Novelty in architecture as a factor of its design: a conservative view

• Autorzy: Bembel Irina

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.21005/pif.2020.44.E-01

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The purposeful attitude towards novelty is a relatively young phenomenon. The attitude to the New as an independent value was shaped initially in the Renaissance (or in the late Middle Ages); it lies in the same channel with the theory of progress. The phenomenon of fashion was gradually formed under its influence and involved into its orbit almost all aspects of life, including art and architecture, one or another degree. The endless need for renewal is defined as one of the main features of modernity as a paradigm (‘modern’ as new, contemporary). What is fashion as a cultural phenomenon, and why did it acquire such great importance precisely in the Modern Times – the epoch of architectural ‘styles’? When does tradition become fashion? How are novelty and freedom, the two main values of the modern paradigm, related? How does the general attitude towards novelty affect the criteria for the aesthetic assessment of contemporary architecture? The category of fashion only recently has become a subject of philosophical reflection, while not affecting the sphere of architecture. In this article, the phenomenon of the New in architecture is considered from the point of philosophical traditionalism. Another starting point of reasoning is the method of the Viennese school of art history, formulated in the phrase “History of art as the history of the spirit”. The religious and philosophical context reveals a fundamentally different approach to the phenomena of novelty and freedom in tradition and modernity and deepens the understanding of the revolution that was carried out in modern architecture. Thus, it helps to substantiate S.O. Khan-Magomedov's idea of two superstyles and refutes the generally accepted point of view, according to which modern architecture directly inherits and evolutionarily develops the achievements of tradition. Taking this idea as a whole, we consider it more broadly – in the sphere of traditional and modern architecture.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

phenomenon of the New; freedom; philosophical traditionalism; tradition; modern; fashion; superstyles on architecture

• Wydawca: Wydawnictwo Uczelniane Zachodniopomorskiego Uniwersytetu Technologicznego w Szczecinie
• Czasopismo: Przestrzeń i Forma
• Rocznik: 2020
• Tom: nr 44
• Strony: 309--316
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 19 poz., fot.

Twórcy

autor

Bembel Irina

• Scientific Research Institute of Theory and History of Architecture and Urban Planning (NIITAG), branch of the Central Institute for Research and Design of the Ministry of Construction and Housing and Communal Services of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Bibliografia

• [1] Bazin G. Istoriya istorii iskusstva: Ot Vazari do nashikh dney (The History of Art History: from Vasari to the Present). Ed. Ts. Arzakanyan. Moscow: Progress — Kultura Publ., 1994 (in Russian).
• [2] Bembel I. O. My dolzhny vse nachat s nulya: Intervyu s Nikosom Salingarosom (We must begin from the ground up: Interview with Nikos Salingaros). URL: http://aaaunion.ru/diskurs/nikosinterv/. Accessed on 01.09.2020 (in Russian).
• [3] Bembel I. O. Ob esteticheskikh kriteriyakh v kontekste antagonizma dvukh superstiley (About aesthetical criteria in the scope of antagonism of the two superstyles). Arkhitektura i stroitelstvo Rossii, 2020, no. 2 (234) (in Russian).
• [4] Complexity. Design Strategy and World View. Edited by A.Gleiniger and G.Vrachliotis. – Birkhauser, Basel – Boston – Berlin, 2008.
• [5] Dvořak M. Istoriya iskusstva kak istoriya dukha (The History of Art as the History of Ideas). Ed. A. Lepork. Saint Petersburg: Akademicheskiy proyekt Publ., 2001 (in Russian).
• [6] Fesenko D.E. — Teoria arkhitekturnogo protsessa: kontury novoj paradigmy — М.: Arkhitekturnyj vestnik, 2010. – URL: http://www.intelros.ru/subject/figures/teoriy_arh_processa/6764-teoriya-arxitekturnogoprocessa-kak-narozhdayushhayasya-disciplina.html
• [7] Florenskiy P. A. Ikonostas (Iconostasis). Florenskiy P. A. Sobraniye sochineniy (Collected works). Vol. 1. Statyi po iskusstvu (Articles on Art). Ed. N. A. Struve. Paris: YMCA-press Publ., 1985 (in Russian).
• [8] Gregory the Theologian. Slovo 6 (Homily 6). Gregory the Theologian. Tvoreniya (Works). Vol. 1. Slova (Homilies). Ed. Metropolitan of Tashkent and Central Asia Vladimir. Moscow: Sibirskaya blagozvonnitsa Publ., 2007 (in Russian).
• [9] Guénon R. Tsarstvo kolichestva i znameniya vremeni (The Reign of Quantity & the Signs of the Times, 1945). Мoscow: Belovodye Publ., 2011 (in Russian).
• [10] Khan-Magomedov S. O. Ivan Zholtovskiy (Ivan Zholtovskiy). Moscow: S. E. Gordeyev Publ., 2010 (in Russian).
• [11] Kutyrev V. A., Slyusarev V. V., Khusyainov T. M. Chelovechestvo i Tekhnos: filosofiya koevolyutsii (Humanity and technos: the philosophy of coevolution). Saint Petersburg: Aleteyya Publ., 2020 (in Russian).
• [12] Lewis C. Pokhorony velikogo mifa (The funeral of a great myth). URL: https://www.scienceandapologetics.com/stati/503-pohorony-velikogo-mifa.html. Accessed on 24.08.2020 (in Russian).
• [13] Plato. Zakony (The Laws). Ed. A. F. Losev, V. F. Asmus, A. A. Takho-Godi. Мoscow: Mysl Publ., 1999 (in Russian).
• [14] Perelom. sbornik statej о spravedlivosti traditsii. Red. А.V. Schipkov, 2013. URL: https://mir-knig.com/read_223821-15
• [15] Salingaros N. A. Algoritmy ustoychivogo proyektirovaniya (Algorithmic Sustainable Design). Moscow — Yekaterinburg: Kabinetnyy ucheniy Publ., 2019 (in Russian).
• [16] Salingaros N. A. Anti-arkhitektura i dekonstruktsiya. Triumf nigilizma (Anti-Architecture and Deconstruction. The Triumph of Nihilism. Moscow — Yekaterinburg: Kabinetnyy ucheniy Publ., 2017 (in Russian).
• [17] Salingaros N., Brain D., Duany A. M., Mehaffy M. W., Philibert-Petit E. Socially-Organized Housing: Biophilia, Connectivity, and Spirituality. URL: https://www.archdaily.com/922149/socially-organized-housingbiophilia-connectivity-and-spirituality/. Accessed on 17.03.2020.
• [18] Sedlmayr H. Utrata serediny (Art in Crisis, the Lost Center, 1958), Moscow: Progress-traditsiya Publ., 2008 (in Russian).
• [19] Yakovleva О.I. Teoriya Hansa Beltinga v egо rabote «Konets istorii iskusstva?» / Vestnik МGОU, №3, 2010, p. 219 (in Russian).

Uwagi

Opracowanie rekordu ze środków MNiSW, umowa Nr 461252 w ramach programu "Społeczna odpowiedzialność nauki" - moduł: Popularyzacja nauki i promocja sportu (2021).