Spatial planning in the Baltic States, affected by depopulation

• Autorzy: Gaudesius Rimvydas

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.24425/gac.2020.135149

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

Three Northern European countries over the last century have had similar political experiences, in 1990–1991 they have re-established independence and developed an individual political and administrative system. From 2004, when all Baltic countries became members of the European Union, the land use and spatial planning systems were developed with many similarities, as well as differences. The topic of this study is a survey of the national land policies and spatial planning systems in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia in the context of sustainable development, needs of society and depopulation. The aim of the article is to examine the problems, needs of society and tendencies in land usage, as well as systemic features of spatial planning in the Baltic countries. It is very important to analyse how countries realize the implementation of sustainable development strategies In land use planning and in the context of depopulation. It was found that the Baltic countries are facing similar problems in land use and spatial planning documents but there are also differences regarding planning procedures of documents, their hierarchy and types of planned measures. The study has shown that people in these countries want more natura environment and eco-industrial development. Also, it was approved as necessary to createan index (engineering method) of sustainability in spatial planning.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

sustainable development; land use; spatial planning; land management; Baltic states

PL

użytkowanie gruntów; planowanie przestrzenne; gospodarka gruntami; kraje nadbałtyckie

• Wydawca: Komitet Geodezji PAN
• Czasopismo: Geodesy and Cartography
• Rocznik: 2021
• Tom: Vol. 70, no. 1
• Strony: 1--16
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 43 poz., rys., tab., wykr.

Twórcy

autor

Gaudesius Rimvydas

• Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithiania

Bibliografia

• [1] Agriculture Census 2010. Statistics Estonia, 2012, Tallin, 72–81.
• [2] Agriculture Census 2001. Statistical office of Estonia, 2002, 17–50.
• [3] Baumane, V. (2011). Real property market data for cadastral assessment in Latvia. Baltic Surveying, 37–42.
• [4] Baumane, V. (2013). Analysis of unused and overgrown land in Latvia. Baltic Surveying, 31–35.
• [5] Baumane, V. and Pasko O. (2014). Comparision of land reform of Latvia and Russia in conditions of transition period. Baltic Surveying, 1, 40–44.
• [6] Bardauskiene, D. (2007). Use of peer reviews in the preparation of the master plan for the city. Techno-logical and economic development of the economy, 7(3), 223–236.
• [7] Butkus, T.S. (2013). Lithuanian Urban Design: The Problem of Discourse and Development Perspectives.Terra urbana: Maps of urban change, 71, 47–58.
• [8] Defries, R., Foley, J. And Anser, G. (2004). Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ekosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(5), 249–257.
• [9] DeFries, R., Hansen, A., et al. (2007). Land use change around protected areas: management to balance human needs and ecological function. Ecol. Appl., 17(4), 1031–1038, DOI: 10.1890/05-1111.
• [10] Estonian Department of Statistics. Online source of information, access via: http://www.stat.ee/population (2017).
• [11] Estrada, M. and Park, D. (2019). The Application of the Gross City Development Index (GCD-Index) In Tokyo, Japan. Econ. Anal. Policy, 62, 37–46.
• [12] Gaudešius, R. (2015). Influence of general plans to agrarian areas urbanization in Lithuania seaside. Environ. Res. Eng. Manag., 71(4), 19–27.
• [13] Giudice, V., Pierfrancesco, P., Francesca, T., Nijkamp, P.J. and Shapira, A. (2019). Real Estate Investment Choices and Decision Support Systems. Sustainability, 11, 3110, DOI: 10.3390/su11113110.
• [14] Ivanauskaite, A. (2015). The concept of the urban form and its potential application in Lithuania. Science Future of Lithuania, 7(1), 46–54. DOI: 10.3846/mla.2015.711.
• [15] Jankava, A. and Jankava, I. (2015). Analysis of land inter – areas in Latvia. In 5th International Conference “Civil Engineering” 5, 163–168.
• [16] Juškevicius, P. (2013). Urbanization and Interpretations of Urbanism. Terra urbana: Maps of Urban change, 71, 13–21.
• [17] Jürgenson, E. (2016). Land reform, land fragmentation and perspectives for future landconsolidation In Estonia. Land Use Policy, 57, 34–43.
• [18] Komisarov, V., Kauškale, L., Lepkova, N. (2016). Positive influencing factors of commercial property development: case of Lithuania. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, 4, 48–60, DOI: 10.1515/bjreecm-2016-0004.
• [19] Kublacovs, A. (2012). Spatial planning system of Latvia – the new transition mode. In 10th anniversary conference of the Estonian Association of Spatial Planners “Planning in two union”. 15th–17th November, Viljandi, Estonia.
• [20] Kulakov, K. (2018). Management of the investment value of land plots during complex residential development. MATEC Web of Conferences, 193, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201819305021.
• [21] Lantitsou, K. (2017). Eco-development and environmental spatial planning. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 26(2), 1291–1300.
• [22] Latvian Department of Statistics. Online source of information, access via: http://data.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/en/ (2017).
• [23] Law on Spatial Planning of the Republic of Lithuania. 2013-06-27 Nr. XII-407, No. 76-3824.
• [24] Land Fund of the Republic of Lithuania. National Land Service under the MOA, State Enterprise Center of Registers, 2011.
• [25] Land Fund of the Republic of Lithuania. National Land Service under the MOA, State Enterprise Center of Registers, 2002.
• [26] Lithuanian Department of Statistics. Online source of information, access via: https://osp.stat.gov.lt/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize1 (2017).
• [27] Marrero, M., Puerto M., Rivero-Camacho, C., Freire-Guerrero, A. and Solis-Guzmán, J. (2017). Assessing the economic impact and ecological footprint of construction and demolition waste during the urbanization of rural land. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 117, 160–174.
• [28] Meirong, S., Chen, B., Yang, Z., Cai, Y. and Wang, J. (2013). Urban Public Health: Is There a Pyramid? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 10(2), 490–498, DOI: 10.3390/ijerph10020490.
• [29] Miškinis A. (1991). Lithuanian Urbanism: History, Present, Future. Vilnius, 17–111.
• [30] Pujiati, A., Bowo, P. and Nihayah, D.M. (2018). The Urban Sustainability Index in Urban Aglomeration. J. Econ. Policy, 11(2), 294–305, DOI: 10.15294/jejak.v11i2.16052.
• [31] Parsova, V., Kapostins, E., Atkoceviˇcien ̇e, V. and Sudonien ̇e V. (2014). Progression route of land consolidation in Latvia. Baltic surveying, 1, 76–83.
• [32] Pilvere, I. (2013). Problems of small farms in Latvia. Economics and rural development, 9(2), 44–50.
• [33] Planning act of Estonia, passed in 2015 https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/compare_original/512112013007(2017).
• [34] Platonova, D., Setkovska, L. and Jankava, A. (2011). Assessment principles of land fragmentation. Baltic surveying, 117–124.
• [35] Platonova, D. (2014). Agricultural holdings and their land size changes in Latvia. Baltic surveying, 1, 7–13.
• [36] Reyes-Bueno, F., Sánchez J.T., Samaniego, J.G., Barrós, D.M., Maseda R.C. and Sánchez-Rodriguez, A.(2016). Factors influencing land fractioning in the context of land market deregulation in Ecuador.Land Use Policy, 52, 144–150, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.021.
• [37] Roose, A., Kull, A., Gauk, M. and Tali, T. (2013). Land use policy shocks in the post-communist Urban fringe: A case study of Estonia. Land Use Policy, 30, 76–83.
• [38] Roshanfekr, S., Tawil, N.M. and Goh, N.A. (2016). Investigation of Sustainable Housing Criteria. MATEC Web of Conferences, 66, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20166600096.
• [39] Said, R., Majid, R., Alias, A., dnan, Y.M. and Razali, M.N. (2016). Sustainable housing affordability in sabah. Planning Malaysia, 14(5), 65–76, DOI: 10.21837/pmjournal.v14.i5.193.
• [40] Tang, J., Zhu, H., Liu, Z., Ji, F. and Zheng X.-X. (2019). Urban Sustainability Evaluation under the Modified TOPSIS Based on Grey Relational Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16(256), DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16020256.
• [41] Vesperis, V (2015). Actual problems of agricultural land market in Latvia. Baltic surveying, 7–13.
• [42] Vyšniunas, A. (2013). Architecture and Urbanism. In Concepts and Genres. Terra urbana: Maps of Urban change, 71, 25–45.
• [43] Wiryasa, N. and Dwijendra, N. (2017). Institutional Structure Models in Implementation of Spatial Planning. J. Sustain. Dev., 10(4), 56–64.