Effectiveness Evaluation on Fire Drills for Emergency and PSC Inspections on Board

• Autorzy: Wu J. , Jin Y. , Fu J.

Identyfikatory

DOI

10.12716/1001.08.02.08

• Języki publikacji: EN

Abstrakty

EN

The paper evaluates effectiveness of fire drills for emergency and responding to PSC inspections on board. A brief background about the PSC inspection on fire drills on board is introduced in the beginning. Then the significance of effectiveness evaluation on fire drills is presented. Next, legal ground is discussed on International Conventions, including regulation of related regional group, national maritime laws and rules and Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC). Furthermore, PSC New Inspection Regime (NIR) for Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU are also discussed, and many deficiencies related to fire safety measures found in the PSC inspection are statistically analyzed. More importantly, the paper introduces System Engineering Theory, presents the principle and method of effectiveness evaluation, focuses on the preparation, performance and rehabilitation of fire drill and develops the Criterion of Effectiveness Evaluation. Finally, some suggestions are raised to carry out effectiveness evaluation for emergency and responding to the PSC inspection.

Słowa kluczowe

EN

Effectiveness Evaluation; Fire Drill; Emergency Scenario; Emergency Situation; Port State Control (PSC); Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC); New Inspection Regime (NIR); PSC Inspection

• Wydawca: Faculty of Navigation, Gdynia Maritime University
• Czasopismo: TransNav : International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation
• Rocznik: 2014
• Tom: Vol. 8, no. 2
• Strony: 229--236
• Opis fizyczny: Bibliogr. 37 poz., rys., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Wu J.

• Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China

autor

Jin Y.

• Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China

autor

Fu J.

• Ningbo Maritime Safety Administration, Ningbo, China

Bibliografia

• [1] Shanghai Maritime Safety Administration. 2013. Tokyo MOU PSC New Inspection Regime.
• [2] International Maritime Organization. 2004. International Convention for The Safety of Life at Sea.
• [3] International Maritime Organization. 2012. The Manila Amendments to the Seafarers’ Training, Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW) Code.
• [4] U.S Coast Guard. (n.d.). Port state control (PSC). Retrieved from http://www.uscg.mil/d13/dep/news/port_state_control.htm
• [5] The American Club. 2012. Member Alert.
• [6] Tokyo MOU. 2013. Report of the 2012 Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Fire Safety Systems.
• [7] Paris MOU on Port State Control. 2013. Report of the 2012 Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Fire Safety Systems.
• [8] Port State Control ‐ Indian Ocean, Black Sea and Viña del Mar MOUs ‐ Concentrated Inspection Campaign on Fire Safety Systems. 2012. Retrieved from http://www. westpandi.com/Publications/News/Port‐State‐Control‐ Indian‐Ocean‐and‐Black‐Sea‐MOUs‐Concentrated‐ Inspection‐Campaign‐on‐Fire‐Safety‐Systems/
• [9] The Tokyo MOU Secretariat. Annual Report on Port State Control in the Asia‐Pacific Region 2011.
• [10] The Tokyo MOU Secretariat. Annual Report on Port State Control in the Asia‐Pacific Region 2012.
• [11] The Tokyo MOU Secretariat. Annual Report on Port State Control in the Asia‐Pacific Region 2013.
• [12] Paris MOU on Port State Control. Annual report 2008.
• [13] Paris MOU on Port State Control. Annual report 2009.
• [14] Paris MOU on Port State Control. Annual report 2010.
• [15] Paris MOU on Port State Control. Annual report 2011.
• [16] Paris MOU on Port State Control. Annual report 2012.
• [17] Paris MOU on Port State Control. Annual report 2013.
• [18] United States Coast Guard. Port State Control in the United States, 2012 Annual Report.
• [19] China MSA.2013.Annual Report on Port State Control Data Analysis of P.R.China（2009）.
• [20] China MSA.2013.Annual Report on Port State Control Data Analysis of P.R.China（2010）.
• [21] China MSA.2013.Annual Report on Port State Control Data Analysis of P.R.China（2011）.
• [22] China MSA.2013.Annual Report on Port State Control Data Analysis of P.R.China（2012）.
• [23] DNV. 2009. Port State Control ‐ Top detention items. Reduce the risk of detentions.
• [24] DNV. 2012. Port State Control ‐ Top detention items. Beprepared and reduce the risk of detentions.
• [25] DNV. 2012. Port State Control‐ Synopsis of Frequent Findings and Detention Items.
• [26] Nippon Kaiji Kyokai (Class NK). 2012. Detainable and ISM Related Deficiencies noted in PSC inspection reports of Class NK & NK‐SMC ships in Jan‐Aug 2012. Retrieved from http://www.classnk.or.jp/hp/zh/index.html
• [27] United States Coast Guard. (n.d.). Navigation and vessel inspection circular No. 3‐98.
• [28] Tokyo MOU Secretariat. 2008. Asia‐Pacific Port State Control Manual, Revision 2/2008.
• [29] IOMOU Secretariat. 2001. Manual for PSC officers.
• [30] Germanischer Lloyd. 2012. PSC Information Manual.
• [31] International Labour Organization. 1997. Accident prevention on board ship at sea and in port. Geneva.
• [32] International Labour Organization. 2009. Guidelines for port State control officers carrying out inspections under the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006. Geneva.
• [33] U.S. Coast Guard Sector. 2008. Auxiliary Assistant Port State Control Examiner Performance Qualification Standard
• [34] Fairfield‐Maxwell Services, Ltd. 2010. SMS Highlights & News. FMSL Safety Alert: P‐2.
• [35] Danish Maritime Authority. 2002. Guidance on safety during abandon ship drills and fire drillss on board ships.
• [36] Germanischer Lloyd. 2006. International Code for Fire Safety Systems, GL consolidated up to Res. MSC.206 (81) adopted 2006.
• [37] Kwiatkowska‐Sienkiewicz K., Kałucka P. 2010. Application of Thermal Analysis and Trough Test for Determination of the Fire Safety of Some Fertilizers Containing Nitrates. TransNav, the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 441‐445