 233–242.
• 12. Behboudi F. Tahmasebi Z. Sarvestani M. Zaman Kassaee S.A.M. Modares Sanavi A. Sorooshzadehand S.B. Ahmadi. 2018. Evaluation of Chitosan Nanoparticles Effects on Yield and Yield Components of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) under Late Season Drought Stress. Journal of Water and Environental Nanotechnology, 3: 22–39.
• 13. Bittelli M. Flury M. Campbell G.S. Nichols E.J. 2001. Reduction of transpiration through foliar application of chitosan. Agriculture and Forest meteorology, 107: 167–175.
• 14. Brown D. Weselby. 2010. NASA-funded research discovers life built with toxi chemical NASA Feature, NASA December, www.nasa.gov.
• 15. Chamnanmanoontham N. Pongprayoon W. Pichayangkura R. Roytrakul S. Chadchawan S. 2015. Chitosan enhances rice seedling growth via gene expression network between nucleus and chloroplast. Plant Growth Regulation, 75: 101–14.
• 16. Chandrkrachang S. 2002. The application of chitin and chitosan in agriculture in Thailand. Advances in Chitin and Chitosan Science, 5: 458–462.
• 17. Doares S.H. Syrovets T. Weilerand C E.W. Ryan A. 1995. Oligogalacturonides and chitosan activate plant defensive genes through the octadecanoid pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92: 4095–4098.
• 18. Dzung P.D. Phu D.V. Du B.D. Ngoc L.S. Duyand N.N. DHiet H. 2017. Effect of foliar application of oligochitosan with different molecular weight on growth promotion and fruit yield enhancement of chili plant. Plant Production Science, 20: 389–395.
• 19. Farouk S. Ghoneemand K.M. Ali A. Abeer M. 2008. Induction and expression of systematic resistance to downy mildew disease in cucumber plant by elicitors. Egyptian Journal of Phytopathology, 1: 95–111.
• 20. Garcia-Lorda P. Megias-Rangiland I. Salas-Salvado J. 2003. Nut consumption, body weight and insulin resistance. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 57, suppl. 1, S8-S11.
• 21. Górnik K. Grzesik M. and Romanowska-Duda B. 2008. The effect of chitosan on rooting of grapevine cuttings and on subsequent plant growth under drought and temperature stress. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 16, 333–43.
• 22. He Z. 1985. Grain Quality and Its Analysis Technology. (Beijing: Agriculture press, 1985).
• 23. Huang C.Y., Shirley N., Genc Y., Shiand B. Langridge P. 2011. Phosphate utilization efficiency correlates with expression of low-affinity phosphate transporters and noncoding RNA, IPS1, in barley. Plant Physiology, 156: 1217–1229.
• 24. Kim H.J. 2005. Characterization of bioactive compounds in essential oils, fermented Anchovy sauce, and edible plants, and, induction of phytochemicals from edible plants using methyl jasmonate (MeJA) and chitosan. PhD Thesis, Clemson University, USA, 178 pp.
• 25. Marschner H.1999. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic press. London, 889p.
• 26. Michael G.1963. Einfluss der Diingung auf Eiweissqualitat und Eiweissfraktionen der Nahrungspflanzen. Qual. Plant. Mat. Veget. 10, 253–265.
• 27. Mondal M. Putehand A.B. Dafader N.C. 2016. Foliar Application of Chitosan Improved Morphophysiological Attributes and Yield In Summer Tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum). Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 53(2).
• 28. Nursu’aidah H. Motior M.R., Nazia A.M. Islam M.A.. 2014. Growth and photosynthetic responses of long bean (Vigna unguiculata) and mung bean (Vigna radiata) response to fertilization. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 24: 573–578.
• 29. Orgaz B. Lobete M.M. Puga C.H. San Jose C. 2011. Effectiveness of chitosan against mature biofilms formed by food related bacteria. International of Molecular Sciences, 12: 817–828.
• 30. Rahman M. Mukta J.A. Sabir A.A. Gupta D.R. Mohi-Ud-Din M. and Hasanuzzaman M. 2018. Chitosan biopolymer promotes yield and stimulates accumulation of antioxidants in strawberry fruit. PLoS ONE, 13(9).
• 31. Rowley H.V., Peters G.M., Lundieand S. S. Moore J. 2012. Aggregating sustainability indicators: beyond the weighed sum. Journal of Environmental Management, 111: 24e33.
• 32. Sharathchandra R.G. Raj S.N. Shetty N.P. Amruthesh K.N. Shetty H.S. 2004. A Chitosan formulation Elexa induces downy mildew disease resistance and growth promotion in pearl millet. Crop Protection, 23: 881–8.
• 33. Steel R.G.D. Torrie J.A. 1980. Principals and Procedure of Statistics. 2nd Edn. Mc. Graw-Hill. Switzerland, pp. 687.
• 34. Tawaha A. M. and Turk M.A. 2002a. Lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.) productivity as influenced by and method of phosphate placement in a Mediterranean environment. Acta Agronomica Hungarica, 50: 197–201.
• 35. Tawaha A.M. 2000. Evaluation of Ten Barley Genotypes in Response to Fertilization and Herbicide Application). M.Sc. Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
• 36. Tawaha A.M. Turk M.A. 2004. Field Pea Seeding Management for Semi-arid Mediterranean conditions. Journal Agronomy and Crop Science, 190, 86–92.
• 37. Tawaha A.M. Turk M.A. Maghaereh G.A. 2002. Response of Barley to herbicide versus mechanical weed control under semi-arid conditions. Journal Agronomy and Crop Science, 188, 106–112.
• 38. Tawaha A.M. Singh V.P. Turk M.A. Zheng W. 2003. A review on growth, yield components and yield of barley as influenced by genotypes, herbicides and fertilizer application. Research on Crops, 4: 1–9.
• 39. Terán H. and Singh S.P. 2002.Comparison of Sources and Lines Selected for Drought Resistance in common Bean Published as Idaho Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Article No. 01722, Univ. of Idaho, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Moscow, ID 83844. Crop Science 42(1),64–70.
• 40. Turk A.M. Tawaha A.M. 2002. Onion (Allium cepa L.) as influenced by rate and method of phosphorus placement. Crop Research, 23: 105–107.
• 41. Turk M.A, Tawaha A. M. Samara N. 2003. Effects of seeding rate and date, and phosphorus application on growth and yield of narbon vetch (Vicianarbonensis). Agronomy Journal, 23: 1–4
• 42. Turk M.A. Tawaha A.M. 2001. Common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) productivity as influenced byrate and method of phosphate fertilization in a Mediterranean environment. Agric. Mediterr.131: 108–111.
• 43. Turk M.A. Tawaha A.M. Lee K.D. 2004. Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Three Lentil Cultivars under Moisture Stress. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 3: 394–397.