Youth Attitudes Towards Goals of a New Sustainable Development Agenda

Borojević, T.; Maletič, M.; Petrović, N.; Radaković, J. A.; Senegačnik, M.; Maletič, D.

Artykuł - szczegóły

Tytuł artykułu

Youth Attitudes Towards Goals of a New Sustainable Development Agenda

Autorzy

Borojević T. , Maletič M. , Petrović N. , Radaković J. A. , Senegačnik M. , Maletič D.

Treść / Zawartość

Pełne teksty:

Pobierz

Identyfikatory

Warianty tytułu

Postawy młodzieży wobec celów Nowej Agendy na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju

Języki publikacji

Abstrakty

The whole world adopted a global strategy as the only possible one – a global development strategy based on the principles of sustainability. This strategy includes not only all types of politics, economies and societies, but is also an integral part of life and wellbeing of all people. A new sustainable development agenda for the period 2015-2030 identifies youth not only as a category much more sensitive to sustainability, but in each of its 17 goals of sustainable development emphasizes the role of young people and the need for their active participation in the promotion and realization of these objectives and its targets. Bearing this in mind, the research presented in the paper deals with young people’s knowledge on sustainable development, the strategy of sustainable development, and their attitudes towards the goals of sustainable development in the context of what they themselves find most important. Obtained results in the case study of the Republic of Serbia, not only show the results of the analysis of young people’s viewpoints on these crucial issues but also of a good way to continue research in this area not only by the authors of the paper but other researchers who are engaged in activism and participation of youth in sustainable development as well.

Społeczność międzynarodowa przyjęła strategię rozwoju globalnego opartą na zasadach zrównoważoności. Uwzględnia ona nie tylko wszystkie występujące typy polityk, ekonomii i społeczeństw, ale także dobrostan wszystkich ludzi. Nowa Agenda dla zrównoważonego rozwoju obejmująca lata 2015-2030 wskazuje na młodzież jako na grupę bardziej wrażliwą na zagadnienie zrównoważoności W każdej z 17 grup celów zrównoważonego rozwoju podkreśla rolę, jaką powinni w tych ramach odgrywać młodzi ludzie i wskazuje na potrzebę ich aktywnego uczestnictwa w promocji i realizacji założonych celów. Niniejsza praca prezentuje wyniki badań odnoszących się do wiedzy młodych ludzi o zrównoważonym rozwoju, strategii zrównoważonego rozwoju, a także ich postaw odnośnie celów zrównoważonego rozwoju i ich własnych przekonań. Badania przeprowadzone w Republice Serbii omawiają opinie młodzieży na te ważne tematy, a ponadto wskazują na ważny kierunek badań nie tylko dla autorów tego artykułu, ale także innych naukowców zaangażowanych we włączenie młodych ludzi w pracę dla zrównoważonego rozwoju.

Słowa kluczowe

youth youth attitudes sustainable development sustainability sustainable development goals

młodzież postawy młodzieży rozwój zrównoważony zrównoważoność cele zrównoważonego rozwoju

Wydawca

Lublin University of Technology

Czasopismo

Problemy Ekorozwoju

Rocznik

2017

Tom

Vol. 12, nr 2

Strony

161--172

Opis fizyczny

Bibliogr. 81 poz., tab.

Twórcy

autor

Borojević T.

University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia

autor

Maletič M.

University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia

autor

Petrović N.

petrovicn@fon.bg.ac.rs

University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences Center for Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Jove Ilica 154, 11040 Belgrade, Serbia

autor

Radaković J. A.

University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Serbia

autor

Senegačnik M.

University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia

autor

Maletič D.

University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia

Bibliografia

1. AMINI M., BIENSTOCK, C.C., 2014, Corporate sustainability: an integrative definition and framework to evaluate corporate practice and guide academic research, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 76, p. 12-19.
2. AMUNDSEN B., LIE E., 2013, Fewer willing to participate in surveys, https://phys.org/news/ 2013-06-surveys.html (21.01.2017).
3. ARCHER J., 1996, Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible?, in: American Psychologist, 51, p. 909-917.
4. BARRIENTOS S., KABEER N., HOSSAIN N., 2004, The Gender Dimensions of Globalization of Production, http://www.ilo.int/wcmsp5/publi c/---dgreports/---integration/documents/publica tion/wcms_079121.pdf (22.01.2017).
5. BEATLEY T., 1998, The Vision of Sustainable Community, Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities, USA, Joseph Henry Press.
6. BERG P.G., 2009, Timeless City land – Building the sustainable human habitat, Uppsala.
7. BIGGS D., BIGGS R.O., DAKOS V., SCHOLES R., SCHOON M., 2011, Are we entering an era of concatenated global crises?, in: Ecological Society, 16(2), p. 27.
8. BOROJEVIĆ T., PETROVIĆ N., VUK D., 2015, Aktivizam mladih i zaštita životne sredine, in: Zbornik radova simpozijuma SYM-OP-IS 2015: XLII Simpozijum o operacionim istraživanjima, Srebrno jezero. (In Serbian)
9. BOROJEVIC T., PETROVIC N.B., VUK D., 2014, Youth and Environmental Education for Sustainable Development, in: IJSR.NET, 3(9), September 2014, p. 57-62.
10. BOROJEVIĆ T., VUK D., PETROVIĆ N., SLOVIĆ, D., 2015, The level of youth activism: Case study of the city of Belgrade, in: Management, 76, p. 23-30.
11. BRUNNBAUER U., 2002, From equality without democracy to democracy without equality? Women and transition in Southeast Europe, in: SEER, 03, p. 151-168.
12. BUSSEY K., BANDURA A., 1999, Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation, in: Psychological Review, 106, p. 676-713.
13. CHAVIS D.M., WANDERSMAN A., 1990, Sense of Community in the Urban Environment: A Catalyst for Participation and Community Development, in: American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 18 no 1, p. 55-81.
14. CONROY M.M., BERKE P.R., 2004, What makes a good sustainable development plan? An analysis of factors that influence principles of sustainable development, in: Environment and Planning A, 36, p. 1381-1396.
15. COSTANZA R. (Ed.), 1991, Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, Columbia University Press, New York, NY.
16. COSTANZA R., PATTEN B.C., 1995, Defining and predicting sustainability, in: Ecological Economics, vol. 15 no 3, p. 193-196.
17. CURTIN R., PRESSER S., SINGER, E., 2000, The effects of response rate changes on the index of consumer sentiment, in: Public Opinion Quarterly 64, p. 413-428.
18. EARTH SUMMIT, 2002, http://www.earthsum mit2002.org/Es2002.pdf (30.10.2016).
19. EISLER A.D., EISLER H., YOSHIDA M., 2003, Perception of human ecology: cross-cultural and gender comparisons, in: Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 23 no 1, p. 89-101.
20. EISLER A.D., WESTER M., YOSHIDA M., BIANCHI G., 1999, Attitudes, beliefs, and opinions about suicide: A cross-cultural comparison of Sweden, Japan, and Slovakia, in: Latest contribution to cross-cultural psychology, p. 176-191, Amsterdam, Swets & Zeitlinger.
21. EUROSTAT, 2016, GDP per capita, consumption per capita and price level indices, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained /index.php/GDP_per_capita,_consumption_per_capita_and_price_level_indices (30.10.2016.).
22. FIGUEIRÓ P.S., RAUFFLET E., 2015, Sustainability in higher education: a systematic review with focus on management education, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, p. 22-33.
23. GRANVIK M., 2005, Implementation of the Habitat-agenda in local communities: Late modern living conditions and residents’ interest, time for and real action in citizen participation, in a Swedish and Russian context, Uppsala.
24. GRIGGS D., STAFFORD-SMITH M., GAFFNEY O., ROCKSTROM J., OHMAN M.C., SHYAMSUNDAR P., STFFEN W., GLASER G., KANIE N., NOBLE I., 2013, Sustainable development goals for people and planet, in: Nature, 495, p. 305-307.
25. HO E., CLARKE A., DOUGHERTY I., 2015, Youth-led social change: Topics, engagement types, organizational types, strategies, and impacts, in: Futures, 67, p. 52-62.
26. HUGÉ J., BLOCK T., WAAS T., WRIGHT T., DAHDOUH-GUEBA F., 2016, How to walk the talk? Developing actions for sustainability in academic research, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, p. 83-92.
27. ILYANA A., HASRULNIZZAM W., MAHMOOD W., FAZLI M.H., FAUADI M., RAHMAN N., FATHIYAH A., 2015, Sustainability in Malaysian Palm Oil: A Review on Manufacturing Perspective, in: Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 24 no 4, p. 1463-1475.
28. INNES J.E., BOOHER D.E., 2001, Indicators for Sustainable Communities: A Strategy Building on Complexity Theory and Distributed Intelligence, in: Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 1 no 2, p. 173-186.
29. IUCN, U., WWF, 1991, Caring for the Earth: a strategy for sustainable living, IUCN, UNEP, WWF, Gland.
30. KLEMENOVIC J., 2004, Činioci ekološkog vaspitanja i obrazovanja, in: Pedagoška stvarnost, vol. 50 no 5-6, p. 366-381.
31. MACCOBY E.E., JACKLIN C.N., 1974, The psychology of sex differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
32. MACONACHIE R., 2014, Disposassions, exploitation or employment? Youth livelihoods and extractive industry investment in Sierra Leone, in: Futures, vol. 62 Part A(0), p. 75-82.
33. MALETIC M., MALETIC D., DAHLGAARD J., DAHLGAARD-PARK, S.M., 2015, Do corporate sustainability practices enhance organizational economic performance?, in: International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, vol. 7 no 2-3, p. 184-200.
34. MALETIČ M., MALETIČ D., DAHLGAARD J.J., DAHLGAARD-PARK S.M., GOMIŠČEK, B., 2014, Sustainability exploration and sustainability exploitation: From a literature review towards a conceptual framework, in: Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, p. 182-194.
35. MILOŠEVIĆ M., 2016, Analiza stanja i perspektiva ekološkog koncepta održivosti u regijama Republike Srbije, master rad, Beograd, Univerzitet u Beogradu – Fakultet organizacionih nauka, Univerza v Ljubljani – Fakulteta za upravo.
36. MINISTRY OF YOUTH AND SPORTS (MOS), 2015, National Youth Strategy  for the period 2015–2025, http://www.mos.gov.rs/wp-content/uploads/download-manager-files/NSM percent202015-2025percent20ENGLISHperce nt20.pdf (04.10.2016).
37. MOLLER L.C., SERBIN L.A., 1996, Antecedents of toddler gender segregation-cognitive consonance, gender-typed toy preferences and behavioral compatibility, in: Sex roles, 35, p. 445-460.
38. MOORE D.L., TARNAI J., 2002, Evaluating nonresponse error in mail surveys, in: Survey Nonresponse, eds. Groves R.M., Dillman D.A., Eltinge J.L., Little R.J.A., John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 197-211.
39. OECD, 2008, Gender and sustainable development: maximizing the economic, social and environmental role of women, https:// wwwoecd.org/greengrowth/40881538.pdf (21.01.2017.).
40. PAVLOVIC V. (ed.), 2011, Univerzitet i održivi razvoj, Fakultet političkih nauka, Beograd.
41. PAWŁOWSKI A., 2010, The role of environmental engineering in introducing sustainable development, in: Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S, vol. 17 no 3, p. 263-278.
42. PEARCE D.W., ATKINSON G.D., 1993, Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of ‘weak’ sustainability, in: Ecological Economics, 8, p. 103-108.
43. PETROVIC N., 2010, Development of higher environmental education program, in: Management – Časopis za teoriju i praksu menadžmenta, vol. 15 no 56, p. 35-41.
44. PETROVIC N., JEREMIC V., PETROVIC D., CIROVIC M., 2014, Modeling the Use of Facebook in Environmental Higher Education, in Social Classroom: Integrating Social Network Use in Education, ed. Ġ. Mallia Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA, p. 100-119).
45. PEZZEY J., 1989, Economic Analysis of Sustainable Growth and Sustainable Develop-ment. Environment Department Working Paper No. 15, The World Bank, Washington, DC.
46. POWERS J., TIFFANY J., 2006, Engaging youth in participatory research and evaluation, in: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, vol. 12, suppl. 6, p. S79-S87.
47. REILLY S., 2008, Environmental Education’s Role in Sustainable Development: Three Case Studies from India, South Africa & the United States. NR 523 – International Resource Management, http://www.uwsp.edu/forestry/St uJournals/Documents/IRM/Reilly.pdf(04.11.2016).
48. ROSELAND M., 2000, Sustainable community development: integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives, in: Program Planning, vol. 54 no 2, p. 73-132.
49. ROSELAND M., 2005, Toward Sustainable Communities: Resources for Citizens and Their Governments, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, Canada.
50. SAKAC M.D., CVETICANIN S., SUCEVIC V., 2012, Mogućnosti organiziranja odgojno obrazovnog procesa u cilju zaštite životne sredine, in: Socijalna ekologija, vol. 21 no 1, p. 89-98.
51. SINGER E., VAN HOEWYK J., MAHER M.P., 2000, Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys, in: Public Opinion Quarterly 64, p. 171-188.
52. SMITH G., 2008, Does gender influence online survey participation?: A record-linkage analysis of university faculty online survey response behavior, in: ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 501717.
53. STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA, 2014a, Population, http://webrzs. stat.gov.rs/WebSite/Public/PageView.aspx?pK ey=162 (20.01.2017).
54. STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA, 2014b, Women and men in the Repubic of Serbia, Statisical office of the Republic of Serbia, Igam, Belgrade.
55. STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA, 2016, Municipalities and regions in the Republic of Serbia, 2012, Statisical office of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade.
56. STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA, 2016, Popis u Srbiji 2011, http:// popis2011.stat.rs/?page_id=2162&lang=lat (23.01.2017).
57. STRATEGIJA RAZVOJA OBRAZOVANJA U SRBIJI DO 2020. GODINE, 2012, Sl. glasnik RS, no. 107/2012, http://www.vtsnis.edu.rs/ StrategijaObrazovanja.pdf (26.01.2017).
58. SUSTAINABLE MEASURES, 2016, Definitions of Sustainability, http://www.sust ainablemeasures.com/node/35 (15.10.2016).
59. SUSTAINABLE SEATTLE, 2016, Vision & Mission, http://www.sustainableseattle.org/abo out-us/vision-mission/ (15.10.2016).
60. TOMANOVIĆ S., STANOJEVIĆ D., 2015, Mladi u Srbiji 2015. Stanja, opažanja, verovanja i nadanja, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, SeConS grupa za razvojnu inicijativu, Beograd.
61. TRUMIC M., PETROVIC N., RADOJICIC Z., 2009, Ekološka svest u formalnom osnovnom obrazovanju Republike Srbije, in: XXXVII Symposium on Operation Research, SYM-OP-IS 2009, Ivanjica, p. 3-6.
62. UN, 2007, World Youth Report 2007: Young People’s Transition to Adulthood: Progress and Challenges, http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unyi n/documents/wyr07_complete.pdf (6.11.2016).
63. UN, 2015a, Millennium development goals, http ://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ (7.10.2016.).
64. UN, 2015b, Sustainable development goals, http ://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustain able-development-goals/ (07.10.2016).
65. UN, 2015c, Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf (03.11.2016).
66. UN, 2016a, What is sustainability?, http:// www.un.org/en/sustainablefuture/sustainability.shtml (15.11.2016.).
67. UN, 2016b, The Role of Gender-based Innovations for the UN Sustainable Development Goals Toward 2030: Better Science and Technology for All, edition 1, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/forum/download.php?doc=472 (22.01.2017).
68. UNCHS, 1996, Sustainable Human Settlements Development in an Urbanizing World, The Habitat Agenda and the Istanbul Declaration, Section IVC, New York.
69. UNDP, 2017, Gender and sustainable development, http://www.undp.org/content/und p/en/home/ourwork/gender-equality/gender-an d-sustai nable-development.html (21.01.2017).
70. UNECE, 1998, Aarhus convention: Convention on access to information, public participation in decision making and access to justice in environmental matters, http://www.unece.org/ env/pp/treatytext.html (20.11.2016).
71. UNESCO, 2012, Education for Sustainable Development: Sourcebook, UNESCO, Paris.
72. UNESCO, 2006, Education for Sustainable Development Toolkit, in: Learning & Training Tools, No. 1, http://www.esdtoolkit.org (28.01.2017).
73. UNESCO, 2012, Education for sustainable development, http://www.unesco.org/new/en/ education/themes/leading-the-international-age nda/education-for-sustainable-development/ed ucation-for-sustainable-development/ (22.01.2017).
74. UNSD, 1992, Agenda 21, United Nations Conference on Environment & Development, Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992, http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/ Agenda21.pdf (12.11.2016).
75. EPA, 2016, Sustainability, http://www.epa.gov/ sstainability/learn-about-sustainability#what (20.10.2016).
76. VALLANCE S., PERKINS H.C., DIXON J.E., 2011, What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts, in: Geoforum, vol. 42 no 3, p. 342-348.
77. WHEELER S.M., BEATLEY T., 2009, The Sustainable Urban Development Reader, Routledge.
78. WORLD BANK, 2006, World development report 2007: Development and the Next Generation, Washington, DC.
79. WCED, 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
80. YOUTH AND ENVIRONMENT EUROPE – YEE, 2016, http://www.yeenet.eu (15.11.2016).
81. ZAKON O TERITORIJALNOJ ORGANIZA-CIJI REPUBLIKE SRBIJE, 2007, 2016, Sl. glasnik RS, no. 129/2007; no. 18/2016, http://w ww.paragraf.rs/propisi/zakon_o_teritorijalnoj_organizaciji_republike_srbije.html (27.01.2017).

Typ dokumentu

Bibliografia

Identyfikator YADDA

bwmeta1.element.baztech-0dbe31fd-0203-48b1-8b5c-6369e3bc4825